ISSUE-38: Add a should requirement to document known implementation

documenting implementation

Add a should requirement to document known implementation

State:

CLOSED

Product:

Document life cycle (pre 2014 chapter 7, now chapter 6)

Raised by:

Charles 'chaals' (McCathie) Nevile

Opened on:

2013-07-23

Description:

There is currently a should requirement to document known implementation at LCCR / Rec. It actually seems like it should be a general requirement.

Related Actions Items:

No related actions

Related emails:

1. RE: New draft of chapter 7 proposal (from szilles@adobe.com on 2013-09-19)
2. Re: AB transparency with the ProcDoc? Yeah, right [Was: Re: New draft of chapter 7 proposal] (from chaals@yandex-team.ru on 2013-09-18)
3. AB transparency with the ProcDoc? Yeah, right [Was: Re: New draft of chapter 7 proposal] (from art.barstow@nokia.com on 2013-09-18)
4. New draft of chapter 7 proposal (from chaals@yandex-team.ru on 2013-09-18)
5. Re: Revision 3: ACTION-4: determining sufficient implementation experience exists (from chaals@yandex-team.ru on 2013-09-18)
6. resolving ISSUE-38 - document known implementations (from chaals@yandex-team.ru on 2013-09-18)
7. RE: w3process-ISSUE-38 (documenting implementation): Add a should requirement to document known implementation [Document life cycle (ch 7)] (from masinter@adobe.com on 2013-08-12)
8. RE: w3process-ISSUE-38 (documenting implementation): Add a should requirement to document known implementation [Document life cycle (ch 7)] (from szilles@adobe.com on 2013-08-11)
9. RE: w3process-ISSUE-38 (documenting implementation): Add a should requirement to document known implementation [Document life cycle (ch 7)] (from masinter@adobe.com on 2013-08-10)
10. w3process-ISSUE-38 (documenting implementation): Add a should requirement to document known implementation [Document life cycle (ch 7)] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2013-07-23)

Related notes:

Display change log