- From: Jeremy Carroll <jeremy@topquadrant.com>
- Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 17:44:27 +0200
- To: "'Sean Bechhofer'" <sean.bechhofer@manchester.ac.uk>
- Cc: "'SWD Working SWD'" <public-swd-wg@w3.org>
My error, please withdraw comment. Jeremy > -----Original Message----- > From: public-swd-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-swd-wg-request@w3.org] On > Behalf Of Sean Bechhofer > Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2008 3:34 PM > To: Jeremy Carroll > Cc: SWD Working SWD > Subject: ISSUE-173 clarification > > > > Jeremy, > > In ISSUE-173, you comment: > > [[ > 13) 9.6.4 (clarification of substantive material) > > Unlike similar paras, this one introduces a normative requirement (in > the first > sentence). > I suggest this should be added as S35a. > ]] > > The first sentence of 9.6.4 discusses the disjointness of > skos:Concept and skos:Collection. However this constraint /is/ > already present as S36. Is there something else you were highlighting > here? > > Thanks, > > Sean > > -- > Sean Bechhofer > School of Computer Science > University of Manchester > sean.bechhofer@manchester.ac.uk > http://www.cs.manchester.ac.uk/people/bechhofer > > >
Received on Wednesday, 22 October 2008 15:45:17 UTC