Mobile Web Best Practices Working Group News

First public draft of mobileOK Basic — 13 November 2006

Back in July, we published the first document describing the mobileOK mark. Since then, we worked very hard on refining tests and re-designing our levels separation, and the results of all this work is the publication as a separate document of mobileOK Basic Tests 1.0: it describes our current thinking on what the first level of mobileOK (thus now called "mobileOK Basic") should be, in other words, what we think any serious mobile web site should do to make their users' life happier (on the mobile web, at least).

This publication as a separate document doesn't mean we're abandoning work on the full mobileOK mark, which will include all the tests derived from Mobile Web Best Practices, but given the breadth of the work needed to define tests that are both useful, precise and well-targeted, we thought it more useful to focus on our first level first. Given that by design, all the tests in this level are machine-testable, we're also hoping it will be easier to write these tests, and easier to have them checked by quality tools, and thus, in the end, easier for content developers to pass them.

While we still have quite a bit of work to finish some of the tests and clarify existing ones, we're very much looking for feedback on the general direction, and especially to assess whether we're setting the bar too high or too low this basic level. Please send any feedback you would have on the document to public-bpwg-comments@w3.org!

Dominique Hazael-Massieux 4 comments Permalink

Comments, Pingbacks:

Comment from: Sameer [Visitor]
I wonder if any statistics of mark-up languages supported by mobile browsers or devices are available? And number of "active" users using them?

rgds
/sameeer
PermalinkPermalink 2007-01-03 @ 17:22
Comment from: Dominique Hazael-Massieux [Member] · http://www.w3.org/People/Dom/

The mark up languaged supported by mobile browsers and devices is at least partly available in WURFL (http://wurfl.sourceforge.net/); from our own tests, even the latest version of XHTML Basic (1.1) is fairly well supported in well-deployed browsers/devices (http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/techs/XhtmlBasic11Support).

I don't think any one has provided us firm data on this corrolated with active users for the said devices and browsers.

PermalinkPermalink 2007-01-04 @ 09:04
Comment from: Andy James [Visitor]
How much time left for these tests to be completed? Would it still be in process for much longer time? Is there any official finish date?
PermalinkPermalink 2007-07-09 @ 09:28
Comment from: Dominique Hazael-Massieux [Member] · http://www.w3.org/People/Dom/
The document has gone through a second last call, which in terms of the W3C Process is a rather good sign; it's hard to make an accurate prediction as to when it may get finished, but it should be before the end of the year 2007.
PermalinkPermalink 2007-07-09 @ 09:53

Contacts: Daniel Appelquist, Jo Rabin, Chairs
Dominique Hazaël-Massieux and François Daoust, W3C Team Contacts