ISSUE-85: Make editorial changes a may or should?

editorial changes

Make editorial changes a may or should?

State:
CLOSED
Product:
Document life cycle (pre 2014 chapter 7, now chapter 6)
Raised by:
Jeff Jaffe
Opened on:
2014-02-07
Description:
Jeff raised this in private email.

As he notes, "the community appreciates information about minor changes" isn't really in the general spirit of the document setting requirements. We could instead make a may or should requirement that editorial changes be noted.
Related Actions Items:
No related actions
Related emails:
  1. Re: w3process-ISSUE-85 (editorial changes): Make editorial changes a may or should? [Document life cycle (ch 7)] (from chaals@yandex-team.ru on 2014-02-14)
  2. w3process-ISSUE-85 (editorial changes): Make editorial changes a may or should? [Document life cycle (ch 7)] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2014-02-07)

Related notes:

No additional notes.

Display change log ATOM feed


David Singer <singer@apple.com>, Chair, Dominique Hazaƫl-Massieux <dom@w3.org>, Staff Contact
Tracker: documentation, (configuration for this group), originally developed by Dean Jackson, is developed and maintained by the Systems Team <w3t-sys@w3.org>.
$Id: 85.html,v 1.1 2020/03/09 13:50:20 carcone Exp $