The presentation of this document has been augmented to identify changes from a previous version. Three kinds of changes are highlighted: new, added text, changed text, and deleted text.


W3C

XProc: An XML Pipeline Language

W3C Working Draft (with revision marks) 29 November 2007

This Version:
http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-xproc-20071129/
Latest Version:
http://www.w3.org/TR/xproc/
Previous versions:
http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-xproc-20070920/ http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-xproc-20070706/ http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-xproc-20070405/
Editors:
Norman Walsh, Sun Microsystems, Inc.
Alex Milowski, Invited expert
Henry S. Thompson, University of Edinburgh

This document is also available in these non-normative formats: XML, Revision markup


Abstract

This specification describes the syntax and semantics of XProc: An XML Pipeline Language, a language for describing operations to be performed on XML documents.

An XML Pipeline specifies a sequence of operations to be performed on one or more XML documents. Pipelines generally accept one or more XML documents as input and produce one or more XML documents as output. Pipelines are made up of simple steps which perform atomic operations on XML documents and constructs similar to conditionals, loops and exception handlers which control which steps are executed.

Status of this Document

This section describes the status of this document at the time of its publication. Other documents may supersede this document. A list of current W3C publications and the latest revision of this technical report can be found in the W3C technical reports index at http://www.w3.org/TR/.

This document was produced by the XML Processing Model Working Group which is part of the XML Activity. Publication as a Working Draft does not imply endorsement by the W3C Membership. This is a draft document and may be updated, replaced or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to cite this document as other than work in progress.

In response to comments made on the previous draft, the Working Group decided to make significant changes to the way XPath and XSLTdocument are supported in XProc. In particular, the requirement toof support XPath 1.0 as XProc's expression language has been relaxed and the two XSLT steps have been combined into a single step.

Thewith Working Group has not finished addressing all of theworking outstanding comments on its previous draft but feels that the XPathinclude: changeThe in particular has such a pervasive impact on the languageno that it has decided to publish a new draftagain immediately in order to expose thisof decision. User and implementor feedback on this decision would be most valuable.specification.

The following changes are reflected in this draft:

Please send comments about this document to public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org (public archives are available).

This document was produced by a group operating under the 5 February 2004 W3C Patent Policy. W3C maintains a public list of any patent disclosures made in connection with the deliverables of the group; that page also includes instructions for disclosing a patent. An individual who has actual knowledge of a patent which the individual believes contains Essential Claim(s) must disclose the information in accordance with section 6 of the W3C Patent Policy.


Table of Contents

Introduction
Pipeline Concepts
2.1 Steps
2.1.1 Step names
2.2 Inputs and Outputs
2.2.1 External Documents
2.3 Primary Inputs and Outputs
2.4 Options
2.5 Parameters
2.6 Connections
2.6.1 Namespace Fixup on Outputs
2.7 Environment
2.8 XPaths in XProcContext
2.8.1 Processor XPath Context
2.8.2 Step XPath Context
2.8.3 XPath Extension Functions
2.9 Security Considerations
Syntax Overview
3.1 XProc Namespaces
3.2 Scoping of Names
3.3 Global Attributes
3.4 Associating Documents with Ports
3.5 Documentation
3.6 Ignored namespaces
3.7 Extension attributes
3.8 Extension elements
3.9 Syntax Summaries
Steps
4.1 p:pipeline
4.2 p:for-each
4.2.1 XPath Context
4.3 p:viewport
4.3.1 XPath Context
4.4 p:choose
4.4.1 p:xpath-context
4.4.2 p:when
4.4.3 p:otherwise
4.5 p:group
4.6 p:try
4.6.1 The Error Vocabulary
4.7 Other Steps
4.7.1 Syntactic Shortcut for Option Values
Other pipeline elements
5.1 p:input
5.1.1 Document Inputs
5.1.2 Parameter Inputs
5.2 p:iteration-source
5.3 p:viewport-source
5.4 p:output
5.5 p:log
5.6 p:serialization
5.7 Options and Parameters
5.7.1 p:option
5.7.2 p:parameter
5.7.3 Option and Parameter Namespaces
5.8 p:declare-step
5.9 p:pipeline-library
5.10 p:import
5.11 p:pipe
5.12 p:inline
5.13 p:document
5.14 p:empty
5.15 p:documentation
Errors
6.1 Static Errors
6.2 Dynamic Errors
6.3 Step Errors
Standard Step Library
7.1 Required Steps
7.1.1 p:add-attributeAdd Attribute
7.1.2 p:add-xml-baseAdd xml:base
7.1.3 p:compare
7.1.4 p:count
7.1.5 p:delete
7.1.6 p:directory-listDirectory List
7.1.7 p:error
7.1.8 p:escape-markupEscape Markup
7.1.9 p:http-requestHTTP Request
7.1.10 p:identity
7.1.11 p:insert
7.1.12 p:label-elementsLabel Elements
7.1.13 p:load
7.1.14 p:make-absolute-urisMake Absolute IRIs
7.1.15 p:namespace-renameNamespace Rename
7.1.16 p:pack
7.1.17 p:parameters
7.1.18 p:rename
7.1.19 p:replace
7.1.20 p:set-attributesSet Attributes
7.1.21 p:sink
7.1.22 p:split-sequenceSplit Sequence
7.1.23 p:store
7.1.24 p:unescape-markupUnescape Markup
7.1.25 p:string-replace
7.1.26 p:unwrap
7.1.27 p:wrap
7.1.28 p:wrap-sequenceWrap Sequence
7.1.29 p:xinclude
7.1.30 p:xslt
7.2 Optional Steps
7.2.1 p:exec
7.2.2 p:hash
7.2.3 p:uuid
7.2.4 p:validate-with-relax-ngValidate
7.2.5 p:validate-with-schematronSchematron Validate
7.2.6 p:validate-with-xml-schemaXML Schema Validate
7.2.7 p:www-form-urldecodeXQuery 1.0
7.2.8 p:www-form-urlencode
7.2.9 p:xquery
7.2.10 p:xsl-formatterXSL Formatter
7.3 Serialization Options

Appendices

1 Introduction

An XML Pipeline specifies a sequence of operations to be performed on a collection of XML input documents. Pipelines take zero or more XML documents as their input and produce zero or more XML documents as their output.

A pipeline consists of steps. Like pipelines, steps take zero or more XML documents as their inputs and produce zero or more XML documents as their outputs. The inputs to a step come from the web, from the pipeline document, from the inputs to the pipeline itself, or from the outputs of other steps in the pipeline. The outputs from a step are consumed by other steps, are outputs of the pipeline as a whole, or are discarded.

There are two kinds of steps: atomic steps and compound steps. Atomic steps carry out single operations and have no substructure as far as the pipeline is concerned, whereas compound steps control the execution of other steps, which they include in the form of one or more subpipelines.

This specification defines a standard library, Section 7, “Standard Step Library”, of steps. Pipeline implementations may support additional types of steps as well.

Figure 1, “A simple, linear XInclude/Validate pipeline” is a graphical representation of a simple pipeline that performs XInclude processing and validation on a document.

A simple, linear XInclude/Validate pipeline
Figure 1. A simple, linear XInclude/Validate pipeline

This is a pipeline that consists of two atomic steps, XInclude and Validate. The pipeline itself has two inputs, “source” (a source document) and “schemas” (a list of W3C XML Schemas). How inputs are connected to XML documents outside the pipeline is implementation-defined. The XInclude step reads the pipeline input “source” and produces a result document. The Validate step reads the pipeline input “schemas” and the output from the XInclude step and produces a result document. The result of the validation, “result”, is the result of the pipeline. How pipeline outputs are connected to XML documents outside the pipeline is implementation-defined.

The pipeline document for this pipeline is shown in Example 1, “A simple, linear XInclude/Validate pipeline”.

Example 1. A simple, linear XInclude/Validate pipeline
<p:pipeline name="pipeline" xmlns:p="http://www.w3.org/ns/xproc">
  <p:input port="source" primary="true"/>
  <p:input port="schemas" sequence="true"/>
  <p:output port="result">
    <p:pipe step="validated" port="result"/>
  </p:output>

  <p:xinclude name="included">
    <p:input port="source">
      <p:pipe step="pipeline" port="source"/>
    </p:input>
  </p:xinclude>

  <p:validate-with-xml-schema name="validated">
    <p:input port="source">
      <p:pipe step="included" port="result"/>
    </p:input>
    <p:input port="schema">
      <p:pipe step="pipeline" port="schemas"/>
    </p:input>
  </p:validate-with-xml-schema>
</p:pipeline>

The example in Example 1, “A simple, linear XInclude/Validate pipeline” is very verbose. It makes all of the connections seen in the figure explicit. In practice, pipelines do not have to be this verbose. XProc supports defaults for many common cases. The same pipeline, using XProc defaults, is shown in Example 2, “A simple, linear XInclude/Validate pipeline (simplified)”.

Example 2. A simple, linear XInclude/Validate pipeline (simplified)
<p:pipeline name="pipeline" xmlns:p="http://www.w3.org/ns/xproc">
  <p:input port="source" primary="true"/>
  <p:input port="schemas" sequence="true"/>
  <p:output port="result"/>

  <p:xinclude/>

  <p:validate-with-xml-schema>
    <p:input port="schema">
      <p:pipe step="pipeline" port="schemas"/>
    </p:input>
  </p:validate-with-xml-schema>
</p:pipeline>

Figure 2, “A validate and transform pipeline” is a more complex example: it performs schema validation with an appropriate schema and then styles the validated document.

A validate and transform pipeline
Figure 2. A validate and transform pipeline

The heart of this example is the conditional. The “choose” step evaluates an XPath expression over a test document. Based on the result of that expression, one or another branch is run. In this example, each branch consists of a single validate step.

Example 3. A validate and transform pipeline
<p:pipeline xmlns:p="http://www.w3.org/ns/xproc">
<p:input port="source"/>
<p:output port="result"/>

  <p:choose>
    <p:when test="/*[@version &lt; 2.0]">
      <p:validate-with-xml-schema name="val1">
	<p:input port="schema">
	  <p:document href="v1schema.xsd"/>
	</p:input>
      </p:validate-with-xml-schema>
    </p:when>

    <p:otherwise>
      <p:validate-with-xml-schema name="val2">
	<p:input port="schema">
	  <p:document href="v2schema.xsd"/>
	</p:input>
      </p:validate-with-xml-schema>
    </p:otherwise>
  </p:choose>

  <p:xslt name="xform">
    <p:input port="stylesheet">
      <p:document href="stylesheet.xsl"/>
    </p:input>
  </p:xslt>
</p:pipeline>

This example, like the preceding, relies on XProc defaults for simplicity. It is always valid to write the fully explicit form if you prefer.

2 Pipeline Concepts

[Definition: A pipeline is a set of connected steps, withoutputs flowing into inputs, without outputs of one step flowing intoread its own output, inputs of another.] A pipeline is itself a step and must satisfy the constraints on steps.

The result of evaluating a pipeline is the result of evaluating the steps that it contains, in the order determined by the connections between them. A pipeline must behave as if it evaluated each step each time it occurs. Unless otherwise indicated, implementations must not assume that steps are functional (that is, that their outputs depend only on their explicit inputs, options, and parameters) or side-effect free.

2.1 Steps

[Definition: A step is the basic computational unit of a pipeline.] All steps have a name; if the pipeline author does not provide a name for a step, a default name is manufactured automatically.

Steps are either atomic or compound. [Definition: An atomic step is a step that performs a unit of XML processing, such as XInclude or transformation, and has no internal subpipeline.] Atomic steps carry out fundamental XML operations and can perform arbitrary amounts of computation, but they are indivisible. An XSLT step, for example, performs XSLT processing; an XML Schema Validation step validates one input with respect to some set of XML Schemas, etc.

There are many types of atomic steps. The standard library of atomic steps is described in Section 7, “Standard Step Library”, but implementations may provide others as well. What additional step types, if any, are provided is implementation-defined. Each use, or instance, of an atomic step invokes the processing defined by that type of step. A pipeline may contain instances of many types of steps and many instances of the same type of step.

Compound steps, on the other hand, control and organize the flow of documents through a pipeline, reconstructing familiar programming language functionality such as conditionals, iterators and exception handling. They contain other steps, whose evaluation they control.

[Definition: A compound step is a step that contains one or more subpipelines.subpipelines. That is, a compound step differs from an atomic step in that its semantics are at least partially determined by the steps that it contains.] Every Every compound step contains one or more subpipelines. [Definition: The steps that occur directly inside a compound step are called contained steps.] [Definition: A compound step which immediately contains another step is called its container.]

[Definition: The steps (and the connections between them) within a compound step form a subpipeline.] [Definition: The last step in a subpipeline is the last step in document order within its container. ]

TheThis simple distinction between atomic and compound steps is occasionally stretched. The immediate children of some compound steps, e.g. p:choose and p:try, are special. In the case of p:choose, the p:when and p:otherwise elements serve as wrappers around different pipelines at most one of which will be processed. In the case of p:try, the p:catch element is a wrapper around a subpipeline that will only be processed if the initial p:group fails. Acknowledging this slight irregularity, we nevertheless treat all compound steps as if they directly contained one or more subpipelines.

The steps (and the connections between them) within a compound step form a subpipeline. The last step in a subpipeline is the last step in document order within its container. subpipeline = (p:for-each|p:viewport|p:choose|p:group|p:try|pfx:other-step|p:documentation|ipfx:ignored)* A compound step can contain one or more subpipelines and it determines how and which of its subpipelines are evaluated.
Note

A p:pipeline, because it defines a subpipeline that can be called from other pipelines, has a somewhat dual nature with respect to the atomic vs. compound distinction. A p:pipeline is a compound step. When it is invoked by name from some other pipeline, its invocation is an atomic step. The “type” of the atomic step is determined by the p:pipeline that defines it.

Steps have “ports” into which inputs and outputs are connected or “bound”. Each step has a number of input ports and a number of output ports; a step can have zero input ports and/or zero output ports. (All steps have an implicit output port for reporting errors that must not be declared.) The names of all ports on each step must be unique on that step (you can't have two input ports named “source”, nor can you have an input port named “schema” and an output port named “schema”).

Steps have any number of options, all with unique names. A step can have zero options.

Steps have parameter input ports, on which parameters can be passed. The parameters passed on a particular parameter input port must be uniquely named. If multiple parameters with the same name are used, only one of the values will actually be available to the step. A A step can have zero, one, or manyzero parameter input ports, and each parameter port can have zero or more parameters passed on it.

2.1.1 Step names

The name attribute on any step can be used to give it a name. The name must be unique within its scope, see Section 3.2, “Scoping of Names”.

If the pipeline author does not provide an explicit name, the processor manufactures a default name. All default names are of the form “!n” where “n” is the ordinal number of the step, considering all steps in document order. For example, consider the pipeline in Example 3, “A validate and transform pipeline”. The p:pipeline step has no name, so it gets the default name “!1”; the p:choose gets the name “!2”; the first p:when gets the name “!3”, etc. If the p:choose had had a name, it would not have received a default name, but it would still have been counted and its first p:when would still have been “!3”.

Providing every step in the pipeline with an interoperable name has several benefits:

  1. It provides a simple mechanism for identifying all steps from outside the pipeline, see Appendix C, The XProc Media Type.

  2. It allows implementors to refer to all steps in an interoperable fashion, for example, in error messages.

  3. Pragmatically, we say that readable ports are identified by a step name/port name pair. By manufacturing names for otherwise anonymous steps, we include implicit bindings without changing our model.

In a valid pipeline that runs successfully to completion, the manufactured names aren't visible (except perhaps in debugging or logging output).

Note

The format for defaulted names does not conform to the requirements of an NCName. This is an explicit design decision; it prevents pipelines from using the defaulted names on p:pipe elements. If an explicit connection is required, the pipeline author must provide an explicit name for the step.

2.2 Inputs and Outputs

Although some steps can read and write non-XML resources, what flows between steps through input ports and output ports are exclusively XML documents or sequences of XML documents.

For the purposes of this specification, an XML document is an [Infoset]. Implementations are free to transmit infosets as sequences of characters, sequences of events, object models, or any other representation that preserves the necessary infoset properties (see Section A.3, “Infoset Conformance).

Most steps in this specification manipulate XML documents, or portions of XML documents. In these cases, we speak of changing elements, attributes, or nodes without prejudice to the actual representation used by an implementation.

An implementation may make it possible for a step to produce non-XML output (through channels other than a named output port)—for example, writing a PDF document to a URI—but that output cannot flow through the pipeline. Similarly, one can imagine a step that takes no pipeline inputs, reads a non-XML file from a URI, and produces an XML output. But the non-XML data cannot arrive on an input port to a step.

It is a dynamic error (err:XD0001) if a non-XML resource is produced on a step output or arrives on a step input.

The common case is that each step has one or more inputs and one or more outputs. Figure 3, “An atomic step” illustrates symbolically an atomic step with two inputs and one output.

An atomic step with two inputs and one output
Figure 3. An atomic step

All atomic steps are defined by a p:declare-step. The declaration of an atomic step defines the input ports, output ports, and options of all steps of that type. For example, every p:xslt step has two inputs, named “source” and “stylesheet”, and one output named “result” and the same set of options.

The situation is slightly more complicated for compound steps because they don't have separate declarations; each instance of a compound step serves as its own declaration. Compound steps don't have declared inputs, but they do have declared outputs, and unlike atomic steps, on compound steps, the number and names of the outputs can be different on each instance of the step.

Figure 4, “A compound step” illustrates symbolically a compound step with one subpipeline and one output. As you can see from the diagram, the output from the compound step comes from one of the outputs of the subpipeline within the step.

A compound step with two inputs and one output
Figure 4. A compound step

[Definition: The input ports declared on a step are its declared inputs.] [Definition: The output ports declared on a step are its declared outputs.] When a step is used in a pipeline, it is connected to other steps through its inputs and outputs.

When a step is used, all of the declared inputs of the step must be connected. Each input can be connected to:

  • The output port of some other step.

  • A fixed, inline document or sequence of documents.

  • A document read from a URI.

  • One of the inputs declared on one of its ancestors.

  • A special port provided by an ancestor compound step, for example, “current” in a p:for-each or p:viewport.

When an input accepts a sequence of documents, the documents can come from any combination of these locations.

The declared outputs of a step may be connected to:

  • The input port of some other step.

  • One of the outputs declared on its container.

The primary output port of a step must be connected, but other outputs can remain unconnected. Any documents produced on an unconnected output port are discarded.

Output ports on compound steps have a dual nature: from the perspective of the compound step's siblings, its outputs are just ordinary outputs and must be connected as described above. From the perspective of the compound step itself, they are inputs into which something must be connected.

Within a compound step, the declared outputs of the step can be connected to:

  • The output port of some contained step.

  • A fixed, inline document or sequence of documents.

  • A document read from a URI.

Each input and output is declared to accept or produce either a single document or a sequence of documents. It is not an error to connect a port that is declared to produce a sequence of documents to a port that is declared to accept only a single document. It is, however, an error if the former step actually produces more than one document at run time.

[Definition: The signature of a step is the set of inputs, outputs, and options that it is declared to accept.] Each atomic step (e.g. XSLT or XInclude) has a fixed signature, declared globally or built-in, which all its instances share, whereas each compound step has its own implicit signature.

[Definition: A step matches its signature if and only if it specifies an input for each declared input, it specifies no inputs that are not declared, it specifies an option for each option that is declared to be required, and it specifies no options that are not declared.] In other words, every input and required option must be specified and only inputs and options that are declared may be specified. Options that aren't required do not have to be specified.

Steps may also produce error, warning, and informative messages. These messages appear on a special “error output” port. The error output port is only bound to an input in the catch clause of a try/catch. Outside of a try/catch, the disposition of error messages is implementation-dependent.

2.2.1 External Documents

It's common for some of the documents used in processing a pipeline to be read from URIs. Sometimes this occurs directly, for example with a p:document element. Sometimes it occurs indirectly, for example if an implementation allows the URI of a pipeline input to be specified on the command line or if an p:xslt step encounters an xsl:import in the stylesheet that it is processing. It's also common for some of the documents produced in processing a pipeline to be written to locations which have, or at least could have, a URI.

The process of dereferencing a URI to retrieve a document is often more interesting than it seems at first. On the web, it may involve caches, proxies, and various forms of indirection. Resolving a URI locally may involve resolvers of various sorts and possibly appeal to implementation-dependent mechanisms such as catalog files.

In XProc, the situation is made even more interesting by the fact that many intermediate results produced by steps in the pipeline have base URIs.Whether or not (and when and how) the intermediate results that pass between steps are ever written to a filesystem is implementation-dependent.

In Version 1.0 of XProc, how (or if) implementers provide local resolution mechanisms and how (or if) they provide access to intermediate results by URI is implementation-defined.

Note

On the one hand, this is a somewhat unsatisfying state of affairs because it leaves room for interoperability problems. On the other, it is not expected to cause such problems very often in practice.

If these problems arise in practice, implementers are encouraged to use the existing extension mechanisms to give users the control needed to circumvent them. Should such mechanisms become widespread, a standard mechanism could be added in some future version of the language.

2.3 Primary Inputs and Outputs

As a convenience for pipeline authors, each step may have one input port designated as the primary input port and one output port designated as the primary output port.

[Definition: If a step has a document input port which is explicitly marked “primary='true'”, or if it has exactly one document input port and that port is not explicitly marked “primary='false'”, then that input port is the primary input port of the step.] If a step has a single input port and that port is explicitly marked “primary='false'”, or if a step has more than one input port and none is explicitly marked as the primary, then the primary input port of that step is undefined.

[Definition: If a step has a document output port which is explicitly marked “primary='true'”, or if it has exactly one document output port and that port is not explicitly marked “primary='false'”, then that output port is the primary output port of the step.] If a step has a single output port and that port is explicitly marked “primary='false'”, or if a step has more than one output port and none is explicitly marked as the primary, then the primary output port of that step is undefined.

The special significance of primary input and output ports is that they are connected automatically by the processor if no explicit binding is given. Generally speaking, if two steps appear sequentially in a subpipeline, then the primary output of the first step will automatically be connected to the primary input of the second.

Additionally, if a p:pipeline has no declared inputs and the first step in its subpipeline has an unbound primary input, then an implicit primary input port (named “source”) will be added to the p:pipeline (and consequently bound to the first step's primary input port). If a compound step has no declared outputs and the the last step in its subpipeline has an unbound primary output, then an implicit primary output port (named “result”) will be added to the compound step (and consequently the last step's primary output will be bound to it). The practical consequence of these rules is that straightforward, This rule does not apply to p:pipelineread, write, and understand. The following pipeline has a single input which is transformed by the XSLT step; the result of that XSLT step steps; allthe result of the pipeline: <p:pipeline xmlns:p="http://www.w3.org/ns/xproc"> <p:xslt> <p:input port="stylesheet"> <p:document href="docbook.xsl"/> </p:input> </p:xslt> </p:pipeline> It is semantically equivalent to this pipeline: <p:pipeline name="main" xmlns:p="http://www.w3.org/ns/xproc"> inputs<p:input port="source"/> <p:input port="parameters" kind="parameter"/> <p:output port="result"> <p:pipe step="transform" port="result"/> </p:output> <p:xslt name="transform"> <p:input port="source"> <p:pipe step="main" port="source"/> </p:input> <p:input port="stylesheet"> <p:document href="docbook.xsl"/> </p:input> <p:input port="parameters"> <p:pipe step="main" andport="parameters"/> </p:input> </p:xslt> </p:pipeline> (Parameter outputs ofports are a p:pipelinespecial must be explicitly declared..)

2.4 Options

Some steps accept options. Options are name/value pairs.

[Definition: An option is a name/value pair where the name is an expanded name and the value must be a string.] If a document, node, or other value is given, its XPath string value is is computed and that string is used.

[Definition: The options declared on a step are its declared options.] All of the options specified on an atomic step must have been declared. Option names are always expressed as literal values, pipelines cannot construct option names dynamically.

[Definition: The options on a step which have specified values, either because a p:option element specifies a value or because the declaration included a default value, are its specified options.]

2.5 Parameters

Some steps accept parameters. Parameters are name/value pairs.

[Definition: A parameter is a name/value pair where the name is an expanded name and the value must be a string.] If a document, node, or other value is given, its XPath string value is computed and that string is used.

Unlike options, which have names known in advance to the pipeline, parameters are not declared and their names may be unknown to the pipeline author. Pipelines can dynamically construct sets of parameters. Steps can read dynamically constructed sets on parameter input ports.

[Definition: A parameter input port is a distinguished kind of input port which accepts (only) dynamically constructed parameter name/value pairs.] See Section 5.1.2, “Parameter Inputs”.

Analogous to primary input ports, steps that have parameter inputs may designate at most one parameter input port as a primary parameter input port.

[Definition: If a step has a parameter input port which is explicitly marked “primary='true'”, or if it has exactly one parameter input port and that port is not explicitly marked “primary='false'”, then that parameter input port is the primary parameter input port of the step.] If a step has a single parameter input port and that port is explicitly marked “primary='false'”, or if a step has more than one parameter input port and none is explicitly marked as the primary, then the primary parameter input port of that step is undefined.

Additionally, if a p:pipeline does not declare any parameter input ports, but contains a step which has a primary parameter input port, then an implicit primary parameter input port (named “parameters”) will be added to the pipeline. (If the pipeline declares an ordinary input named “parameters”, the implicit primary parameter input port will be named “parameters1”. If that's not available, then “parameters2”, etc. until an available name is found.)

How an implementation maps parameters specified to the application, or through some API, to parameters accepted by the p:pipeline is implementation-defined.

2.6 Connections

Steps are connected together by their input ports and output ports. It is a static error (err:XS0001) if there are any loops in the connections between steps: no step can be connected to itself nor can there be any sequence of connections through other steps that leads back to itself.

2.6.1 Namespace Fixup on Outputs

XProcWhat flows between processors are expected,exclusively XML documents. The inputs and sometimesoutputs can be implemented as sequences of characters, sequences of events, object models, or any other representation that the implementation chooses. Most steps in this specification manipulate XML documents, or portions of XML documents. In these cases, we speak of changing elements, attributes, or nodes without required, to the actual performrepresentation used by namespacean fixup.implementation. Unless the semantics of a step explicitly says otherwise:

  • The in-scope namespaces associated with a node (even those that are inherited from namespace bindings that appear among its ancestors in the document in which it appears initially) are assumed to travel with it.

  • Changes to one part of a tree (wrapping or unwrapping a node or renaming an element, for example) do not change the in-scope namespaces associated with the descendants of the node so changed.

As a result, some steps can produce XML documents which have no direct serialization (because they include nodes with conflicting or missing namespace declarations, for example). [Definition: To produce a serializable XML document, the XProc processor must sometimes add additional namespace nodes, perhaps even renaming prefixes, to satisfy the constraints of Namespaces in XML. This process is referred to as namespace fixup.]

Implementors are encouraged to perform namespace fixup before passing documents between steps, but they are not required to do so. Conversely, an implementation which does serialize between steps and therefore must perform such fixups, or reject documents that cannot be serialized, is also conformant.

Except where the semantics of a step explicitly require changes, processors are required to preserve the information in the documents and fragments they manipulate. In particular, the information corresponding to the [Infoset] properties [attributes], [base URI], [children], [local name], [namespace name], [normalized value], [owner], and [parent] must be preserved.

The information corresponding to [prefix], [in-scope namespaces], [namespace attributes], and [attribute type] should be preserved, with changes to the first three only as required for namespace fixup. In particular, processors are encouraged to take account of prefix information in creating new namespace bindings, to minimize negative impact on prefixed names in content.

Except for cases which are specifically called out in Section 7, “Standard Step Library”, the extent to which namespace fixup, and other checks for outputs which cannot be serialized, are performed on intermediate outputs is implementation-defined.

Whenever an implementation serializes pipeline contents, for example for pipeline outputs, logging, or as part of steps such as p:store or p:http-request, it is a dynamic error if that serialization could not be done so as to produce a document which is both well-formed and namespace-well-formed, as specified in XML and Namespaces in XML, regardless of what serialization method, if any, is called for.

2.7 Environment

[Definition: The environment of a step is the static information available to each instance of a step in a pipeline.] Most of the information in the environment is static and can be computed before evaluation of the pipeline begins. The values of the in-scope options have to be calculated when the pipeline is being evaluated.

The environment consists of:

  1. A set of readable ports. [Definition: The readable ports are the step name/portname/output port name pairs that are visible to the step.] Inputs and outputs can only be connected to readable ports.

  2. A set of in-scope options. [Definition: The in-scope options are the set of options that are visible to a step.] All of the in-scope options are available to the processor for computing option and parameter values. The actual options passed to a step are those that are declared for a step of its type and that have values either provided explicitly with p:option elements on the step or as defaults in the declaration of the step type.

  3. A default readable port. [Definition: The default readable port, which may be undefined, is a specific step name/port name pair from the set of readable ports.]

[Definition: The empty environment contains no readable ports, no in-scope options, and an undefined default readable port. ]

Unless otherwise specified, the environment of a contained step is its inherited environment. [Definition: The inherited environment of a contained step is an environment that is the same as the environment of its container with the standard modifications. ]

The standard modifications made to an inherited environment are:

  • All of the specified options of the container are added to the in-scope options. The value of any option in the environment with the same name as one of the options specified on the container is shadowed by the new value.

    In other words, steps can access the most recently specified value of all of the options specified on any ancestor step.

  • The declared inputs of the container are added to the readable ports.

    In other words, contained steps can see the inputs to their container.

  • The union of all the declared outputs of all of the step's contained steps are added to the readable ports.

    In other words, sibling steps can see each other's outputs in addition to the outputs visible to their container.

  • If there is a preceding sibling step element:

  • If there is not a preceding sibling step element, the default readable port is the primary input port of the container, if it has one, otherwise the default readable port is unchanged.

A step with no parent inherits the empty environment.

2.8 XPaths in XProcContext

XProc uses XPath as an expression language. XPath expressions can occur in several places: on compound steps, in the expressions used to compute option and parameter values, and in values passed to atomic steps.

Broadly, these can be divided into two classes: expressions evaluated evaluated by the XProc processor and expressions evaluated by the implementations of individual steps.

This distinction can be seen in the following example:

<p:option name="home" value="http://example.com/docs"/>

<p:load name="read-from-home">
  <p:option name="href" select="concat($home,'/document.xml')"/>
</p:load>

<p:split-sequence name="select-chapters">
  <p:input port="source" select="//section"/>
  <p:option name="test" value="@role='chapter'"/>
</p:split-sequence>

The href option of the p:load step step is evaluated by the XProc processor. The actual href option received by the step is simply the string literal “http://example.com/docs/document.xml”. (The selection on the source input of the select-chapters step is also evaluated by the XProc processor.)

TheConversely, the XPath expression “@role='chapter'” is passed literally to the test option on the p:split-sequence step. That's because the nature of the p:split-sequence is that it evaluates the expression. Only some options on some steps expect XPath expressions.

The XProc processor evaluates all of the XPath expressions in select attributes on steps, options, parameters, and inputs and in test attributes on p:when steps. (XPath expressions in value attributes are passed literally to the step for evaluation.)

An XProc implementation can use either [XPath 1.0] or [XPath 2.0] to evaluate these expressions. This is a compromise driven entirely by the timing of XProc development. During the development of this specification, the community indicated that it was too early to mandate that all implementations use XPath 2.0 and too late to mandate that all implementations use XPath 1.0.

Many, many expressions that are likely to be used in XProc pipelines are the same in both versions (simple element tests, ancestor and descendant tests, string-based attribute tests, etc.).

As an aid to interoperability, pipeline authors may indicate the version of XPath that they are using. The attribute xpath-version may be used on p:pipeline (or p:pipeline-library) to identify the XPath version that should be used to evaluate XPath expressions on the pipeline(s). This is a purely lexical identifier. If the xpath-version is specified on a pipeline in a library, the version specified on the pipeline is used for that pipeline; otherwise, the default version is “1.0”.

The following rules determine how the indicated version and the implementation's actual version interact:

  1. If the indicated version and the implementation version are the same, then that version is used.

  2. If the indicated version is 1.0 and the implementation uses XPath 2.0 (or later), the expression must be evaluated in XPath 1.0 compatibility mode. It is a static error (err:XS0046) if the processor does not support XPath 1.0 compatibility mode.

  3. If the indicated version is 2.0 (or later) and the implementation uses XPath 1.0, the implementation must not evaluate any expression that it cannot determine will give the same result in XPath 1.0 that it would have given if XPath 2.0 had been used. It is a static error (err:XS0047) if the processor cannot determine that the expression would yield the same result.

2.8.1 Processor XPath Context

When the XProc processor evaluates an XPath expression using XPathexpression, 1.0, unless otherwise indicated by a particular step, it does so with the following context:

context node

The document node of a document. The document is either specified with a binding or is taken from the default readable port. It is a dynamic error (err:XD0008) if a document sequence appears where a document to be used as the context node is expected.

If there is no binding and there is no default readable port then the context node is an empty document node.

context position and context size

The context position and context size are both “1”.

variable bindings

The in-scope options are available as variables.

function library

The [XPath 1.0] core function library and the Section 2.8.3, “XPath Extension Functions”XProc extension functions.

in-scope namespaces

The namespace bindings in-scope on the element where the expression occurred.

When the XProc processor evaluates an XPath expression using XPath 2.0, unless otherwise indicated by a particular step, it does so with the following static context:

XPath 1.0 compatibility mode

Is true if the indicated XPath version is 1.0, false otherwise.

Statically known namespaces

The namespace declarations in-scope for the containing element or made available through p:namespaces.

Default element/type namespace

The null namespace.

Default function namespace

The [XPath 2.0] function namespace.

In-scope schema definitions

None.

In-scope variables

The names of the in-scope options are available as variables.

Context item static type

Document.

Function signatures

The signatures of the XPath 2.0 functions and the Section 2.8.3, “XPath Extension Functions”.

Statically known collations

Implementation defined but must include the Unicode codepoint collation.

Default collation

Unicode codepoint collation.

Base URI

The base URI of the element on which the expression occurs.

Statically known documents

None.

Statically known collections

None.

And the following dynamic context:

context item

The document node of a document. The document is either specified with a binding or is taken from the default readable port. It is a dynamic error (err:XD0008) if a document sequence appears where a document to be used as the context node is expected.

If there is no binding and there is no default readable port then the context node is an empty document node.

context position and context size

The context position and context size are both “1”.

Variable values

The values of the in-scope options.

Function implementations

The XPath 2.0 functions and the Section 2.8.3, “XPath Extension Functions”.

Current dateTime

An implementation defined point in time.

Implicit timezone

The implicit timezone is implementation defined.

Available documents

The set of available documents (those that may be retrieved with a URI) is implementation dependent.

Available collections

None.

Default collection

None.

2.8.2 Step XPath Context

When a step evaluates an XPath expression using XPath 1.0,expression, it does so with the following context:

context node

The document node that appears on the primary input port of the step, unless otherwise specified by the step.

context position and context size

The position and size are both “1”, unless otherwise specified by the step.

variable bindings

None, unless otherwise specified by the step.

function library

The [XPath 1.0] core function library, unless otherwise specified by the step.

in-scope namespaces

The set of namespace bindings provided by the XProc processor. The processor computes this set of bindings by taking a union of the bindings on the step element itself as well as the bindings on any of the options and parameters used in computing values for the step (see Section 5.7.3, “Option and Parameter Namespaces”).

The results of computing the union of namespaces in the presence of conflicting declarations for a particular prefix are implementation-dependent.

When a step evaluates an XPath expression using XPath 2.0, unless otherwise indicated by a particular step, it does so with the following static context:

XPath 1.0 compatibility mode

Is true if the indicated XPath version is 1.0, false otherwise.

Statically known namespaces

The namespace declarations in-scope for the containing element or made available through p:namespaces.

Default element/type namespace

The null namespace.

Default function namespace

The [XPath 2.0] function namespace.

In-scope schema definitions

None.

In-scope variables

None, unless otherwise specified by the step.

Context item static type

Document.

Function signatures

The signatures of the XPath 2.0 functions.

Statically known collations

Implementation defined but must include the Unicode codepoint collation.

Default collation

Unicode codepoint collation.

Base URI

The base URI of the element on which the expression occurs.

Statically known documents

None.

Statically known collections

None.

And the following dynamic context:

context item

The document node of the document that appears on the primary input of the step, unless otherwise specified by the step.

context position and context size

The context position and context size are both “1”, unless otherwise specified by the step.

Variable values

None, unless otherwise specified by the step.

Function implementations

The XPath 2.0 functions.

Current dateTime

An implementation defined point in time.

Implicit timezone

The implicit timezone is implementation defined.

Available documents

The set of available documents (those that may be retrieved with a URI) is implementation dependent.

Available collections

None.

Default collection

None.

2.8.3 XPath Extension Functions

The XProc processor must support a few additional functions in XPath expressions evaluated by the processor.

2.8.3.1 System Properties

XPath expressions within a pipeline document can interrogate the processor for information about the current state of the pipeline. Various aspects of the processor are exposed through the p:system-property function in the pipeline namespace:

Function: String p:system-property(String property)

The property string must have the form of a QName; the QName is expanded into a name using the namespace declarations in scope for the expression. The p:system-property function returns the string representing the value of the system property identified by the QName. If there is no such property, the empty string must be returned.

Implementations must provide the following system properties, which are all in the XProc namespace:

p:episode

Returns a string which should be unique for each invocation of the pipeline processor.

The unique identifier must consist of ASCII alphanumeric characters and must start with an alphabetic character. Thus, the string is syntactically an XML name.

p:language

Returns a string which identifies the current language, for example, for message localization purposes. The exact format of the language string is implementation defined.

p:product-name

Returns a string containing the name of the implementation, as defined by the implementer. This should normally remain constant from one release of the product to the next. It should also be constant across platforms in cases where the same source code is used to produce compatible products for multiple execution platforms.

p:product-version

Returns a string identifying the version of the implementation, as defined by the implementer. This should normally vary from one release of the product to the next, and at the discretion of the implementer it may also vary across different execution platforms.

p:vendor

Returns a string which identifie