ATAG 2.0 Guidelines
ATAG Part A
ATAG Part B
Jeanne F Spellman
Sally Cain, RNIB: I feel that there is some detail missing in this draft. If you are trying to encourage a developer to make an editor with an accessible user interface, then they should be referring to standards that are out there to do this, for example ISO 9241-171. If they would prefer the developers use ATAG, then ATAG should at least be as comprehensive as ISO 9241-171 which at the moment, it isn't.
Add notes (no markup allowed, URIs get automatically hyperlinked):
No related emails.
Major rewrite to refer to software standards.