ISSUE-93: What should the requirements be for specifications produced by more than one WG?

joint specs

What should the requirements be for specifications produced by more than one WG?

State:

OPEN

Product:

Process Document

Raised by:

Charles 'chaals' (McCathie) Nevile

Opened on:

2014-04-23

Description:

Liam Quin raised this question in the context of his Chapter 7 review.

There is a requirement in chapter 7 that editor's be a member of *the* Working Group, but there are a number of specifications that are actually produced as a joint deliverable of two (or more?) groups.

This touches on Patent Policy, Chapter 7, and perhaps other parts of the process too - what is the decision-making process for such specs...

Related Actions Items:

No related actions

Related emails:

1. List of Process Document Issue Not Currently Covered in the Process 2015 Draft being reviewed (from szilles@adobe.com on 2015-02-08)
2. Summary of Resolutions re Process 2015 (from szilles@adobe.com on 2015-01-13)
3. Agenda Process Document Task Force 6 January 2015a (from szilles@adobe.com on 2015-01-04)
4. Agenda Process Document Task Force 16 December 2014; Last Telcon of 2014; correcting the date (from szilles@adobe.com on 2014-12-16)
5. Agenda Process Document Task Force 17 December 2014; Last Telcon of 2014 (from szilles@adobe.com on 2014-12-15)
6. Agenda Process Document Task Force 10 December 2014 (from szilles@adobe.com on 2014-12-08)
7. Re: Agenda Process Task Force Telcon on 14 October (from chaals@yandex-team.ru on 2014-10-14)
8. Re: Feedback from Liam Quin - Fwd: Re: Staff contacts review of draft Chapter 7 revision (from chaals@yandex-team.ru on 2014-04-23)
9. w3process-ISSUE-93 (joint specs): What should the requirements be for specifications produced by more than one WG? (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2014-04-23)

Related notes:

Display change log