Edit ISSUE-76: Concerns about Microdata section and inclusion/exclusion of RDFa

Nickname:

Title:

State:

Product:

Raised By:

Description:

Add notes (no markup allowed, URIs get automatically hyperlinked):

Related emails:

  1. Re: CfC: Request transition of HTML Microdata to Candidate Recommendation (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2012-11-28) (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2012-11-28)
  2. Re: CfC: Request transition of HTML Microdata to Candidate Recommendation (from msporny@digitalbazaar.com on 2012-11-25) (from msporny@digitalbazaar.com on 2012-11-25)
  3. Re: CfC: Request transition of HTML Microdata to Candidate Recommendation (from mjs@apple.com on 2012-11-25) (from mjs@apple.com on 2012-11-25)
  4. Responses to Last Call survey objections (from mjs@apple.com on 2011-05-25) (from mjs@apple.com on 2011-05-25)
  5. Working Group Decision on ISSUE-139 ack-microdata (from rubys@intertwingly.net on 2011-03-24) (from rubys@intertwingly.net on 2011-03-24)
  6. Re: Change Proposals, objections, and the Decision Policy (from jackalmage@gmail.com on 2010-06-15) (from jackalmage@gmail.com on 2010-06-15)
  7. Re: Change Proposals, objections, and the Decision Policy (from mjs@apple.com on 2010-06-14) (from mjs@apple.com on 2010-06-14)
  8. Re: Change Proposals, objections, and the Decision Policy (from fielding@gbiv.com on 2010-06-14) (from fielding@gbiv.com on 2010-06-14)
  9. Re: Change Proposals, objections, and the Decision Policy (from w3c@adambarth.com on 2010-06-14) (from w3c@adambarth.com on 2010-06-14)
  10. Change Proposals, objections, and the Decision Policy (from mjs@apple.com on 2010-06-14) (from mjs@apple.com on 2010-06-14)
  11. Re: Change Proposals, objections, and the Decision Policy (from jonas@sicking.cc on 2010-06-14) (from jonas@sicking.cc on 2010-06-14)
  12. Re: Request for editing guidance (from rubys@intertwingly.net on 2010-06-10) (from rubys@intertwingly.net on 2010-06-10)
  13. Re: Request for editing guidance (from shelleyp@burningbird.net on 2010-06-09) (from shelleyp@burningbird.net on 2010-06-09)
  14. Re: Request for editing guidance (from rubys@intertwingly.net on 2010-06-09) (from rubys@intertwingly.net on 2010-06-09)
  15. Request for editing guidance (from ian@hixie.ch on 2010-06-09) (from ian@hixie.ch on 2010-06-09)
  16. Re: Zero-edit Change Proposal for ISSUE-90 figure, ISSUE-91 aside, ISSUE-93 details, ISSUE-95 hidden, ISSUE-96 progress, and ISSUE-97 meter (from shelley.just@gmail.com on 2010-04-22) (from shelley.just@gmail.com on 2010-04-22)
  17. Re: Zero-edit Change Proposal for ISSUE-90 figure, ISSUE-91 aside, ISSUE-93 details, ISSUE-95 hidden, ISSUE-96 progress, and ISSUE-97 meter (from mjs@apple.com on 2010-04-22) (from mjs@apple.com on 2010-04-22)
  18. Re: CfC: Publish HTML5 Microdata as First Public Working Draft and a new HTML5 Working Draft (from rubys@intertwingly.net on 2010-01-12) (from rubys@intertwingly.net on 2010-01-12)
  19. Re: CfC: Publish HTML5 Microdata as First Public Working Draft and a new HTML5 Working Draft (from jonas@sicking.cc on 2010-01-09) (from jonas@sicking.cc on 2010-01-09)
  20. Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-76 Microdata/RDFa (from ian@hixie.ch on 2010-01-08) (from ian@hixie.ch on 2010-01-08)
  21. Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-76 Microdata/RDFa (from mjs@apple.com on 2010-01-07) (from mjs@apple.com on 2010-01-07)
  22. Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-76 Microdata/RDFa (from shelley.just@gmail.com on 2010-01-07) (from shelley.just@gmail.com on 2010-01-07)
  23. Working Group Decision on ISSUE-76 Microdata/RDFa (from mjs@apple.com on 2010-01-07) (from mjs@apple.com on 2010-01-07)
  24. Re: ISSUE-76: If we fixed namespaces, does RDFa still have problems? (from hsivonen@iki.fi on 2009-12-16) (from hsivonen@iki.fi on 2009-12-16)
  25. RE: ISSUE-76: If we fixed namespaces, does RDFa still have problems? (from xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no on 2009-12-16) (from xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no on 2009-12-16)
  26. {agenda} HTML WG telcon 2009-12-17: action items, calls for consensus/proposals, task forces (from Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com on 2009-12-15) (from Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com on 2009-12-15)
  27. {agenda} HTML WG telcon 2009-12-17: action items, calls for consensus/proposals, task forces (from Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com on 2009-12-15) (from Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com on 2009-12-15)
  28. Minutes HTML WG 10 December 2009 (from rubys@intertwingly.net on 2009-12-15) (from rubys@intertwingly.net on 2009-12-15)
  29. Re: ISSUE-76: If we fixed namespaces, does RDFa still have problems? (from ian@hixie.ch on 2009-12-15) (from ian@hixie.ch on 2009-12-15)
  30. Re: ISSUE-76: If we fixed namespaces, does RDFa still have problems? (from tai@g5n.co.uk on 2009-12-15) (from tai@g5n.co.uk on 2009-12-15)
  31. Re: ISSUE-76: If we fixed namespaces, does RDFa still have problems? (from hsivonen@iki.fi on 2009-12-15) (from hsivonen@iki.fi on 2009-12-15)
  32. RE: ISSUE-76: If we fixed namespaces, does RDFa still have problems? (from tai@g5n.co.uk on 2009-12-15) (from tai@g5n.co.uk on 2009-12-15)
  33. RE: ISSUE-76: If we fixed namespaces, does RDFa still have problems? (from xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no on 2009-12-15) (from xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no on 2009-12-15)
  34. Re: ISSUE-76: If we fixed namespaces, does RDFa still have problems? (from Simetrical+w3c@gmail.com on 2009-12-14) (from Simetrical+w3c@gmail.com on 2009-12-14)
  35. RE: ISSUE-76: If we fixed namespaces, does RDFa still have problems? (from robert.ennals@intel.com on 2009-12-14) (from robert.ennals@intel.com on 2009-12-14)
  36. RE: ISSUE-76: If we fixed namespaces, does RDFa still have problems? (from tai@g5n.co.uk on 2009-12-14) (from tai@g5n.co.uk on 2009-12-14)
  37. RE: ISSUE-76: If we fixed namespaces, does RDFa still have problems? (from robert.ennals@intel.com on 2009-12-14) (from robert.ennals@intel.com on 2009-12-14)
  38. RE: ISSUE-76: If we fixed namespaces, does RDFa still have problems? (from robert.ennals@intel.com on 2009-12-14) (from robert.ennals@intel.com on 2009-12-14)
  39. RE: ISSUE-76: If we fixed namespaces, does RDFa still have problems? (from robert.ennals@intel.com on 2009-12-14) (from robert.ennals@intel.com on 2009-12-14)
  40. Re: ISSUE-76: If we fixed namespaces, does RDFa still have problems? (from Simetrical+w3c@gmail.com on 2009-12-14) (from Simetrical+w3c@gmail.com on 2009-12-14)
  41. Re: ISSUE-76: If we fixed namespaces, does RDFa still have problems? (from bnowack@semsol.com on 2009-12-14) (from bnowack@semsol.com on 2009-12-14)
  42. Re: ISSUE-76: If we fixed namespaces, does RDFa still have problems? (from msporny@digitalbazaar.com on 2009-12-13) (from msporny@digitalbazaar.com on 2009-12-13)
  43. Re: ISSUE-76: If we fixed namespaces, does RDFa still have problems? (from msporny@digitalbazaar.com on 2009-12-13) (from msporny@digitalbazaar.com on 2009-12-13)
  44. Re: ISSUE-76: If we fixed namespaces, does RDFa still have problems? (from msporny@digitalbazaar.com on 2009-12-13) (from msporny@digitalbazaar.com on 2009-12-13)
  45. Re: ISSUE-76: If we fixed namespaces, does RDFa still have problems? (from mjs@apple.com on 2009-12-13) (from mjs@apple.com on 2009-12-13)
  46. Re: ISSUE-76: If we fixed namespaces, does RDFa still have problems? (from msporny@digitalbazaar.com on 2009-12-13) (from msporny@digitalbazaar.com on 2009-12-13)
  47. Re: HTML WG issues scheduled to close Dec 17 comments (from mjs@apple.com on 2009-12-12) (from mjs@apple.com on 2009-12-12)
  48. HTML WG issues scheduled to close Dec 17 comments (from masinter@adobe.com on 2009-12-12) (from masinter@adobe.com on 2009-12-12)
  49. RE: ISSUE-76: If we fixed namespaces, does RDFa still have problems? (from robert.ennals@intel.com on 2009-12-12) (from robert.ennals@intel.com on 2009-12-12)
  50. RE: ISSUE-76: If we fixed namespaces, does RDFa still have problems? (from tai@g5n.co.uk on 2009-12-12) (from tai@g5n.co.uk on 2009-12-12)
  51. Re: ISSUE-76: If we fixed namespaces, does RDFa still have problems? (from martin@weborganics.co.uk on 2009-12-11) (from martin@weborganics.co.uk on 2009-12-11)
  52. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2009-12-11) (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2009-12-11)
  53. RE: ISSUE-76: If we fixed namespaces, does RDFa still have problems? (from robert.ennals@intel.com on 2009-12-11) (from robert.ennals@intel.com on 2009-12-11)
  54. Re: ISSUE-76: If we fixed namespaces, does RDFa still have problems? (from Simetrical+w3c@gmail.com on 2009-12-11) (from Simetrical+w3c@gmail.com on 2009-12-11)
  55. Re: ISSUE-76 - Microdata - Straw Poll for Objections (from shelley.just@gmail.com on 2009-12-11) (from shelley.just@gmail.com on 2009-12-11)
  56. Re: ISSUE-76 - Microdata - Straw Poll for Objections (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2009-12-11) (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2009-12-11)
  57. Re: ISSUE-76 - Microdata - Straw Poll for Objections (from mjs@apple.com on 2009-12-11) (from mjs@apple.com on 2009-12-11)
  58. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate (from xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no on 2009-12-11) (from xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no on 2009-12-11)
  59. Re: ISSUE-76 - Microdata - Straw Poll for Objections (from shelley.just@gmail.com on 2009-12-11) (from shelley.just@gmail.com on 2009-12-11)
  60. Re: ISSUE-76: If we fixed namespaces, does RDFa still have problems? (from msporny@digitalbazaar.com on 2009-12-11) (from msporny@digitalbazaar.com on 2009-12-11)
  61. ISSUE-76: If we fixed namespaces, does RDFa still have problems? (from robert.ennals@intel.com on 2009-12-11) (from robert.ennals@intel.com on 2009-12-11)
  62. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate (from fielding@gbiv.com on 2009-12-10) (from fielding@gbiv.com on 2009-12-10)
  63. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate (from xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no on 2009-12-10) (from xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no on 2009-12-10)
  64. ISSUE-76 - Microdata - Straw Poll for Objections (from mjs@apple.com on 2009-12-10) (from mjs@apple.com on 2009-12-10)
  65. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate (from ian@hixie.ch on 2009-12-10) (from ian@hixie.ch on 2009-12-10)
  66. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate (from xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no on 2009-12-10) (from xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no on 2009-12-10)
  67. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from ian@hixie.ch on 2009-12-10) (from ian@hixie.ch on 2009-12-10)
  68. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no on 2009-12-10) (from xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no on 2009-12-10)
  69. Re: {agenda} HTML WG telcon 2009-10-29: action items, calls for consensus/proposals, task forces (from shelley.just@gmail.com on 2009-12-10) (from shelley.just@gmail.com on 2009-12-10)
  70. Re: {agenda} HTML WG telcon 2009-10-29: action items, calls for consensus/proposals, task forces (from shelley.just@gmail.com on 2009-12-10) (from shelley.just@gmail.com on 2009-12-10)
  71. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from ian@hixie.ch on 2009-12-10) (from ian@hixie.ch on 2009-12-10)
  72. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no on 2009-12-10) (from xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no on 2009-12-10)
  73. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from shelley.just@gmail.com on 2009-12-10) (from shelley.just@gmail.com on 2009-12-10)
  74. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from shelley.just@gmail.com on 2009-12-10) (from shelley.just@gmail.com on 2009-12-10)
  75. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2009-12-10) (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2009-12-10)
  76. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2009-12-10) (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2009-12-10)
  77. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from ian@hixie.ch on 2009-12-10) (from ian@hixie.ch on 2009-12-10)
  78. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from jonas@sicking.cc on 2009-12-10) (from jonas@sicking.cc on 2009-12-10)
  79. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2009-12-10) (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2009-12-10)
  80. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from jackalmage@gmail.com on 2009-12-09) (from jackalmage@gmail.com on 2009-12-09)
  81. ISSUE-76: CHANGE PROPOSAL (Draft 4): Separate Microdata from HTML5 Specification (from msporny@digitalbazaar.com on 2009-12-09) (from msporny@digitalbazaar.com on 2009-12-09)
  82. ISSUE-76: CHANGE PROPOSAL (Draft 3): Separate Microdata from HTML5 Specification (from msporny@digitalbazaar.com on 2009-12-09) (from msporny@digitalbazaar.com on 2009-12-09)
  83. {agenda} HTML WG telcon 2009-10-29: action items, calls for consensus/proposals, task forces (from rubys@intertwingly.net on 2009-12-09) (from rubys@intertwingly.net on 2009-12-09)
  84. Re: Change Proposals and FPWD Resolutions (from rubys@intertwingly.net on 2009-12-09) (from rubys@intertwingly.net on 2009-12-09)
  85. Re: Change Proposals and FPWD Resolutions (from msporny@digitalbazaar.com on 2009-12-09) (from msporny@digitalbazaar.com on 2009-12-09)
  86. Re: Change Proposals and FPWD Resolutions (from shelley.just@gmail.com on 2009-12-09) (from shelley.just@gmail.com on 2009-12-09)
  87. Re: Change Proposals and FPWD Resolutions (from 1981km@gmail.com on 2009-12-09) (from 1981km@gmail.com on 2009-12-09)
  88. Re: Change Proposals and FPWD Resolutions (from msporny@digitalbazaar.com on 2009-12-08) (from msporny@digitalbazaar.com on 2009-12-08)
  89. ISSUE-76: CHANGE PROPOSAL (Draft 3): Separate Microdata from HTML5 Specification (from msporny@digitalbazaar.com on 2009-12-08) (from msporny@digitalbazaar.com on 2009-12-08)
  90. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from jackalmage@gmail.com on 2009-12-08) (from jackalmage@gmail.com on 2009-12-08)
  91. RE: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from jfoliot@stanford.edu on 2009-12-08) (from jfoliot@stanford.edu on 2009-12-08)
  92. Plan to resolve ISSUE-76 RDFa / Microdata (from mjs@apple.com on 2009-12-08) (from mjs@apple.com on 2009-12-08)
  93. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from mjs@apple.com on 2009-12-08) (from mjs@apple.com on 2009-12-08)
  94. Re: Path forward on Microdata (from mjs@apple.com on 2009-12-08) (from mjs@apple.com on 2009-12-08)
  95. Re: Path forward on Microdata (from mjs@apple.com on 2009-12-08) (from mjs@apple.com on 2009-12-08)
  96. Re: Path forward on Microdata (from msporny@digitalbazaar.com on 2009-12-08) (from msporny@digitalbazaar.com on 2009-12-08)
  97. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from ian@hixie.ch on 2009-12-08) (from ian@hixie.ch on 2009-12-08)
  98. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from martin@weborganics.co.uk on 2009-12-08) (from martin@weborganics.co.uk on 2009-12-08)
  99. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from ian@hixie.ch on 2009-12-08) (from ian@hixie.ch on 2009-12-08)
  100. ISSUE-76: CHANGE PROPOSAL (Draft 2): Separate Microdata from HTML5 Specification (from msporny@digitalbazaar.com on 2009-12-08) (from msporny@digitalbazaar.com on 2009-12-08)
  101. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from martin@weborganics.co.uk on 2009-12-07) (from martin@weborganics.co.uk on 2009-12-07)
  102. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from tai@g5n.co.uk on 2009-12-07) (from tai@g5n.co.uk on 2009-12-07)
  103. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from ian@hixie.ch on 2009-12-07) (from ian@hixie.ch on 2009-12-07)
  104. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from shelley.just@gmail.com on 2009-12-07) (from shelley.just@gmail.com on 2009-12-07)
  105. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from Simetrical+w3c@gmail.com on 2009-12-07) (from Simetrical+w3c@gmail.com on 2009-12-07)
  106. Re: Dropping Microdata entirely (from shelley.just@gmail.com on 2009-12-07) (from shelley.just@gmail.com on 2009-12-07)
  107. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from tai@g5n.co.uk on 2009-12-06) (from tai@g5n.co.uk on 2009-12-06)
  108. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from Simetrical+w3c@gmail.com on 2009-12-06) (from Simetrical+w3c@gmail.com on 2009-12-06)
  109. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from shelley.just@gmail.com on 2009-12-06) (from shelley.just@gmail.com on 2009-12-06)
  110. Re: Dropping Microdata entirely (from mjs@apple.com on 2009-12-05) (from mjs@apple.com on 2009-12-05)
  111. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from tim@depulz.nl on 2009-12-04) (from tim@depulz.nl on 2009-12-04)
  112. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from tim@depulz.nl on 2009-12-04) (from tim@depulz.nl on 2009-12-04)
  113. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from jackalmage@gmail.com on 2009-12-04) (from jackalmage@gmail.com on 2009-12-04)
  114. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from jackalmage@gmail.com on 2009-12-04) (from jackalmage@gmail.com on 2009-12-04)
  115. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from jackalmage@gmail.com on 2009-12-04) (from jackalmage@gmail.com on 2009-12-04)
  116. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from shelley.just@gmail.com on 2009-12-04) (from shelley.just@gmail.com on 2009-12-04)
  117. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from shelley.just@gmail.com on 2009-12-04) (from shelley.just@gmail.com on 2009-12-04)
  118. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from jackalmage@gmail.com on 2009-12-04) (from jackalmage@gmail.com on 2009-12-04)
  119. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from mjs@apple.com on 2009-12-04) (from mjs@apple.com on 2009-12-04)
  120. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from jackalmage@gmail.com on 2009-12-04) (from jackalmage@gmail.com on 2009-12-04)
  121. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from msporny@digitalbazaar.com on 2009-12-04) (from msporny@digitalbazaar.com on 2009-12-04)
  122. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no on 2009-12-04) (from xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no on 2009-12-04)
  123. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from Simetrical+w3c@gmail.com on 2009-12-04) (from Simetrical+w3c@gmail.com on 2009-12-04)
  124. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from shelley.just@gmail.com on 2009-12-04) (from shelley.just@gmail.com on 2009-12-04)
  125. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from mjs@apple.com on 2009-12-04) (from mjs@apple.com on 2009-12-04)
  126. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from shelley.just@gmail.com on 2009-12-04) (from shelley.just@gmail.com on 2009-12-04)
  127. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no on 2009-12-04) (from xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no on 2009-12-04)
  128. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no on 2009-12-04) (from xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no on 2009-12-04)
  129. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from mjs@apple.com on 2009-12-04) (from mjs@apple.com on 2009-12-04)
  130. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from mjs@apple.com on 2009-12-04) (from mjs@apple.com on 2009-12-04)
  131. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from rubys@intertwingly.net on 2009-12-04) (from rubys@intertwingly.net on 2009-12-04)
  132. Re: Renamed topic: focus and length of HTML5 was Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from shelley.just@gmail.com on 2009-12-04) (from shelley.just@gmail.com on 2009-12-04)
  133. Renamed topic: focus and length of HTML5, was: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2009-12-04) (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2009-12-04)
  134. Re: Renamed topic: focus and length of HTML5 was Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from shelley.just@gmail.com on 2009-12-04) (from shelley.just@gmail.com on 2009-12-04)
  135. Renamed topic: focus and length of HTML5 was Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from shelley.just@gmail.com on 2009-12-04) (from shelley.just@gmail.com on 2009-12-04)
  136. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from ian@hixie.ch on 2009-12-04) (from ian@hixie.ch on 2009-12-04)
  137. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from jackalmage@gmail.com on 2009-12-04) (from jackalmage@gmail.com on 2009-12-04)
  138. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from shelley.just@gmail.com on 2009-12-04) (from shelley.just@gmail.com on 2009-12-04)
  139. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from jackalmage@gmail.com on 2009-12-04) (from jackalmage@gmail.com on 2009-12-04)
  140. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from shelley.just@gmail.com on 2009-12-04) (from shelley.just@gmail.com on 2009-12-04)
  141. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no on 2009-12-04) (from xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no on 2009-12-04)
  142. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from jgraham@opera.com on 2009-12-04) (from jgraham@opera.com on 2009-12-04)
  143. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2009-12-04) (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2009-12-04)
  144. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2009-12-04) (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2009-12-04)
  145. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2009-12-04) (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2009-12-04)
  146. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from philipj@opera.com on 2009-12-04) (from philipj@opera.com on 2009-12-04)
  147. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from shelley.just@gmail.com on 2009-12-03) (from shelley.just@gmail.com on 2009-12-03)
  148. Minutes HTML WG 3 December 2009 (from cooper@w3.org on 2009-12-03) (from cooper@w3.org on 2009-12-03)
  149. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from Simetrical+w3c@gmail.com on 2009-12-03) (from Simetrical+w3c@gmail.com on 2009-12-03)
  150. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from jackalmage@gmail.com on 2009-12-03) (from jackalmage@gmail.com on 2009-12-03)
  151. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from mjs@apple.com on 2009-12-03) (from mjs@apple.com on 2009-12-03)
  152. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from Simetrical+w3c@gmail.com on 2009-12-03) (from Simetrical+w3c@gmail.com on 2009-12-03)
  153. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from ian@hixie.ch on 2009-12-03) (from ian@hixie.ch on 2009-12-03)
  154. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from ian@hixie.ch on 2009-12-03) (from ian@hixie.ch on 2009-12-03)
  155. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from jgraham@opera.com on 2009-12-03) (from jgraham@opera.com on 2009-12-03)
  156. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from rubys@intertwingly.net on 2009-12-03) (from rubys@intertwingly.net on 2009-12-03)
  157. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no on 2009-12-03) (from xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no on 2009-12-03)
  158. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from jgraham@opera.com on 2009-12-03) (from jgraham@opera.com on 2009-12-03)
  159. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from shelley.just@gmail.com on 2009-12-03) (from shelley.just@gmail.com on 2009-12-03)
  160. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from rubys@intertwingly.net on 2009-12-03) (from rubys@intertwingly.net on 2009-12-03)
  161. Re: ESW Wiki (was Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification) (from laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com on 2009-12-03) (from laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com on 2009-12-03)
  162. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2009-12-03) (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2009-12-03)
  163. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from jackalmage@gmail.com on 2009-12-03) (from jackalmage@gmail.com on 2009-12-03)
  164. Re: ESW Wiki (was Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification) (from mike@w3.org on 2009-12-03) (from mike@w3.org on 2009-12-03)
  165. Re: ESW Wiki (was Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification) (from mike@w3.org on 2009-12-03) (from mike@w3.org on 2009-12-03)
  166. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2009-12-03) (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2009-12-03)
  167. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from jgraham@opera.com on 2009-12-03) (from jgraham@opera.com on 2009-12-03)
  168. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2009-12-03) (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2009-12-03)
  169. Re: ESW Wiki (was Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification) (from tai@g5n.co.uk on 2009-12-03) (from tai@g5n.co.uk on 2009-12-03)
  170. Re: ESW Wiki (was Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification) (from mark@zepheira.com on 2009-12-02) (from mark@zepheira.com on 2009-12-02)
  171. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from jackalmage@gmail.com on 2009-12-02) (from jackalmage@gmail.com on 2009-12-02)
  172. Re: ESW Wiki (was Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification) (from mjs@apple.com on 2009-12-02) (from mjs@apple.com on 2009-12-02)
  173. Re: ESW Wiki (was Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification) (from mjs@apple.com on 2009-12-02) (from mjs@apple.com on 2009-12-02)
  174. ESW Wiki (was Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification) (from laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com on 2009-12-02) (from laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com on 2009-12-02)
  175. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from rubys@intertwingly.net on 2009-12-02) (from rubys@intertwingly.net on 2009-12-02)
  176. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from mjs@apple.com on 2009-12-02) (from mjs@apple.com on 2009-12-02)
  177. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from jackalmage@gmail.com on 2009-12-02) (from jackalmage@gmail.com on 2009-12-02)
  178. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from mjs@apple.com on 2009-12-02) (from mjs@apple.com on 2009-12-02)
  179. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from jackalmage@gmail.com on 2009-12-02) (from jackalmage@gmail.com on 2009-12-02)
  180. {agenda} HTML WG telcon 2009-12-3: issues, action items, calls for consensus/proposals, task force reports (from mjs@apple.com on 2009-12-02) (from mjs@apple.com on 2009-12-02)
  181. Re: {agenda} HTML WG telcon 2009-11-19: issues, action items, calls for consensus/proposals, task force reports (from oradnio@gmail.com on 2009-11-19) (from oradnio@gmail.com on 2009-11-19)
  182. Re: {agenda} HTML WG telcon 2009-11-19: issues, action items, calls for consensus/proposals, task force reports (from laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com on 2009-11-19) (from laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com on 2009-11-19)
  183. {agenda} HTML WG telcon 2009-11-19: issues, action items, calls for consensus/proposals, task force reports (from Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com on 2009-11-18) (from Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com on 2009-11-18)
  184. {agenda} HTML WG telcon 2009-11-19: issues, action items, calls for consensus/proposals, task force reports (from Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com on 2009-11-18) (from Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com on 2009-11-18)
  185. ISSUE-76: CHANGE PROPOSAL: Separate Microdata from HTML5 Specification (from msporny@digitalbazaar.com on 2009-10-21) (from msporny@digitalbazaar.com on 2009-10-21)
  186. {agenda} HTML WG telcon 2009-10-22: AIs, Task Forces, F2F meeting plans (from mjs@apple.com on 2009-10-21) (from mjs@apple.com on 2009-10-21)
  187. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from mjs@apple.com on 2009-10-21) (from mjs@apple.com on 2009-10-21)
  188. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from annevk@opera.com on 2009-10-21) (from annevk@opera.com on 2009-10-21)
  189. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from tai@g5n.co.uk on 2009-10-21) (from tai@g5n.co.uk on 2009-10-21)
  190. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from mjs@apple.com on 2009-10-20) (from mjs@apple.com on 2009-10-20)
  191. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from joedwil@earthlink.net on 2009-10-19) (from joedwil@earthlink.net on 2009-10-19)
  192. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from jonas@sicking.cc on 2009-10-19) (from jonas@sicking.cc on 2009-10-19)
  193. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from shelley.just@gmail.com on 2009-10-19) (from shelley.just@gmail.com on 2009-10-19)
  194. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2009-10-19) (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2009-10-19)
  195. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from scotfl@gmail.com on 2009-10-19) (from scotfl@gmail.com on 2009-10-19)
  196. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from rubys@intertwingly.net on 2009-10-19) (from rubys@intertwingly.net on 2009-10-19)
  197. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2009-10-19) (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2009-10-19)
  198. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from hsivonen@iki.fi on 2009-10-19) (from hsivonen@iki.fi on 2009-10-19)
  199. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from shelley.just@gmail.com on 2009-10-19) (from shelley.just@gmail.com on 2009-10-19)
  200. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from hsivonen@iki.fi on 2009-10-19) (from hsivonen@iki.fi on 2009-10-19)
  201. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from shelleyp@burningbird.net on 2009-10-19) (from shelleyp@burningbird.net on 2009-10-19)
  202. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from hsivonen@iki.fi on 2009-10-19) (from hsivonen@iki.fi on 2009-10-19)
  203. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from hsivonen@iki.fi on 2009-10-19) (from hsivonen@iki.fi on 2009-10-19)
  204. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from shelley.just@gmail.com on 2009-10-18) (from shelley.just@gmail.com on 2009-10-18)
  205. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2009-10-18) (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2009-10-18)
  206. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from karl+w3c@la-grange.net on 2009-10-18) (from karl+w3c@la-grange.net on 2009-10-18)
  207. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from karl@la-grange.net on 2009-10-18) (from karl@la-grange.net on 2009-10-18)
  208. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from jonas@sicking.cc on 2009-10-18) (from jonas@sicking.cc on 2009-10-18)
  209. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from shelleyp@burningbird.net on 2009-10-18) (from shelleyp@burningbird.net on 2009-10-18)
  210. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from tantek@cs.stanford.edu on 2009-10-18) (from tantek@cs.stanford.edu on 2009-10-18)
  211. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from jonas@sicking.cc on 2009-10-17) (from jonas@sicking.cc on 2009-10-17)
  212. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from karl@la-grange.net on 2009-10-17) (from karl@la-grange.net on 2009-10-17)
  213. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from jgraham@opera.com on 2009-10-16) (from jgraham@opera.com on 2009-10-16)
  214. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no on 2009-10-16) (from xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no on 2009-10-16)
  215. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from shelleyp@burningbird.net on 2009-10-16) (from shelleyp@burningbird.net on 2009-10-16)
  216. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from shelleyp@burningbird.net on 2009-10-16) (from shelleyp@burningbird.net on 2009-10-16)
  217. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from cgcardona@gmail.com on 2009-10-16) (from cgcardona@gmail.com on 2009-10-16)
  218. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from jackalmage@gmail.com on 2009-10-16) (from jackalmage@gmail.com on 2009-10-16)
  219. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2009-10-16) (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2009-10-16)
  220. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from jgraham@opera.com on 2009-10-16) (from jgraham@opera.com on 2009-10-16)
  221. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from hsivonen@iki.fi on 2009-10-16) (from hsivonen@iki.fi on 2009-10-16)
  222. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from shelleyp@burningbird.net on 2009-10-16) (from shelleyp@burningbird.net on 2009-10-16)
  223. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2009-10-16) (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2009-10-16)
  224. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from hsivonen@iki.fi on 2009-10-16) (from hsivonen@iki.fi on 2009-10-16)
  225. minutes for 2009-10-15 HTML WG telcon (from mike@w3.org on 2009-10-16) (from mike@w3.org on 2009-10-16)
  226. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from Simetrical+w3c@gmail.com on 2009-10-15) (from Simetrical+w3c@gmail.com on 2009-10-15)
  227. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from mjs@apple.com on 2009-10-15) (from mjs@apple.com on 2009-10-15)
  228. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from shelleyp@burningbird.net on 2009-10-15) (from shelleyp@burningbird.net on 2009-10-15)
  229. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from Simetrical+w3c@gmail.com on 2009-10-15) (from Simetrical+w3c@gmail.com on 2009-10-15)
  230. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from shelleyp@burningbird.net on 2009-10-15) (from shelleyp@burningbird.net on 2009-10-15)
  231. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from martin@weborganics.co.uk on 2009-10-15) (from martin@weborganics.co.uk on 2009-10-15)
  232. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from shelleyp@burningbird.net on 2009-10-15) (from shelleyp@burningbird.net on 2009-10-15)
  233. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from Simetrical+w3c@gmail.com on 2009-10-15) (from Simetrical+w3c@gmail.com on 2009-10-15)
  234. [VER 2] {agenda} HTML WG telcon 2009-10-15: AIs, Task Forces, F2F meeting plans (from Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com on 2009-10-15) (from Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com on 2009-10-15)
  235. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from shelleyp@burningbird.net on 2009-10-15) (from shelleyp@burningbird.net on 2009-10-15)
  236. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2009-10-15) (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2009-10-15)
  237. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from annevk@opera.com on 2009-10-15) (from annevk@opera.com on 2009-10-15)
  238. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from shelleyp@burningbird.net on 2009-10-15) (from shelleyp@burningbird.net on 2009-10-15)
  239. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from shelleyp@burningbird.net on 2009-10-15) (from shelleyp@burningbird.net on 2009-10-15)
  240. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from shelleyp@burningbird.net on 2009-10-15) (from shelleyp@burningbird.net on 2009-10-15)
  241. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from hsivonen@iki.fi on 2009-10-15) (from hsivonen@iki.fi on 2009-10-15)
  242. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from jonas@sicking.cc on 2009-10-14) (from jonas@sicking.cc on 2009-10-14)
  243. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no on 2009-10-14) (from xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no on 2009-10-14)
  244. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2009-10-14) (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2009-10-14)
  245. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from philipj@opera.com on 2009-10-14) (from philipj@opera.com on 2009-10-14)
  246. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2009-10-14) (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2009-10-14)
  247. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from annevk@opera.com on 2009-10-14) (from annevk@opera.com on 2009-10-14)
  248. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2009-10-14) (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2009-10-14)
  249. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2009-10-14) (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2009-10-14)
  250. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from shelleyp@burningbird.net on 2009-10-14) (from shelleyp@burningbird.net on 2009-10-14)
  251. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from msporny@digitalbazaar.com on 2009-10-14) (from msporny@digitalbazaar.com on 2009-10-14)
  252. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from annevk@opera.com on 2009-10-14) (from annevk@opera.com on 2009-10-14)
  253. Re: {agenda} HTML WG telcon 2009-10-15: AIs, Task Forces, F2F meeting plans (from singer@apple.com on 2009-10-14) (from singer@apple.com on 2009-10-14)
  254. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2009-10-14) (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2009-10-14)
  255. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from philipj@opera.com on 2009-10-14) (from philipj@opera.com on 2009-10-14)
  256. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from jonas@sicking.cc on 2009-10-14) (from jonas@sicking.cc on 2009-10-14)
  257. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2009-10-14) (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2009-10-14)
  258. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2009-10-14) (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2009-10-14)
  259. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from jonas@sicking.cc on 2009-10-14) (from jonas@sicking.cc on 2009-10-14)
  260. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from jonas@sicking.cc on 2009-10-14) (from jonas@sicking.cc on 2009-10-14)
  261. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from shelleyp@burningbird.net on 2009-10-14) (from shelleyp@burningbird.net on 2009-10-14)
  262. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from mjs@apple.com on 2009-10-14) (from mjs@apple.com on 2009-10-14)
  263. Re: ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from mjs@apple.com on 2009-10-14) (from mjs@apple.com on 2009-10-14)
  264. ISSUE-76: Need feedback on splitting Microdata into separate specification (from msporny@digitalbazaar.com on 2009-10-14) (from msporny@digitalbazaar.com on 2009-10-14)
  265. {agenda} HTML WG telcon 2009-10-15: AIs, Task Forces, F2F meeting plans (from Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com on 2009-10-14) (from Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com on 2009-10-14)
  266. [minutes] 20091008 HTML Working Group call (from plh@w3.org on 2009-10-08) (from plh@w3.org on 2009-10-08)
  267. Re: {agenda} HTML WG telcon 2009-10-08: AIs, Task Forces, TPAC/ECMA, Decision Policy (from msporny@digitalbazaar.com on 2009-10-07) (from msporny@digitalbazaar.com on 2009-10-07)
  268. {agenda} HTML WG telcon 2009-10-08: AIs, Task Forces, TPAC/ECMA, Decision Policy (from rubys@intertwingly.net on 2009-10-07) (from rubys@intertwingly.net on 2009-10-07)
  269. Re: Microdata vocabulary specifications (from shelleyp@burningbird.net on 2009-10-04) (from shelleyp@burningbird.net on 2009-10-04)
  270. minutes of 2009-10-01 telcon (from mike@w3.org on 2009-10-02) (from mike@w3.org on 2009-10-02)
  271. Re: Agenda for HTML WG telcon 2009-09-24 - CfCs, Accessibility TF, Testing TF, etc. (from msporny@digitalbazaar.com on 2009-09-30) (from msporny@digitalbazaar.com on 2009-09-30)
  272. Agenda for HTML WG telcon 2009-09-24 - CfCs, Accessibility TF, Testing TF, etc. (from mjs@apple.com on 2009-09-30) (from mjs@apple.com on 2009-09-30)
  273. minutes for 2009-09-17 telcon (from mike@w3.org on 2009-09-20) (from mike@w3.org on 2009-09-20)
  274. {agenda} HTML WG telcon 2009-09-17 (from rubys@intertwingly.net on 2009-09-16) (from rubys@intertwingly.net on 2009-09-16)
  275. Re: Withdrawal of HTML5-warnings draft (from mjs@apple.com on 2009-08-18) (from mjs@apple.com on 2009-08-18)
  276. Re: Withdrawal of HTML5-warnings draft (from rubys@intertwingly.net on 2009-08-18) (from rubys@intertwingly.net on 2009-08-18)
  277. Re: Begin discussions for pushing Last Call into 2010 (from shelleyp@burningbird.net on 2009-08-12) (from shelleyp@burningbird.net on 2009-08-12)
  278. Re: Begin discussions for pushing Last Call into 2010 (from mjs@apple.com on 2009-08-12) (from mjs@apple.com on 2009-08-12)
  279. Re: Begin discussions for pushing Last Call into 2010 (from shelleyp@burningbird.net on 2009-08-12) (from shelleyp@burningbird.net on 2009-08-12)
  280. Re: Begin discussions for pushing Last Call into 2010 (from rubys@intertwingly.net on 2009-08-12) (from rubys@intertwingly.net on 2009-08-12)
  281. Re: HTML5-warnings - motivations (from msporny@digitalbazaar.com on 2009-08-10) (from msporny@digitalbazaar.com on 2009-08-10)
  282. Re: HTML5-warnings - request to publish as next heartbeat WD (from rubys@intertwingly.net on 2009-08-10) (from rubys@intertwingly.net on 2009-08-10)
  283. Re: HTML5-warnings - motivations (from shelleyp@burningbird.net on 2009-08-10) (from shelleyp@burningbird.net on 2009-08-10)
  284. ISSUE-76 (Shelleyp): Concerns about Microdata section and inclusion/exclusion of RDFa (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2009-08-10) (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2009-08-10)

Related notes:

See ISSUE-41

Shawn Medero, 10 Aug 2009, 18:16:48

Possibly related email search: http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&tbo=1&num=50&tbs=qdr%3Ay&q=site%3Alists.whatwg.org+%2BRDFa+&aq=f&oq=&aqi=

Shawn Medero, 10 Aug 2009, 18:43:50

Additional discussions related to this topic:

Thread beginning with this post http://lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/2009-January/018220.html

Thread beginning with this post http://lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/2009-May/019601.html

Thread beginning with this post http://lists.whatwg.org/htdig.cgi/whatwg-whatwg.org/2009-May/019672.html

The WhatWG Wiki on Microdata http://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/Microdata_Problem_Descriptions

Ian Hickson's post listing emails reflecting his decision to create the Microdata section http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2009May/0207.html

Shelley Powers, 10 Aug 2009, 18:49:15

Additional information:

A loose set of notes on RDFa, XHTML, and HTML 5 http://realtech.burningbird.net/web/page-markups/loose-set-notes-rdfa-microdata-and-html5

Use cases and comparison of RDFa/HTML5 microdata http://realtech.burningbird.net/semantic-web/semantic-web-issues-and-practices/use-cases-and-comparison-rdfahtml5-microdata

One use case: annotation http://realtech.burningbird.net/web/standards/annotation

Another use case: searchcase http://realtech.burningbird.net/web/standards/searchcase

Shelley Powers, 10 Aug 2009, 18:53:50

Discussions in the HTML WG email list:

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2009Jul/0701.html

A note related to the vcard predefined vocabulary http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2009Jul/0489.html

Does anyone like Microdata? http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2009Jun/0732.html

Shelley Powers, 10 Aug 2009, 18:59:59

Ian Hickson's summary document listing the use cases used to derive microdata, and his interpretation of requirements

http://lists.whatwg.org/htdig.cgi/whatwg-whatwg.org/2009-April/019374.html

Shelley Powers, 10 Aug 2009, 19:08:52

Ian Hickson's summary document listing the use cases used to derive microdata, and his interpretation of requirements

http://lists.whatwg.org/htdig.cgi/whatwg-whatwg.org/2009-April/019374.html

Shelley Powers, 10 Aug 2009, 19:09:20

Posting of same note from Ian Hickson, but on HTML WG and related discussion

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2009Apr/0208.html

Shelley Powers, 10 Aug 2009, 19:11:44

[MikeSmith]: see also the discussion at http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=7542

24 Sep 2009, 08:33:25

TAG support for ISSUE-76: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8220

Shawn Medero, 6 Nov 2009, 19:41:23


Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, Chairs, Michael[tm] Smith <mike@w3.org>, Staff Contact
Tracker: documentation, (configuration for this group), originally developed by Dean Jackson, is developed and maintained by the Systems Team <w3t-sys@w3.org>.
$Id: index.php,v 1.323 2013-12-19 14:47:09 dom Exp $