ISSUE-78: Requirements for public discussion and wide review of rescindment request are redundant

Redundant Rescindment Requirements

Requirements for public discussion and wide review of rescindment request are redundant

State:
CLOSED
Product:
Document life cycle (pre 2014 chapter 7, now chapter 6)
Raised by:
Ian Jacobs
Opened on:
2013-12-12
Description:
In relation to the section on rescinding recommendations Ian wrote in http://www.w3.org/mid/CFE36B99-1937-41DD-999B-7F9A6B4C22ED@w3.org>

There is confusion in this section about requests and proposals. For example,
the document says:

"In addition a Working Group proposing to rescind
must show that the request to rescind has received wide review"

What wide review are we talking about? Does this mean that there
needs to have been some discussion BEFORE the group requests that the
spec be rescinded? If so then the second bullet, which says "the
request to rescind is based on public comment" covers that. If "wide review"
refers to the review period about to start, then I don't understand.

I propose to actually remove the should requirement. At least one of them is pretty much redundant...
Related Actions Items:
No related actions
Related emails:
  1. Re: Ian Jacobs comments [Was: New draft - please review] (from ij@w3.org on 2014-02-17)
  2. Re: Ian Jacobs comments [Was: New draft - please review] (from chaals@yandex-team.ru on 2014-02-17)
  3. Re: Ian Jacobs comments [Was: New draft - please review] (from szilles@adobe.com on 2014-02-15)
  4. Re: Ian Jacobs comments [Was: New draft - please review] (from ij@w3.org on 2014-02-14)
  5. Re: Ian Jacobs comments [Was: New draft - please review] (from chaals@yandex-team.ru on 2014-02-14)
  6. Re: Ian Jacobs comments [Was: New draft - please review] (from ij@w3.org on 2014-02-14)
  7. Re: Ian Jacobs comments [Was: New draft - please review] (from chaals@yandex-team.ru on 2014-02-14)
  8. Minutes and summary of 3 February 2014 Chapter 7 Revision Task Force teleconference (from coralie@w3.org on 2014-02-04)
  9. [minutes] and summary of 27 January 2014 Revising W3C Process Community Group Teleconference (from coralie@w3.org on 2014-01-27)
  10. w3process-ISSUE-78 (Redundant Rescindment Requirements): Requirements for public discussion and wide review of rescindment request are redundant [Document life cycle (ch 7)] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2013-12-12)

Related notes:

I agree this should be clarified

Charles 'chaals' (McCathie) Nevile, 22 Jan 2014, 12:41:56

RESOLVED: the bullet "should show that the request to rescind is based on public comment" in section 7.8 is dropped.

Steve Zilles, 27 Jan 2014, 16:48:21

Redundant requirement was removed in 2 February editor's draft.

Steve Zilles, 3 Feb 2014, 16:15:12

Display change log ATOM feed


David Singer <singer@apple.com>, Chair, Dominique Hazaƫl-Massieux <dom@w3.org>, Staff Contact
Tracker: documentation, (configuration for this group), originally developed by Dean Jackson, is developed and maintained by the Systems Team <w3t-sys@w3.org>.
$Id: 78.html,v 1.1 2020/03/09 13:50:17 carcone Exp $