ISSUE-41: Remove the "Review of corrections" process?

Reviewing corrections

Remove the "Review of corrections" process?

State:
CLOSED
Product:
Document life cycle (pre 2014 chapter 7, now chapter 6)
Raised by:
Ian Jacobs
Opened on:
2013-10-03
Description:
Currently the process allows errata to be reviewed, and attain normative status. This has not been useful in practice, and instead Edited Recommendations are published when required.

Removing this process would mean implementing the following two proposals in Ian's mail http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-w3process/2013Sep/0018.html for changes to section 7.6.1:

a) "An errata page MAY include both proposed and normative
corrections. The Working Group MUST clearly identify which
corrections are proposed and which are normative." I think this is
a bug. The corrections only become normative once included in the
specification. I suggest deleting the sentences.

b) Please delete all the text related to "Call for Review of
Proposed Corrections." This bit of process has never been used
and the odds that it will be are very low.
Related Actions Items:
No related actions
Related emails:
  1. Re: Comments on 23 September Editor's Draft of Chapter 7 (from chaals@yandex-team.ru on 2013-10-03)
  2. w3process-ISSUE-41 (Reviewing corrections): Remove the "Review of corrections" process? (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2013-10-03)

Related notes:

Removed in the current editor's draft 2013-10-03

Charles 'chaals' (McCathie) Nevile, 3 Oct 2013, 18:05:49

Display change log ATOM feed


David Singer <singer@apple.com>, Chair, Dominique Hazaƫl-Massieux <dom@w3.org>, Staff Contact
Tracker: documentation, (configuration for this group), originally developed by Dean Jackson, is developed and maintained by the Systems Team <w3t-sys@w3.org>.
$Id: 41.html,v 1.1 2020/03/09 13:50:00 carcone Exp $