This Wiki page is edited by participants of the HTML Accessibility Task Force. It does not necessarily represent consensus and it may have incorrect information or information that is not supported by other Task Force participants, WAI, or W3C. It may also have some very useful information.

Difference between revisions of "Longdesc-comments"

From HTML accessibility task force Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Richards, Jan (Tuesday, 16 July))
(Last Call Comments: ...)
Line 5: Line 5:
 
* [http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-a11y/2013Jul/0034.html Comment on HTML-longdesc Last Call.]
 
* [http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-a11y/2013Jul/0034.html Comment on HTML-longdesc Last Call.]
 
** [http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-a11y/2013Jul/0043.html Reply from Chaals 17 July]
 
** [http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-a11y/2013Jul/0043.html Reply from Chaals 17 July]
 
[[response-gm|DRAFT Response to Guy Moreau]]
 
  
 
[https://www.w3.org/bugzilla_public/show_bug.cgi?id=23287 Bug 23287 strengthen requirement for user access to longdesc]
 
[https://www.w3.org/bugzilla_public/show_bug.cgi?id=23287 Bug 23287 strengthen requirement for user access to longdesc]
 +
 +
==== Proposed response to Guy ====
 +
No. Constraining user intereaction too much is probably a bad idea before we have much experience. There are also viable implementation strategies which use an interaction very different to that of ordinary links (e.g. the interaction in the Tell Me More extension).
  
 
=== Richards, Jan (Tuesday, 16 July) ===
 
=== Richards, Jan (Tuesday, 16 July) ===
Line 26: Line 27:
 
****** [http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-a11y/2013Aug/0033.html Reply from John Foliot 15 August]
 
****** [http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-a11y/2013Aug/0033.html Reply from John Foliot 15 August]
 
******* [http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-a11y/2013Aug/0042.html Reply from James Craig 15 August]
 
******* [http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-a11y/2013Aug/0042.html Reply from James Craig 15 August]
 
[[response-jc|DRAFT Response to James Craig]]
 
  
 
==== Related discussion on MathML ====
 
==== Related discussion on MathML ====
Line 39: Line 38:
 
=== Matthew Turvey (Tuesday, 16 July) ===
 
=== Matthew Turvey (Tuesday, 16 July) ===
 
* [http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-a11y/2013Jul/0033.html Re: Call for Review: HTML5 Image Description Extension (longdesc) Last Call] [http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-a11y/2013Jul/0032.html (Related to comment from James Craig)]
 
* [http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-a11y/2013Jul/0033.html Re: Call for Review: HTML5 Image Description Extension (longdesc) Last Call] [http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-a11y/2013Jul/0032.html (Related to comment from James Craig)]
 
[[response-mt|DRAFT Response to Matthew Turvey]]
 
  
 
=== Andrew Kirkpatrick (Friday, 23 August) ===
 
=== Andrew Kirkpatrick (Friday, 23 August) ===
Line 51: Line 48:
 
***** [http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-a11y/2013Aug/0082.html Clarification from Steve Faulkner 29 August]
 
***** [http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-a11y/2013Aug/0082.html Clarification from Steve Faulkner 29 August]
 
***** [http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-a11y/2013Aug/0083.html Reply from Chaals 29 August]
 
***** [http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-a11y/2013Aug/0083.html Reply from Chaals 29 August]
 
[[response-awk|DRAFT Response to Andrew Kirkpatrick]]
 
  
 
===  Shawn Henry/EOWG (Monday, 16 September) ===
 
===  Shawn Henry/EOWG (Monday, 16 September) ===
  
 
* [http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-a11y/2013Sep/0037.html EOWG Comments on longdesc]
 
* [http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-a11y/2013Sep/0037.html EOWG Comments on longdesc]
 
[[response-eowg|DRAFT Response to EOWG]]
 
  
 
[https://www.w3.org/bugzilla_public/show_bug.cgi?id=23289 Bug 23289 Suggested editorial fixes from EOWG]
 
[https://www.w3.org/bugzilla_public/show_bug.cgi?id=23289 Bug 23289 Suggested editorial fixes from EOWG]
Line 65: Line 58:
  
 
* [http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-a11y/2013Sep/0034.html comment on Longdesc extension]
 
* [http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-a11y/2013Sep/0034.html comment on Longdesc extension]
 
[[response-yandex|DRAFT Response to Yandex]]
 
  
 
[https://www.w3.org/bugzilla_public/show_bug.cgi?id=23290 Bug 23290 Additional use case for discoverability of long descriptions]
 
[https://www.w3.org/bugzilla_public/show_bug.cgi?id=23290 Bug 23290 Additional use case for discoverability of long descriptions]
 +
 +
==== Proposed Response to Yandex ====
 +
Yes --[[User:Charles|Charles McCathie Nevile]] 14:46, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
  
 
== Old bugs ==
 
== Old bugs ==
  
 
* [http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-a11y/2013Aug/0021.html Long descriptions of complex graphics Charles McCathie Nevile (Thursday, 8 August)]
 
* [http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-a11y/2013Aug/0021.html Long descriptions of complex graphics Charles McCathie Nevile (Thursday, 8 August)]

Revision as of 14:46, 19 September 2013

Last Call Comments

Guy Moreau (Tuesday, 16 July)

Bug 23287 strengthen requirement for user access to longdesc

Proposed response to Guy

No. Constraining user intereaction too much is probably a bad idea before we have much experience. There are also viable implementation strategies which use an interaction very different to that of ordinary links (e.g. the interaction in the Tell Me More extension).

Richards, Jan (Tuesday, 16 July)

Bug 23288 Reference for Authoring and Repair

James Craig (Tuesday, 16 July)

Related discussion on MathML

Related discussion on SVG Accessibility

Matthew Turvey (Tuesday, 16 July)

Andrew Kirkpatrick (Friday, 23 August)

Shawn Henry/EOWG (Monday, 16 September)

Bug 23289 Suggested editorial fixes from EOWG

Charles McCathie Nevile (Monday, 16 September)

Bug 23290 Additional use case for discoverability of long descriptions

Proposed Response to Yandex

Yes --Charles McCathie Nevile 14:46, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

Old bugs