ISSUE-26: glossary to be added to the document?
glossary
glossary to be added to the document?
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- Group Note 1 -- General
- Raised by:
- José Manuel Alonso
- Opened on:
- 2009-04-23
- Description:
- Some have suggested this, as an example Anna Zhuang suggested:
"You may consider putting together an achronym list and explain all abbreviations there and even add links to standards or whatever applicable. You can also have a glossary."
- Related Actions Items:
ACTION-56 on Sharron Rush to Start glossary related to ISSUE-26 - due 2009-05-04, closed- Related emails:
- Re: ISO 639 Cookbook was ... LD? algorithm and questions. (from gannon_dick@yahoo.com on 2012-03-27)
- Re: ISO 639 Cookbook was ... LD? algorithm and questions. (from konstant@iit.demokritos.gr on 2012-03-27)
- [minutes] eGov IG call, 29 April 2009 (from josema@w3.org on 2009-04-29)
- Re: PDF's usefulness to the semantic web (from josema@w3.org on 2009-04-24)
- Re: Multi-Channel Section . Reinforced the re-use of government information (from josema@w3.org on 2009-04-23)
- ISSUE-26 (glossary): glossary to be added to the document? [Group Note 1 -- General] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2009-04-23)
Related notes:
[josema]: see ACTION-56
29 Apr 2009, 13:43:25ACTION-56 opened to develop the glossary as agreed
ISSUE closed
Display change log