ISSUE-46: Publish and explain if 6 months pass with no change

explain heartbeat-only

Publish and explain if 6 months pass with no change

State:

CLOSED

Product:

Document life cycle (pre 2014 chapter 7, now chapter 6)

Raised by:

Charles 'chaals' (McCathie) Nevile

Opened on:

2013-10-09

Description:

Chris Lilley in email[1] proposed that the default criterion for a new draft should be when there are significant changes that would benefit from review (was already a criteria), and seperating the "should publish every 6 months" criterion, adding a "should explain why nothing changed" if nothing changed in 6 months.

Related Actions Items:

No related actions

Related emails:

1. Re: Suggested change to Revised Public Working Drafts section (from chaals@yandex-team.ru on 2013-10-10)
2. New Editor's draft, Chapter 7 (from chaals@yandex-team.ru on 2013-10-10)
3. Re: Suggested change to Revised Public Working Drafts section (from chris@w3.org on 2013-10-10)
4. Re: Suggested change to Revised Public Working Drafts section (from chaals@yandex-team.ru on 2013-10-10)
5. w3process-ISSUE-46 (explain heartbeat-only): Publish and explain if 6 months pass with no change [Document life cycle (ch 7)] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2013-10-09)

Related notes:

Display change log