ISSUE-4: Is a patent policy for WGs and a different one for CGs an optimal approach?

2 patent policies

Is a patent policy for WGs and a different one for CGs an optimal approach?

State:

OPEN

Product:

AC/member workload

Raised by:

Charles 'chaals' (McCathie) Nevile

Opened on:

2012-03-06

Description:

Following a thread on the current state of Patent Policy and how much work it creates for members and their AC rep. Two policies means understanding both, and making sure to be clear on which one applies for a given exercise.

Related Actions Items:

• ACTION-11 on Jeff Jaffe to Send Reminder to all CG Chairs re Requirement for IP Provenance Tracking - due 2013-10-10, closed

Related emails:

1. List of Issue in the Revising the W3C Process Tracket that are Not Currently viewed as being In Scope for the Process Document TF (from szilles@adobe.com on 2015-02-08)
2. Re: Agenda Process Document Task Force 13 January 2015a (from chaals@yandex-team.ru on 2015-01-13)
3. Re: Patent Policy issues... (from jeff@w3.org on 2012-03-12)
4. Re: Patent Policy issues... (from chaals@opera.com on 2012-03-12)
5. Re: Patent Policy issues... (from jeff@w3.org on 2012-03-06)
6. Patent Policy issues... (from chaals@opera.com on 2012-03-06)

Related notes:

Display change log