Edit ISSUE-1: hyperlink auditing requires use of unsafe HTTP method

Nickname:

Title:

State:

Product:

Raised By:

Description:

Add notes (no markup allowed, URIs get automatically hyperlinked):

Related emails:

  1. {minutes} HTML WG telecon 2012-04-19: issues, decisions, TF reports, Change Proposal reviews (from glenn@skynav.com on 2012-04-19) (from glenn@skynav.com on 2012-04-19)
  2. CfC: Close ISSUE-187 validity-stability by Amicable Resolution (from Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com on 2012-03-07) (from Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com on 2012-03-07)
  3. Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals) (from glenn@skynav.com on 2012-02-21) (from glenn@skynav.com on 2012-02-21)
  4. ISSUE-187: validity-stability - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals (from Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com on 2012-01-25) (from Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com on 2012-01-25)
  5. ISSUE-189: uri-web-prefix - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals (from Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com on 2012-01-17) (from Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com on 2012-01-17)
  6. ISSUE-188: generic-track-format - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals (from Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com on 2012-01-17) (from Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com on 2012-01-17)
  7. HTML WG minutes (Re: {agenda} HTML WG telecon 2012-01-12: issue progress, other business) (from mjs@apple.com on 2012-01-12) (from mjs@apple.com on 2012-01-12)
  8. ISSUE-181 remove-sidebar: Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals (from Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com on 2011-11-29) (from Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com on 2011-11-29)
  9. Re: ISSUE-179 av_param: Chairs Solicit Proposals (from glenn@skynav.com on 2011-10-29) (from glenn@skynav.com on 2011-10-29)
  10. {minutes} HTML WG telecon 2011-07-14: Issue status, Priority requests, Decisions, WD publication (from rubys@intertwingly.net on 2011-07-14) (from rubys@intertwingly.net on 2011-07-14)
  11. ISSUE-152: multitrack-media-resources - Schedule for Straw Poll for Objections (from Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com on 2011-03-25) (from Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com on 2011-03-25)
  12. {minutes} HTML WG Telecon 2010-11-18: status of actions, calls, issues, meeting schedule, timeline to LC status (from Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com on 2010-11-21) (from Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com on 2010-11-21)
  13. {minutes} HTML WG F2F minutes, Lyon, France, Nov 4-5 Part 1 (from Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com on 2010-11-09) (from Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com on 2010-11-09)
  14. {minutes} } HTML WG telecon 2010-07-24: issues, surveys, decisions, publication status, TF reports (from Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com on 2010-06-25) (from Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com on 2010-06-25)
  15. Re: CfC: Adopt ISSUE-1 PINGUI / ISSUE-2 PINGPOST Change Proposal to remove @ping from HTML5 (from ian@hixie.ch on 2010-03-04) (from ian@hixie.ch on 2010-03-04)
  16. [minutes] HTML WG 2010004 (from plh@w3.org on 2010-03-04) (from plh@w3.org on 2010-03-04)
  17. Re: CfC: Adopt ISSUE-1 PINGUI / ISSUE-2 PINGPOST Change Proposal to remove @ping from HTML5 (from mjs@apple.com on 2010-03-04) (from mjs@apple.com on 2010-03-04)
  18. {agenda} HTML WG telcon 2010-03-04: actions, publications, decision policy, issues (from Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com on 2010-03-03) (from Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com on 2010-03-03)
  19. {agenda} HTML WG telcon 2010-03-04: actions, publications, decision policy, issues (from Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com on 2010-03-03) (from Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com on 2010-03-03)
  20. Subject: {agenda} HTML WG telcon 2010-02-25: actions, issues, publication (from mjs@apple.com on 2010-02-24) (from mjs@apple.com on 2010-02-24)
  21. Re: Relationship between the WHATWG and W3C (was: CfC: Adopt ISSUE-1 / ISSUE-2 Change Proposal) (from fielding@gbiv.com on 2010-02-24) (from fielding@gbiv.com on 2010-02-24)
  22. Relationship between the WHATWG and W3C (was: CfC: Adopt ISSUE-1 / ISSUE-2 Change Proposal) (from rubys@intertwingly.net on 2010-02-24) (from rubys@intertwingly.net on 2010-02-24)
  23. Re: CfC: Adopt ISSUE-1 PINGUI / ISSUE-2 PINGPOST Change Proposal to remove @ping from HTML5 (from ian@hixie.ch on 2010-02-24) (from ian@hixie.ch on 2010-02-24)
  24. Re: CfC: Adopt ISSUE-1 PINGUI / ISSUE-2 PINGPOST Change Proposal to remove @ping from HTML5 (from fielding@gbiv.com on 2010-02-24) (from fielding@gbiv.com on 2010-02-24)
  25. Re: CfC: Adopt ISSUE-1 PINGUI / ISSUE-2 PINGPOST Change Proposal to remove @ping from HTML5 (from fielding@gbiv.com on 2010-02-24) (from fielding@gbiv.com on 2010-02-24)
  26. Re: CfC: Adopt ISSUE-1 PINGUI / ISSUE-2 PINGPOST Change Proposal to remove @ping from HTML5 (from mjs@apple.com on 2010-02-23) (from mjs@apple.com on 2010-02-23)
  27. Re: CfC: Adopt ISSUE-1 PINGUI / ISSUE-2 PINGPOST Change Proposal to remove @ping from HTML5 (from fielding@gbiv.com on 2010-02-23) (from fielding@gbiv.com on 2010-02-23)
  28. Re: HTTP constraints on UI for unsafe methods (Re: CfC: Adopt ISSUE-1 PINGUI / ISSUE-2 PINGPOST Change Proposal to remove @ping from HTML5) (from jonas@sicking.cc on 2010-02-23) (from jonas@sicking.cc on 2010-02-23)
  29. HTTP constraints on UI for unsafe methods (Re: CfC: Adopt ISSUE-1 PINGUI / ISSUE-2 PINGPOST Change Proposal to remove @ping from HTML5) (from mjs@apple.com on 2010-02-23) (from mjs@apple.com on 2010-02-23)
  30. Re: CfC: Adopt ISSUE-1 PINGUI / ISSUE-2 PINGPOST Change Proposal to remove @ping from HTML5 (from jonas@sicking.cc on 2010-02-23) (from jonas@sicking.cc on 2010-02-23)
  31. Re: CfC: Adopt ISSUE-1 PINGUI / ISSUE-2 PINGPOST Change Proposal to remove @ping from HTML5 (from mjs@apple.com on 2010-02-23) (from mjs@apple.com on 2010-02-23)
  32. Re: CfC: Adopt ISSUE-1 PINGUI / ISSUE-2 PINGPOST Change Proposal to remove @ping from HTML5 (from jonas@sicking.cc on 2010-02-23) (from jonas@sicking.cc on 2010-02-23)
  33. Re: CfC: Adopt ISSUE-1 PINGUI / ISSUE-2 PINGPOST Change Proposal to remove @ping from HTML5 (from mjs@apple.com on 2010-02-23) (from mjs@apple.com on 2010-02-23)
  34. CfC: Adopt ISSUE-1 PINGUI / ISSUE-2 PINGPOST Change Proposal to remove @ping from HTML5 (from mjs@apple.com on 2010-02-23) (from mjs@apple.com on 2010-02-23)
  35. Re: Zero-edits Counter Proposal for Issues 1 and 2 (Ping) (from jonas@sicking.cc on 2010-02-17) (from jonas@sicking.cc on 2010-02-17)
  36. Re: Zero-edits Counter Proposal for Issues 1 and 2 (Ping) (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2010-02-17) (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2010-02-17)
  37. Re: Zero-edits Counter Proposal for Issues 1 and 2 (Ping) (from jackalmage@gmail.com on 2010-02-17) (from jackalmage@gmail.com on 2010-02-17)
  38. Re: Zero-edits Counter Proposal for Issues 1 and 2 (Ping) (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2010-02-17) (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2010-02-17)
  39. Zero-edits Counter Proposal for Issues 1 and 2 (Ping) (from jackalmage@gmail.com on 2010-02-15) (from jackalmage@gmail.com on 2010-02-15)
  40. [VER 2] {agenda} HTML WG telcon 2010-01-21: AIs, CfC/CfPs, and heartbeat docs (from Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com on 2010-01-21) (from Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com on 2010-01-21)
  41. Re: {agenda} HTML WG telcon 2010-01-21: AIs, CfC/CfPs, and heartbeat docs (from singer@apple.com on 2010-01-21) (from singer@apple.com on 2010-01-21)
  42. {agenda} HTML WG telcon 2010-01-21: AIs, CfC/CfPs, and heartbeat docs (from Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com on 2010-01-20) (from Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com on 2010-01-20)
  43. {agenda} HTML WG telcon 2010-01-21: AIs, CfC/CfPs, and heartbeat docs (from Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com on 2010-01-20) (from Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com on 2010-01-20)
  44. Re: ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2 - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals (from mjs@apple.com on 2010-01-14) (from mjs@apple.com on 2010-01-14)
  45. Re: ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2 - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals (from jackalmage@gmail.com on 2010-01-13) (from jackalmage@gmail.com on 2010-01-13)
  46. Re: ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2 - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals (from mjs@apple.com on 2010-01-13) (from mjs@apple.com on 2010-01-13)
  47. Re: ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2 - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals (from jackalmage@gmail.com on 2010-01-13) (from jackalmage@gmail.com on 2010-01-13)
  48. Re: {agenda} HTML WG telcon 2010-01-14: AIs, CfC/CfPs, TFs, plus: heartbeat docs (from shelley.just@gmail.com on 2010-01-13) (from shelley.just@gmail.com on 2010-01-13)
  49. {agenda} HTML WG telcon 2010-01-14: AIs, CfC/CfPs, TFs, plus: heartbeat docs (from rubys@intertwingly.net on 2010-01-13) (from rubys@intertwingly.net on 2010-01-13)
  50. ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2 - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals (from rubys@intertwingly.net on 2010-01-13) (from rubys@intertwingly.net on 2010-01-13)
  51. Re: CHANGE PROPOSAL: Remove ping and hyperlink auditing (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2) (from mjs@apple.com on 2010-01-13) (from mjs@apple.com on 2010-01-13)
  52. Re: CHANGE PROPOSAL: Remove ping and hyperlink auditing (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2) (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2010-01-13) (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2010-01-13)
  53. Re: CHANGE PROPOSAL: Remove ping and hyperlink auditing (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2) (from fielding@gbiv.com on 2010-01-12) (from fielding@gbiv.com on 2010-01-12)
  54. Re: CHANGE PROPOSAL: Remove ping and hyperlink auditing (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2) (from rubys@intertwingly.net on 2009-12-17) (from rubys@intertwingly.net on 2009-12-17)
  55. Re: CHANGE PROPOSAL: Remove ping and hyperlink auditing (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2) (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2009-12-17) (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2009-12-17)
  56. {agenda} HTML WG telcon 2009-12-17: action items, calls for consensus/proposals, task forces (from Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com on 2009-12-15) (from Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com on 2009-12-15)
  57. {agenda} HTML WG telcon 2009-12-17: action items, calls for consensus/proposals, task forces (from Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com on 2009-12-15) (from Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com on 2009-12-15)
  58. Re: {agenda} HTML WG telcon 2009-10-29: action items, calls for consensus/proposals, task forces (from shelley.just@gmail.com on 2009-12-10) (from shelley.just@gmail.com on 2009-12-10)
  59. Re: {agenda} HTML WG telcon 2009-10-29: action items, calls for consensus/proposals, task forces (from shelley.just@gmail.com on 2009-12-10) (from shelley.just@gmail.com on 2009-12-10)
  60. {agenda} HTML WG telcon 2009-10-29: action items, calls for consensus/proposals, task forces (from rubys@intertwingly.net on 2009-12-09) (from rubys@intertwingly.net on 2009-12-09)
  61. Re: CHANGE PROPOSAL: Remove ping and hyperlink auditing (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2) (from mjs@apple.com on 2009-12-08) (from mjs@apple.com on 2009-12-08)
  62. Re: CHANGE PROPOSAL: Remove ping and hyperlink auditing (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2) (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2009-12-08) (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2009-12-08)
  63. Re: CHANGE PROPOSAL: Remove ping and hyperlink auditing (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2) (from fielding@gbiv.com on 2009-12-07) (from fielding@gbiv.com on 2009-12-07)
  64. Re: CHANGE PROPOSAL: Remove ping and hyperlink auditing (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2) (from kornel@geekhood.net on 2009-12-07) (from kornel@geekhood.net on 2009-12-07)
  65. Re: CHANGE PROPOSAL: Remove ping and hyperlink auditing (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2) (from mjs@apple.com on 2009-12-05) (from mjs@apple.com on 2009-12-05)
  66. CHANGE PROPOSAL: Remove ping and hyperlink auditing (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2) (from fielding@gbiv.com on 2009-12-05) (from fielding@gbiv.com on 2009-12-05)
  67. Minutes HTML WG 3 December 2009 (from cooper@w3.org on 2009-12-03) (from cooper@w3.org on 2009-12-03)
  68. {agenda} HTML WG telcon 2009-12-3: issues, action items, calls for consensus/proposals, task force reports (from mjs@apple.com on 2009-12-02) (from mjs@apple.com on 2009-12-02)
  69. Re: ISSUE-1: pingpost - Chairs Solicit Proposals (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2009-11-25) (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2009-11-25)
  70. Re: ISSUE-1: pingpost - Chairs Solicit Proposals (from mjs@apple.com on 2009-11-24) (from mjs@apple.com on 2009-11-24)
  71. Re: ISSUE-1: pingpost - Chairs Solicit Proposals (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2009-11-19) (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2009-11-19)
  72. ISSUE-1: pingpost - Chairs Solicit Proposals (from Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com on 2009-11-19) (from Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com on 2009-11-19)
  73. Re: {agenda} HTML WG telcon 2009-11-19: issues, action items, calls for consensus/proposals, task force reports (from oradnio@gmail.com on 2009-11-19) (from oradnio@gmail.com on 2009-11-19)
  74. Re: {agenda} HTML WG telcon 2009-11-19: issues, action items, calls for consensus/proposals, task force reports (from laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com on 2009-11-19) (from laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com on 2009-11-19)
  75. {agenda} HTML WG telcon 2009-11-19: issues, action items, calls for consensus/proposals, task force reports (from Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com on 2009-11-18) (from Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com on 2009-11-18)
  76. {agenda} HTML WG telcon 2009-11-19: issues, action items, calls for consensus/proposals, task force reports (from Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com on 2009-11-18) (from Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com on 2009-11-18)
  77. State of HTML WG Unresolved Issues (from mjs@apple.com on 2009-08-20) (from mjs@apple.com on 2009-08-20)
  78. Re: Spec with issue markers [was: Re: HTML5-warnings - request to publish as next heartbeat WD] (from jgraham@opera.com on 2009-08-19) (from jgraham@opera.com on 2009-08-19)
  79. Re: Spec with issue markers [was: Re: HTML5-warnings - request to publish as next heartbeat WD] (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2009-08-19) (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2009-08-19)
  80. Re: Consolidated issues that may qualify as 'controversial' (from rubys@intertwingly.net on 2009-08-12) (from rubys@intertwingly.net on 2009-08-12)
  81. Re: Consolidated issues that may qualify as 'controversial' (from shelleyp@burningbird.net on 2009-08-12) (from shelleyp@burningbird.net on 2009-08-12)
  82. Consolidated issues that may qualify as 'controversial' (from mjs@apple.com on 2009-08-12) (from mjs@apple.com on 2009-08-12)
  83. Re: <a ping> (from jonas@sicking.cc on 2009-08-11) (from jonas@sicking.cc on 2009-08-11)
  84. controversial issue candidates in issues 1-15 (from mjs@apple.com on 2009-08-10) (from mjs@apple.com on 2009-08-10)
  85. Re: HTML5-warnings - request to publish as next heartbeat WD (from msporny@digitalbazaar.com on 2009-08-10) (from msporny@digitalbazaar.com on 2009-08-10)
  86. Re: HTML5-warnings - request to publish as next heartbeat WD (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2009-08-10) (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2009-08-10)
  87. Re: a/@ping discussion (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2), was: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (from ian@hixie.ch on 2008-11-27) (from ian@hixie.ch on 2008-11-27)
  88. Re: a/@ping discussion (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2), was: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2008-11-27) (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2008-11-27)
  89. Re: a/@ping discussion (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2), was: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2008-11-27) (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2008-11-27)
  90. Re: a/@ping discussion (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2), was: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2008-11-27) (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2008-11-27)
  91. Re: a/@ping discussion (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2), was: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2008-11-25) (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2008-11-25)
  92. Re: a/@ping discussion (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2), was: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2008-11-25) (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2008-11-25)
  93. Re: a/@ping discussion (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2), was: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (from lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au on 2008-11-25) (from lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au on 2008-11-25)
  94. Re: a/@ping discussion (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2), was: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (from jimjjewett@gmail.com on 2008-11-25) (from jimjjewett@gmail.com on 2008-11-25)
  95. Re: a/@ping discussion (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2), was: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (from ian@hixie.ch on 2008-11-25) (from ian@hixie.ch on 2008-11-25)
  96. Re: a/@ping discussion (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2), was: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2008-11-25) (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2008-11-25)
  97. Re: a/@ping discussion (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2), was: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (from ian@hixie.ch on 2008-11-25) (from ian@hixie.ch on 2008-11-25)
  98. Re: a/@ping discussion (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2), was: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2008-11-25) (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2008-11-25)
  99. Re: a/@ping discussion (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2), was: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (from ian@hixie.ch on 2008-11-25) (from ian@hixie.ch on 2008-11-25)
  100. Re: a/@ping discussion (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2), was: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (from ian@hixie.ch on 2008-11-25) (from ian@hixie.ch on 2008-11-25)
  101. Re: a/@ping discussion (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2), was: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (from ian@hixie.ch on 2008-11-25) (from ian@hixie.ch on 2008-11-25)
  102. Re: a/@ping discussion (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2), was: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (from kornel@geekhood.net on 2008-11-25) (from kornel@geekhood.net on 2008-11-25)
  103. Re: a/@ping discussion (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2), was: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2008-11-25) (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2008-11-25)
  104. Re: a/@ping discussion (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2), was: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (from jimjjewett@gmail.com on 2008-11-24) (from jimjjewett@gmail.com on 2008-11-24)
  105. Re: a/@ping discussion (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2), was: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (from jimjjewett@gmail.com on 2008-11-24) (from jimjjewett@gmail.com on 2008-11-24)
  106. Re: a/@ping discussion (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2), was: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (from mjs@apple.com on 2008-11-24) (from mjs@apple.com on 2008-11-24)
  107. Re: a/@ping discussion (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2), was: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2008-11-24) (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2008-11-24)
  108. Re: a/@ping discussion (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2), was: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (from ian@hixie.ch on 2008-11-24) (from ian@hixie.ch on 2008-11-24)
  109. Re: a/@ping discussion (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2), was: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2008-11-24) (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2008-11-24)
  110. Re: a/@ping discussion (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2), was: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (from ian@hixie.ch on 2008-11-24) (from ian@hixie.ch on 2008-11-24)
  111. Re: a/@ping discussion (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2), was: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (from jonas@sicking.cc on 2008-11-23) (from jonas@sicking.cc on 2008-11-23)
  112. Re: a/@ping discussion (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2), was: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (from gavin@mozilla.com on 2008-11-23) (from gavin@mozilla.com on 2008-11-23)
  113. Re: a/@ping discussion (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2), was: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (from lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au on 2008-11-23) (from lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au on 2008-11-23)
  114. Re: a/@ping discussion (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2), was: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2008-11-23) (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2008-11-23)
  115. Re: a/@ping discussion (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2), was: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (from ian@hixie.ch on 2008-11-23) (from ian@hixie.ch on 2008-11-23)
  116. Re: a/@ping discussion (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2), was: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2008-11-22) (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2008-11-22)
  117. Re: a/@ping discussion (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2), was: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (from hsivonen@iki.fi on 2008-11-22) (from hsivonen@iki.fi on 2008-11-22)
  118. a/@ping discussion (ISSUE-1 and ISSUE-2), was: An HTML language specification vs. a browser specification (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2008-11-22) (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2008-11-22)
  119. {minutes} 2008-10-24 f2f meeting (day two) (from mike@w3.org on 2008-11-07) (from mike@w3.org on 2008-11-07)
  120. {minutes} HTML WG issue-tracking telcon 2008-06-19 (from mike@w3.org on 2008-06-25) (from mike@w3.org on 2008-06-25)
  121. ping attribute (ISSUE-1, ISSUE-2) (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2008-02-04) (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2008-02-04)
  122. Re: Re[2]: Feedback on the ping='' attribute (ISSUE-1) (from soypunk@gmail.com on 2007-11-14) (from soypunk@gmail.com on 2007-11-14)
  123. Re[2]: Feedback on the ping='' attribute (ISSUE-1) (from html60@narod.ru on 2007-11-14) (from html60@narod.ru on 2007-11-14)
  124. Re: Feedback on the ping='' attribute (ISSUE-1) (from adam.vandenhoven@gmail.com on 2007-11-13) (from adam.vandenhoven@gmail.com on 2007-11-13)
  125. Re: Feedback on the ping='' attribute (ISSUE-1) (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2007-11-13) (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2007-11-13)
  126. Re: Feedback on the ping='' attribute (ISSUE-1) (from jonbarnett@gmail.com on 2007-11-13) (from jonbarnett@gmail.com on 2007-11-13)
  127. Re: Feedback on the ping='' attribute (ISSUE-1) (from daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com on 2007-11-13) (from daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com on 2007-11-13)
  128. Re: Feedback on the ping='' attribute (ISSUE-1) (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2007-11-13) (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2007-11-13)
  129. Re: Feedback on the ping='' attribute (ISSUE-1) (from jonbarnett@gmail.com on 2007-11-12) (from jonbarnett@gmail.com on 2007-11-12)
  130. Re: Feedback on the ping='' attribute (ISSUE-1) (from t.broyer@gmail.com on 2007-11-12) (from t.broyer@gmail.com on 2007-11-12)
  131. Re: Feedback on the ping='' attribute (ISSUE-1) (from foolistbar@googlemail.com on 2007-11-12) (from foolistbar@googlemail.com on 2007-11-12)
  132. Re: Feedback on the ping='' attribute (ISSUE-1) (from P.Taylor@Rhul.Ac.Uk on 2007-11-12) (from P.Taylor@Rhul.Ac.Uk on 2007-11-12)
  133. Re: Feedback on the ping='' attribute (ISSUE-1) (from daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com on 2007-11-12) (from daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com on 2007-11-12)
  134. Re: Feedback on the ping='' attribute (ISSUE-1) (from P.Taylor@Rhul.Ac.Uk on 2007-11-12) (from P.Taylor@Rhul.Ac.Uk on 2007-11-12)
  135. Re: Feedback on the ping='' attribute (ISSUE-1) (from jonbarnett@gmail.com on 2007-11-12) (from jonbarnett@gmail.com on 2007-11-12)
  136. protocol [was: Re[2]: Feedback on the ping='' attribute (ISSUE-1) ] (from html60@narod.ru on 2007-11-11) (from html60@narod.ru on 2007-11-11)
  137. Re: Feedback on the ping='' attribute (ISSUE-1) (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2007-11-10) (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2007-11-10)
  138. Re: Feedback on the ping='' attribute (ISSUE-1) (from bzbarsky@MIT.EDU on 2007-11-09) (from bzbarsky@MIT.EDU on 2007-11-09)
  139. Re: Feedback on the ping='' attribute (ISSUE-1) (from bzbarsky@MIT.EDU on 2007-11-09) (from bzbarsky@MIT.EDU on 2007-11-09)
  140. Re: Feedback on the ping='' attribute (ISSUE-1) (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2007-11-09) (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2007-11-09)
  141. Re[2]: Feedback on the ping='' attribute (ISSUE-1) (from html60@narod.ru on 2007-11-09) (from html60@narod.ru on 2007-11-09)
  142. Re: Feedback on the ping='' attribute (ISSUE-1) (from distobj@acm.org on 2007-11-09) (from distobj@acm.org on 2007-11-09)
  143. Re: Feedback on the ping='' attribute (ISSUE-1) (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2007-11-09) (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2007-11-09)
  144. Re: Feedback on the ping='' attribute (ISSUE-1) (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2007-11-09) (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2007-11-09)
  145. Re[2]: Feedback on the ping='' attribute (ISSUE-1) (from html60@narod.ru on 2007-11-09) (from html60@narod.ru on 2007-11-09)
  146. Re: Feedback on the ping='' attribute (ISSUE-1) (from t.broyer@gmail.com on 2007-11-09) (from t.broyer@gmail.com on 2007-11-09)
  147. Re: Feedback on the ping='' attribute (ISSUE-1) (from bzbarsky@MIT.EDU on 2007-11-08) (from bzbarsky@MIT.EDU on 2007-11-08)
  148. Re: Feedback on the ping='' attribute (ISSUE-1) (from bzbarsky@MIT.EDU on 2007-11-08) (from bzbarsky@MIT.EDU on 2007-11-08)
  149. Re: Feedback on the ping='' attribute (ISSUE-1) (from distobj@acm.org on 2007-11-08) (from distobj@acm.org on 2007-11-08)
  150. Re: Feedback on the ping='' attribute (ISSUE-1) (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2007-11-08) (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2007-11-08)
  151. Re: Feedback on the ping='' attribute (ISSUE-1) (from bzbarsky@MIT.EDU on 2007-11-08) (from bzbarsky@MIT.EDU on 2007-11-08)
  152. Re: Feedback on the ping='' attribute (ISSUE-1) (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2007-11-08) (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2007-11-08)
  153. Re: Feedback on the ping='' attribute (ISSUE-1) (from bzbarsky@MIT.EDU on 2007-11-08) (from bzbarsky@MIT.EDU on 2007-11-08)
  154. Re: Feedback on the ping='' attribute (ISSUE-1) (from bzbarsky@MIT.EDU on 2007-11-08) (from bzbarsky@MIT.EDU on 2007-11-08)
  155. Re: Feedback on the ping='' attribute (ISSUE-1) (from bzbarsky@MIT.EDU on 2007-11-08) (from bzbarsky@MIT.EDU on 2007-11-08)
  156. Re: Feedback on the ping='' attribute (ISSUE-1) (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2007-11-08) (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2007-11-08)
  157. Re: Feedback on the ping='' attribute (ISSUE-1) (from adam.vandenhoven@gmail.com on 2007-11-08) (from adam.vandenhoven@gmail.com on 2007-11-08)
  158. Re: Feedback on the ping='' attribute (ISSUE-1) (from adam.vandenhoven@gmail.com on 2007-11-08) (from adam.vandenhoven@gmail.com on 2007-11-08)
  159. Re: Feedback on the ping='' attribute (ISSUE-1) (from dimitri.glazkov@gmail.com on 2007-11-08) (from dimitri.glazkov@gmail.com on 2007-11-08)
  160. Re: Feedback on the ping='' attribute (ISSUE-1) (from distobj@acm.org on 2007-11-08) (from distobj@acm.org on 2007-11-08)
  161. Re: Feedback on the ping='' attribute (ISSUE-1) (from raman@google.com on 2007-11-08) (from raman@google.com on 2007-11-08)
  162. Re: Feedback on the ping='' attribute (ISSUE-1) (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2007-11-08) (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2007-11-08)
  163. Re: Feedback on the ping='' attribute (ISSUE-1) (from t.broyer@gmail.com on 2007-11-08) (from t.broyer@gmail.com on 2007-11-08)
  164. Re: Feedback on the ping='' attribute (ISSUE-1) (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2007-11-08) (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2007-11-08)
  165. Re: Feedback on the ping='' attribute (ISSUE-1) (from bzbarsky@MIT.EDU on 2007-11-08) (from bzbarsky@MIT.EDU on 2007-11-08)
  166. Re: Feedback on the ping='' attribute (ISSUE-1) (from distobj@acm.org on 2007-11-08) (from distobj@acm.org on 2007-11-08)
  167. Re: Feedback on the ping='' attribute (ISSUE-1) (from bzbarsky@MIT.EDU on 2007-11-07) (from bzbarsky@MIT.EDU on 2007-11-07)
  168. Re: Feedback on the ping='' attribute (ISSUE-1) (from ian@hixie.ch on 2007-11-07) (from ian@hixie.ch on 2007-11-07)
  169. Re: Feedback on the ping='' attribute (ISSUE-1) (from distobj@acm.org on 2007-11-07) (from distobj@acm.org on 2007-11-07)
  170. Re: Feedback on the ping='' attribute (ISSUE-1) (from adam.vandenhoven@gmail.com on 2007-11-07) (from adam.vandenhoven@gmail.com on 2007-11-07)
  171. Re: Feedback on the ping='' attribute (ISSUE-1) (from bzbarsky@MIT.EDU on 2007-11-07) (from bzbarsky@MIT.EDU on 2007-11-07)
  172. Re: Feedback on the ping='' attribute (ISSUE-1) (from ian@hixie.ch on 2007-11-07) (from ian@hixie.ch on 2007-11-07)
  173. Re: Feedback on the ping='' attribute (ISSUE-1) (from distobj@acm.org on 2007-11-07) (from distobj@acm.org on 2007-11-07)
  174. Re: Feedback on the ping='' attribute (ISSUE-1) (from bzbarsky@MIT.EDU on 2007-11-07) (from bzbarsky@MIT.EDU on 2007-11-07)
  175. Re: Feedback on the ping='' attribute (ISSUE-1) (from distobj@acm.org on 2007-11-07) (from distobj@acm.org on 2007-11-07)
  176. Re: Feedback on the ping='' attribute (ISSUE-1) (from bzbarsky@MIT.EDU on 2007-11-06) (from bzbarsky@MIT.EDU on 2007-11-06)
  177. Re: Feedback on the ping='' attribute (ISSUE-1) (from distobj@acm.org on 2007-11-06) (from distobj@acm.org on 2007-11-06)
  178. Re: Feedback on the ping='' attribute (ISSUE-1) (from fielding@gbiv.com on 2007-11-06) (from fielding@gbiv.com on 2007-11-06)
  179. Re: Feedback on the ping='' attribute (ISSUE-1) (from ian@hixie.ch on 2007-11-06) (from ian@hixie.ch on 2007-11-06)
  180. Re: Feedback on the ping='' attribute (ISSUE-1) (from distobj@acm.org on 2007-11-06) (from distobj@acm.org on 2007-11-06)
  181. Re: Feedback on the ping='' attribute (ISSUE-1) (from ian@hixie.ch on 2007-11-06) (from ian@hixie.ch on 2007-11-06)
  182. Re: Feedback on the ping='' attribute (ISSUE-1) (from distobj@acm.org on 2007-11-06) (from distobj@acm.org on 2007-11-06)
  183. Re: Feedback on the ping='' attribute (ISSUE-1) (from ian@hixie.ch on 2007-11-05) (from ian@hixie.ch on 2007-11-05)
  184. Re: Feedback on the ping='' attribute (ISSUE-1) (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2007-11-04) (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2007-11-04)
  185. Re: Feedback on the ping='' attribute (ISSUE-1) (from distobj@acm.org on 2007-11-04) (from distobj@acm.org on 2007-11-04)
  186. Re: Feedback on the ping='' attribute (ISSUE-1) (from connolly@w3.org on 2007-11-04) (from connolly@w3.org on 2007-11-04)
  187. Re: [whatwg] Feedback on the ping='' attribute (ISSUE-1) (from giecrilj@stegny.2a.pl on 2007-11-03) (from giecrilj@stegny.2a.pl on 2007-11-03)
  188. Re: Feedback on the ping='' attribute (ISSUE-1) (from ian@hixie.ch on 2007-11-03) (from ian@hixie.ch on 2007-11-03)
  189. Re: [whatwg] Feedback on the ping='' attribute (ISSUE-1) (from ian@hixie.ch on 2007-11-03) (from ian@hixie.ch on 2007-11-03)
  190. Re: Feedback on the ping='' attribute (ISSUE-1) (from hsivonen@iki.fi on 2007-11-03) (from hsivonen@iki.fi on 2007-11-03)
  191. Re: Feedback on the ping='' attribute (ISSUE-1) (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2007-11-03) (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2007-11-03)
  192. Re: Feedback on the ping='' attribute (ISSUE-1) (from lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au on 2007-11-03) (from lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au on 2007-11-03)
  193. Re: Feedback on the ping='' attribute (ISSUE-1) (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2007-11-03) (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2007-11-03)
  194. Re: Feedback on the ping='' attribute (ISSUE-1) (from ian@hixie.ch on 2007-11-03) (from ian@hixie.ch on 2007-11-03)
  195. Re: Feedback on the ping='' attribute (ISSUE-1) (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2007-11-03) (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2007-11-03)
  196. Re: Feedback on the ping='' attribute (ISSUE-1) (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2007-11-03) (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2007-11-03)
  197. Re: Feedback on the ping='' attribute (ISSUE-1) (from hsivonen@iki.fi on 2007-11-03) (from hsivonen@iki.fi on 2007-11-03)
  198. Re: Feedback on the ping='' attribute (ISSUE-1) (from ian@hixie.ch on 2007-11-03) (from ian@hixie.ch on 2007-11-03)
  199. Re: Feedback on the ping='' attribute (ISSUE-1) (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2007-11-03) (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2007-11-03)
  200. Re: Feedback on the ping='' attribute (ISSUE-1) (from bzbarsky@MIT.EDU on 2007-11-02) (from bzbarsky@MIT.EDU on 2007-11-02)
  201. Feedback on the ping='' attribute (ISSUE-1) (from ian@hixie.ch on 2007-11-02) (from ian@hixie.ch on 2007-11-02)
  202. ISSUE-1 (PINGPOST): hyperlink auditing requires use of unsafe HTTP method (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2007-11-02) (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2007-11-02)

Related notes:

Related mailing list thread starts with <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2007Oct/0337.html>.

Julian Reschke, 2 Nov 2007, 15:25:01

According to <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2007Oct/0344.html>, the rational for using POST actually was that following the link is considered an unsafe operation, because it may result in money being exchanged -- for instance because the link being followed was an advertisement.

Julian Reschke, 2 Nov 2007, 15:32:43

Julian says we have made no new progress on this.

Michael[tm] Smith, 19 Jun 2008, 16:57:17

MikeSmith to take this to group for resolution

Michael[tm] Smith, 19 Jun 2008, 17:01:54

see also ISSUE-2 re requirement for ping

demoting unscheduled issues to RAISED as discussed in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-wg-issue-tracking/2008Aug/0005.html

Dan Connolly, 22 Aug 2008, 15:34:59

Moved to Open based on submitted Change Proposal.

Maciej Stachowiak, 6 Dec 2009, 02:11:47

Spec changes have now been made. Closed by consensus to adopt a Change Proposal.

Maciej Stachowiak, 4 Mar 2010, 21:50:39


Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, Chairs, Michael[tm] Smith <mike@w3.org>, Staff Contact
Tracker: documentation, (configuration for this group), originally developed by Dean Jackson, is developed and maintained by the Systems Team <w3t-sys@w3.org>.
$Id: index.php,v 1.323 2013-12-19 14:47:09 dom Exp $