W3C
Web Services Description Language (WSDL) Version 2.0 Part 1: Core Language
W3C Working Draft 10 May 2005
This version:
http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-wsdl20-20050510
Latest version:
http://www.w3.org/TR/wsdl20
Previous versions:
http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-wsdl20-20040803
Editors:
Roberto Chinnici, Sun Microsystems
Jean-Jacques Moreau, Canon
Arthur Ryman, IBM
Sanjiva Weerawarana
This document is also available in these non-normative formats: XHTML with
Z-notation, postscript, PDF, XML, and plain text.
Copyright © 2005 W3C^® (MIT, ERCIM, Keio), All Rights Reserved. W3C liability,
trademark and document use rules apply.
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Abstract
This document describes the Web Services Description Language Version 2.0 (WSDL
2.0), an XML language for describing Web services. This specification defines
the core language which can be used to describe Web services based on an
abstract model of what the service offers. It also defines criteria for a
conformant processor of this language.
Status of this Document
This section describes the status of this document at the time of its
publication. Other documents may supersede this document. A list of current W3C
publications and the latest revision of this technical report can be found in
the W3C technical reports index at http://www.w3.org/TR/.
This is a W3C Working Draft of the Web Services Description Language (WSDL) 2.0
document. This document has been produced as part of the W3C Web Services
Activity. The authors of this document are the Web Services Description Working
Group members.
The Working Group is in the process of addressing the comments it has received
on WSDL 2.0 Part 1, 2 and 3 during its Last Call period. This document reflects
the current state of this work. The latest status of the last call issues
received by the Working Group can be found in the last call issues list. The
Working Group is planning to publish a new Last Call Working Draft once it has
closed all these issues.
Comments on this document are to be sent to the public
public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org mailing list (public archive).
A diff-marked version against the previous version of this document is
available. For a detailed list of changes since the last publication of this
document, please refer to appendix F. Part 1 Change Log.
Publication as a Working Draft does not imply endorsement by the W3C
Membership. This is a draft document and may be updated, replaced or obsoleted
by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to cite this document as
other than work in progress.
This document has been produced under the 24 January 2002 Current Patent
Practice as amended by the W3C Patent Policy Transition Procedure. Patent
disclosures relevant to this specification may be found on the Working Group's
patent disclosure page. An individual who has actual knowledge of a patent
which the individual believes contains Essential Claim(s) with respect to this
specification should disclose the information in accordance with section 6 of
the W3C Patent Policy.
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Short Table of Contents
1. Introduction
2. Component Model
3. Types
4. Modularizing WSDL 2.0 descriptions
5. Documentation
6. Language Extensibility
7. Locating WSDL 2.0 Documents
8. Conformance
9. XML Syntax Summary (Non-Normative)
10. References
A. The application/wsdl+xml Media Type
B. Acknowledgements (Non-Normative)
C. URI References for WSDL 2.0 Components (Non-Normative)
D. Migrating from WSDL 1.1 to WSDL 2.0 (Non-Normative)
E. Examples of Specifications of Extension Elements for Alternative Schema
Language Support. (Non-Normative)
F. Part 1 Change Log (Non-Normative)
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Table of Contents
1. Introduction
1.1 Web Service
1.2 Document Conformance
1.3 The Meaning of a Service Description
1.4 Notational Conventions
1.4.1 RFC 2119 Keywords
1.4.2 RFC 3986 Namespaces
1.4.3 Prefixes and Namespaces Used in This Specification
1.4.4 Terms Used in This Specification
1.4.5 XML Information Set Properties
1.4.6 WSDL 2.0 Component Model Properties
1.4.7 Z Notation
1.4.8 BNF Pseudo-Schemas
2. Component Model
2.1 Description
2.1.1 The Description Component
2.1.2 XML Representation of Description Component
2.1.2.1 targetNamespace attribute information item
2.1.3 Mapping Description's XML Representation to Component Properties
2.2 Interface
2.2.1 The Interface Component
2.2.2 XML Representation of Interface Component
2.2.2.1 name attribute information item with interface [owner
element]
2.2.2.2 extends attribute information item
2.2.2.3 styleDefault attribute information item
2.2.3 Mapping Interface's XML Representation to Component Properties
2.3 Interface Fault
2.3.1 The Interface Fault Component
2.3.2 XML Representation of Interface Fault Component
2.3.2.1 name attribute information item with fault [owner element]
2.3.2.2 element attribute information item with fault [owner
element]
2.3.3 Mapping Interface Fault's XML Representation to Component
Properties
2.4 Interface Operation
2.4.1 The Interface Operation Component
2.4.1.1 Operation Style
2.4.2 XML Representation of Interface Operation Component
2.4.2.1 name attribute information item with operation [owner
element]
2.4.2.2 pattern attribute information item with operation [owner
element]
2.4.2.3 style attribute information item with operation [owner
element]
2.4.2.4 safe attribute information item with operation [owner
element]
2.4.3 Mapping Interface Operation's XML Representation to Component
Properties
2.5 Interface Message Reference
2.5.1 The Interface Message Reference Component
2.5.2 XML Representation of Interface Message Reference Component
2.5.2.1 messageLabel attribute information item with input or
output [owner element]
2.5.2.2 element attribute information item with input or output
[owner element]
2.5.3 Mapping Interface Message Reference's XML Representation to
Component Properties
2.6 Interface Fault Reference
2.6.1 The Interface Fault Reference Component
2.6.2 XML Representation of Interface Fault Reference
2.6.2.1 ref attribute information item with infault, or outfault
[owner element]
2.6.2.2 messageLabel attribute information item with infault, or
outfault [owner element]
2.6.3 Mapping Interface Fault Reference's XML Representation to
Component Properties
2.7 Feature
2.7.1 The Feature Component
2.7.1.1 Feature Composition Model
2.7.1.1.1 Example of Feature Composition Model
2.7.2 XML Representation of Feature Component
2.7.2.1 uri attribute information item with feature [owner element]
2.7.2.2 required attribute information item with feature [owner
element]
2.7.3 Mapping Feature's XML Representation to Component Properties
2.8 Property
2.8.1 The Property Component
2.8.1.1 Property Composition Model
2.8.2 XML Representation of Property Component
2.8.2.1 uri attribute information item with property [owner
element]
2.8.2.2 value element information item with property [parent]
2.8.2.3 constraint element information item with property [parent]
2.8.3 Mapping Property's XML Representation to Component Properties
2.9 Binding
2.9.1 The Binding Component
2.9.2 XML Representation of Binding Component
2.9.2.1 name attribute information item with binding [owner
element]
2.9.2.2 interface attribute information item with binding [owner
element]
2.9.2.3 type attribute information item with binding [owner
element]
2.9.2.4 Binding extension elements
2.9.3 Mapping Binding's XML Representation to Component Properties
2.10 Binding Fault
2.10.1 The Binding Fault Component
2.10.2 XML Representation of Binding Fault Component
2.10.2.1 ref attribute information item with fault [owner element]
2.10.2.2 Binding Fault extension elements
2.10.3 Mapping Binding Fault's XML Representation to Component
Properties
2.11 Binding Operation
2.11.1 The Binding Operation Component
2.11.2 XML Representation of Binding Operation Component
2.11.2.1 ref attribute information item with operation [owner
element]
2.11.2.2 Binding Operation extension elements
2.11.3 Mapping Binding Operation's XML Representation to Component
Properties
2.12 Binding Message Reference
2.12.1 The Binding Message Reference Component
2.12.2 XML Representation of Binding Message Reference Component
2.12.2.1 messageLabel attribute information item with input or
output [owner element]
2.12.2.2 Binding Message Reference extension elements
2.12.3 Mapping Binding Message Reference's XML Representation to
Component Properties
2.13 Binding Fault Reference
2.13.1 The Binding Fault Reference Component
2.13.2 XML Representation of Binding Fault Reference Component
2.13.2.1 ref attribute information item with infault or outfault
[owner element]
2.13.2.2 messageLabel attribute information item with infault or
outfault [owner element]
2.13.2.3 Binding Fault Reference extension elements
2.13.3 Mapping Binding Fault Reference's XML Representation to
Component Properties
2.14 Service
2.14.1 The Service Component
2.14.1.1 Operation Name Mapping (non-normative)
2.14.2 XML Representation of Service Component
2.14.2.1 Service References
2.14.2.2 name attribute information item with service [owner
element]
2.14.2.3 interface attribute information item with service [owner
element]
2.14.3 Mapping Service's XML Representation to Component Properties
2.15 Endpoint
2.15.1 The Endpoint Component
2.15.2 XML Representation of Endpoint Component
2.15.2.1 Endpoint References
2.15.2.2 name attribute information item with endpoint [owner
element]
2.15.2.3 binding attribute information item with endpoint [owner
element]
2.15.2.4 address attribute information item with endpoint [owner
element]
2.15.2.5 Endpoint extension elements
2.15.3 Mapping Endpoint's XML Representation to Component Properties
2.16 XML Schema 1.0 Simple Types Used in the Component Model
2.17 Equivalence of Components
2.18 Symbol Spaces
2.19 QName resolution
2.20 Comparing URIs
3. Types
3.1 Using W3C XML Schema Description Language
3.1.1 Importing XML Schema
3.1.1.1 namespace attribute information item
3.1.1.2 schemaLocation attribute information item
3.1.2 Inlining XML Schema
3.1.2.1 targetNamespace attribute information item
3.1.3 References to Element Declarations and Type Definitions
3.2 Using Other Schema Languages
4. Modularizing WSDL 2.0 descriptions
4.1 Including Descriptions
4.1.1 location attribute information item with include [owner element]
4.2 Importing Descriptions
4.2.1 namespace attribute information item
4.2.2 location attribute information item with import [owner element]
5. Documentation
6. Language Extensibility
6.1 Element based Extensibility
6.1.1 Mandatory extensions
6.1.2 required attribute information item
6.2 Attribute-based Extensibility
6.3 Extensibility Semantics
7. Locating WSDL 2.0 Documents
7.1 wsdli:wsdlLocation attribute information item
8. Conformance
8.1 XML Information Set Conformance
9. XML Syntax Summary (Non-Normative)
10. References
10.1 Normative References
10.2 Informative References
Appendices
A. The application/wsdl+xml Media Type
A.1 Registration
A.2 Fragment Identifiers
A.2.1 wsdl.interface(interface)
A.2.2 wsdl.interfaceFault(interface/fault)
A.2.3 wsdl.interfaceOperation(interface/operation)
A.2.4 wsdl.interfaceMessageReference(interface/operation/message)
A.2.5 wsdl.interfaceFaultReference(interface/operation/message/fault)
A.2.6 wsdl.binding(binding)
A.2.7 wsdl.bindingFault(binding/fault)
A.2.8 wsdl.bindingOperation(binding/operation)
A.2.9 wsdl.bindingMessageReference(binding/operation/message)
A.2.10 wsdl.bindingFaultReference(binding/operation/fault/message)
A.2.11 wsdl.service(service)
A.2.12 wsdl.endpoint(service/endpoint)
A.2.13 wsdl.feature(parent/feature)
A.2.14 wsdl.property(parent/property)
A.2.15 wsdl.extension(extension-namespace, extension-specific-syntax)
A.3 Security considerations
B. Acknowledgements (Non-Normative)
C. URI References for WSDL 2.0 Components (Non-Normative)
C.1 WSDL 2.0 URIs
C.2 Example
D. Migrating from WSDL 1.1 to WSDL 2.0 (Non-Normative)
D.1 Operation Overloading
D.2 PortTypes
D.3 Ports
D.4 Single Interface per Service
E. Examples of Specifications of Extension Elements for Alternative Schema
Language Support. (Non-Normative)
E.1 DTD
E.1.1 namespace attribute information item
E.1.2 location attribute information item
E.1.3 References to Element Definitions
E.2 RELAX NG
E.2.1 Importing RELAX NG
E.2.1.1 ns attribute information item
E.2.1.2 href attribute information item
E.2.2 Inlining RELAX NG
E.2.2.1 ns attribute information item
E.2.3 References to Element Declarations
F. Part 1 Change Log (Non-Normative)
F.1 WSDL 2.0 Specification Changes
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
1. Introduction
Web Services Description Language Version 2.0 (WSDL 2.0) provides a model and
an XML format for describing Web services. WSDL 2.0 enables one to separate the
description of the abstract functionality offered by a service from concrete
details of a service description such as “how” and “where” that functionality
is offered.
This specification defines a language for describing the abstract functionality
of a service as well as a framework for describing the concrete details of a
service description. It also defines criteria for a conformant processor of
this language. The WSDL Version 2.0 Part 2: Adjuncts specification [WSDL 2.0
Adjuncts] describes extensions for Message Exchange Patterns, features, SOAP
modules and bindings of features, and a language for describing such concrete
details for SOAP 1.2 [SOAP 1.2 Part 1: Messaging Framework] and HTTP [IETF RFC
2616].
1.1 Web Service
WSDL 2.0 describes a Web service in two fundamental stages: one abstract and
one concrete. Within each stage, the description uses a number of constructs to
promote reusability of the description and to separate independent design
concerns.
At an abstract level, WSDL 2.0 describes a Web service in terms of the messages
it sends and receives; messages are described independent of a specific wire
format using a type system, typically XML Schema.
An operation associates a message exchange pattern with one or more messages. A
message exchange pattern identifies the sequence and cardinality of messages
sent and/or received as well as who they are logically sent to and/or received
from. An interface groups together operations without any commitment to
transport or wire format.
At a concrete level, a binding specifies transport and wire format details for
one or more interfaces. An endpoint associates a network address with a
binding. And finally, a service groups together endpoints that implement a
common interface.
1.2 Document Conformance
An element information item (as defined in [XML Information Set]) whose
namespace name is "http://www.w3.org/2005/05/wsdl" and whose local part is
description conforms to this specification if it is valid according to the XML
Schema for that element as defined by this specification (http://www.w3.org/
2005/05/wsdl/wsdl20.xsd) and additionally adheres to all the constraints
contained in this specification family and conforms to the specifications of
any extensions contained in it. Such a conformant element information item
constitutes a WSDL 2.0 document.
The definition of the WSDL 2.0 language is based on the XML Information Set [
XML Information Set] but also imposes many semantic constraints over and above
structural conformance to this XML Infoset. In order to precisely describe
these constraints, and as an aid in precisely defining the meaning of each WSDL
2.0 document, the WSDL 2.0 specification defines a component model 2. Component
Model as an additional layer of abstraction above the XML Infoset. Constraints
and meaning are defined in terms of this component model, and the definition of
each component includes a mapping that specifies how values in the component
model are derived from corresponding items in the XML Infoset.
It is not a requirement to support any particular serialization of the
normative XML Infoset mapping of the component model for a WSDL 2.0 document.
For instance, a conformant processor MAY only support XML 1.0 and not XML 1.1 [
XML 1.1].
An XML 1.0 document that is valid with respect to the WSDL 2.0 XML Schema and
that maps to a valid WSDL 2.0 Component Model is conformant to the WSDL 2.0
specification.
1.3 The Meaning of a Service Description
A WSDL 2.0 service description indicates how potential clients are intended to
interact with the described service. It represents an assertion that the
described service fully implements and conforms to what the WSDL 2.0 document
describes. For example, as further explained in section 6.1.1 Mandatory
extensions, if the WSDL 2.0 document specifies a particular optional extension,
the functionality implied by that extension is only optional to the client. But
it needs to be supported by the Web service.
A WSDL 2.0 interface describes potential interaction with a service--not
required interaction. The declaration of an operation in a WSDL 2.0 interface
is not an assertion that the interaction described by the operation must occur.
Rather it is an assertion that if such an interaction is (somehow) initiated,
then the declared operation describes how that interaction is intended to
occur.
1.4 Notational Conventions
All parts of this specification are normative, with the EXCEPTION of notes,
pseudo-schemas, examples, and sections explicitly marked as “Non-Normative”.
1.4.1 RFC 2119 Keywords
The keywords “MUST”, “MUST NOT”, “EQUIRED”, “SHALL”, “SHALL NOT”, “SHOULD”,
“SHOULD NOT”, “RECOMMENDED”, “MAY”, and “OPTIONAL” in this document are to be
interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [IETF RFC 2119].
1.4.2 RFC 3986 Namespaces
Namespace names of the general form:
• "http://example.org/..." and
• "http://example.com/..."
represent application or context-dependent URIs [IETF RFC 3986].
1.4.3 Prefixes and Namespaces Used in This Specification
This specification uses predefined namespace prefixes throughout; they are
given in the following list. Note that the choice of any namespace prefix is
arbitrary and not semantically significant (see [XML Namespaces]).
wsdl
"http://www.w3.org/2005/05/wsdl"
Defined by this specification.
wsdli
"http://www.w3.org/2005/05/wsdl-instance"
Defined by this specification 7.1 wsdli:wsdlLocation attribute information
item.
wrpc
"http://www.w3.org/2005/05/wsdl/rpc"
Defined by WSDL 2.0: Adjuncts [WSDL 2.0 Adjuncts].
wsoap
"http://www.w3.org/2005/05/wsdl/soap"
Defined by WSDL 2.0: Adjuncts [WSDL 2.0 Adjuncts].
whttp
"http://www.w3.org/2005/05/wsdl/http"
Defined by WSDL 2.0: Adjuncts [WSDL 2.0 Adjuncts].
xs
"http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
Defined in the W3C XML Schema specification [XML Schema: Structures], [XML
Schema: Datatypes].
xsi
"http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
Defined in the W3C XML Schema specification [XML Schema: Structures], [XML
Schema: Datatypes].
1.4.4 Terms Used in This Specification
This section describes the terms and concepts introduced in Part 1 of the WSDL
Version 2.0 specification (this document).
Actual Value
As in [XML Schema: Structures], the phrase actual value is used to refer to
the member of the value space of the simple type definition associated with
an attribute information item which corresponds to its normalized value.
This will often be a string, but may also be an integer, a boolean, a URI
reference, etc.
Inlined Schema
An XML schema that is defined in a the xs:types element information item of
a WSDL 2.0 description. For example, an XML 1.0 Schema defined in an
xs:schema element information item 3.1.2 Inlining XML Schema.
1.4.5 XML Information Set Properties
This specification refers to properties in the XML Information Set [XML
Information Set]. Such properties are denoted by square brackets, e.g.
[children], [attributes].
1.4.6 WSDL 2.0 Component Model Properties
This specification defines and refers to properties in the WSDL 2.0 Component
Model 2. Component Model. Such properties are denoted by curly brackets, e.g.
{name}, {interfaces}.
This specification uses a consistent naming convention for component model
properties that refer to components. If a property refers to a required or
optional component, then the property name is the same as the component name.
If a property refers to a set of components, then the property name is the
pluralized form of the component name.
1.4.7 Z Notation
Z Notation [Z Notation Reference Manual] was used in the development of this
specification. Z Notation is a formal specification language that is based on
standard mathematical notation. The Z Notation for this specification has been
verified using the Fuzz 2000 type-checker [Fuzz 2000].
Since Z Notation is not widely known, it is not included the normative version
of this specification. However, it is included in a non-normative version which
allows to dynamically hide and show the Z Notation. Browsers correctly display
the mathematical Unicode characters, provided that the required fonts are
installed. Mathematical fonts for Mozilla Firefox can be downloaded from the
Mozilla Web site.
The Z Notation was used to improve the quality of the normative text that
defines the Component Model, and to help ensure that the test suite covered all
important rules implied by the Component Model. However, the Z Notation is
non-normative, so any conflict between it and the normative text is an error in
the Z Notation. Readers and implementors may nevertheless find the Z Notation
useful in cases where the normative text is unclear.
There are two elements of Z Notation syntax that conflict with the notational
conventions described in the preceeding sections. In Z Notation, square
brackets are used to introduce basic sets, e.g. [ID], which conflicts with the
use of square brackets to denote XML Information Set properties 1.4.5 XML
Information Set Properties. Also, in Z Notation, curly brackets are used to
denote set display and set comprehension, e.g. {1, 2, 3}, which conflicts with
the use of curly brackets to denote WSDL 2.0 Component Model properties 1.4.6
WSDL 2.0 Component Model Properties. However, the intended meaning of square
and curly brackets should be clear from their context and this minor notational
conflict should not cause any confusion.
1.4.8 BNF Pseudo-Schemas
Pseudo-schemas are provided for each component, before the description of the
component. They use BNF-style conventions for attributes and elements: "?"
denotes optionality (i.e. zero or one occurrences), "*" denotes zero or more
occurrences, "+" one or more occurrences, "[" and "]" are used to form groups,
and "|" represents choice. Attributes are conventionally assigned a value which
corresponds to their type, as defined in the normative schema.
?
+
[ | ]*
2. Component Model
This section describes the conceptual model of WSDL 2.0 as a set of components
with attached properties, which collectively describe a Web service. This model
is called the Component Model of WSDL 2.0.
Components are typed collections of properties that correspond to different
aspects of Web services.
┌───────────────────────────────┬──────────────────────────────┐
│Editorial note │ │
├───────────────────────────────┴──────────────────────────────┤
│Change property to avoid confusion with other meaning in spec.│
└──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
Each subsection herein describes a different type of component, its defined
properties, and its representation as an XML Infoset [XML Information Set].
Properties are unordered and unique with respect to the component they are
associated with. Individual properties' definitions may constrain their content
(e.g., to a typed value, another component, or a set of typed values or
components), and components may require the presence of a property to be
considered conformant. Such properties are marked as REQUIRED, whereas those
that are not required to be present are marked as OPTIONAL. By convention, when
specifying the mapping rules from the XML Infoset representation of a component
to the component itself, an optional property that is absent in the component
in question is described as being “empty”. Unless otherwise specified, when a
property is identified as being a collection (a set or a list), its value may
be a 0-element (empty) collection. In order to simplify the presentation of the
rules that deal with sets of components, for all OPTIONAL properties whose type
is a set, the absence of such a property from a component MUST be treated as
semantically equivalent to the presence of a property with the same name and
whose value is the empty set. In other words, every OPTIONAL set-valued
property MUST be assumed to have the empty set as its default value, to be used
in case the property is absent.
Component definitions are serializable in XML 1.0 format but are independent of
any particular serialization of the component model. Component definitions use
a subset (see 2.16 XML Schema 1.0 Simple Types Used in the Component Model) of
the simple types defined by the XML Schema 1.0 specification [XML Schema:
Datatypes].
In addition to the direct XML Infoset representation described here, the
component model allows components external to the Infoset through the
mechanisms described in 4. Modularizing WSDL 2.0 descriptions.
A component model can be extracted from a given XML Infoset which conforms to
the XML Schema for WSDL 2.0 by recursively mapping Information Items to their
identified components, starting with the wsdl:description element information
item. This includes the application of the mechanisms described in 4.
Modularizing WSDL 2.0 descriptions.
This document does not specify a means of producing an XML Infoset
representation from a component model instance. In particular, there are in
general many valid ways to modularize a given component model instance into one
or more XML Infosets.
2.1 Description
2.1.1 The Description Component
At the abstract level, the Description component is just a container for two
categories of components: WSDL 2.0 components and type system components.
WSDL 2.0 components are interfaces, bindings and services. Type system
components are element declarations and type definitions.
Interface, Binding, Service, Element Declaration, and Type Definition
components are directly contained in the Description component and are referred
to as top-level components. The top-level WSDL 2.0 components contain other
components, e.g. Interface Operation and Endpoint, which are referred to as
nested components. Nested components may contain other nested components. The
component that contains a nested component is referred to as the parent of the
nested components. Nested components have a {parent} property that is a
reference to their parent component.
Type system components describe the constraints on a message's content. By
default, these constraints are expressed in terms of the [XML Information Set],
i.e. they define the [local name], [namespace name], [children] and
[attributes] properties of an element information item. Type systems based upon
other data models are generally accommodated by extensions to WSDL 2.0; see 6.
Language Extensibility. In the case where they define information equivalent to
that of a XML Schema global element declaration, they can be treated as if they
were such a declaration.
This specification does not define the behavior of a WSDL 2.0 document that
uses multiple schema languages for describing type system components
simultaneously.
The properties of the Description component are as follows:
• {interfaces} OPTIONAL. A set of Interface components.
• {bindings} OPTIONAL. A set of Binding components.
• {services} OPTIONAL. A set of Service components.
• {element declarations} OPTIONAL. A set of named element declarations, each
one isomorphic to a global element declaration as defined by XML Schema.
• {type definitions} OPTIONAL. A set of named type definitions, each one
isomorphic to a global type definition as defined by XML Schema.
The set of top-level components contained in the Description component
associated with an initial WSDL 2.0 document consists of the components defined
in the initial document and the components associated with the documents that
the initial document includes or imports. The component model makes no
distinction between the components that are defined in the initial document
versus those that are defined in the included or imported documents. However,
any WSDL 2.0 document that contains component definitions that refer by QName
to WSDL 2.0 components that belong to a different namespace MUST contain a
ws:import element information item for that namespace (see 4.2 Importing
Descriptions). Furthermore, all QName references, whether to the same or to
different namespaces MUST resolve to components (see 2.19 QName resolution).
In addition to WSDL 2.0 components and type system components, additional
extension components MAY be added via extensibility 6. Language Extensibility.
Further, additional properties to WSDL 2.0 and type system components MAY also
be added via extensibility.
2.1.2 XML Representation of Description Component
?
[ | ]*
?
[ | | ]*
WSDL 2.0 definitions are represented in XML by one or more WSDL 2.0 Information
Sets (Infosets), that is one or more description element information items. A
WSDL 2.0 Infoset contains representations for a collection of WSDL 2.0
components which share a common target namespace. A WSDL 2.0 Infoset which
contains one or more import element information items 4.2 Importing
Descriptions corresponds to a collection with components drawn from multiple
target namespaces.
The components directly defined or included within a Description component are
said to belong to the same target namespace. The target namespace therefore
groups a set of related component definitions and represents an unambiguous
name for the intended semantics of the collection of components. The value of
the targetNamespace attribute information item SHOULD be a dereferenceable URI.
It SHOULD resolve to a human or machine processable document that directly or
indirectly defines the intended semantics of those components. It MAY resolve
to a WSDL 2.0 document which provides service description information for that
namespace.
If a service description is split into multiple documents (which may be
combined as needed via 4.1 Including Descriptions), then the targetNamespace
attribute information item SHOULD resolve to a master document which includes
all the WSDL 2.0 documents needed for that service description. This approach
enables the WSDL 2.0 component designators' fragment identifiers to be properly
resolvable.
Imported components have different target namespace values from the Description
component that is importing them. Thus importing is the mechanism to use
components from one namespace in another set of definitions.
Each WSDL 2.0 or type system component MUST be uniquely identified by its
qualified name. That is, if two distinct components of the same kind
(Interface, Binding etc.) are in the same target namespace, then their QNames
MUST be unique. However, different kinds of components (e.g., an Interface
component and a Binding component) MAY have the same QName. Thus, QNames of
components must be unique within the space of those components in a given
target namespace.
The description element information item has the following Infoset properties:
• A [local name] of description .
• A [namespace name] of "http://www.w3.org/2005/05/wsdl".
• One or more attribute information items amongst its [attributes] as
follows:
□ A REQUIRED targetNamespace attribute information item as described
below in 2.1.2.1 targetNamespace attribute information item.
□ Zero or more namespace qualified attribute information items whose
[namespace name] is NOT "http://www.w3.org/2005/05/wsdl".
• Zero or more element information items amongst its [children], in order as
follows:
1. An OPTIONAL documentation element information item (see 5.
Documentation).
2. Zero or more element information items from among the following, in any
order:
☆ Zero or more include element information items (see 4.1 Including
Descriptions)
☆ Zero or more import element information items (see 4.2 Importing
Descriptions)
☆ Zero or more namespace-qualified element information items whose
[namespace name] is NOT "http://www.w3.org/2005/05/wsdl".
3. An OPTIONAL types element information item (see 3. Types).
4. Zero or more element information items from among the following, in any
order:
☆ interface element information items (see 2.2.2 XML Representation
of Interface Component).
☆ binding element information items (see 2.9.2 XML Representation of
Binding Component).
☆ service element information items (see 2.14.2 XML Representation of
Service Component).
☆ Zero or more namespace-qualified element information items whose
[namespace name] is NOT "http://www.w3.org/2005/05/wsdl".
2.1.2.1 targetNamespace attribute information item
The targetNamespace attribute information item defines the namespace
affiliation of top-level components defined in this description element
information item. Interfaces, Bindings and Services are top-level components.
The targetNamespace attribute information item has the following Infoset
properties:
• A [local name] of targetNamespace
• A [namespace name] which has no value
The type of the targetNamespace attribute information item is xs:anyURI. The
value of the targetNamespace attribute information item MUST be an absolute URI
(see [IETF RFC 3986]).
2.1.3 Mapping Description's XML Representation to Component Properties
The mapping from the XML Representation of the description element information
item (see 2.1.2 XML Representation of Description Component) to the properties
of the Description component (see 2.1.1 The Description Component) is described
in Table 2-1.
Table 2-1. Mapping from XML Representation to Description Component Properties
┌─────────────┬───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Property │ Value │
├─────────────┼───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ │The set of Interface components corresponding to all the │
│ │interface element information items in the [children] of the │
│{interfaces} │description element information item, if any, plus any included│
│ │or imported Interface components (see 4. Modularizing WSDL 2.0 │
│ │descriptions). │
├─────────────┼───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ │The set of Binding components corresponding to all the binding │
│{bindings} │element information items in the [children] of the description │
│ │element information item, if any, plus any included or imported│
│ │Binding components (see 4. Modularizing WSDL 2.0 descriptions).│
├─────────────┼───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ │The set of Service components corresponding to all the service │
│{services} │element information items in the [children] of the description │
│ │element information item, if any, plus any included or imported│
│ │Service components (see 4. Modularizing WSDL 2.0 descriptions).│
├─────────────┼───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ │The set of element declarations corresponding to all the │
│ │element declarations defined as descendants of the types │
│ │element information item, if any, plus any included or imported│
│{element │element declarations. At a minimum this will include all the │
│declarations}│global element declarations defined by XML Schema element │
│ │element information items. It MAY also include any declarations│
│ │from some other type system which describes the [local name], │
│ │[namespace name], [attributes] and [children] properties of an │
│ │element information item. │
├─────────────┼───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ │The set of type definitions corresponding to all the type │
│ │definitions defined as descendants of the types element │
│ │information item, if any, plus any included or imported type │
│{type │definitions. At a minimum this will include all the global type│
│definitions} │definitions defined by XML Schema simpleType and complexType │
│ │element information items. It MAY also include any definitions │
│ │from some other type system which describes the [attributes] │
│ │and [children] properties of an element information item. │
└─────────────┴───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
2.2 Interface
2.2.1 The Interface Component
An Interface component describes sequences of messages that a service sends and
/or receives. It does this by grouping related messages into operations. An
operation is a sequence of input and output messages, and an interface is a set
of operations.
An interface can optionally extend one or more other interfaces. To avoid
circular definitions, an interface MUST NOT appear as an element of the set of
interfaces it extends, either directly or indirectly. The set of operations
available in an interface includes all the operations defined by the interfaces
it extends, along with any operations it directly defines. The operations
directly defined on an interface are referred to as the declared operations of
the interface. In the process, operation components that are equivalent per
2.17 Equivalence of Components are treated as one. The interface extension
mechanism behaves in a similar way for all other components that can be defined
inside an interface, namely Interface Fault, Feature and Property components.
Interfaces are named constructs and can be referred to by QName (see 2.19 QName
resolution). For instance, Binding components refer to interfaces in this way.
The properties of the Interface component are as follows:
• {name} REQUIRED. An xs:QName.
• {extended interfaces} OPTIONAL. A set of declared Interface components
which this interface extends.
• {interface faults} OPTIONAL. The set of declared Interface Fault
components. The namespace name of the {name} property of each Interface
Fault in this set MUST be the same as the namespace name of the {name}
property of this Interface component.
• {interface operations} OPTIONAL. A set of declared Interface Operation
components. The namespace name of the {name} property of each Interface
Operation in this set MUST be the same as the namespace name of the {name}
property of this Interface component.
• {features} OPTIONAL. A set of declared Feature components.
• {properties} OPTIONAL. A set of declared Property components.
For each Interface component in the {interfaces} property of a description
container, the {name} property MUST be unique.
2.2.2 XML Representation of Interface Component
?
[ | | | ]*
The XML representation for an Interface component is an element information
item with the following Infoset properties:
• A [local name] of interface
• A [namespace name] of "http://www.w3.org/2005/05/wsdl"
• One or more attribute information items amongst its [attributes] as
follows:
□ A REQUIRED name attribute information item as described below in
2.2.2.1 name attribute information item with interface [owner element].
□ An OPTIONAL extends attribute information item as described below in
2.2.2.2 extends attribute information item.
□ An OPTIONAL styleDefault attribute information item as described below
in 2.2.2.3 styleDefault attribute information item.
□ Zero or more namespace qualified attribute information items whose
[namespace name] is NOT "http://www.w3.org/2005/05/wsdl".
• Zero or more element information items amongst its [children], in order, as
follows:
1. An OPTIONAL documentation element information item (see 5.
Documentation).
2. Zero or more element information items from among the following, in any
order:
☆ Zero or more fault element information items 2.3.2 XML
Representation of Interface Fault Component.
☆ Zero or more operation element information items 2.4.2 XML
Representation of Interface Operation Component.
☆ Zero or more feature element information items 2.7.2 XML
Representation of Feature Component.
☆ Zero or more property element information items 2.8.2 XML
Representation of Property Component.
☆ Zero or more namespace-qualified element information items whose
[namespace name] is NOT "http://www.w3.org/2005/05/wsdl".
2.2.2.1 name attribute information item with interface [owner element]
The name attribute information item together with the targetNamespace attribute
information item of the [parent] description element information item forms the
QName of the interface.
The name attribute information item has the following Infoset properties:
• A [local name] of name
• A [namespace name] which has no value
The type of the name attribute information item is xs:NCName.
2.2.2.2 extends attribute information item
The extends attribute information item lists the interfaces that this interface
derives from.
The extends attribute information item has the following Infoset properties:
• A [local name] of extends
• A [namespace name] which has no value
The type of the extends attribute information item is a list of xs:QName.
2.2.2.3 styleDefault attribute information item
The styleDefault attribute information item indicates the default style (see
2.4.1.1 Operation Style) used to construct the {element} properties of
{interface message references} of all operations contained within the [owner
element] interface .
The styleDefault attribute information item has the following Infoset
properties:
• A [local name] of styleDefault.
• A [namespace name] which has no value.
The type of the styleDefault attribute information item is list of xs:anyURI.
Moreover, the value of the styleDefault attribute information item, if present,
MUST contain absolute URIs (see [IETF RFC 3986]).
2.2.3 Mapping Interface's XML Representation to Component Properties
The mapping from the XML Representation of the interface element information
item (see 2.2.2 XML Representation of Interface Component) to the properties of
the Interface component (see 2.2.1 The Interface Component) is as described in
Table 2-2.
Table 2-2. Mapping from XML Representation to Interface Component Properties
┌────────────┬────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Property │ Value │
├────────────┼────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ │The QName whose local name is actual value of the name attribute│
│{name} │information item and whose namespace name is the actual value of│
│ │the targetNamespace attribute information item of the [parent] │
│ │description element information item │
├────────────┼────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│{extended │The set of Interface components resolved to by the values in the│
│interfaces} │extends attribute information item if any (see 2.19 QName │
│ │resolution). │
├────────────┼────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│{interface │The set of Interface Fault components corresponding to the fault│
│faults} │element information items in [children], if any. │
├────────────┼────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│{interface │The set of Interface Operation components corresponding to the │
│operations} │operation element information items in [children], if any. │
├────────────┼────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│{features} │The set of Feature components corresponding to the feature │
│ │element information items in [children], if any. │
├────────────┼────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│{properties}│The set of Property components corresponding to the property │
│ │element information items in [children], if any. │
└────────────┴────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
Note that, per 2.2.1 The Interface Component, the Interface components in the
{extended interfaces} property of a given Interface component MUST NOT contain
that Interface component in any of their {extended interfaces} properties, that
is to say, recursive extension of interfaces is disallowed.
2.3 Interface Fault
2.3.1 The Interface Fault Component
A fault is an event that occurs during the execution of a message exchange that
disrupts the normal flow of messages.
A fault is typically raised when a party is unable to communicate an error
condition inside the normal message flow, or a party wishes to terminate a
message exchange. A fault message may be used to communicate out of band
information such as the reason for the error, the origin of the fault, as well
as other informal diagnostics such as a program stack trace.
An Interface Fault component describes a fault that MAY occur during invocation
of an operation of the interface. The Interface Fault component declares an
abstract fault by naming it and indicating the contents of the fault message.
When and how the fault message flows is indicated by the Interface Operation
component 2.4 Interface Operation.
The Interface Fault component provides a clear mechanism to name and describe
the set of faults an interface may generate. This allows operations to easily
identify the individual faults they may generate by name. This mechanism allows
the ready identification of the same fault occurring across multiple operations
and referenced in multiple bindings as well as reducing duplication of
description for an individual fault.
Note that faults other than the ones described in the Interface component can
also be generated at run-time, i.e. faults are an open set.
The properties of the Interface Fault component are as follows:
• {name} REQUIRED. An xs:QName.
• {element declaration} OPTIONAL. A reference to an XML element declaration
in the {element declarations} property of 2.1.1 The Description Component.
This element represents the content or “payload” of the fault.
• {features} OPTIONAL. A set of Feature components.
• {properties} OPTIONAL. A set of Property components.
• {parent} REQUIRED. The Interface component that contains this component in
its {interface faults} property.
If a type system NOT based on the XML Infoset [XML Information Set] is in use
(as considered in 3.2 Using Other Schema Languages) then additional properties
would need to be added to the Interface Fault Component (along with
extensibility attributes to its XML representation) to allow associating such
message types with the message reference.
For each Interface Fault component in the {interface faults} property of an
Interface component, the {name} property must be unique.
Interface Fault components are uniquely identified by the the QName of the
enclosing Interface component and QName of the Interface Fault component
itself.
Note:
Despite having a {name} property, Interface Fault components cannot be
identified solely by their QName. Indeed, two Interface components whose {name}
property value has the same namespace name, but different local names, can
contain Interface Fault components with the same {name} property value. Thus,
the {name} property of Interface Fault components is not sufficient to form the
unique identity of an Interface Fault component.
In cases where, due to an interface extending one or more other interfaces, two
or more Interface Faults components have the same value for their {name}
property, then the component models of those Interface Fault components MUST be
equivalent (see 2.17 Equivalence of Components). If the Interface Fault
components are equivalent then they are considered to collapse into a single
component. It is an error if two Interface Fault components have the same value
for their {name} properties but are not equivalent.
Note that, due to the above rules, if two interfaces that have the same value
for the namespace name of their {name} property also have one or more faults
that have the same value for their {name} property then those two interfaces
cannot both form part of the derivation chain of a derived interface unless
those faults are the same fault.
Note:
For the above reason, it is considered good practice to ensure, where
necessary, that the local name of the {name} property of Interface Fault
components within a namespace are unique, thus allowing such derivation to
occur without inadvertent error.
2.3.2 XML Representation of Interface Fault Component
?
[ | ]*
The XML representation for an Interface Fault component is an element
information item with the following Infoset properties:
• A [local name] of fault
• A [namespace name] of "http://www.w3.org/2005/05/wsdl"
• One or more attribute information items amongst its [attributes] as
follows:
□ A REQUIRED name attribute information item as described below in
2.3.2.1 name attribute information item with fault [owner element].
□ An OPTIONAL element attribute information item as described below in
2.3.2.2 element attribute information item with fault [owner element].
□ Zero or more namespace qualified attribute information items whose
[namespace name] is NOT "http://www.w3.org/2005/05/wsdl".
• Zero or more element information item amongst its [children], in order, as
follows:
1. An OPTIONAL documentation element information item (see 5.
Documentation).
2. Zero or more element information items from among the following, in any
order:
☆ Zero or more feature element information items 2.7.2 XML
Representation of Feature Component
☆ Zero or more property element information items 2.8.2 XML
Representation of Property Component
☆ Zero or more namespace-qualified element information items whose
[namespace name] is NOT "http://www.w3.org/2005/05/wsdl".
2.3.2.1 name attribute information item with fault [owner element]
The name attribute information item identifies a given fault element
information item inside a given interface element information item.
The name attribute information item has the following Infoset properties:
• A [local name] of name
• A [namespace name] which has no value
The type of the name attribute information item is xs:NCName.
2.3.2.2 element attribute information item with fault [owner element]
The element attribute information item refers, by QName, to an element
declaration component.
The element attribute information item has the following Infoset properties:
• A [local name] of element .
• A [namespace name] which has no value.
The type of the element attribute information item is xs:QName.
2.3.3 Mapping Interface Fault's XML Representation to Component Properties
The mapping from the XML Representation of the fault element information item
(see 2.3.2 XML Representation of Interface Fault Component) to the properties
of the Interface Fault component (see 2.3.1 The Interface Fault Component) is
as described in Table 2-3.
Table 2-3. Mapping from XML Representation to Interface Fault Component
Properties
┌────────────┬────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Property │ Value │
├────────────┼────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ │The QName whose local name is the actual value of the name │
│ │attribute information item. and whose namespace name is the │
│{name} │actual value of the targetNamespace attribute information item │
│ │of the [parent] description element information item of the │
│ │[parent] interface element information item. │
├────────────┼────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ │The element declaration from the {element declarations} property│
│ │of 2.1.1 The Description Component resolved to by the value of │
│{element │the element attribute information item if present (see 2.19 │
│declaration}│QName resolution), otherwise empty. It is an error for the │
│ │element attribute information item to have a value and for it to│
│ │not resolve to a global element declaration from the {element │
│ │declarations} property of 2.1.1 The Description Component. │
├────────────┼────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│{features} │The set of Feature components corresponding to the feature │
│ │element information items in [children], if any. │
├────────────┼────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│{properties}│The set of Property components corresponding to the property │
│ │element information items in [children], if any. │
├────────────┼────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│{parent} │The Interface component corresponding to the interface element │
│ │information item in [parent]. │
└────────────┴────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
2.4 Interface Operation
2.4.1 The Interface Operation Component
An Interface Operation component describes an operation that a given interface
supports. An operation is an interaction with the service consisting of a set
of (ordinary and fault) messages exchanged between the service and the other
parties involved in the interaction. The sequencing and cardinality of the
messages involved in a particular interaction is governed by the message
exchange pattern used by the operation (see {message exchange pattern}
property).
A message exchange pattern defines placeholders for messages, the participants
in the pattern (i.e., the sources and sinks of the messages), and the
cardinality and sequencing of messages exchanged by the participants. The
message placeholders are associated with specific message types by the
operation that uses the pattern by means of message and fault references (see
{inteface message references} and {interface fault references} properties). The
service whose operation is using the pattern becomes one of the participants of
the pattern. This specification does not define a machine understandable
language for defining message exchange patterns, nor does it define any
specific patterns. The companion specification, [WSDL 2.0 Adjuncts] defines a
set of such patterns and defines identifying URIs any of which MAY be used as
the value of the {message exchange pattern} property.
The properties of the Interface Operation component are as follows:
• {name} REQUIRED. An xs:QName.
• {message exchange pattern} REQUIRED. An xs:anyURI identifying the message
exchange pattern used by the operation. This URI MUST be an absolute URI
(see [IETF RFC 3986]).
• {interface message references} OPTIONAL. A set of Interface Message
Reference components for the ordinary messages the operation accepts or
sends. (See 2.5 Interface Message Reference.)
• {interface fault references} OPTIONAL. A set of Interface Fault Reference
components for the fault messages the operation accepts or sends. (See 2.6
Interface Fault Reference.)
• {style} OPTIONAL. A set of xs:anyURIs identifying the rules that were used
to construct the {element} properties of {interface message references}.
(See 2.4.1.1 Operation Style.) These URIs MUST be absolute URIs (see [IETF
RFC 3986]).
• {safety} REQUIRED. An xs:boolean indicating whether the operation is
asserted to be safe (as defined in Section 3.5 of [Web Architecture]) for
users of the described service to invoke. If this property is false, then
no assertion has been made about the safety of the operation, thus the
operation MAY or MAY NOT be safe. However, an operation SHOULD be marked
safe if it meets the criteria for a safe interaction defined in Section 3.5
of [Web Architecture].
• {features} OPTIONAL. A set of Feature components.
• {properties} OPTIONAL. A set of Property components.
• {parent} REQUIRED. The Interface component that contains this component in
its {interface operations} property.
For each Interface Operation component in the {interface operations} property
of an Interface component, the {name} property MUST be unique.
Interface Operation components are uniquely identified by the the QName of the
enclosing Interface component and QName of the Interface Operation component
itself.
Note:
Despite having a {name} property, Interface Operation components cannot be
identified solely by their QName. Indeed, two Interface components whose {name}
property value has the same namespace name, but different local names, can
contain Interface Operation components with the same {name} property value.
Thus, the {name} property of Interface Operation components is not sufficient
to form the unique identity of an Interface Operation component.
In cases where, due to an interface extending one or more other interfaces, two
or more Interface Operation components have the same value for their {name}
property, then the component models of those Interface Operation components
MUST be equivalent (see 2.17 Equivalence of Components). If the Interface
Operation components are equivalent then they are considered to collapse into a
single component. It is an error if two Interface Operation components have the
same value for their {name} property but are not equivalent.
Note that, due to the above rules, if two interfaces that have the same value
for the namespace name of their {name} property also have one or more
operations that have the same value for their {name} property then those two
interfaces cannot both form part of the derivation chain of a derived interface
unless those operations are the same operation.
Note:
For the above reason, it is considered good practice to ensure, where
necessary, that the {name} property of Interface Operation components within a
namespace are unique, thus allowing such derivation to occur without
inadvertent error.
More than one Interface Fault Reference component in the {interface fault
references} property of an Interface Operation component may refer to the same
message label. In that case, the listed fault types define alternative fault
messages. This allows one to indicate that there is more than one type of fault
that is related to that message.
2.4.1.1 Operation Style
If the {style} property of an Interface Operation component has a value then
that value (a set of URIs) implies the rules that were used to define the
{element} properties (or other property which defines the content of the
message properties; see 3.2 Using Other Schema Languages) of all the Interface
Message Reference components which are members of the {message references}
property of that component. Although a given operation style has the ability to
constrain all input and output messages for an operation, it MAY choose to
contrain only the former or the latter or any combination thereof.
Note that the property MAY not have any value. If this property has a value (a
set of URIs), then for each individual URI that is an element of that set, the
rules implied by that URI (such as rules that govern the schemas) MUST be
followed or it is an error. So, if the set of URIs has more than one item in
it, then the rules implied by ALL the URIs must be adhered to by the content
definitions.
The WSDL Version 2.0 Part 2: Adjuncts specification [WSDL 2.0 Adjuncts] defines
the following operation style:
• RPC Style
2.4.2 XML Representation of Interface Operation Component
?
[ | |
[ | | | ]+
]*
The XML representation for an Interface Operation component is an element
information item with the following Infoset properties:
• A [local name] of operation
• A [namespace name] of "http://www.w3.org/2005/05/wsdl"
• Two or more attribute information items amongst its [attributes] as
follows:
□ A REQUIRED name attribute information item as described below in
2.4.2.1 name attribute information item with operation [owner element].
□ A REQUIRED pattern attribute information item as described below in
2.4.2.2 pattern attribute information item with operation [owner
element].
□ An OPTIONAL style attribute information item as described below in
2.4.2.3 style attribute information item with operation [owner element]
.
□ An OPTIONAL safe attribute information item as described below in
2.4.2.4 safe attribute information item with operation [owner element].
□ Zero or more namespace qualified attribute information items whose
[namespace name] is NOT "http://www.w3.org/2005/05/wsdl".
• One or more element information item amongst its [children], in order, as
follows:
1. An OPTIONAL documentation element information item (see 5.
Documentation).
2. One or more element information items from among the following, in any
order:
☆ One or more element information items from among the following, in
any order:
○ Zero or more input element information items (see 2.5.2 XML
Representation of Interface Message Reference Component).
○ Zero or more output element information items (see 2.5.2 XML
Representation of Interface Message Reference Component).
○ Zero or more infault element information items (see 2.6.2 XML
Representation of Interface Fault Reference).
○ Zero or more outfault element information items (see 2.6.2 XML
Representation of Interface Fault Reference).
☆ Zero or more element information items from among the following, in
any order:
○ A feature element information item (see 2.7.2 XML
Representation of Feature Component).
○ A property element information item (see 2.8.2 XML
Representation of Property Component).
○ Zero or more namespace-qualified element information items
whose [namespace name] is NOT "http://www.w3.org/2005/05/wsdl".
2.4.2.1 name attribute information item with operation [owner element]
The name attribute information item identifies a given operation element
information item inside a given interface element information item.
The name attribute information item has the following Infoset properties:
• A [local name] of name
• A [namespace name] which has no value
The type of the name attribute information item is xs:NCName.
2.4.2.2 pattern attribute information item with operation [owner element]
The pattern attribute information item identifies the message exchange pattern
a given operation uses.
The pattern attribute information item has the following Infoset properties:
• A [local name] of pattern
• A [namespace name] which has no value
The type of the pattern attribute information item is xs:anyURI. Its value MUST
be an absolute URI.
2.4.2.3 style attribute information item with operation [owner element]
The style attribute information item indicates the rules that were used to
construct the {element} properties of the Interface Message Reference
components which are members of the {interface message references} property of
the [owner element] operation.
The style attribute information item has the following Infoset properties:
• A [local name] of style
• A [namespace name] which has no value
The type of the style attribute information item is list of xs:anyURI. Its
value MUST be an absolute URI.
2.4.2.4 safe attribute information item with operation [owner element]
The safe attribute information item indicates whether the operation is declared
to be safe or not.
The safe attribute information item has the following Infoset properties:
• A [local name] of safe
• A [namespace name] which has no value
The type of the safe attribute information item is xs:boolean and does not have
a default value.
2.4.3 Mapping Interface Operation's XML Representation to Component Properties
The mapping from the XML Representation of the operation element information
item (see 2.4.2 XML Representation of Interface Operation Component) to the
properties of the Interface Operation component (see 2.4.1 The Interface
Operation Component) is as described in Table 2-4.
Table 2-4. Mapping from XML Representation to Interface Operation Component
Properties
┌────────────┬────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Property │ Value │
├────────────┼────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ │The QName whose local name is the actual value of the name │
│ │attribute information item and whose namespace name is the │
│{name} │actual value of the targetNamespace attribute information item │
│ │of the [parent] description element information item of the │
│ │[parent] interface element information item. │
├────────────┼────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│{message │ │
│exchange │The actual value of the pattern attribute information item │
│pattern} │ │
├────────────┼────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│{interface │The set of message references corresponding to the input and │
│message │output element information items in [children], if any. │
│references} │ │
├────────────┼────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│{interface │The set of interface fault references corresponding to the │
│fault │infault and outfault element information items in [children], if│
│references} │any. │
├────────────┼────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ │The set containing the URIs in the actual value of the style │
│ │attribute information item if present, otherwise the set │
│{style} │containing the URIs in the actual value of the styleDefault │
│ │attribute information item of the [parent] interface element │
│ │information item if present, otherwise empty. │
├────────────┼────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│{safety} │The actual value of the safe attribute information item if │
│ │present, otherwise the value false. │
├────────────┼────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│{features} │The set of Feature components corresponding to the feature │
│ │element information items in [children], if any. │
├────────────┼────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│{properties}│The set of Property components corresponding to the property │
│ │element information items in [children], if any. │
├────────────┼────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│{parent} │The Interface component corresponding to the interface element │
│ │information item in [parent]. │
└────────────┴────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
2.5 Interface Message Reference
2.5.1 The Interface Message Reference Component
A Interface Message Reference component associates a defined element with a
message exchanged in an operation. By default, the element is defined in the
XML Infoset [XML Information Set].
A message exchange pattern defines a set of placeholder messages that
participate in the pattern and assigns them unique message labels within the
pattern (e.g. 'In', 'Out'). The purpose of an Interface Message Reference
component is to associate an actual message element (XML element declaration or
some other declaration (see 3.2 Using Other Schema Languages)) with a message
in the pattern, as identified by its message label. Later, when the message
exchange pattern is instantiated, messages corresponding to that particular
label will follow the element assignment made by the Interface Message
Reference component.
The properties of the Interface Message Reference component are as follows:
• {message label} REQUIRED. An xs:NCName. This property identifies the role
this message plays in the {message exchange pattern} of the Interface
Operation component this message is contained within. The value of this
property MUST match the name of a placeholder message defined by the
message exchange pattern.
• {direction} REQUIRED. An xs:token with one of the values in or out,
indicating whether the message is coming to the service or going from the
service, respectively. The direction MUST be the same as the direction of
the message identified by the {message label} property in the {message
exchange pattern} of the Interface Operation component this is contained
within.
• {message content model} REQUIRED. An xs:token with one of the values #any,
#none, #other, or #element. A value of #any indicates that the message
content is any single element. A value of #none indicates there is no
message content. A value of #other indicates that the message content is
described by some other extension property that references a declaration in
a non-XML extension type system. A value of #element indicates that the
message consists of a single element described by the global element
declaration referenced by the {element} property. This property is used
only when the message is described using an XML based data model.
• {element declaration} OPTIONAL. A reference to an XML element declaration
in the {element declarations} property of 2.1.1 The Description Component.
This element represents the content or “payload” of the message. When the
{message content model} property has the value #any or #none the {element
declaration} property MUST be empty.
• {features} OPTIONAL. A set of Feature components.
• {properties} OPTIONAL. A set of Property components.
• {parent} REQUIRED. The Interface Operation component that contains this
component in its {interface message references} property.
If a type system not based upon the XML Infoset is in use (as considered in 3.2
Using Other Schema Languages) then additional properties would need to be added
to the Interface Message Reference Component (along with extensibility
attributes to its XML representation) to allow associating such message types
with the message reference.
For each Interface Message Reference component in the {message references}
property of an Interface Operation component, its {message label} property MUST
be unique.
2.5.2 XML Representation of Interface Message Reference Component
?
[ | ]*
The XML representation for an Interface Message Reference component is an
element information item with the following Infoset properties:
• A [local name] of input or output
• A [namespace name] of "http://www.w3.org/2005/05/wsdl"
• Zero or more attribute information items amongst its [attributes] as
follows:
□ An OPTIONAL messageLabel attribute information item as described below
in 2.5.2.1 messageLabel attribute information item with input or output
[owner element].
If the {message exchange pattern} of the Interface Operation component
has only one message with a given value for {direction}, then the
messageLabel attribute information item is optional for the XML
representation of the Message Reference component with that
{direction}.
□ An OPTIONAL element attribute information item as described below in
2.5.2.2 element attribute information item with input or output [owner
element].
□ Zero or more namespace qualified attribute information items whose
[namespace name] is NOT "http://www.w3.org/2005/05/wsdl".
• Zero or more element information item amongst its [children], in order, as
follows:
1. An OPTIONAL documentation element information item (see 5.
Documentation).
2. Zero or more element information items from among the following, in any
order:
☆ Zero or more feature element information items 2.7.2 XML
Representation of Feature Component
☆ Zero or more property element information items 2.8.2 XML
Representation of Property Component
☆ Zero or more namespace-qualified element information items whose
[namespace name] is NOT "http://www.w3.org/2005/05/wsdl".
2.5.2.1 messageLabel attribute information item with input or output [owner
element]
The messageLabel attribute information item identifies the role of this message
in the message exchange pattern of the given operation element information item
.
The messageLabel attribute information item has the following Infoset
properties:
• A [local name] of messageLabel
• A [namespace name] which has no value
The type of the messageLabel attribute information item is xs:NCName.
2.5.2.2 element attribute information item with input or output [owner element]
The element attribute information item has the following Infoset properties:
• A [local name] of element .
• A [namespace name] which has no value.
The type of the element attribute information item is a union of xs:QName and
xs:token where the allowed token values are #any, #none, or #other.
2.5.3 Mapping Interface Message Reference's XML Representation to Component
Properties
The mapping from the XML Representation of the message reference element
information item (see 2.5.2 XML Representation of Interface Message Reference
Component) to the properties of the Interface Message Reference component (see
2.5.1 The Interface Message Reference Component) is as described in Table 2-5.
Table 2-5. Mapping from XML Representation to Interface Message Reference
Component Properties
┌────────────┬────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Property │ Value │
├────────────┼────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ │The actual value of the messageLabel attribute information item │
│{message │if any; otherwise the {message label} property of the message │
│label} │with same {direction} from the {message exchange pattern} of the│
│ │Interface Operation component, provided there is exactly one │
│ │such message; otherwise it is an error. │
├────────────┼────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ │If the [local name] of the element information item is input │
│{direction} │then "in", else if the [local name] of the element information │
│ │item is output then "out". │
├────────────┼────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│{message │If the element attribute information item is present and its │
│content │value is a QName, then #element. Otherwise the actual value of │
│model} │the element attribute information item, if any, otherwise #other│
│ │. │
├────────────┼────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ │If the element attribute information item is present and its │
│ │value is a QName, then the element declaration from the {element│
│ │declarations} property of 2.1.1 The Description Component │
│{element │resolved to by the value of the element attribute information │
│declaration}│item (see 2.19 QName resolution), otherwise empty. It is an │
│ │error for the element attribute information item to have a value│
│ │and for it to not resolve to a global element declaration from │
│ │the {element declarations} property of 2.1.1 The Description │
│ │Component. │
├────────────┼────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│{features} │The set of Feature components corresponding to the feature │
│ │element information items in [children], if any. │
├────────────┼────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│{properties}│The set of Property components corresponding to the property │
│ │element information items in [children], if any. │
├────────────┼────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│{parent} │The Interface Operation component corresponding to the interface│
│ │element information item in [parent]. │
└────────────┴────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
2.6 Interface Fault Reference
2.6.1 The Interface Fault Reference Component
An Interface Fault Reference component associates a defined type, specified by
an Interface Fault component, to a fault message exchanged in an operation.
A message exchange pattern defines a set of placeholder messages that
participate in the pattern and assigns them unique message labels within the
pattern (e.g. 'In', 'Out'). The purpose of an Interface Fault Reference
component is to associate an actual message type (XML element declaration or
some other declaration (see 3.2 Using Other Schema Languages) for message
content, as specified by an Interface Fault component) with a fault message
occurring in the pattern. In order to identify the fault message it describes,
the Fault Reference component uses the message label of the message the fault
is associated with as a key.
The companion specification [WSDL 2.0 Adjuncts] defines two fault patterns that
a given message exchange pattern may use. For the pattern
fault-replaces-message, the message that the fault relates to identifies the
message in place of which the declared fault message will occur. Thus, the
fault message will travel in the same direction as the message it replaces in
the pattern. For the pattern message-triggers-fault, the message that the fault
relates to identifies the message after which the indicated fault may occur, in
the opposite direction of the referred to message. That is, the fault message
will travel in the opposite direction of the message it comes after in the
pattern.
The properties of the Interface Fault Reference component are as follows:
• {interface fault} REQUIRED. An Interface Fault component in the {interface
faults} property of the [parent] Interface Operation component's [parent]
Interface component, or an Interface component that it directly or
indirectly extends. Identifying the Interface Fault component therefore
indirectly defines the actual content or payload of the fault message.
• {message label} REQUIRED. An xs:NCName. This property identifies the
message this fault relates to among those defined in the {message exchange
pattern} property of the Interface Operation component it is contained
within. The value of this property MUST match the name of a placeholder
message defined by the message exchange pattern.
• {direction} REQUIRED. A xs:token with one of the values in or out,
indicating whether the fault is coming to the service or going from the
service, respectively. The direction MUST be consistent with the direction
implied by the fault rule used in the message exchange pattern of the
operation. For example, if the fault rule fault-replaces-message is used,
then a fault which refers to an outgoing message would have a {direction}
property value of out. On the other hand, if the fault rule
message-triggers-fault is used, then a fault which refers to an outgoing
message would have a {direction} property value of in as the fault travels
in the opposite direction of the message.
• {features} OPTIONAL. A set of Feature components.
• {properties} OPTIONAL. A set of Property components.
• {parent} REQUIRED. The Interface Operation component that contains this
component in its {interface fault references} property.
2.6.2 XML Representation of Interface Fault Reference
?
[ | ]*
*
?
[ | ]*
*
The XML representation for a Interface Fault Reference component is an element
information item with the following Infoset properties:
• A [local name] of infault or outfault
• A [namespace name] of "http://www.w3.org/2005/05/wsdl"
• One or more attribute information items amongst its [attributes] as
follows:
□ A REQUIRED ref attribute information item as described below in 2.6.2.1
ref attribute information item with infault, or outfault [owner
element].
□ An OPTIONAL messageLabel attribute information item as described below
in 2.6.2.2 messageLabel attribute information item with infault, or
outfault [owner element].
If the {message exchange pattern} of the Interface Operation component
has only one message with a given value for {direction}, the
messageLabel attribute information item is optional for the XML
representation of any Interface Fault Reference component with the same
value for {direction} (if the fault pattern of the {message exchange
pattern} is fault-replaces-message) or of any Fault Reference component
with the opposite value for {direction} (if the fault pattern is
message-triggers-fault).
□ Zero or more namespace qualified attribute information items whose
[namespace name] is NOT "http://www.w3.org/2005/05/wsdl".
• Zero or more element information item amongst its [children], in order, as
follows:
1. An OPTIONAL documentation element information item (see 5.
Documentation).
2. Zero or more element information items from among the following, in any
order:
☆ Zero or more feature element information items 2.7.2 XML
Representation of Feature Component
☆ Zero or more property element information items 2.8.2 XML
Representation of Property Component
☆ Zero or more namespace-qualified element information items whose
[namespace name] is NOT "http://www.w3.org/2005/05/wsdl".
2.6.2.1 ref attribute information item with infault , or outfault [owner
element]
The ref attribute information item refers to a fault component.
The ref attribute information item has the following Infoset properties:
• A [local name] of ref
• A [namespace name] which has no value
The type of the ref attribute information item is xs:QName.
2.6.2.2 messageLabel attribute information item with infault , or outfault
[owner element]
The messageLabel attribute information item identifies the message in the
message exchange pattern of the given operation element information item to
which this fault is related to.
The messageLabel attribute information item has the following Infoset
properties:
• A [local name] of messageLabel
• A [namespace name] which has no value
The type of the messageLabel attribute information item is xs:NCName.
2.6.3 Mapping Interface Fault Reference's XML Representation to Component
Properties
The mapping from the XML Representation of the message reference element
information item (see 2.6.2 XML Representation of Interface Fault Reference) to
the properties of the Interface Fault Reference component (see 2.6.1 The
Interface Fault Reference Component) is as described in Table 2-6.
Table 2-6. Mapping from XML Representation to Interface Fault Reference
Component Properties
┌────────────┬────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Property │ Value │
├────────────┼────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ │The Interface Fault component from {interface faults} property │
│{interface │of the parent Interface component, or an Interface component │
│fault} │that it directly or indirectly extends, whose {name} property is│
│ │the actual value of the ref attribute information item. │
├────────────┼────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ │The actual value of the messageLabel attribute information item │
│ │if any; otherwise the {message label} property of the message │
│ │with the same {direction} from the {message exchange pattern} of│
│ │the Interface Operation component, provided there is exactly one│
│{message │such message and the fault pattern of the {message exchange │
│label} │pattern} is fault-replaces-message; otherwise the {interface │
│ │message reference} property of the message with the opposite │
│ │{direction}, provided there is exactly one such message and the │
│ │fault pattern is message-triggers-fault; otherwise it is an │
│ │error. │
├────────────┼────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ │If the [local name] of the element information item is infault │
│{direction} │then "in", else if the [local name] of the element information │
│ │item is outfault then "out". │
├────────────┼────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│{features} │The set of Feature components corresponding to the feature │
│ │element information items in [children], if any. │
├────────────┼────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│{properties}│The set of Property components corresponding to the property │
│ │element information items in [children], if any. │
├────────────┼────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│{parent} │The Interface Operation component corresponding to the interface│
│ │element information item in [parent]. │
└────────────┴────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
2.7 Feature
2.7.1 The Feature Component
A feature component describes an abstract piece of functionality typically
associated with the exchange of messages between communicating parties.
Although WSDL 2.0 imposes no constraints on the potential scope of such
features, examples might include “reliability”, “security”, “correlation”, and
“routing”. The presence of a feature component in a WSDL 2.0 description
indicates that the service supports the feature and may require a client that
interacts with the service to use that feature. Each Feature is identified by
its URI.
WSDL 2.0's feature concept is derived from SOAP 1.2's abstract feature concept
([SOAP 1.2 Part 1: Messaging Framework]). Thus, by definition, every SOAP 1.2
abstract feature is also a WSDL 2.0 feature and does not have to be declared as
such.
The properties of the Feature component are as follows:
• {uri} REQUIRED. An xs:anyURI. This URI MUST be absolute as defined by [IETF
RFC 3986]. This URI SHOULD be dereferenceable to a document that directly
or indirectly defines the meaning and use of the Feature that it
identifies.
• {required} REQUIRED. An xs:boolean. If the value of this property is true,
then the client MUST use the Feature that is identified by the {uri} URI.
Otherwise, the client MAY use the Feature that is identified by the {uri}
URI. In either case, if the client does use the Feature that is identified
by the {uri} URI, then the client MUST obey all semantics implied by the
definition of that Feature.
• {parent} REQUIRED. The component that contains this component in its
{features} property.
The {uri} property of a Feature component MUST be unique within the {features}
property of an Interface, Interface Fault, Interface Operation, Interface
Message Reference, Fault Reference, Binding, Binding Fault, Binding Operation,
Binding Message Reference, Binding Fault Reference, Service, or Endpoint
component.
2.7.1.1 Feature Composition Model
The set of features which are required or available for a given component
consists of the combined set of ALL feature declarations applicable to that
component. A feature is applicable to a component if:
• it is asserted directly within that component, or
• it is asserted in a containing component, or
• it is asserted in a component referred to by the current component.
Following these rules, the set of features applicable at each component are as
follows:
• Interface component: all features asserted within the interface component.
• Interface Fault component: all features asserted within the interface fault
component and those within the [parent] interface component.
• Interface Operation component: all features asserted within the interface
operation component and those within the [parent] interface component.
• Interface Message Reference component: all features asserted within the
interface message reference component, those within the [parent] interface
operation component and those within its [parent] interface component.
• Interface Fault Reference component: all features asserted within the fault
reference component, those within the [parent] interface operation
component and those within its [parent] interface component.
• Binding component: all features asserted within the binding component and
those within the interface component referred to by the binding component
(if any).
• Binding Fault component: all features asserted within the binding fault
component, those within the [parent] binding component, those within the
corresponding interface fault component, and those within the interface
component referred to by the binding component (if any).
• Binding Operation component: all features asserted within the binding
operation component, those within the [parent] binding component, those
within the corresponding interface operation component, and those within
the interface component referred to by the binding component.
• Binding Message Reference component: all features asserted within the
binding message reference component, those within the [parent] binding
operation component, those within its [parent] binding component, those
within the corresponding message reference component, and those within the
interface component referred to by the binding component.
• Binding Fault Reference component: all features asserted within the binding
fault reference component, those within the [parent] binding operation
component, those within its [parent] binding component, those within the
corresponding fault reference component, and those within the interface
component referred to by the binding component.
If a given feature is asserted at multiple locations, then the value of that
feature at a particular component is determined by the conjunction of all the
constraints implied by its asserted values. If a feature is not required then
it may or may not be engaged, but if a feature is required then it must be
engaged. Therefore, the conjunction of a required value and a non-required
value is a required value. A composed feature is required if and only if at
least one of its asserted values is required. This rule may be summarized as
"true trumps".
2.7.1.1.1 Example of Feature Composition Model
In the following example, the depositFunds operation on the BankService has to
be used with the ISO9001 , the notarization and the secure-channel features;
they are all in scope. The fact that the notarization feature is declared both
in the operation and in the binding has no effect.
...
...
...
2.7.2 XML Representation of Feature Component
?
The XML representation for a Feature component is an element information item
with the following Infoset properties:
• A [local name] of feature
• A [namespace name] of "http://www.w3.org/2005/05/wsdl"
• One or more attribute information items amongst its [attributes] as
follows:
□ A REQUIRED uri attribute information item as described below in 2.7.2.1
uri attribute information item with feature [owner element].
□ An OPTIONAL required attribute information item as described below in
2.7.2.2 required attribute information item with feature [owner
element].
□ Zero or more namespace qualified attribute information items whose
[namespace name] is NOT "http://www.w3.org/2005/05/wsdl".
• Zero or more element information items amongst its [children], in order as
follows:
1. An OPTIONAL documentation element information item (see 5.
Documentation).
2. Zero or more namespace-qualified element information items whose
[namespace name] is NOT "http://www.w3.org/2005/05/wsdl".
2.7.2.1 uri attribute information item with feature [owner element]
The uri attribute information item specifies the URI of the feature.
The uri attribute information item has the following Infoset properties:
• A [local name] of uri
• A [namespace name] which has no value
The type of the uri attribute information item is xs:anyURI .
2.7.2.2 required attribute information item with feature [owner element]
The required attribute information item specifies whether the use of the
feature is mandatory or optional.
The required attribute information item has the following Infoset properties:
• A [local name] of required
• A [namespace name] which has no value
The type of the required attribute information item is xs:boolean .
2.7.3 Mapping Feature's XML Representation to Component Properties
The mapping from the XML Representation of the feature element information item
(see 2.7.2 XML Representation of Feature Component) to the properties of the
Feature component (see 2.7.1 The Feature Component) is as described in Table
2-7.
Table 2-7. Mapping from XML Representation to Feature Component Properties
┌──────────┬──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Property │ Value │
├──────────┼──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│{uri} │The actual value of the uri attribute information item │
├──────────┼──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│{required}│The actual value of the required attribute information item if │
│ │present, otherwise "false". │
├──────────┼──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│{parent} │The component corresponding to the element information item in │
│ │[parent]. │
└──────────┴──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
2.8 Property
2.8.1 The Property Component
A “property” in the Features and Properties architecture represents a named
runtime value which affects the behavior of some aspect of a Web service
interaction, much like an environment variable. For example, a reliable
messaging SOAP module may specify a property to control the number of retries
in the case of network failure. WSDL 2.0 documents may specify the value
constraints for these properties by referring to a Schema type, or by
specifying a particular value. Properties, and hence property values, can be
shared amongst features/bindings/modules, and are named with URIs precisely to
allow this type of sharing.
The properties of the Property component are as follows:
• {uri} REQUIRED. An xs:anyURI. This URI MUST be absolute as defined by [IETF
RFC 3986]. This URI SHOULD be dereferenceable to a document that directly
or indirectly defines the meaning and use of the Property that it
identifies.
• {value constraint} OPTIONAL. A reference to a type definition in the {type
definitions} property of 2.1.1 The Description Component constraining the
value of the property, or the token #value if the {value} property is not
empty.
• {value} OPTIONAL. The value of the property, an ordered list of child
information items, as specified by the [children] property of element
information items in [XML Information Set].
• {parent} REQUIRED. The component that contains this component in its
{properties} property.
The {uri} property of a Property component MUST be unique within the
{properties} property of an Interface, Interface Fault, Interface Operation,
Interface Message Reference, Fault Reference, Binding, Binding Fault, Binding
Operation, Binding Message Reference, Binding Fault Reference, Service, or
Endpoint component.
If a type system not based upon the XML Infoset is in use (as considered in 3.2
Using Other Schema Languages) then additional properties would need to be added
to the Property Component (along with extensibility attributes to its XML
representation) to allow using such a type system to describe values and
constraints for properties.
2.8.1.1 Property Composition Model
At runtime, the behavior of features, (SOAP) modules and bindings may be
affected by the values of in-scope properties. Properties combine into a
virtual “execution context” which maps property names (URIs) to constraints.
Each property URI MAY therefore be associated with AT MOST one property
constraint for a given interaction.
The set of properties which are required or available for a given component
consists of the combined set of ALL property declarations applicable to that
component. A property is applicable to a component if:
• it is asserted directly within that component, or
• it is asserted in a containing component, or
• it is asserted in a component referred to by the current component.
Following these rules, the set of properties applicable at each component are
as follows:
• Interface component: all properties asserted within the interface
component.
• Interface Fault component: all properties asserted within the interface
fault component and those within the [parent] interface component.
• Interface Operation component: all properties asserted within the interface
operation component and those within the [parent] interface component.
• Interface Message Reference component: all properties asserted within the
message reference component, those within the [parent] interface operation
component and those within its [parent] interface component.
• Binding component: all properties asserted within the binding component and
those within the interface component referred to by the binding component
(if any).
• Binding Fault component: all properties asserted within the binding fault
component, those within the [parent] binding component, those within the
corresponding interface fault component, and those within the interface
component referred to by the binding component (if any).
• Binding Operation component: all properties asserted within the binding
operation component, those within the [parent] binding component, those
within the corresponding interface operation component, and those within
the interface component referred to by the binding component.
• Binding Message Reference component: all properties asserted within the
binding message reference component, those within the [parent] binding
operation component, those within its [parent] binding component, those
within the corresponding interface message reference component, and those
within the interface component referred to by the binding component.
• Binding Fault Reference component: all properties asserted within the
binding fault reference component, those within the [parent] binding
operation component, those within its [parent] binding component, those
within the corresponding fault reference component, and those within the
interface component referred to by the binding component.
Note that, in the text above, “property constraint” (or, simply, “constraint”)
is used to mean EITHER a constraint inside a property component OR a value ,
since value may be considered a special case of constraint .
If a given property is asserted at multiple locations, then the value of that
property at a particular component is determined by the conjunction of all the
constraints of its in-scope property components. A property constraint asserts
that, for a given interaction, the value of a property is either a specified
value or belongs to a specified set of values. A specified value may be
regarded as a singleton set, so in both cases a property constraint corresponds
to an assertion that the property value belongs to some set. The conjunction of
all the constraints associated with the in-scope properties is an assertion
that the property value belongs to each of the associated sets, or
equivalently, that the value belongs to the intersection of all the associated
sets. If the intersection of the associated sets is empty, then the property
constraints are mutually incompatible, and the composition is invalid.
Therefore, the intersection of the associated sets SHOULD NOT be empty.
Note:
The reason that we phrase the requirement for a non-empty intersection as
SHOULD rather than MUST, is that in general, it may be computationally
difficult to determine by inspection of the type definitions that the
intersection of two or more value sets is empty. Therefore, it is not a strict
validity requirement that the intersection of the value sets be non-empty. An
empty intersection will always result in failure of the service at run-time.
However, it is in general feasible to test specified values for either equality
or membership in value sets. All specified values MUST be equal and belong to
each specified value set.
2.8.2 XML Representation of Property Component
?
[ | ]?
The XML representation for a Property component is an element information item
with the following Infoset properties:
• A [local name] of property
• A [namespace name] of "http://www.w3.org/2005/05/wsdl"
• One or more attribute information items amongst its [attributes] as
follows:
□ A REQUIRED uri attribute information item as described below in 2.8.2.1
uri attribute information item with property [owner element].
□ Zero or more namespace qualified attribute information items whose
[namespace name] is NOT "http://www.w3.org/2005/05/wsdl".
• Zero or more element information items amongst its [children], in order as
follows:
1. An OPTIONAL documentation element information item (see 5.
Documentation).
2. One OPTIONAL element information item from among the following:
☆ A value element information item as described in 2.8.2.2 value
element information item with property [parent]
☆ A constraint element information item as described in 2.8.2.3
constraint element information item with property [parent]
3. Zero or more namespace-qualified element information items whose
[namespace name] is NOT "http://www.w3.org/2005/05/wsdl".
2.8.2.1 uri attribute information item with property [owner element]
The uri attribute information item specifies the URI of the property. It has
the following Infoset properties:
• A [local name] of uri
• A [namespace name] which has no value
The type of the uri attribute information item is xs:anyURI .
2.8.2.2 value element information item with property [parent]
xs:anyType
The value element information item specifies the value of the property. It has
the following Infoset properties:
• A [local name] of value
• A [namespace name] of "http://www.w3.org/2005/05/wsdl"
The type of the value element information item is xs:anyType .
2.8.2.3 constraint element information item with property [parent]
xs:QName
The constraint element information item specifies a constraint on the value of
the property. It has the following Infoset properties:
• A [local name] of constraint
• A [namespace name] of "http://www.w3.org/2005/05/wsdl"
The type of the constraint attribute information item is xs:QName .
2.8.3 Mapping Property's XML Representation to Component Properties
The mapping from the XML Representation of the property element information
item (see 2.8.2 XML Representation of Property Component) to the properties of
the Property component (see 2.8.1 The Property Component) is as described in
Table 2-8.
Table 2-8. Mapping from XML Representation to Property Component Properties
┌───────────┬─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Property │ Value │
├───────────┼─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│{uri} │The actual value of the uri attribute information item. │
├───────────┼─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ │If the constraint element information item is present, the type │
│ │definition from the {type definitions} property of 2.1.1 The │
│{value │Description Component resolved to by the value of the constraint │
│constraint}│element information item (see 2.19 QName resolution). Otherwise, │
│ │if the value element information item is present, the token # │
│ │value, otherwise empty. │
├───────────┼─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│{value} │The value of the [children] property of the value element │
│ │information item, if that element is present, otherwise empty. │
├───────────┼─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│{parent} │The component corresponding to the element information item in │
│ │[parent]. │
└───────────┴─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
2.9 Binding
2.9.1 The Binding Component
A Binding component describes a concrete message format and transmission
protocol which may be used to define an endpoint (see 2.15 Endpoint). That is,
a Binding component defines the implementation details necessary to access the
service.
Binding components can be used to describe such information in a re-usable
manner for any interface or specifically for a given interface. Furthermore,
binding information MAY be specified on a per-operation basis (see 2.11.1 The
Binding Operation Component) within an interface in addition to across all
operations of an interface.
If a Binding component specifies any operation-specific binding details (by
including Binding Operation components) or any fault binding details (by
including Binding Fault components) then it MUST specify an interface the
Binding component applies to, so as to indicate which interface the operations
come from.
Conversely, a Binding component which omits any operation-specific binding
details and any fault binding details MAY omit specifying an interface. Binding
components that do not specify an interface MAY be used to specify
operation-independent binding details for Service components with different
interfaces. That is, such Binding components are reusable across one or more
interfaces.
No concrete binding details are given in this specification. The companion
specification, WSDL (Version 2.0): Adjuncts [WSDL 2.0 Adjuncts] defines such
bindings for SOAP 1.2 [SOAP 1.2 Part 1: Messaging Framework] and HTTP [IETF RFC
2616]. Other specifications MAY define additional binding details. Such
specifications are expected to annotate the Binding component (and its
sub-components) with additional properties and specify the mapping from the XML
representation to those properties.
A Binding component which defines bindings for an Interface component MUST
define bindings for all the operations of that Interface component. The
bindings may occur via defaulting rules which allow one to specify default
bindings for all operations (see, for example [WSDL 2.0 Adjuncts]) or by
directly listing each Operation component of the Interface component and
defining bindings for them. Thus, it is an error for a Binding component to not
define bindings for all the Operation components of the Interface component for
which the Binding component purportedly defines bindings for.
Bindings are named constructs and can be referred to by QName (see 2.19 QName
resolution). For instance, Endpoint components refer to bindings in this way.
The properties of the Binding component are as follows:
• {name} REQUIRED. An xs:QName.
• {interface} OPTIONAL. An Interface component indicating the interface for
which binding information is being specified.
• {type} REQUIRED. An xs:anyURI. This URI MUST be absolute as defined by [
IETF RFC 3986]. The value of this URI indicates what kind of concrete
binding details are contained within this Binding component. Specifications
(such as [WSDL 2.0 Adjuncts] ) that define such concrete binding details
MUST specify appropriate values for this property. The value of this
property MAY be the namespace name of the extension elements or attributes
which define those concrete binding details.
• {binding faults} OPTIONAL. A set of Binding Fault components.
• {binding operations} OPTIONAL. A set of Binding Operation components.
• {features} OPTIONAL. A set of Feature components.
• {properties} OPTIONAL. A set of Property components.
For each Binding component in the {bindings} property of a description
container, the {name} property MUST be unique.
2.9.2 XML Representation of Binding Component
?
[ | | | ]*
The XML representation for a Binding component is an element information item
with the following Infoset properties:
• A [local name] of binding
• A [namespace name] of "http://www.w3.org/2005/05/wsdl"
• Two or more attribute information items amongst its [attributes] as
follows:
□ A REQUIRED name attribute information item as described below in
2.9.2.1 name attribute information item with binding [owner element].
□ An OPTIONAL interface attribute information item as described below in
2.9.2.2 interface attribute information item with binding [owner
element].
□ An REQUIRED type attribute information item as described below in
2.9.2.3 type attribute information item with binding [owner element].
□ Zero or more namespace qualified attribute information items whgse
[namespace name] is NOT "http://www.w3.org/2005/05/wsdl".
• Zero or mor