WAI UA Telecon for April 4th, 2002

Chair: Jon Gunderson
Date: Thursday, 4 April 2002
Time: 2:00-3:30 pm Boston Local Time, USA (18:00-19:30 UTC/GMT)
Call-in: Longfellow Bridge (+1) (617) 252-1038

Agenda

Review Action Items

Announcements

1. Next meeting 11 April

Discussion

1. Discussion of problems with requirements of Checkpoint 10.3 and 11.6 (may be propsal for document changes before the meeting)
   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2002JanMar/0124.html
2. Ian's proposals based on UAAG evaluations with developers and AT meeting last week
   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2002JanMar/0085.html
3. Implementation Report Update
   http://www.w3.org/WAI/UA/implementation/report-cr2.html

Attendance

Chair: Jon Gunderson

Scribe: Ian Jacobs

Present:
David Poehlman
Tim Lacy
Harvey Bigham

Regrets:
Lee Bateman
Jost Eckhardt
Rich Schwerdtfeger
Eric Hansen

Action Item Summary

Open Action Items

1. RS: Write up paragraph about the importance of thread-safe access for in-process ATs.
   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2002JanMar/0100.html
2. ALL: Send to the WG the top 5 things you need through an API.
   Deadline: 4 April 2002

New Action Items

1. IJ: Send proposal for Guideline 10 modifications based on today's teleconference
   Source: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2002AprJun/0027.html
2. IJ: Add issue - should we delete fee link requirements in UAAG 1.0 since not part of today's Web?
   Source: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2002AprJun/0027.html
3. JG: Write up user scenarios for why non-text-based highlighting important for users; notably which users.
   Source: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2002AprJun/0027.html
4. IJ: Ask what the importance of in-process communication of the DOM to Rich and Aaron on the list. Should it be part of the requirement or be considered an implementation detail in certain environments?
   Source: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2002AprJun/0027.html
5. IJ: Propose text to the UAWG on conformance profiles for use by other specifcations.
   Source: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2002AprJun/0027.html
6. IJ: Add question to the issues list: Are there some requirements that must be satisfied for *all formats* corresponding to a given content type label, even when a claim is for fewer than all implemented formats corresponding to that label?
   Source: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2002AprJun/0027.html

Completed Action Items

1. IJ and JT: Coordinate on E-Monocle evaluation.
   Done
2. RS: Talk to Arnaud Le Hors about C++ bindings, for re-raising in the DOM WG.
   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2002JanMar/0120
   Done

Minutes