XProc Agenda
08 Oct 2014
Meeting 252.
The XML Processing Model (XProc) WG will meet on Wednesday,
08 Oct 2014 at
10:00a EDT
(07:00a PDT, 14:00GMT)
for one hour on the W3C Zakim Bridge,
+1-617-761-6200 (or
via SIP),
passcode
97762# ("XPROC").
XProc uses the
#xproc IRC channel on
irc.w3.org:6665
(or via the
web interface).
The IRC channel is used for managing
agendas, minutes, and other aspects of the teleconference, so please
join us there if at all possible.
See the XProc WG page
for pointers to current documents and other information. If you have
additions to the agenda, please email them to the WG list before the
start of the telcon.
- Administrivia
- Roll call.
- Accept this
agenda.
- Accept the
minutes
of 01 Oct 2014.
- Next meeting: 15 Oct 2014.
- Review of open action items:
- A-235-01: Alex to provide a use case for user-defined extension functions in XProc
- A-241-05: Alex to describe use cases for RDF support that require the ability to
go back and forth from the triples to the documents.
- Technical
- Disposition of action items.
See
pull request #79
and
proposed
errata document.
- A-227-01
- Norm to review variable/option scope/shadow language and test cases.
Resolved by erratum
E-13.
- A-229-01
- Norm to comment on 21002 with proposed wording.
Already resolved by erratum
S-02.
- A-230-01
- A-230-02
- Henry to create dated and undated versions of the schemas and
pipeline library in appropriate locations and Norm to propose errata
along the lines described in msg 2013Mar/0028
Proposed: Abandon.
- A-230-03
- Norm to propose the erratum to resolve bug 21003
Already resolved by erratum
S-03.
- >A-230-04
- Norm to propose the erratum to resolve bug 21004
Already resolved by erratum
E-12.
- A-230-06
- Norm to put Henry's erratum text in the errata document
Resolved by erratum
E-14.
- A-231-01
- Norm to propose a resolution for bug 21007.
Resolved by erratum
E-15.
- Issue
#62,
2.5.1 Specify types of variables, options, and parameters.
See
proposal.
- Issue
#38,
2.7.5 Syntax: allow p:inline to be optional
See pull request
#77.
- Issue
#53,
3.9 Consider dividing the specification.
- Issue
#37,
2.7.4 Syntax: allow <p:input port="portname"/>
- Any other business
$Author: NormanWalsh $
Last revised $Date: 2014/10/07 00:16:18 $