As following is my reply for “Korean bank” use-case – Rejected? by Anders Rundgren. In conclusion, I think new charter includes Korean usecase too.
2011/12/8 Anders Rundgren > This use-case (in order to be meaningful) covers all aspects of a key's life: > from enrollment, to usage, renewals and revocation. This can be separated primary and secondary area. Mos impoartant part of Korean use-cases is generationg of *digital signature* with user certificate in anywhere. Key management can be served by third party extensions or oneself in key manament option in browers. > I do not think this group is properly equipped to deal with such a wide scope > but if somebody wants to take it up, please do! If someone can afford to try to do, I think it can be do this in working group too. Many crypto-geeks can be volunteers. BTW, where is VeriSign? :) > Experiences from other consortium's like the Information Card Foundation > indicates that the interest in publicly dealing with on-line banking technology > is moderate; it has always been a "consultant paradise". You're right. There are many companies to support banks technically in Korea too. But, many counties have already "law" for digital signature, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_signatures_and_law. It means it's standards area in web applications too. Channy