ISSUE-69: Chapter 7: get Wide Review of Chapter 7 from other SDOs

Ch7-Get-Review-from-SDOs

Chapter 7: get Wide Review of Chapter 7 from other SDOs

State:
CLOSED
Product:
Document life cycle (pre 2014 chapter 7, now chapter 6)
Raised by:
Arthur Barstow
Opened on:
2013-11-27
Description:
This was raised in:

[[
<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-w3process/2013Nov/0062.html>.

Since a number of SDOs (IETF, etc.) reference W3C standards, what is the
plan to get those SDOs to review the Draft of Chapter 7?

One potential issue for organizations that reference W3C standards based
on Process-20151014 is if they explicitly cite/reference any of the
maturity levels that are proposed to be deleted (i.e. LC and PR).
]]

Before the proposal is ratified by the Director, SDOs that reference W3C spec should be asked to review the proposal as well as a heads-up that:

1. LC is deleted

2. PR is deleted

3. Groups have a requirement to seek review but each group can define their own process to do the review.
Related Actions Items:
No related actions
Related emails:
  1. Minutes and summary of 3 February 2014 Chapter 7 Revision Task Force teleconference (from coralie@w3.org on 2014-02-04)
  2. Re: Agenda for Chapter 7 Task Force Telcon, 8AM Pacific, 11AM Eastern, 3 February (from chaals@yandex-team.ru on 2014-02-03)
  3. Re: Agenda for Chapter 7 Task Force Telcon, 8AM Pacific, 11AM Eastern, 3 February (from chaals@yandex-team.ru on 2014-02-03)
  4. Agenda for Chapter 7 Task Force Telcon, 8AM Pacific, 11AM Eastern, 3 February (from szilles@adobe.com on 2014-02-02)
  5. Re: getting external review of W3C process changes (from chaals@yandex-team.ru on 2013-12-05)
  6. Re: w3process-ISSUE-69 (Ch7-Get-Review-from-SDOs): Chapter 7: get Wide Review of Chapter 7 from other SDOs [Document life cycle (ch 7)] (from chaals@yandex-team.ru on 2013-12-01)
  7. w3process-ISSUE-69 (Ch7-Get-Review-from-SDOs): Chapter 7: get Wide Review of Chapter 7 from other SDOs [Document life cycle (ch 7)] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2013-11-27)

Related notes:

CLOSE: Independent SDOs do not review their proposed Process changes with other SDOs and the Chapter 7 changes do not reduce Review opportunities. Since our status as a PAS submitter depends on our process, we should get a review by ISO/IEC JTC 1 when we have a complete revised Process Document.

Steve Zilles, 3 Feb 2014, 16:25:25

Display change log ATOM feed


David Singer <singer@apple.com>, Chair, Dominique Hazaƫl-Massieux <dom@w3.org>, Staff Contact
Tracker: documentation, (configuration for this group), originally developed by Dean Jackson, is developed and maintained by the Systems Team <w3t-sys@w3.org>.
$Id: 69.html,v 1.1 2020/03/09 13:50:13 carcone Exp $