ISSUE-11: Do we need a rationale layer at the guideline (or any level)

Do we need a rationale layer at the guideline (or any level)

State:
CLOSED
Product:
UAAG 2.0 Guidelines
Raised by:
Opened on:
2008-10-20
Description:
Related Actions Items:
No related actions
Related emails:
  1. ISSUE 11 (from simon.harper@manchester.ac.uk on 2009-06-04)
  2. Minutes of the F2F meeting for User Agent of October 20 (from jeanne@w3.org on 2008-10-20)

Related notes:

No additional notes.

Changelog:

Created issue 'Do we need a rationale layer at the guideline (or any level)' nickname owned by on product , description '' non-public

20 Oct 2008, 09:30:56

Product changed to UAAG 2.0 Guidelines

Jim Allan, 21 Oct 2010, 20:07:54

Status changed to 'closed'

Jim Allan, 21 Oct 2010, 20:07:54


Jim Allan <jimallan@tsbvi.edu>, Kelly Ford <kelly.ford@microsoft.com>, Chairs, Jeanne F Spellman <jeanne@w3.org>, Staff Contact
Tracker: documentation, (configuration for this group), originally developed by Dean Jackson, is developed and maintained by the Systems Team <w3t-sys@w3.org>.
$Id: index.php,v 1.325 2014-09-10 21:42:02 ted Exp $