Re: 答复: drafting March f2f agenda

Jing Wu

I have added this to the draft agenda on day #3  but if you think it will inform our other discussions we can adjust the schedule.

Please send any slides to the public list in advance if possible.

regards, Frederick

Frederick Hirsch
Nokia



On Feb 19, 2012, at 9:39 PM, ext 吴静 wrote:

> Hi!
> 
> I’m Jing Wu from Chinaunicom and we have a proposal about the topics of
> March f2f agenda.
> 
> WoPhone is a kind of smart phone officially launched on 2.28.2011 by
> Chinaunicom. WoPhone OS is developed under the leadership of China Unicom
> ,which is supported by our government fund. 
> So, we want to give a presentation about WoPhone on this meeting. We will
> introduce the progress and plan on the mobile web runtime of WoPhone.
> 
> Could you give Chinaunicom a chance to give the presentation?
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> -----邮件原件-----
> 发件人: Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com [mailto:Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com] 
> 发送时间: 2012-02-15 6:16
> 收件人: public-device-apis@w3.org
> 抄送: Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com
> 主题: drafting March f2f agenda
> 
> I have created a rough draft for an agenda for the F2F 20-22 March to help
> us review and create an agenda, see
> http://www.w3.org/2009/dap/wiki/F2F_Agenda_20-22_March_2012,_Shenzhen,_China

> 
> http://www.w3.org/2009/dap/wiki/F2F_Agenda_20-22_March_2012,_Shenzhen,_China

> #Day_3.2C_Thursday_22_March_2012_.289_am_-_4_pm.29
> 
> Some thoughts:
> 
> 1) WebIntents on Day 1 reflects our general agreement to review and progress
> WebIntents on day !. I also think it would be useful to review how we intend
> to progress Contacts given our understanding of WebIntents. We probably
> should also review and plan to document privacy/security of device APIs in
> the context of WebIntents.
> 
> 2) I suggest the WG as a whole should understand the status of the Media
> Capture task force, perhaps a member of that task force can volunteer to
> lead a session to review and discuss that work. This can help socialize the
> work and also encourage additional participation and feedback to the TF.
> 
> 3) We probably should consider how to move Battery and Vibration to CR, this
> might happen on a teleconference before the F2F (after 1 March for
> Vibration), but maybe it is an appropriate decision for the F2F.
> 
> 4) Although work on  test cases and interop can happen out of the main WG
> calls, maybe we can start work on this at the F2F, raising any issues we
> might have.
> 
> Timings and topics are all a rough take, just to get us started. If you plan
> to call in, you should indicate if a topic you can contribute to should be
> moved in the schedule. I'm not sure we can juggle everything to everyone's
> satisfaction, but we can try. We also need to get a clear understanding of
> who plans to attend in person, and who plans to call in, including those
> working on WebIntents that are not in DAP.
> 
> I tentatively put 9-5 for day 1, 2 and 9-4 for day 3, but we should discuss.
> 
> Do you see any missing topics?
> 
> thanks
> 
> regards, Frederick
> 
> Frederick Hirsch, Nokia
> Co-Chair, W3C DAP Working Group
> 
> 
> 
> 
>

Received on Wednesday, 22 February 2012 14:15:37 UTC