<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!-- generator="b2evolution/1.10.2" -->
<rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"					xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel rdf:about="http://www.w3.org/blog/powder">
	<title>POWDER Working Group Blog - Last comments</title>
	<link>http://www.w3.org/blog/powder?disp=comments</link>
	<description></description>
	<dc:language>en-EU</dc:language>
	<admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://b2evolution.net/?v=1.10.2"/>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<sy:updateBase>2000-01-01T12:00+00:00</sy:updateBase>
	<items>
		<rdf:Seq>
					<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/blog/powder/2008/11/25/meeting_summary_13_october_2008#c3759"/>
						<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/blog/powder/2008/09/22/outreach_event_report_september_2008#c3738"/>
						<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/blog/powder/2007/11/10/summary_of_face_to_face_meeting_held_dur_2007#c1354"/>
						<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/blog/powder/2007/11/10/summary_of_face_to_face_meeting_held_dur_2007#c1341"/>
					</rdf:Seq>
	</items>
</channel>
<item rdf:about="http://www.w3.org/blog/powder/2008/11/25/meeting_summary_13_october_2008#c3759">
	<title>In response to: Meeting Summary  13 October 2008</title>
	<link>http://www.w3.org/blog/powder/2008/11/25/meeting_summary_13_october_2008#c3759</link>
	<dc:date>2008-11-26T18:00:20Z</dc:date>
	<dc:creator>Dan Brickley [Visitor]</dc:creator>
	<description>But the DC properties aren't Annotation Properties either. Are you relying on the Dublin Core site avoiding certain RDFS/OWL constructs forever? This would probably be a mistake.

I could remove the owl:Thing statement from FOAF but I'm not completely convinced this is necessary. Could you post the full reasoning behind this at a public URL? </description>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[But the DC properties aren't Annotation Properties either. Are you relying on the Dublin Core site avoiding certain RDFS/OWL constructs forever? This would probably be a mistake.<br />
<br />
I could remove the owl:Thing statement from FOAF but I'm not completely convinced this is necessary. Could you post the full reasoning behind this at a public URL? ]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.w3.org/blog/powder/2008/09/22/outreach_event_report_september_2008#c3738">
	<title>In response to: Outreach Event Report September 2008</title>
	<link>http://www.w3.org/blog/powder/2008/09/22/outreach_event_report_september_2008#c3738</link>
	<dc:date>2008-11-23T09:22:23Z</dc:date>
	<dc:creator>Matt [Visitor]</dc:creator>
	<description>"Can a machine trust a machine?" with a definitive answer of NO from POWDER is encouraging.
Until computers are able to detect nuance and intonation then there is always the possibility of deceit, and this is something that is only inherently capable by a person.  However I do think that there will be a time when a computer can trust a website's intent after analysis of the total content.  
It will be interesting to see this in action sometime in the future.</description>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA["Can a machine trust a machine?" with a definitive answer of NO from POWDER is encouraging.<br />
Until computers are able to detect nuance and intonation then there is always the possibility of deceit, and this is something that is only inherently capable by a person.  However I do think that there will be a time when a computer can trust a website's intent after analysis of the total content.  <br />
It will be interesting to see this in action sometime in the future.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.w3.org/blog/powder/2007/11/10/summary_of_face_to_face_meeting_held_dur_2007#c1354">
	<title>In response to: Summary of Face to Face meeting held during TPAC, 8 – 9 November 2007</title>
	<link>http://www.w3.org/blog/powder/2007/11/10/summary_of_face_to_face_meeting_held_dur_2007#c1354</link>
	<dc:date>2007-11-14T09:26:20Z</dc:date>
	<dc:creator>Kjetil Kjernsmo [Visitor]</dc:creator>
	<description>Hi Phil!

It is very interesting how things like that happen! It is good to note the progress, and interesting to follow the new ideas!

Cheers,

Kjetil</description>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[Hi Phil!<br />
<br />
It is very interesting how things like that happen! It is good to note the progress, and interesting to follow the new ideas!<br />
<br />
Cheers,<br />
<br />
Kjetil]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.w3.org/blog/powder/2007/11/10/summary_of_face_to_face_meeting_held_dur_2007#c1341">
	<title>In response to: Summary of Face to Face meeting held during TPAC, 8 – 9 November 2007</title>
	<link>http://www.w3.org/blog/powder/2007/11/10/summary_of_face_to_face_meeting_held_dur_2007#c1341</link>
	<dc:date>2007-11-12T08:56:27Z</dc:date>
	<dc:creator>Kai Scheppe [Visitor]</dc:creator>
	<description>Hi Phil,
Thanks for this good summary of the meeting.

Regards,
Kai</description>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[Hi Phil,<br />
Thanks for this good summary of the meeting.<br />
<br />
Regards,<br />
Kai]]></content:encoded>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>
