ISSUE-100: Should it be possible to publish a pr before a call for exclusion ends

PR in exclusion period

Should it be possible to publish a pr before a call for exclusion ends

State:
CLOSED
Product:
Document life cycle (pre 2014 chapter 7, now chapter 6)
Raised by:
Charles 'chaals' (McCathie) Nevile
Opened on:
2014-06-12
Description:
The process doesn't have a requirement that W3C do not move a document to PR (or even Rec, although this requires very precisely meeting all time restrictions as deadlines). Should it do so?
Related Actions Items:
No related actions
Related emails:
  1. RE: ISSUE-100 (from szilles@adobe.com on 2015-11-17)
  2. Re: ISSUE-100 (from chaals@yandex-team.ru on 2015-11-17)
  3. RE: ISSUE-100 (from szilles@adobe.com on 2015-11-17)
  4. ISSUE-100 (from chaals@yandex-team.ru on 2015-11-13)
  5. Re: Agenda Process Document Task Force Tuesday, 17 March 2015 (from chaals@yandex-team.ru on 2015-03-16)
  6. Agenda Process Document Task Force Tuesday, 17 March 2015 (from szilles@adobe.com on 2015-03-16)
  7. Re: ISSUE-100 - going to PR with open exclusions (from singer@apple.com on 2015-03-10)
  8. Re: ISSUE-100 - going to PR with open exclusions (from art.barstow@gmail.com on 2015-03-10)
  9. ISSUE-100 - going to PR with open exclusions (from chaals@yandex-team.ru on 2015-03-10)
  10. Agenda Process Document Task Force 3 March 2015 (from szilles@adobe.com on 2015-03-02)
  11. Re: Agenda Process Document Task Force 24 February 2015 (from singer@apple.com on 2015-02-24)
  12. Agenda Process Document Task Force 24 February 2015 (from szilles@adobe.com on 2015-02-24)
  13. Agenda Process Document Task Force 24 February 2015 (from szilles@adobe.com on 2015-02-24)
  14. List of Process Document Issue Not Currently Covered in the Process 2015 Draft being reviewed (from szilles@adobe.com on 2015-02-08)
  15. Re: Agenda Process Document Task Force 27 January 2015 (from wayne.carr@linux.intel.com on 2015-01-28)
  16. Re: Agenda Process Document Task Force 27 January 2015 (from singer@apple.com on 2015-01-28)
  17. Re: Agenda Process Document Task Force 27 January 2015 (from chaals@yandex-team.ru on 2015-01-28)
  18. Re: Agenda Process Document Task Force 27 January 2015 (from singer@apple.com on 2015-01-28)
  19. Re: Agenda Process Document Task Force 27 January 2015 (from wayne.carr@linux.intel.com on 2015-01-27)
  20. Re: Agenda Process Document Task Force 27 January 2015 (from singer@apple.com on 2015-01-27)
  21. Agenda Process Document Task Force 27 January 2015 (from szilles@adobe.com on 2015-01-26)
  22. Re: Agenda Process Document Task Force 20 January 2015a (from singer@apple.com on 2015-01-19)
  23. Agenda Process Document Task Force 20 January 2015a (from szilles@adobe.com on 2015-01-19)
  24. Re: Agenda Process Document Task Force 13 January 2015a (from chaals@yandex-team.ru on 2015-01-13)
  25. call is at 1500Z (not 1400) EoM Re: Agenda Process Document Task Force 13 January 2015a (from chaals@yandex-team.ru on 2015-01-13)
  26. Agenda Process Document Task Force 13 January 2015a (from szilles@adobe.com on 2015-01-12)
  27. Agenda Process Document Task Force 16 December 2014; Last Telcon of 2014; correcting the date (from szilles@adobe.com on 2014-12-16)
  28. Agenda Process Document Task Force 17 December 2014; Last Telcon of 2014 (from szilles@adobe.com on 2014-12-15)
  29. Agenda Process Document Task Force 10 December 2014 (from szilles@adobe.com on 2014-12-08)
  30. Re: Issue-100 - proceeding with open exclusion periods (from wayne.carr@linux.intel.com on 2014-11-26)
  31. RE: Issue-100 - proceeding with open exclusion periods (from szilles@adobe.com on 2014-11-26)
  32. Re: Issue-100 - proceeding with open exclusion periods (from chaals@yandex-team.ru on 2014-11-26)
  33. Re: Issue-100 - proceeding with open exclusion periods (from wayne.carr@linux.intel.com on 2014-11-26)
  34. Issue-100 - proceeding with open exclusion periods (from chaals@yandex-team.ru on 2014-11-26)
  35. Re: incubation in CGs and W3C Notes when a WG drops work on a spec - was: Re: Comments on https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/AB/raw-file/5508dec95a6a/tr.html (from wayne.carr@linux.intel.com on 2014-06-19)
  36. Re: incubation in CGs and W3C Notes when a WG drops work on a spec - was: Re: Comments on https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/AB/raw-file/5508dec95a6a/tr.html (from singer@apple.com on 2014-06-19)
  37. RE: incubation in CGs and W3C Notes when a WG drops work on a spec - was: Re: Comments on https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/AB/raw-file/5508dec95a6a/tr.html (from Michael.Champion@microsoft.com on 2014-06-19)
  38. Re: incubation in CGs and W3C Notes when a WG drops work on a spec - was: Re: Comments on https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/AB/raw-file/5508dec95a6a/tr.html (from wayne.carr@linux.intel.com on 2014-06-19)
  39. Re: incubation in CGs and W3C Notes when a WG drops work on a spec - was: Re: Comments on https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/AB/raw-file/5508dec95a6a/tr.html (from singer@apple.com on 2014-06-19)
  40. Re: Comments on https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/AB/raw-file/5508dec95a6a/tr.html (from singer@apple.com on 2014-06-19)
  41. incubation in CGs and W3C Notes when a WG drops work on a spec - was: Re: Comments on https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/AB/raw-file/5508dec95a6a/tr.html (from wayne.carr@linux.intel.com on 2014-06-18)
  42. RE: Comments on https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/AB/raw-file/5508dec95a6a/tr.html (from Michael.Champion@microsoft.com on 2014-06-18)
  43. Re: Comments on https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/AB/raw-file/5508dec95a6a/tr.html (from singer@apple.com on 2014-06-18)
  44. Re: Comments on https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/AB/raw-file/5508dec95a6a/tr.html (from wayne.carr@linux.intel.com on 2014-06-18)
  45. Re: Comments on https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/AB/raw-file/5508dec95a6a/tr.html (from chaals@yandex-team.ru on 2014-06-18)
  46. w3process-ISSUE-100 (PR in exclusion period): Should it be possible to publish a pr before a call for exclusion ends [Document life cycle (ch 7)] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2014-06-12)

Related notes:

Not sure if this related PP FAQ entry has been associated with this issue:
http://www.w3.org/2003/12/22-pp-faq.html#mult-exclusions

Ian Jacobs, 12 Jun 2014, 13:31:43

I don't think I created this issue so changing `Raised By` to Chaals. Sorry Chaals :-).

If you can show evidence re who raised it, please let me know and I'll change it.

If it turns out I did indeed create this issue, I'll close it now because I think this is already (rightfully) practiced.

Arthur Barstow, 8 Dec 2014, 17:31:00

Display change log ATOM feed

David Singer <singer@apple.com>, Chair, Dominique Hazaël-Massieux <dom@w3.org>, Staff Contact
Tracker: documentation, (configuration for this group), originally developed by Dean Jackson, is developed and maintained by the Systems Team <w3t-sys@w3.org>.
$Id: 100.html,v 1.1 2020/03/09 13:49:11 carcone Exp $