Re: Action DanC? [was Re: More on XSD in RDF] from Patrick Stickler on 2002-11-26 (w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org from November 2002)

From: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 09:30:36 +0200
To: "Dan Connolly" <connolly@w3.org>, "ext Brian McBride" <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Cc: "ext Jeremy Carroll" <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <003201c2951d$b8a95310$4b9316ac@NOE.Nokia.com>

[Patrick Stickler, Nokia/Finland, (+358 40) 801 9690, patrick.stickler@nokia.com]


> It seems to me that what we need, as well as test cases, is an RDF Schema 
> for XML Schema datatypes.  

Attached. I did this ages ago as part of the RDF datatyping design
process. It captures the type hierarchy defined by XML Schema part 2
as illustrated in the attached graphic (from the XML Schema spec).

Patrick

Attachments

text/xml attachment: XSD.rdf
image/gif attachment: xsd-type-hierarchy.gif

Received on Tuesday, 26 November 2002 02:30:44 UTC