ACTION-68

2008-06-26 16:25:23: Editor's Draft spec pointer: http://www.w3.org/html/wg/html5/#urls [Shawn Medero]

2008-07-10 14:37:14: done: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2008Jun/0335.html
This response was particularly helpful:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2008Jun/0353.html
[Dan Connolly]

2008-07-17 15:22:31: in 10 July discussion, this action expanded a little
http://www.w3.org/2008/07/10-html-wg-minutes.html

didn't finish it this week. darn. [Dan Connolly]

2008-07-31 15:56:08: made some progress on this; still working on it. [Dan Connolly]

2008-08-14 15:25:52: ugh... this is taking forever. [Dan Connolly]

2008-10-23 07:29:54: very little progress [Dan Connolly]

2008-12-02 22:01:09: still negotiating my availability for HTML WG stuff [Dan Connolly]

2008-12-16 21:54:11: still working in this general area, somewhat slowly [Dan Connolly]

2009-01-05 21:11:10: other stuff seems to take priority this week [Dan Connolly]

2009-01-16 16:39:41: Jan 06 19:04:28 <Hixie> danc: if you are still around, the earlier question was http://krijnhoetmer.nl/irc-logs/html-wg/20090106#l-20
Jan 06 19:04:31 <pimpbot> Title: IRC logs: w3c / #html-wg / 20090106 (at krijnhoetmer.nl)
Jan 06 19:04:42 * DanC takes a look...
Jan 06 19:05:13 <DanC> yes, I'm still interested in doing something with the URL section
Jan 06 19:06:02 <DanC> it's fallen below a few other things (in particular: lining up funding for half my time) but I hope to get to it RSN
Jan 06 19:06:22 <Hixie> cool
Jan 06 19:06:26 <Hixie> any idea of a timeline?
Jan 06 19:06:36 <DanC> hmm
Jan 06 19:06:45 <Hixie> i'm looking at splitting the relevant bits out by march
Jan 06 19:07:52 <DanC> I'd like to have something in a few weeks, so march seems straightforward
Jan 06 19:07:58 <Hixie> cool
Jan 06 19:08:54 <DanC> I haven't taken the shortest path to the target; I'm doing some coding/testing while I'm at it.
Jan 06 19:09:06 <Hixie> makes sense
Jan 06 19:09:15 <Hixie> i'm sure that section can be dramatically improved
Jan 06 19:09:38 <Hixie> how much of section 2.5 are you planning on taking out?
Jan 06 19:10:05 <Hixie> all of 2.5.1, 2.5.2, and 2.5.3? or some subset thereof?
Jan 06 19:10:47 <DanC> hmm... not sure about "2.5.4 Dynamic changes to base URLs"
Jan 06 19:11:07 <Hixie> yeah i think 2.5.4 and 2.5.5 should stay in html5
Jan 06 19:11:19 <Hixie> well 2.5.5 might go to webapps, but that's another issue
Jan 06 19:11:33 <DanC> but yeah, up to "2.5.3 Resolving URLs" looks like it can come out...
Jan 06 19:11:51 * dbaron has quit (Quit: 8403864 bytes have been tenured, next gc will be global.)
Jan 06 19:13:01 <Hixie> i guess the base URL and document base URL definitions should also stay in html5 somehow
Jan 06 19:13:14 <Hixie> we'll have to come up with an "interface" between the two drafts
Jan 06 19:14:18 <Hixie> ok cool [Dan Connolly]

2009-01-16 16:41:35: was: develop expected results for http://hixie.ch/tests/adhoc/uri/encoding/ tests [Dan Connolly]

2009-03-09 22:29:14: some testing work: http://homer.w3.org/~connolly/projects/urlp/raw-file/tip/tinker.html [Dan Connolly]

2009-03-12 16:27:27: looked at LEIRIs with HST http://homer.w3.org/~connolly/projects/urlp/rev/60c6a260898b

made a plan and blocked out some time to get something to show 17-20 March [Dan Connolly]