#UAAG 1.0 Postscript format UAAG 1.0 PDF format UAAG 1.0 plain text format UAAG 1.0 zip archive [contents] [summary] [checklist] [linear checklist] _________________________________________________________________ W3C User Agent Accessibility Guidelines 1.0 W3C Candidate Recommendation, 12 September 2001 This version: http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/CR-UAAG10-20010912/ (Formats: single HTML, plain text, gzip PostScript, gzip PDF, gzip tar file of HTML, zip archive of HTML) Latest version: http://www.w3.org/TR/UAAG10/ Previous version: http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/WD-UAAG10-20010622/ Editors: Ian Jacobs, W3C Jon Gunderson, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Eric Hansen, Educational Testing Service Authors and Contributors: See acknowledgements. Copyright © 1999 - 2001 W3C^® (MIT, INRIA, Keio), All Rights Reserved. W3C liability, trademark, document use and software licensing rules apply. _________________________________________________________________ Abstract This document provides guidelines for designing user agents that lower barriers to Web accessibility for people with disabilities (visual, hearing, physical, and cognitive). User agents include HTML browsers and other types of software that retrieve and render Web content. A user agent that conforms to these guidelines will promote accessibility through its own user interface and through other internal facilities, including its ability to communicate with other technologies (especially assistive technologies). Furthermore, all users, not just users with disabilities, are expected to find conforming user agents to be more usable. In addition to helping developers of HTML browsers, media players, etc., this document will also benefit developers of assistive technologies because it explains what types of information and control an assistive technology may expect from a conforming user agent. Technologies not addressed directly by this document (e.g., technologies for braille rendering) will be essential to ensuring Web access for some users with disabilities. Status of this document This section describes the status of this document at the time of its publication. Other documents may supersede this document. The latest status of this document series is maintained at the W3C. This is the 12 September 2001 Candidate Recommendation of "User Agent Accessibility Guidelines 1.0". W3C publishes a technical report as a Candidate Recommendation to indicate that the document is believed to be stable, and to encourage implementation by the developer community. Candidate Recommendation status is described in section 5.2.3 of the Process Document. The UAWG resolved to request to advance to Candidate Recommendation at its 30 August 2001 teleconference. The User Agent Accessibility Guidelines Working Group (UAWG) expects to request that the Director advance this document to Proposed Recommendation once the Working Group has demonstrated two implementations of each requirement. The UAWG, working closely with the developer community, expects to show these implementations by the end of December 2001. This estimate is based on the UAWG's initial implementation report. The UAWG expects to revise this report over the course of the implementation period. This document incorporates resolutions of the User Agent Accessibility Guidelines Working Group to all issues raised during the third last call review of the 9 April 2001 version. A snapshot of the third last call issues list is available, as is the disposition of comments (which includes objections). A list of changes to this document is available. Publication as a Candidate Recommendation does not imply endorsement by the W3C Membership. This is a draft document and may be updated, replaced or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to cite this document as other than "work in progress." Please send comments about this document to the public mailing list w3c-wai-ua@w3.org; public archives are available. This document is part of a series of accessibility documents published by the Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI) of the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C). WAI Accessibility Guidelines are produced as part of the WAI Technical Activity. The goals of the User Agent Accessibility Guidelines Working Group are described in the charter. A list of current W3C Recommendations and other technical documents can be found at the W3C Web site. Table of contents * Abstract * Status of this document * 1. Introduction + 1.1 Relationship to WAI accessibility guidelines + 1.2 Target user agents + 1.3 Known limitations of this document + 1.4 Relationship to general software design guidelines * 2. The user agent accessibility guidelines + 1. Support input and output device-independence. + 2. Ensure user access to all content. + 3. Allow configuration not to render some content that may reduce accessibility. + 4. Ensure user control of rendering. + 5. Ensure user control of user interface behavior. + 6. Implement interoperable application programming interfaces. + 7. Observe operating environment conventions. + 8. Implement specifications that benefit accessibility. + 9. Provide navigation mechanisms. + 10. Orient the user. + 11. Allow configuration and customization. + 12. Provide accessible user agent documentation and help. * 3. Conformance + 3.1 Unconditional conformance + 3.2 Conditional conformance + 3.3 Conformance details + 3.4 Conformance levels + 3.5 Content type labels + 3.6 Input modality labels + 3.7 Selection label + 3.8 Checkpoint applicability + 3.9 Well-formed conformance claims + 3.10 Validity of a claim * 4. Glossary * 5. References + 5.1 How to refer to this document + 5.2 Normative references + 5.3 Informative references * 6. Acknowledgments An appendix to this document [UAAG10-SUMMARY] summarizes the document's principal goals and structure. Another appendix to this document [UAAG10-CHECKLIST] lists all checkpoints for convenient reference (e.g., as a tool for developers to evaluate software for conformance). Note: With a user agent that implements HTML 4 [HTML4] access keys, readers may navigate directly to the table of contents via the "c" character. Users may have to use additional keyboard strokes depending on their operating environment. Related resources A separate document, entitled "Techniques for User Agent Accessibility Guidelines 1.0" [UAAG10-TECHS], provides suggestions and examples of how each checkpoint might be satisfied. It also includes references to other accessibility resources (such as platform-specific software accessibility guidelines) that provide additional information on how a user agent may satisfy each checkpoint. The techniques provided in "Techniques for User Agent Accessibility Guidelines 1.0" are informative examples only, and other strategies may be used or required to satisfy the checkpoints. The Techniques document is expected to be updated more frequently than the current guidelines. Developers, W3C Working Groups, users, and others are encouraged to contribute techniques for incorporation into the Techniques document. The Web Accessibility Initiative provides other resources and educational materials to promote Web accessibility. Resources include information about accessibility policies, links to translations of WAI materials into languages other than English, information about specialized user agents and other tools, accessibility training resources, and more. _________________________________________________________________ 1. Introduction This document specifies requirements that, if satisfied by user agent developers, will lower barriers to accessibility. This introduction (section 1) provides context for understanding the guidelines listed in section 2. Section 1 explains the relationship of this document to other accessibility guidelines published by the Web Accessibility Initiative, which user agents are expected to conform, known limitations of this document, and the relationship of this document to other software design guidelines. Section 3 explains how to make claims that software conforms to these guidelines and details about the applicability of the requirements for different kinds of user agents. 1.1 Relationship to WAI accessibility guidelines "User Agent Accessibility Guidelines 1.0" (UAAG 1.0) is part of a series of accessibility guidelines published by the Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI). The documents in this series reflect an accessibility model in which Web content authors, format designers, and software developers have roles in ensuring that users with disabilities have access to the Web. These stakeholders intersect and complement each other as follows: * Protocol (e.g., HTTP) and content format (e.g., HTML, XHTML, XML, SVG, SMIL, MathML, etc.) specifications allow communication on the Web. Format designers include features that authors should use to create accessible content, and features that user agents should support through an accessible user interface. * Authors make use of the accessibility features of different format specifications, use markup appropriately, write in clear and simple language, organize a Web site consistently, etc. The "Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 1.0" [WCAG10] explains the responsibilities of authors in meeting the needs of users with disabilities. The "Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 1.0" is considered the reference for what defines accessible Web content. The "Authoring Tool Accessibility Guidelines 1.0" [ATAG10] explains the responsibilities of authoring tool developers. An accessible authoring tool facilitates the creation of accessible Web content and may be operated by users with disabilities. * User agent developers design software that conforms to specifications (including implementation of their accessibility features), provides an accessible user interface, accessible documentation, and communicates with other software (notably assistive technologies). This document explains the responsibilities of user agents in meeting the needs of users with disabilities. The requirements of this document interact with those of the "Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 1.0" [WCAG10] in a number of ways: * UAAG 1.0 checkpoint 8.1 requires implementation of the accessibility features of all implemented specifications. Features are those identified as such and those that satisfy all of the requirements of WCAG 1.0 [WCAG10]. * UAAG 1.0 checkpoint 12.1 requires conformance to WCAG 1.0 for user agent documentation. * UAAG 1.0 also incorporates some terms and concepts from WCAG 1.0, a natural consequence of fact that the documents were designed to complement one another. Formats, authors, and designers all have limitations. Formats generally do not enable authors to encode all of their knowledge in a way that a user agent can recognize 100%. A format may lack features required for accessibility. An author may not make use of the accessibility features of a format or may misuse a format (which can cause problems for user agents). A user agent designer may not implement a format specification correctly or completely. Some requirements of this document take these limitations into account. * UAAG 1.0 includes requirements to satisfy the expectations set by WCAG 1.0 "until user agent" clauses. These clauses make additional requirements of authors in order to compensate for some limitations of deployed user agents. * UAAG 1.0 includes several repair requirements (e.g., checkpoints checkpoint 2.7 and checkpoint 2.11) for cases where content does not conform to WCAG 1.0. Furthermore, this document includes some requirements to address certain widespread authoring practices that are discouraged because they may cause accessibility or usability problems (e.g., some uses of HTML frames). * Except for the indicated repair checkpoints, UAAG 1.0 only requires user agents to handle what may be recognized through protocols and formats. For example, user agents are not expected to recognize that the author has used "clear and simple" language to express ideas. Please see the section on checkpoint applicability for more information about what the user agent is expected to recognize. 1.2 Target user agents This document was designed specifically to improve the accessibility of user agents with multimedia capabilities running in the following type of environment (typically that of a desktop computer): * The operating environment includes a keyboard; * Assistive technologies may be used in the operating environment and may communicate with the conforming user agent; This document is not designed so that user agents on other types of platforms (e.g., handheld devices, kiosks, etc.) will readily conform. This document does not forbid conformance by any user agent, but some requirements (e.g., implementation of certain APIs) are not likely to be satisfied on environments other than the target environment. Future work by the UAWG may address the accessibility of user agents running on handheld devices, etc. The target user agent is one designed for the general public to handle general-purpose content in ordinary operating conditions. It is expected that a conforming user agent will typically consist of a Web browser, one or more media players, and possibly other components. This document was designed to improve the accessibility of target user agents for users with one or more disabilities (including visual, hearing, physical, and cognitive) in two ways: 1. through its own user interface, and 2. through other internal facilities, including its ability to communicate with other technologies (especially assistive technologies). Technologies not addressed directly by this document (e.g., those for braille rendering) will be essential to ensuring Web access for some users with disabilities. Note that the ability of conforming user agents to communicate well with assistive technologies will depend in part on the willingness of assistive technology developers to follow the same standards and conventions for communication. This document allows a certain amount of flexibility in the features a user agent must support in order to conform. For example, some user agents may conform even though they do not support certain content types (such as video or audio) or input modalities (such as mouse or voice). See the section on conformance for more information. 1.3 Known limitations of this document People with (or without) disabilities access the Web with widely varying sets of capabilities, software, and hardware. Some users with disabilities: * May not be able to see, hear, move, speak, or may not be able to process some types of information easily or at all. * May have difficulty reading or comprehending text. * May not have or be able to use a keyboard or pointing device. This document does not include requirements to meet all known accessibility needs. Some known limitations of this document include the following: * Input modalities. This document only includes requirements for keyboard, pointing device, and voice input modalities. This document includes several checkpoints related to voice input as part of general input requirements (e.g., the checkpoints of guideline 7 and guideline 11) but does not otherwise address voice-based navigation or control. Note: The UAWG intends to coordinate further work on the topics of voice input and synthesized speech rendering with groups in W3C's Voice Browser Activity. * Output modalities. This document does not include requirements for braille rendering. Some requirements are specific to graphical rendering and others specific to synthesized speech rendering (speech rendering requirements are made by checkpoint 4.12 to checkpoint 4.16). Many of the requirements of this document are generic enough to apply to any output modality (including braille). User agents conform to this document by supporting some combination of graphical and audio/speech rendering output; see the section on content type labels for more information. * Size and color of non-text content. This document includes some checkpoints to ensure that the user is able to control the size and color of visually rendered text content (checkpoints 4.1 and 4.3). This document does not in general address control of the size and color of visually rendered non-text content. Note: Resizing capabilities may be required for conformance to other specifications (e.g., SVG [SVG]). * Background image interference. The requirement of checkpoint 3.1 to allow the user to turn off rendering of background images does not extend to multi-layered rendering. * User control of every user interface component. This document includes some requirements for user control of user interface components that may be changed through content (see guideline 5). However, these requirements do not account for every user interface component that the author may affect (e.g., the author might supply a script that causes text to scroll in the status bar). User agents are required to follow software usability guidelines (see checkpoint 7.3), which are also expected to include requirements for user control over user interface behavior. Note. It is more difficult for users to distinguish content from user interface when both are rendered as sound in one dimension, than it is when both are rendered visually in two dimensions. Developers of aural user agents are therefore strongly encouraged to apply the requirements of this document to both content and user agent components. * Time. This document includes requirements for control of some time parameters (including checkpoint 2.4, checkpoint 4.4, checkpoint 4.5, and checkpoint 4.12). The requirements are for time parameters that the user agent recognizes and controls. This document does not include requirements for control of time parameters managed on the server. * Security. This document does not address security issues that may arise as a result of these requirements. For instance, requirements that software be able to read and write content and user interface information through APIs raise security issues. See the section on restricted functionality and conformance. * Intellectual property. This document does not address intellectual property issues that may arise as a result of these requirements. Note: The User Agent Accessibility Guidelines Working Group may address these topics in a future version of the User Agent Accessibility Guidelines. Even though UAAG 1.0 does not address these topics, user agent developers are encouraged to consider them in their designs. 1.4 Relationship to general software design guidelines Considerable effort has been made to ensure that the requirements of this document are compatible with other good software design practices. However, this document does not purport to be a complete guide to good software design. For instance, the general topic of user interface design for computer software exceeds the scope of this document, though some user interface requirements have been included because of their importance to accessibility. The "Techniques for User Agent Accessibility Guidelines 1.0" [UAAG10-TECHS] includes some references to general software design guidelines and platform-specific accessibility guidelines (see checkpoint 7.3). Involving people with disabilities in the design and testing of software will generally improve the accessibility of the software. Installation is an important aspect of both accessibility and general software usability. On platforms where a user can install a user agent, the installation (and update) procedures need to be accessible. This document does not include a checkpoint requiring that installation procedures be accessible. Since this document considers installation to be part of software usage, the different aspects of installation (user interface, documentation, operating environment conventions, etc.) are already covered by the complete set of checkpoints. Benefits of accessible user agent design Many users without disabilities are likely to benefit from the requirements developed to benefit users with disabilities. For example, users without disabilities: * may have a text-only screen, a small screen, or a slow Internet connection (e.g., via a mobile phone browser). These users are likely to benefit from the same features that provide access to people with low vision or blindness. * may be in a situation where their eyes, ears, or hands are busy or interfered with (e.g., driving to work, working in a noisy environment, etc.). These users are likely to benefit from the same features that provide access to people who cannot use a mouse or keyboard due to a visual, hearing, or physical disability. * may not understand fluently the natural language of spoken content. These users are likely to benefit from the same visual rendering of text equivalents that make spoken language accessible to people with a hearing disability. Software that satisfies the requirements of this document is expected to be more flexible, manageable, extensible, and beneficial to all users. For example, a user agent architecture that allows programmatic access to content and the user interface will encourage software modularity and reuse, and will enable operation by scripting tools and automated test engines in addition to assistive technologies. 2. The user agent accessibility guidelines The twelve guidelines in this document state general principles for the development of accessible user agents. Each guideline includes: * The guideline number. * The statement of the guideline. * The rationale behind the guideline and identification of some groups of users who benefit from it. * A list of checkpoint definitions. This list may be split into groups of related checkpoints. For instance, the list might be split into one group of "checkpoints for visually rendered text" and second group of "checkpoints for audio volume control"." Within each group, checkpoints are ordered according to their priority, e.g., Priority 1 before Priority 2. Within a guideline, checkpoint groupings and checkpoint order have no bearing on conformance. Each checkpoint definition includes the following parts. Some parts are normative (i.e., relate to conformance); others are informative only. * The checkpoint number. * The checkpoint title. This title is not a requirement, just a phrase to help readers remember an important requirement made by the checkpoint statement. (Informative) * The priority of the checkpoint. (Normative) * The statement or statements of the checkpoint. These statements include one or more requirements that must be satisfied by the user agent (i.e., the "subject of the claim) for the purposes of conformance. (Normative) * An optional "content/rendered content/user agent feature/both" label that indicates whether the requirements of the checkpoint must be satisfied by the subject of the claim for all content, all rendered content, for user agent features only, or for both content and user agent features. The label only appears when necessary to disambiguate the checkpoint. (Normative) * A link to rationale, implementation details, references, and more information in "Techniques for User Agent Accessibility Guidelines 1.0" [UAAG10-TECHS]. (Informative) * Content type labels (zero or more). Content type labels are explained in the section on conformance. (Normative) * Optional notes about the checkpoint (beginning with the word "Note"). They notes clarify the scope of the checkpoint through further description, examples, cross references, and commentary. Some checkpoints in this document are more general than others, and some may overlap in scope. Therefore, a checkpoint may be identified as a "special case" or an "important special case" of one or more other checkpoints. (Informative) Each checkpoint definition expresses one or more requirements. These requirements are not technology specific. In fact, they have been designed to be largely technology independent, in order to make sense for a variety of existing and future technologies. "Techniques for User Agent Accessibility Guidelines 1.0" [UAAG10-TECHS] is an important resource to help developers understand how to "apply" the requirements to HTML, CSS, SMIL, and SVG, and several operating environments. The User Agent Accessibility Guidelines Working Group welcomes comments and anticipates discussion on how to apply these requirements to new technologies in different operating environments. Each requirement is a "minimal" requirement, which means that for conformance, the user agent is required to satisfy no more than the stated requirement. In many cases, however, it may be easier or less costly (or just be better design) to implement a general feature that satisfies more than a minimal requirement. One general solution might satisfy five checkpoints and be easier to implement than five disconnected features. For instance, a navigable structure view of content that allows users to query elements for their properties is likely to benefit all users and may be used to satisfy a number of requirements of this document. Some requirements have a wider impact than others. For instance, the keyboard requirements of checkpoint 1.1 have an impact on all other requirements in the document related to user input: any requirement that involves user input must be satisfied through the keyboard. Because the keyboard requirements of checkpoint 1.1 have been factored out, the other checkpoints are shorter; they are written "Allow configuration" instead of "Allow configuration through the keyboard." First-time readers of the document are encouraged to read the full context provided for each checkpoint, including the guideline prose, the surrounding checkpoints (since nearby checkpoints are generally related), notes after checkpoints, and associated techniques (in the Techniques document [UAAG10-TECHS]). The checklist [UAAG10-CHECKLIST] is also a useful tool (e.g., for evaluating a user agent for conformance), but does not provide the same contextual support. Priorities Each checkpoint in this document is assigned a priority that indicates its importance for users with disabilities. Priority 1 (P1) This checkpoint must be satisfied by user agents, otherwise one or more groups of users with disabilities will find it impossible to access the Web. Satisfying this checkpoint is a basic requirement for enabling some people to access the Web. Priority 2 (P2) This checkpoint should be satisfied by user agents, otherwise one or more groups of users with disabilities will find it difficult to access the Web. Satisfying this checkpoint will remove significant barriers to Web access for some people. Priority 3 (P3) This checkpoint may be satisfied by user agents to make it easier for one or more groups of users with disabilities to access information. Satisfying this checkpoint will improve access to the Web for some people. Guideline 1. Support input and output device-independence. Ensure that the user can interact with the user agent (and the content it renders) through different input and output devices. Since people use a variety of devices for input and output, user agent developers need to ensure redundancy in the user interface. The user may have to operate the user interface with a variety of input devices (keyboard, pointing device, voice input, etc.) and output modalities (e.g., graphical, speech, or braille rendering). Though it may seem contradictory, enabling full user agent operation through the keyboard is an important part of promoting device-independence given today's user agents. In addition to the fact that some form of keyboard is supported by most platforms, there are several reasons for this: * For some users (e.g., users with blindness or physical disabilities), operating a user agent with a pointing device may be difficult or impossible since it requires tracking the pointing device position in a two-dimensional visual space. Keyboard operation does not generally require as much movement "through space". * Some assistive technologies that support a diversity of input and output mechanisms use keyboard APIs for communication with some user agents; see checkpoint 6.6. People who cannot or do not use a pointing device may interact with the user interface with the keyboard, through voice input, a head wand, touch screen, or other device. While this document only requires keyboard operation for conformance, it promotes device-independence by also allowing people to claim conformance for full pointing device support or full voice support. As a way to promote output device independence, this guideline requires support for text messages in the user interface because text may be rendered visually, as synthesized speech, and as braille. The API requirements of guideline 6 also promote device independence by ensuring communication with specialized software. Checkpoints 1.1 Full keyboard access. (P1) 1. Ensure that the user can operate through keyboard input alone any user agent functionality available through the user interface. For both content and user agent. Techniques for checkpoint 1.1 Note: User agents may support at least two types of keyboard access to functionalities: direct access (where user awareness of a location "in space" is not required, as is the case with keyboard shortcuts and navigation of user agent menus) and spatial access (where the user moves the pointing device "in space" via the keyboard). To satisfy this checkpoint, user agents are expected to provide a mix of both types of keyboard access. User agents should allow direct keyboard access where possible, and this may be redundant with spatial input techniques. Furthermore, the user agent should satisfy this requirement by offering a combination of keyboard-operable user interface controls (e.g., keyboard operable print menus and settings) and direct keyboard operation of user agent functionalities (e.g., a short cut to print the current page). As examples of functionalities, ensure that the user can interact with enabled elements, select content, navigate viewports, configure the user agent, access documentation, install the user agent, operate controls of the user interface, etc., all entirely through keyboard input. It is also possible to claim conformance to this document for full support through pointing device input and voice input. See the section on input modality labels. 1.2 Activate event handlers. (P1) 1. For the element with content focus, allow the user to activate any explicitly associated input device event handlers through keyboard input alone. 2. The user agent is not required to allow activation of event handlers associated with a given device (e.g., the pointing device) in any order other than what the device itself allows. Techniques for checkpoint 1.2 Note: The requirements for this checkpoint refer to any explicitly associated input device event handlers associated with an element, independent of the input modalities for which the user agent conforms. For example, suppose that an element has an explicitly associated handler for pointing device events. Even when the user agent only conforms for keyboard input (and does not conform for the pointing device, for example), this checkpoint requires the user agent to allow the user to activate that handler with the keyboard. This checkpoint is an important special case of checkpoint 1.1. Please refer to the checkpoints of guideline 9 for more information about focus requirements. 1.3 Provide text messages. (P1) 1. Ensure that every message (e.g., prompt, alert, notification, etc.) that is a non-text element and is part of the user agent user interface has a text equivalent. Techniques for checkpoint 1.3 Note: For example, if the user is alerted of an event by an audio cue, a visually-rendered text equivalent in the status bar could satisfy this checkpoint. Per checkpoint 6.4, a text equivalent for each such message must be available through an API. See also checkpoint 6.5 for requirements for programmatic alert of changes to the user interface. [next guideline 2] [review guideline 1] [contents] Guideline 2. Ensure user access to all content. Ensure that users have access to all content, notably conditional content that may have been provided to meet the requirements of the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 1.0 [WCAG10]. The checkpoints in this section require the user agent to provide access to all content through a series of complementary mechanisms designed so that if one fails, another will provide some access. The following preferences are embodied in the checkpoints: * Not all content is rendered at all times. Automatic decision by the user agent about when and where to render conditional content is preferred, but manual choice by the user may be necessary for access. * Structure is preferred (both the author's specified preferences and the user's structured access), but unstructured access may be necessary for access to all content. * Rendering according to format specification is preferred, but a source view of text content may be necessary for access (e.g., because of user-side error conditions, authoring errors, inadequate specification, or incorrect user agent implementation). For example, the user may have to look at URIs for information, HTML comments, XML element names, or script data. The user agent should respect authoring synchronization cues for content that changes over time, but also needs to allow the user to control the time intervals when user input is possible. * Configuration and control of rendering are important for access. Authors may use the conditional content mechanisms of a specification to satisfy the requirements of the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 1.0 [WCAG10]. Ensuring access to conditional content benefits all users since some users may not have access to some content due to a technological limitation (e.g., their mobile browser cannot display graphics) or simply a configuration preference (e.g., they have a slow Internet connection and prefer not to download movies or images). Checkpoints 2.1 Render content according to specification. (P1) 1. Render content according to format specification (e.g., for a markup language or style sheet). 2. When a rendering requirement of another specification contradicts a requirement of the current document, the user agent may disregard the rendering requirement of the other specification and still satisfy this checkpoint. 3. Rendering requirements include format-defined interactions between author preferences and user preferences/capabilities (e.g., when to render the "alt" attribute in HTML, the rendering order of nested OBJECT elements in HTML, test attributes in SMIL, and the cascade in CSS2). Techniques for checkpoint 2.1 Note: If a conforming user agent does not render a content type, it should allow the user to choose a way to handle that content (e.g., by launching another application, by saving it to disk, etc.). The user agent is not required to satisfy this checkpoint for all implemented specifications; see the section on conformance and implementing specifications for more information. 2.2 Provide text view. (P1) 1. For content authored in text formats, provide a view of the text source. For the purposes of this document, text formats are defined to be: + all media objects given an Internet media type of "text" (e.g., text/plain, text/HTML, or text/*) as defined in RFC 2046 [RFC2046], section 4.1. + all SGML and XML applications, regardless of Internet media type (e.g., HTML 4.01, XHTML 1.1, SMIL, SVG, etc.). Techniques for checkpoint 2.2 Note: A user agent would also satisfy this checkpoint by providing a source view for any text format, not just implemented text formats. The user agent is not required to satisfy this checkpoint for all implemented specifications; see the section on conformance and implementing specifications for more information. 2.3 Render conditional content. (P1) 1. Allow configuration to provide access to each piece of unrendered conditional content "C". 2. The configuration may be a switch that, for all content, turns on or off the access mechanisms described in the next provision. 3. When a specification does not explain how to provide access to this content, do so as follows: + If C is a summary, title, alternative, description, or expansion of another piece of content D, provide access through at least one of the following mechanisms: o (1a) render C in place of D; o (2a) render C in addition to D; o (3a) provide access to C by querying D. In this case, the user agent must also alert the user, on a per-element basis, to the existence of C (so that the user knows to query D); o (4a) allow the user to follow a link to C from the context of D. + Otherwise, provide access to C through at least one of the following mechanisms: o (1b) render a placeholder for C, and allow the user to view the original author-supplied content associated with each placeholder; o (2b) provide access to C by query (e.g., allow the user to query an element for its attributes). In this case, the user agent must also alert the user, on a per-element basis, to the existence of C; o (3b) allow the user to follow a link in context to C. 4. To satisfy this checkpoint, the user agent may provide access on a per-element basis (e.g., by allowing the user to query individual elements) or for all elements (e.g., by offering a configuration to render conditional content all the time). For all content. Techniques for checkpoint 2.3 Note: For instance, an HTML user agent might allow users to query each element for access to conditional content supplied for the "alt", "title", and "longdesc" attributes. Or, the user agent might allow configuration so that the value of the "alt" attribute is rendered in place of all IMG elements (while other conditional content might be made available through another mechanism). See checkpoint 2.10 for additional placeholder requirements. 2.4 Allow time-independent interaction. (P1) 1. For rendered content where user input is only possible within a finite time interval controlled by the user agent, allow configuration to provide a view where user interaction is time-independent. 2. The user agent may satisfy this checkpoint by pausing processing automatically to allow for user input, and resuming processing on explicit user request. When this technique is used, pause at the end of each time interval where user input is possible. In the paused state: + Alert the user that the rendered content has been paused (e.g., highlight the "pause" button in a multimedia player's control panel). + Highlight which enabled elements are time-sensitive. + Allow the user to interact with the enabled elements. + Allow the user to resume on explicit user request (e.g., by pressing the "play" button in a multimedia player's control panel; see also checkpoint 4.5). 3. The user agent may satisfy this checkpoint by generating a time-independent ("static") view, based on the original content, that offers the user the same opportunities for interaction. The static view should reflect the structure and flow of the original time-sensitive presentation; orientation cues will help users understand the context for various interaction opportunities. 4. When satisfying this checkpoint for a real-time presentation, the user agent may discard packets that continue to arrive after the construction of the time-independent view (e.g., when paused or after the construction of a static view). Techniques for checkpoint 2.4 Note: If the user agent satisfies this checkpoint by pausing automatically, it may be necessary to pause more than once when there are multiple opportunities for time-sensitive user interaction When pausing, pause synchronized content as well (whether rendered in the same or different viewports) per checkpoint 2.6. In SMIL 1.0 [SMIL], for example, the "begin", "end", and "dur" attributes synchronize presentation components. This checkpoint does not apply when the user agent cannot recognize the time interval in the presentation format, or when the user agent cannot control the timing (e.g., because it is controlled by the server). See also checkpoint 3.5, which involves client-driven content refresh. 2.5 Make captions, transcripts available. (P1) 1. Allow configuration or control to render text transcripts, collated text transcripts, captions, and auditory descriptions at the same time as the associated audio tracks and visual tracks. For all content. Techniques for checkpoint 2.5 Content type labels: Video, Audio. Note: This checkpoint is an important special case of checkpoint 2.1. 2.6 Respect synchronization cues. (P1) 1. Respect synchronization cues (e.g., in markup) during rendering. Techniques for checkpoint 2.6 Content type labels: Video, Audio. Note: This checkpoint is an important special case of checkpoint 2.1. 2.7 Repair missing content. (P2) 1. Allow configuration to generate repair text when the user agent recognizes that the author has failed to provide conditional content that was required by the format specification. 2. The user agent may satisfy this checkpoint by basing the repair text on any of the following available sources of information: URI reference, content type, or element type. For all content. Techniques for checkpoint 2.7 Note: Some markup languages (such as HTML 4 [HTML4] and SMIL 1.0 [SMIL] require the author to provide conditional content for some elements (e.g., the "alt" attribute on the IMG element). Repair text based on URI reference, content type, or element type is sufficient to satisfy the checkpoint, but may not result in the most effective repair. Information that may be recognized as relevant to repair might not be "near" the missing conditional content in the document object. For instance, instead of generating repair text on a simple URI reference, the user agent might look for helpful information near a different instance of the URI reference in the same document object, or might retrieve useful information (e.g., a title) from the resource designated by the URI reference. 2.8 No repair text. (P3) 1. Allow at least two configurations for when the user agent recognizes that conditional content required by the format specification is present but empty: + generate no repair text, or + generate repair as described in checkpoint 2.7. For all content. Techniques for checkpoint 2.8 Note: In some authoring scenarios, empty content (e.g., a string of zero characters) may make an appropriate text equivalent, such as when non-text content has no other function than pure decoration, or when an image is part of a "mosaic" of several images and doesn't make sense out of the mosaic. Please refer to the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 1.0 [WCAG10] for more information about text equivalents. 2.9 Render conditional content automatically. (P3) 1. Allow configuration to render all conditional content automatically. The user agent is not required to render all conditional content at the same time in a single viewport. 2. Provide access to this content according to format specifications or where unspecified, by applying one of the techniques described in checkpoint 2.3: 1a, 2a, or 1b. For all content. Techniques for checkpoint 2.9 Note: For instance, an HTML user agent might allow configuration so that the value of the "alt" attribute is rendered in place of all IMG elements (while other conditional content might be made available through another mechanism). The user agent may offer multiple configurations (e.g., a first configuration to render one type of conditional content automatically, a second to render another type, etc.). 2.10 Toggle placeholders. (P3) 1. Once the user has viewed the original author-supplied content associated with a placeholder, allow the user to turn off the rendering of the author-supplied content. Techniques for checkpoint 2.10 Note: For example, if the user agent substitutes the author-supplied content for the placeholder in context, allow the user to "toggle" between placeholder and the associated content. Or, if the user agent renders the author-supplied content in a separate viewport, allow the user to close that viewport. Note: See checkpoint 2.3, provision (1b) for placeholder requirements. 2.11 Alert unsupported language. (P3) 1. Allow configuration not to render content in unsupported natural languages, when that content would otherwise be rendered. Content "in a natural language" includes pre-recorded spoken language and text in a given script, i.e., writing system. 2. Indicate to the user in context that author-supplied content has not been rendered. 3. This checkpoint does not require the user agent to allow different configurations for different natural languages. Techniques for checkpoint 2.11 Note: For example, use a text substitute or accessible graphical icon to indicate that content in a particular language has not been rendered. [next guideline 3] [review guideline 2] [previous guideline 1] [contents] Guideline 3. Allow configuration not to render some content that may reduce accessibility. Ensure that the user may turn off rendering of content (audio, video, scripts, etc.) that may reduce accessibility by obscuring other content or disorienting the user. Some content or behavior specified by the author may make the user agent unusable or may obscure information. For instance, flashing content may trigger seizures in people with photosensitive epilepsy, or may make a Web page too distracting to be usable by someone with a cognitive disability. Blinking text can affect screen reader users, since screen readers (in conjunction with speech synthesizers or braille displays) may re-render the text every time it blinks. Distracting background images, colors, or sounds may make it impossible for users to see or hear other content. Dynamically changing Web content may cause problems for some assistive technologies. Scripts that cause unanticipated changes (viewports that open, automatically redirected or refreshed pages, etc.) may disorient some users with cognitive disabilities. This guideline requires the user agent to allow configuration so that, when loading Web resources, the user agent does not render content in a manner that may pose accessibility problems. Requirements for interactive control of rendered content are part of guideline 4. Checkpoints 3.1 Toggle background images. (P1) 1. Allow configuration not to render background image content. 2. In this configuration, the user agent is not required to retrieve background images from the Web. 3. This checkpoint only requires control of background images for "two-layered renderings", i.e., one rendered background image with all other content rendered "above it". Techniques for checkpoint 3.1 Content type labels: Image. Note: See checkpoint 2.3 for information about how to provide access to unrendered background images. When background images are not rendered, user agents should render a solid background color instead (see checkpoint 4.3). 3.2 Toggle audio, video, animated images. (P1) 1. Allow configuration not to render audio, video, or animated image content, except on explicit user request. This configuration is required for content rendered without any user interaction (including content rendered on load or as the result of a script), as well as content rendered as the result of user interaction (e.g., when the user activates a link). 2. The user agent may satisfy this checkpoint by making video and animated images invisible and audio silent, but this technique is not recommended. 3. When configured not to render content except on explicit user request, the user agent is not required to retrieve the audio, video, or animated image from the Web until requested by the user. Techniques for checkpoint 3.2 Content type labels: Animation, Video, Audio. Note: See checkpoint 2.3 for information about how to provide access to unrendered audio, video, and animated images. See also checkpoint 4.5, checkpoint 4.9, and checkpoint 4.10. 3.3 Toggle animated/blinking text. (P1) 1. Allow configuration to render animated or blinking text content. as motionless, unblinking text. Blinking text is text whose visual rendering alternates between visible and invisible, any rate of change. 2. In this configuration, the user must still have access to the same text content, but the user agent may render it in a separate viewport (e.g., for large amounts of streaming text). 3. The user agent also satisfies this checkpoint by always rendering animated or blinking text as motionless, unblinking text. Techniques for checkpoint 3.3 Content type labels: VisualText. Note: Animation (a rendering effect) differs from streaming (a delivery mechanism). Streaming content might be rendered as an animation (e.g., an animated stock ticker or vertically scrolling text) or as static text (e.g., movie subtitles, which are rendered for a limited time, but do not give the impression of movement). See also checkpoint 3.5. This checkpoint does not apply for blinking and animation effects that are caused by mechanisms that the user agent cannot recognize. 3.4 Toggle scripts. (P1) 1. Allow configuration not to execute any executable content (e.g., scripts and applets). 2. In this configuration, provide an option to alert the user when executable content is available (but has not been executed). 3. The user agent is only required to alert the user to the presence of more than zero scripts or applets (i.e., per-element alerts are not required). Techniques for checkpoint 3.4 Note: This checkpoint does not refer to plug-ins and other programs that are not part of content. Scripts and applets may provide very useful functionality, not all of which causes accessibility problems. Developers should not consider that the user's ability to turn off scripts is an effective way to improve content accessibility; turning off scripts means losing the benefits they offer. Instead, developers should provide users with finer control over user agent or content behavior known to raise accessibility barriers. The user should only have to turn off scripts as a last resort. 3.5 Toggle content refresh. (P1) 1. Allow configuration so that the user agent only refreshes content on explicit user request. 2. In this configuration, alert the user of the refresh rate specified in content, and allow the user to request fresh content manually (e.g., by following a link or confirming a prompt). 3. When the user chooses not to refresh content, the user agent may ignore that content; buffering is not required. 4. This checkpoint only applies when the user agent (not the server) automatically initiates the request for fresh content. Techniques for checkpoint 3.5 Note: For example, allow configuration to prompt the user to confirm content refresh, at the rate specified by the author. 3.6 Toggle redirects. (P2) 1. Allow configuration so that a "client-side redirect" (i.e., one initiated by the user agent, not the server) only changes content on explicit user request. 2. Allow the user to access the new content on demand (e.g., by following a link or confirming a prompt). 3. The user agent is not required to provide these functionalities for client-side redirects specified to occur instantaneously (i.e., after no delay). Techniques for checkpoint 3.6 Note: Some HTML user agents support client-side redirects authored using a META element with http-equiv="refresh". Authors (and Web masters) should use the redirect mechanisms of HTTP instead. 3.7 Toggle images. (P2) 1. Allow configuration not to render image content. 2. The user agent may satisfy this checkpoint by making images invisible, but this technique is not recommended. Techniques for checkpoint 3.7 Content type labels: Image. Note: See checkpoint 2.3 for information about how to provide access to unrendered images. [next guideline 4] [review guideline 3] [previous guideline 2] [contents] Guideline 4. Ensure user control of rendering. Ensure that the user can select preferred styles (colors, size of rendered text, synthesized speech characteristics, etc.) from choices offered by the user agent. Allow the user to override author-specified styles and user agent default styles. Providing access to content (see guideline 2) includes enabling users to configure and control its rendering. Users with low vision may require that text be rendered at a size larger than the size specified by the author or by the user agent's default rendering. Users with color blindness may need to impose or prevent certain color combinations. For dynamic presentations such as synchronized multimedia presentations created with SMIL 1.0 [SMIL], users with cognitive, hearing, visual, and physical disabilities may not be able to interact with a presentation within the time frame assumed by the author. To make the presentation accessible to these users, user agents rendering multimedia content (audio, video, and other animations), have to allow the user to control the playback rate of this content, and also to stop, start, pause, and navigate it quickly. User agents rendering audio have to allow the user to control the audio volume globally and to allow the user to control independently distinguishable audio tracks. User agents with speech synthesis capabilities need to allow users to control various synthesized speech rendering parameters. For instance, users who are blind and hard of hearing may not be able to make use of high or low frequencies; these users have to be able to configure their speech synthesizers to use suitable frequencies. Checkpoints for visually rendered text 4.1 Configure text size. (P1) 1. Allow global configuration of the reference size of visually rendered text, with an option to override reference sizes specified by the author or user agent defaults. 2. Offer a range of text sizes to the user that includes at least: + the range offered by the conventional utility available in the operating environment that allows users to choose the text size (e.g., the font size), + or, if no such utility is available, the range of text sizes supported by the conventional APIs of the operating environment for drawing text. Techniques for checkpoint 4.1 Content type labels: VisualText. Note: The reference size of rendered text corresponds to the default value of the CSS2 'font-size' property, which is 'medium' (refer to CSS2 [CSS2], section 15.2.4). For example, in HTML, this might be paragraph text. The default reference size of rendered text may vary among user agents. User agents may offer different mechanisms to allow control of the size of rendered text (e.g., font size control, zoom, magnification, etc.). Refer, for example to the Scalable Vector Graphics specification [SVG] for information about scalable rendering. 4.2 Configure font family. (P1) 1. Allow global configuration of the font family of all visually rendered text, with an option to override font families specified by the author or by user agent defaults. 2. Offer a range of font families to the user that includes at least: + the range offered by the conventional utility available in the operating environment that allows users to choose the font family, + or, if no such utility is available, the range of font families supported by the conventional APIs of the operating environment for drawing text. 3. For text that cannot be rendered properly using the user's preferred font family, the user agent may substitute an alternative font family. Techniques for checkpoint 4.2 Content type labels: VisualText. Note: For example, allow the user to specify that all text is to be rendered in a particular sans-serif font family. 4.3 Configure text colors. (P1) 1. Allow global configuration of the foreground and background color of all visually rendered text, with an option to override foreground and background colors specified by the author or user agent defaults. 2. Offer a range of colors to the user that includes at least: + the range offered by the conventional utility available in the operating environment that allows users to choose colors, + or, if no such utility is available, the range of colors supported by the conventional APIs of the operating environment for specifying colors. Techniques for checkpoint 4.3 Content type labels: ColorText. Note: User configuration of foreground and background colors may inadvertently lead to the inability to distinguish ordinary text from selected text, focused text, etc. See checkpoint 10.3 for more information about highlight styles. Checkpoints for multimedia presentations and other presentations that change continuously over time 4.4 Slow multimedia. (P1) 1. Allow the user to slow the presentation rate of rendered audio and animations (including video and animated images). 2. For a visual track, provide at least one setting between 40% and 60% of the original speed. 3. For a prerecorded audio track including audio-only presentations, provide at least one setting between 75% and 80% of the original speed. 4. When the user agent allows the user to slow the visual track of a synchronized multimedia presentation to between 100% and 80% of its original speed, synchronize the visual and audio tracks. Below 80%, the user agent is not required to render the audio track. 5. The user agent is not required to satisfy this checkpoint for audio and animations whose recognized role is to create a purely stylistic effect. Techniques for checkpoint 4.4 Content type labels: Animation, Audio. Note: Purely stylistic effects include background sounds, decorative animated images, and effects caused by style sheets. The style exception of this checkpoint is based on the assumption that authors have satisfied the requirements of the "Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 1.0" [WCAG10] not to convey information through style alone (e.g., through color alone or style sheets alone). See checkpoint 2.6 and checkpoint 4.7. 4.5 Start, stop, pause, and navigate multimedia. (P1) 1. Allow the user to stop, pause, and resume rendered audio and animations (including video and animated images) that last three or more seconds at their default playback rate. 2. Allow the user to navigate efficiently within audio and animations (including video and animated images) that last three or more seconds at their default playback rate. The user agent may satisfy this requirement through forward and backward sequential access techniques (e.g., advance three seconds), or direct access techniques (e.g., play starting at the 10-minute mark), or some combination. 3. When serial techniques are used to satisfy the previous requirement, the user agent is not required to play back content during serial advance or rewind (though doing so may help orient the user). 4. The user agent is not required to satisfy this checkpoint for audio and animations whose recognized role is to create a purely stylistic effect. 5. When the user pauses a real-time audio or animation, the user agent may discard packets that continue to arrive during the pause. Techniques for checkpoint 4.5 Content type labels: Animation, Audio. Note: See checkpoint 4.4 for more information about the exception for purely stylistic effects. This checkpoint applies to content that is either rendered automatically or on request from the user. Respect synchronization cues per checkpoint 2.6. 4.6 Position captions. (P1) 1. For graphical viewports, allow the user to position rendered captions with respect to synchronized visual tracks as follows: + if the user agent satisfies this checkpoint by using a markup language or style sheet language to provide configuration or control, then the user agent must allow the user to choose from among at least the range of positions enabled by the format + otherwise the user agent must allow both non-overlapping and overlapping positions (e.g., by rendering captions in a separate viewport that may be positioned on top of the visual track). 2. In either case, the user agent must allow the user to override the author's specified position. 3. The user agent is not required to change the layout of other content (i.e., reflow) after the user has changed the position of captions. 4. The user agent is not required to make the captions background transparent when those captions are rendered above a related video track. Techniques for checkpoint 4.6 4.7 Slow other multimedia. (P2) 1. Allow the user to slow the presentation rate of rendered audio and animations (including video and animated images) not covered by checkpoint 4.4. 2. The same speed percentage requirements of checkpoint 4.4 apply. Techniques for checkpoint 4.7 Content type labels: Animation, Audio. Note: User agents automatically satisfy this checkpoint if they satisfy checkpoint 4.4 for all audio and animations. 4.8 Control other multimedia. (P2) 1. Allow the user to stop, pause, resume, and navigate efficiently rendered audio and animations (including video and animated images) not covered by checkpoint 4.5. Techniques for checkpoint 4.8 Content type labels: Animation, Audio. Note: User agents automatically satisfy this checkpoint if they satisfy checkpoint 4.5 for all audio and animations. Checkpoints for audio volume control 4.9 Global volume control. (P1) 1. Allow global configuration of the volume of all rendered audio, with an option to override audio volumes specified by the author or user agent defaults. 2. Allow the user to choose zero volume (i.e., silent). Techniques for checkpoint 4.9 Content type labels: Audio. Note: User agents should allow configuration of volume through available operating environment controls. 4.10 Independent volume control. (P1) 1. Allow independent control of the volumes of rendered audio sources synchronized to play simultaneously. 2. The user agent is not required to satisfy this checkpoint for audio whose recognized role is to create a purely stylistic effect. 3. The user control required by this checkpoint includes the ability to override author-specified volumes for the relevant sources of audio. Techniques for checkpoint 4.10 Content type labels: Audio. Note: See checkpoint 4.4 for more information about the exception for purely stylistic effects. The user agent should satisfy this checkpoint by allowing the user to control independently the volumes of all audio sources (e.g., by implementing a general audio mixer type of functionality). See also checkpoint 4.13. 4.11 Control other volume. (P2) 1. Allow independent control of the volumes of rendered audio sources synchronized to play simultaneously that are not covered by checkpoint 4.10. Techniques for checkpoint 4.11 Content type labels: Audio. Note: User agents automatically satisfy this checkpoint if they satisfy checkpoint 4.10 for all audio. Checkpoints for synthesized speech rendering 4.12 Configure synthesized speech rate. (P1) 1. Allow configuration of the synthesized speech rate, according to the full range offered by the speech synthesizer. Techniques for checkpoint 4.12 Content type labels: Speech. Note: The range of synthesized speech rates offered by the speech synthesizer may depend on natural language. 4.13 Configure synthesized speech volume. (P1) 1. Allow control of the synthesized speech volume, independent of other sources of audio. 2. The user control required by this checkpoint includes the ability to override author-specified synthesized speech volume. Techniques for checkpoint 4.13 Content type labels: Speech. Note: See also checkpoint 4.10. 4.14 Configure synthesized speech characteristics. (P1) 1. Allow configuration of synthesized speech characteristics according to the full range of values offered by the speech synthesizer. Techniques for checkpoint 4.14 Note: Some speech synthesizers allow users to choose values for synthesized speech characteristics at a higher abstraction layer, i.e., by choosing from present options that group several characteristics. Some typical options one might encounter include: "adult male voice", "female child voice", "robot voice", "pitch", "stress", etc. Ranges for values may vary among speech synthesizers. 4.15 Specific synthesized speech characteristics. (P2) 1. Allow configuration of the following synthesized speech characteristics: pitch, pitch range, stress, richness. 2. Pitch refers to the average frequency of the speaking voice. 3. Pitch range specifies a variation in average frequency. 4. Stress refers to the height of "local peaks" in the intonation contour of the voice. 5. Richness refers to the richness or brightness of the voice. Techniques for checkpoint 4.15 Note: This checkpoint is more specific than checkpoint 4.14: it requires support for the voice characteristics listed. Definitions for these characteristics are based on descriptions in section 19 of the Cascading Style Sheets Level 2 Recommendation [CSS2]; please refer to that specification for additional informative descriptions. Some speech synthesizers allow users to choose values for synthesized speech characteristics at a higher abstraction layer, i.e., by choosing from present options distinguished by "gender", "age", "accent", etc. Ranges of values may vary among speech synthesizers. Content type labels: Speech. 4.16 Configure synthesized speech features. (P2) 1. Provide support for user-defined extensions to the synthesized speech dictionary, as well as the following functionalities: + spell-out: spell text one character at a time or according to language-dependent pronunciation rules; + speak-numeral: speak a numeral as individual digits or as a full number; and + speak-punctuation: speak punctuation literally or render as natural pauses. Techniques for checkpoint 4.16 Note: Definitions for the functionalities listed are based on descriptions in section 19 of the Cascading Style Sheets Level 2 Recommendation [CSS2]; please refer to that specification for additional informative descriptions. Checkpoints related to style sheets 4.17 Choose style sheets. (P1) 1. For user agents that support style sheets: + Allow the user to choose from and apply available author style sheets (in content). + Allow the user to choose from and apply available user style sheets. + Allow the user to ignore author and user style sheets. Techniques for checkpoint 4.17 Note: By definition, the user agent's default style sheet is always present, but may be overridden by author or user styles. Developers should not consider that the user's ability to turn off author and user style sheets is an effective way to improve content accessibility; turning off style sheet support means losing the many benefits they offer. Instead, developers should provide users with finer control over user agent or content behavior known to raise accessibility barriers. The user should only have to turn off author and user style sheets as a last resort. [next guideline 5] [review guideline 4] [previous guideline 3] [contents] Guideline 5. Ensure user control of user interface behavior. Ensure that the user can control the behavior of viewports and other user interface controls, including those that may be manipulated by the author (e.g., through scripts). Control of viewport behavior is important to accessibility. For people with visual disabilities or certain types of learning disabilities, it is important that the point of regard - what the user is presumed to be viewing - remain as stable as possible. Unexpected changes may cause users to lose track of how many viewports are open, which viewport has the current focus, etc. This guideline includes requirements for control of opening and closing viewports, the relative position of graphical viewports, changes to focus, and inadvertent form submissions and micropayments. Checkpoints 5.1 No automatic content focus change. (P2) 1. Allow configuration so that if a viewport opens without explicit user request, its content focus does not automatically become the current focus. 2. Configuration is preferred, but is not required if the content focus can only ever be moved on explicit user request. Techniques for checkpoint 5.1 5.2 Keep viewport on top. (P2) 1. For graphical user interfaces, allow configuration so that the viewport with the current focus remains "on top" of all other viewports with which it overlaps. Techniques for checkpoint 5.2 5.3 Manual viewport open only. (P2) 1. Allow configuration so that viewports only open on explicit user request. 2. In this configuration, instead of opening a viewport automatically, alert the user and allow the user to open it on demand (e.g., by following a link or confirming a prompt). 3. Allow the user to close viewports. 4. If a viewport (e.g., a frame set) contains other viewports, these requirements only apply to the outermost container viewport. 5. Configuration is preferred, but is not required if viewports can only ever open on explicit user request. 6. User creation of a new viewport (e.g., empty or with a new resource loaded) through the user agent's user interface constitutes an explicit user request. Techniques for checkpoint 5.3 Note: Generally, viewports open automatically as the result of instructions in content. See also checkpoint 5.1 (for control over changes of focus when a viewport opens) and checkpoint 6.5 (for programmatic alert of changes to the user interface). 5.4 Selection and focus in viewport. (P2) 1. Ensure that when a viewport's selection or content focus changes, it is at least partially in the viewport after the change. Techniques for checkpoint 5.4 Note: For example, if users navigating links move to a portion of the document outside a graphical viewport, the viewport should scroll to include the new location of the focus. Or, for users of audio viewports, allow configuration to render the selection or focus immediately after the change. 5.5 Confirm form submission. (P2) 1. Allow configuration to prompt the user to confirm (or cancel) any form submission. 2. Configuration is preferred, but it not required if forms can only ever be submitted on explicit user request. Techniques for checkpoint 5.5 Note: For example, do not submit a form automatically when a menu option is selected, when all fields of a form have been filled out, or when a "mouseover" or "change" event occurs. 5.6 Confirm fee links. (P2) 1. Allow configuration to prompt the user to confirm (or cancel) any payment that results from activation of a fee link. 2. Configuration is preferred, but is not required if fee links can only ever be activated on explicit user request. Techniques for checkpoint 5.6 5.7 Manual viewport close only. (P3) 1. Allow configuration to prompt the user to confirm (or cancel) closing any viewport that starts to close without explicit user request. Techniques for checkpoint 5.7 [next guideline 6] [review guideline 5] [previous guideline 4] [contents] Guideline 6. Implement interoperable application programming interfaces. Implement interoperable interfaces to communicate with other software (e.g., assistive technologies, the operating environment, plug-ins, etc.). This guideline addresses interoperability between a conforming user agent and other software, in particular assistive technologies. The checkpoints of this guideline require implementation of application programming interfaces (APIs) for communication. There are three types of requirements in this guideline: 1. Requirements for what information must be communicated through an API. 2. Requirements for which APIs or types of APIs must be used to communicate this information. 3. Requirements for additional characteristics of these APIs. Note: The User Agent Accessibility Guidelines Working Group believes that, in order to promote interoperability between a conforming user agent and more than one assistive technology, it is more important to implement conventional APIs than custom APIs, even though custom APIs may superior access. When conventional APIs do not allow users to satisfy the requirements of these checkpoints, however, developers may implement alternative APIs in order to conform to this document. Checkpoints 6.1 DOM read access. (P1) 1. Provide programmatic read access to HTML and XML content by conforming to the following modules of the W3C Document Object Model DOM Level 2 Core Specification [DOM2CORE] and exporting the interfaces they define: + the Core module for HTML; + the Core and XML modules for XML. Techniques for checkpoint 6.1 Note: Please refer to the "Document Object Model (DOM) Level 2 Core Specification" [DOM2CORE] for information about HTML and XML versions covered. 6.2 DOM write access. (P1) 1. If the user can modify HTML and XML content through the user interface, provide the same functionality programmatically by conforming to the following modules of the W3C Document Object Model DOM Level 2 Core Specification [DOM2CORE] and exporting the interfaces they define: + the Core module for HTML; + the Core and XML modules for XML. Techniques for checkpoint 6.2 Note: For example, if the user interface allows users to complete HTML forms, this must also be possible through the required DOM APIs. Please refer to the "Document Object Model (DOM) Level 2 Core Specification" [DOM2CORE] for information about HTML and XML versions covered. 6.3 Programmatic access to non-HTML/XML content. (P1) 1. For markup languages other than HTML and XML, provide programmatic read access to content. 2. Provide programmatic write access for those parts of content that the user can modify through the user interface. To satisfy these requirements, implement at least one API that is either + defined by a W3C Recommendation, or + a publicly documented API designed to enable interoperability with assistive technologies. 3. If no such API is available, or if available APIs do not enable the user agent to satisfy the requirements, implement at least one publicly documented API to satisfy the requirements, and follow operating environment conventions for the use of input and output APIs. 4. An API is considered available if the specification of the API is published (e.g., as a W3C Recommendation) in time for integration into a user agent's development cycle. Techniques for checkpoint 6.3 Note: This checkpoint addresses content not covered by checkpoints checkpoint 6.1 and checkpoint 6.2. 6.4 Programmatic operation. (P1) 1. Provide programmatic read access to user agent user interface controls. 2. Provide programmatic write access for those controls that the user can modify through the user interface. For security reasons, user agents are not required to allow instructions in content to modify user agent user interface controls. 3. To satisfy these requirements, implement at least one API that is either + defined by a W3C Recommendation, or + a publicly documented API designed to enable interoperability with assistive technologies. 4. If no such API is available, or if available APIs do not enable the user agent to satisfy the requirements, implement at least one publicly documented API that allows programmatic operation of all of the functionalities that are available through the user agent user interface, and follow operating environment conventions for the use of input and output APIs. 5. An API is considered available if the specification of the API is published (e.g., as a W3C Recommendation) in time for integration into a user agent's development cycle. For user agent features. Techniques for checkpoint 6.4 Note: APIs used to satisfy the requirements of this checkpoint may be platform-independent APIs such as the W3C DOM, conventional APIs for a particular operating environment, conventional APIs for programming languages, plug-ins, virtual machine environments, etc. User agent developers are encouraged to implement APIs that allow assistive technologies to interoperate with multiple types of software in a given operating environment (user agents, word processors, spreadsheet programs, etc.), as this reuse will benefit users and assistive technology developers. User agents should always follow operating environment conventions for the use of input and output APIs. 6.5 Programmatic alert of changes. (P1) 1. Provide programmatic alert of changes to content, user interface controls, selection, content focus, and user interface focus. 2. To satisfy these requirements, implement at least one API that is either + defined by a W3C Recommendation, or + a publicly documented API designed to enable interoperability with assistive technologies. 3. If no such API is available, or if available APIs do not enable the user agent to satisfy the requirements, implement at least one publicly documented API to satisfy the requirements, and follow operating environment conventions for the use of input and output APIs. 4. An API is considered available if the specification of the API is published (e.g., as a W3C Recommendation) in time for integration into a user agent's development cycle. For both content and user agent. Techniques for checkpoint 6.5 Note: For instance, when user interaction in one frame causes automatic changes to content in another, provide a programmatic alert. This checkpoint does not require the user agent to alert the user of rendering changes caused by content (e.g., an animation effect or an effect caused by a style sheet), just changes to the content itself. 6.6 Conventional keyboard APIs. (P1) 1. Follow operating environment conventions when implementing APIs for the keyboard. 2. If such APIs for the keyboard do not exist, implement publicly documented APIs for the keyboard. Techniques for checkpoint 6.6 Note: An operating environment may define more than one conventional API for the keyboard. For instance, for Japanese and Chinese, input may be processed in two stages, with an API for each. 6.7 API character encodings. (P1) 1. For an API implemented to satisfy requirements of this document, support the character encodings required for that API. For both content and user agent. Techniques for checkpoint 6.7 Note: Support for character encodings is important so that text is not "broken" when communicated to assistive technologies. For example, the DOM Level 2 Core Specification [DOM2CORE], section 1.1.5 requires that the DOMString type be encoded using UTF-16. This checkpoint is an important special case of the other API requirements of this document. 6.8 DOM CSS access. (P2) 1. For user agents that implement Cascading Style Sheets (CSS), provide programmatic access to those style sheets in content by conforming to the CSS module of the W3C Document Object Model (DOM) Level 2 Style Specification [DOM2STYLE] and exporting the interfaces it defines. 2. For the purposes of satisfying this checkpoint, Cascading Style Sheets (CSS) are defined by either CSS Level 1 [CSS1] or CSS Level 2 [CSS2]. Techniques for checkpoint 6.8 Note: Please refer to the "Document Object Model (DOM) Level 2 Style Specification" [DOM2STYLE] for information about CSS versions covered. 6.9 Timely access. (P2) 1. Ensure that programmatic exchanges proceed in a timely manner. For both content and user agent. Techniques for checkpoint 6.9 Note: For example, the programmatic exchange of information required by other checkpoints in this document should be efficient enough to prevent information loss, a risk when changes to content or user interface occur more quickly than the communication of those changes. Timely exchange is also important for the proper synchronization of alternative renderings. The techniques for this checkpoint explain how developers can reduce communication delays. This will help ensure that assistive technologies have timely access to the document object model and other information that is important for providing access. [next guideline 7] [review guideline 6] [previous guideline 5] [contents] Guideline 7. Observe operating environment conventions. Observe operating environment conventions for the user agent user interface, documentation, installation, etc. Part of user agent accessibility involves following the conventions of the user's operating environment. This includes: * following operating environment conventions for user agent user interface design, documentation, and installation. * incorporating operating environment-level user preferences into the user agent. For instance, some operating systems include settings that allow users to request high-contrast colors (for users with low vision) or graphical rendering of audio cues (for users with hearing disabilities). Following operating environment conventions increases predictability for users and for developers of assistive technologies. Platform guidelines explain what users will expect from the look and feel of the user interface, keyboard conventions, documentation, etc. Platform guidelines also include information about accessibility features that the user agent should adopt rather than reimplement. Checkpoints 7.1 Focus and selection conventions. (P1) 1. Follow operating environment conventions that benefit accessibility when implementing the selection, content focus, and user interface focus. Techniques for checkpoint 7.1 Note: This checkpoint is an important special case of checkpoint 7.3. See also checkpoint 9.1 and checkpoint 9.2. 7.2 Respect input configuration conventions. (P1) 1. Ensure that default input configurations of the user agent do not interfere with operating environment accessibility conventions (e.g., for keyboard accessibility). For user agent features. Techniques for checkpoint 7.2 Note: Information about operating environment accessibility conventions is available in the Techniques document [UAAG10-TECHS]. See also checkpoint 11.5. 7.3 Operating environment conventions. (P2) 1. Follow operating environment conventions that benefit accessibility. In particular, follow conventions that benefit accessibility for user interface design, keyboard configuration, product installation, and documentation. 2. For the purposes of this checkpoint, an operating environment convention that benefits accessibility is either + one identified as such in operating environment design or accessibility guidelines, or + one that allows the author to satisfy any requirement of the "Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 1.0" [WCAG10] or of the current document. For user agent features. Techniques for checkpoint 7.3 Note: Some of these conventions (e.g., sticky keys, mouse keys, show sounds, etc.) are discussed in the Techniques document [UAAG10-TECHS]. 7.4 Input configuration indications. (P2) 1. Follow operating environment conventions to indicate the input configuration. For user agent features. Techniques for checkpoint 7.4 Note: For example, in some operating environments, when a functionality may be triggered through a menu and through the keyboard, the developer may design the menu entry so that the character of the activating key is also shown. This checkpoint is an important special case of checkpoint 7.3. See also checkpoint 11.5. [next guideline 8] [review guideline 7] [previous guideline 6] [contents] Guideline 8. Implement specifications that benefit accessibility. Support the accessibility features of all implemented specifications. Implement W3C Recommendations when available and appropriate for a task. Developers should implement open specifications. Conformance to open specifications benefits interoperability and accessibility by making it easier to design assistive technologies (also discussed in guideline 6). While developers should implement the accessibility features of any specification (checkpoint 8.1), this document recommends conformance to W3C Recommendations in particular (checkpoint 8.2) for several reasons: * W3C specifications include "built-in" accessibility features. * W3C specifications undergo early review to ensure that accessibility issues are considered during the design phase. This review includes review from stakeholders in accessibility. * W3C specifications are developed in a consensus process (refer to the process defined by the W3C Process Document [W3CPROCESS]). W3C encourages the public to review and comment on these specifications (public Working Drafts, Candidate Recommendations, and Proposed Recommendations). For information about how specifications become W3C Recommendations, refer to the W3C Recommendation track ([W3CPROCESS], section 6.2). W3C Recommendations (and other technical reports) are published at the W3C Web site. Checkpoints 8.1 Implement accessibility features. (P1) 1. Implement the accessibility features of specifications (markup languages, style sheet languages, metadata languages, graphics formats, etc.). For the purposes of this checkpoint, an accessibility feature is either + one identified as such, or + one that allows the author to satisfy any requirement of the "Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 1.0" [WCAG10]. For all content. Techniques for checkpoint 8.1 Note: This checkpoint applies to both W3C-developed and non-W3C specifications. The Techniques document [UAAG10-TECHS] provides information about the accessibility features of some specifications, including W3C specifications. The user agent is not required to satisfy this checkpoint for all implemented specifications; see the section on conformance and implementing specifications for more information. 8.2 Conform to specifications. (P2) 1. Use and conform to either + W3C Recommendations when they are available and appropriate for a task, or + non-W3C specifications that enable the creation of content that conforms at level A or better to the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 1.0 [WCAG10]. 2. When a requirement of another specification contradicts a requirement of the current document, the user agent may disregard the requirement of the other specification and still satisfy this checkpoint. 3. A specification is considered available if it is published (e.g., as a W3C Recommendation) in time for integration into a user agent's development cycle. For all content. Techniques for checkpoint 8.2 Note: For instance, for markup, the user agent may conform to HTML 4 [HTML4], XHTML 1.0 [XHTML10], or XML 1.0 [XML]. For style sheets, the user agent may conform to CSS ([CSS1], [CSS2]). For mathematics, the user agent may conform to MathML 2.0 [MATHML20]. For synchronized multimedia, the user agent may conform to SMIL 1.0 [SMIL]. The user agent is not required to satisfy this checkpoint for all implemented specifications; see the section on conformance and implementing specifications for more information. [next guideline 9] [review guideline 8] [previous guideline 7] [contents] Guideline 9. Provide navigation mechanisms. Provide access to content through a variety of navigation mechanisms: sequential navigation, direct navigation, searches, structured navigation, etc. Users should be able to navigate to important pieces of content within a configurable view, identify the type of object they have navigated to, interact with that object easily (if it is an enabled element), and review the surrounding context (to orient themselves). Providing a variety of navigation and search mechanisms helps users with disabilities (and all users) access content more efficiently. Navigation and searching are particularly important to users who access content serially (e.g., as synthesized speech or braille). Sequential navigation (e.g., line scrolling, page scrolling, sequential navigation through enabled elements, etc.) means advancing (or rewinding) through rendered content in well-defined steps (line by line, screen by screen, link by link, etc.). Sequential navigation can provide context, but can be time-consuming. Sequential navigation is important to users who cannot scan a page visually for context and also benefits users unfamiliar with a page. Sequential access may be based on element type (e.g., links only), content structure (e.g., navigation from heading to heading), or other criteria. Direct navigation (e.g., to a particular link or paragraph) is faster than sequential navigation, but generally requires familiarity with the content. Direct navigation is important to users with some physical disabilities (who may have little or no manual dexterity and/or increased tendency to push unwanted buttons or keys), to users with visual disabilities, and also benefits "power users." Direct navigation may be possible with the pointing device or the keyboard (e.g., keyboard shortcuts). Structured navigation mechanisms offer both context and speed. User agents should allow users to navigate to content known to be structurally important: blocks of content, headers and sections, tables, forms and form elements, enabled elements, navigation mechanisms, containers, etc. For information about programmatic access to document structure, see guideline 6. User agents should allow users to configure navigation mechanisms (e.g., to allow navigation of links only, or links and headings, or tables and forms, etc.). Checkpoints 9.1 Provide content focus. (P1) 1. Provide at least one content focus for each viewport (including frames) where enabled elements are part of the rendered content. 2. Allow the user to make the content focus of each viewport the current focus. Techniques for checkpoint 9.1 Note: For example, when two frames of a frameset contain enabled elements, allow the user to make the content focus of either frame the current focus. Note that viewports "owned" by plug-ins that are part of a conformance claim are also covered by this checkpoint. 9.2 Provide user interface focus. (P1) 1. Provide a user interface focus. Techniques for checkpoint 9.2 9.3 Move content focus. (P1) 1. Allow the user to move the content focus to any enabled element in the viewport. 2. Allow configuration so that the content focus of a viewport only changes on explicit user request. Configuration is not required if the content focus only ever changes on explicit user request. See also checkpoint 5.1. 3. If the author has not specified a navigation order, allow at least forward sequential navigation to each element, in document order. 4. The user agent may also include disabled elements in the navigation order. Techniques for checkpoint 9.3 Note: In addition to forward sequential navigation, the user agent should also allow reverse sequential navigation. This checkpoint is an important special case of checkpoint 9.9. 9.4 Restore history. (P1) 1. For user agents that implement a viewport history mechanism, for each state in a viewport's browsing history, maintain information about the point of regard, content focus, and selection. 2. When the user returns to any state in the viewport history, restore the saved values for these three state variables. Techniques for checkpoint 9.4 Note: For example, when the user uses the "back button", restore the point of regard, content focus, and selection for previous state in the viewport's history. 9.5 No events on focus change. (P2) 1. Allow configuration so that moving the content focus to or from an enabled element does not automatically activate any explicitly associated event handlers. Techniques for checkpoint 9.5 Note: For instance, in this configuration for an HTML document, do not activate any handlers for the 'onfocus', 'onblur', or 'onchange' attributes. In this configuration, user agents should still apply any stylistic changes (e.g., highlighting) that may occur when there is a change in content focus. 9.6 Show event handlers. (P2) 1. For the element with content focus, make available the list of input device event handlers explicitly associated with the element. Techniques for checkpoint 9.6 Note: For example, allow the user to query the element with content focus for the list of input device event handlers, or add them directly to the serial navigation order described in checkpoint 9.3. See checkpoint 1.2 for information about activation of event handlers associated with the element with focus. 9.7 Move content focus optimally. (P2) 1. Allow the user to move the content focus to any enabled element in the viewport. 2. If the author has not specified a navigation order, allow at least forward and reverse sequential navigation to each element, in document order. 3. The user agent must not include disabled elements in the navigation order. Techniques for checkpoint 9.7 Note: This checkpoint is a special case of checkpoint 9.3. 9.8 Text search. (P2) 1. Allow the user to search within rendered text for a sequence of characters from the document character set. 2. Allow the user to start a forward search (in document order) from any selected or focused location in content. 3. When there is a match do both of the following: + move the viewport so that the matched text content is within it, and + allow the user to search for the next instance of the text from the location of the match. 4. Alert the user when there is no match, when the search reaches the end of content, and prior to any wrapping. A wrapping search is one that restarts automatically at the beginning of content once the end of content has been reached. 5. Provide a case-insensitive search option for text in scripts (i.e., writing systems) where case is significant. For all rendered content. Techniques for checkpoint 9.8 Note: If the user has not indicated a start position for the search, the search should start from the beginning of content. Per checkpoint 7.3, use operating environments conventions for indicating the result of a search (e.g., selection or content focus). 9.9 Structured navigation. (P2) 1. Allow the user to navigate efficiently to and among important structural elements in rendered content. 2. Allow forward and backward sequential navigation to these important structural elements. Techniques for checkpoint 9.9 Note: This specification intentionally does not identify which "important elements" must be navigable as this will vary according to markup language. What constitutes "efficient navigation" may depend on a number of factors as well, including the "shape" of content (e.g., serial navigation of long lists is not efficient) and desired granularity (e.g., among tables, then among the cells of a given table). Refer to the Techniques document [UAAG10-TECHS] for information about identifying and navigating important elements. 9.10 Configure important elements. (P3) 1. Allow configuration of the set of important elements required by checkpoint 9.9 and checkpoint 10.5. 2. Allow the user to include and exclude element types in the set of elements. Techniques for checkpoint 9.10 Note: For example, allow the user to navigate only paragraphs, or only headings and paragraphs, or to suppress and restore navigation bars, to navigate within and among tables and table cells, etc. [next guideline 10] [review guideline 9] [previous guideline 8] [contents] Guideline 10. Orient the user. Provide information that will help the user understand browsing context. All users require clues to help them understand their "location" when browsing: where they are, how they got there, where they can go, what's nearby, etc. Some mechanisms that provide such clues through the user interface (visually, as audio, or as braille) include: * information about the current state of the user's interaction with content: where the viewport is in content (shown, for example, through proportional scroll bars), which viewport has the current focus, where the user has selected content, a history mechanism, the title of the current document or frame, etc. These clues need to be available to the user in a device-independent manner; * information about specific elements, such as the dimensions of a table, the length of an audio clip, the structure of a form, whether following a link will involve a fee, etc. * information about relationships among elements, such as between table cells and related table headers. * information about the structure of content. For instance, a navigable outline view can accelerate access to content while preserving context. Orientation mechanisms such as these are especially important to users who view content serially, (e.g., when rendered as synthesized speech or braille). For instance, these users cannot "scan" a graphically displayed table with their eyes for information about a table cell's headers, neighboring cells, etc. User agents need to provide other means for users to understand table cell relationships, frame relationships (what relationship does the graphical layout convey?), form context (have I filled out the form completely?), link information (have I already visited this link?), etc. This guideline also includes requirements to allow the user to control some user agent behavior (form submission and activation of fee links) that, if carried out automatically, might go unnoticed by some users (e.g., users with blindness) or might disorient others (e.g., some users with a cognitive disability). Checkpoints 10.1 Table orientation. (P1) 1. Make available to the user the purpose of each rendered table (e.g., as expressed in a summary or table caption) and the relationships among the table cells and headers. Techniques for checkpoint 10.1 Note: This checkpoint refers only to table purpose and cell/header relationship information that the user agent can recognize. Depending on the table, some techniques may be more efficient than others for conveying data relationships. For many tables, user agents rendering in two dimensions may satisfy this checkpoint by rendering a table as a grid and by ensuring that users can find headers associated with cells. However, for large tables or small viewports, allowing the user to query cells for information about related headers may improve access. This checkpoint is an important special case of checkpoint 2.1. 10.2 Highlight selection and content focus. (P1) 1. Provide a mechanism for highlighting the selection and content focus of each viewport. 2. The highlight mechanism must not rely on color alone. 3. Allow global configuration of selection and focus highlight styles. 4. For graphical viewports, if the highlight mechanism involves colors or text decorations, offer a range of colors or text decorations to the user that includes at least: + the range offered by the conventional utility available in the operating environment that allows users to choose colors or text decorations, + or, if no such utility is available, the range of colors or text decorations supported by the conventional APIs of the operating environment for specifying colors or drawing text. Techniques for checkpoint 10.2 Note: Examples of highlight mechanisms include foreground and background color variations, underlining, distinctive synthesized speech prosody, border styling, etc. Because the selection and focus change frequently, user agents should not highlight them using mechanisms (e.g., font size variations) that cause content to reflow as this may disorient the user. See also checkpoint 7.1. 10.3 Distinct default highlight styles. (P1) 1. Ensure that all of the default highlight styles for the selection and content focus, as well as for enabled elements, recently visited links, and fee links in rendered content: + do not rely on color alone, and + differ from each other, and not by color alone. 2. This checkpoint does not apply to those highlight styles inherited from the operating environment as default values, as long as the user can change the styles in the operating environment. Techniques for checkpoint 10.3 Note: For instance, by default a graphical user agent may present the selection using color and a dotted outline, the focus using a solid outline, enabled elements as underlined in blue, recently visited links as dotted underlined in purple, and fee links using a special icon or flag to draw the user's attention. 10.4 Highlight special elements. (P2) 1. Provide a mechanism for highlighting all enabled elements, recently visited links, and fee links in rendered content. 2. Allow the user to configure the highlight styles. The highlight mechanism must not rely on color alone. 3. For graphical viewports, if the highlight mechanism involves text size, font family, colors, or text decorations, offer the corresponding range of values required by checkpoint 4.1, checkpoint 4.2, checkpoint 4.3, or checkpoint 10.2. 4. For a graphically rendered enabled elements, highlight the most specific rendered element that: + encompasses the enabled element, and + is rendered as a coherent unit according to specification. For example, an HTML user agent rendering a PNG image as part of an image map is only required to highlight the image as a whole, not each enabled region. On the other hand, an SVG user agent rendering an SVG image with embedded graphical links is required to highlight each graphical link that may be rendered independently according to the SVG specification. Techniques for checkpoint 10.4 Note: Examples of highlight mechanisms include foreground and background color variations, font variations, underlining, distinctive synthesized speech prosody, border styling, etc. 10.5 Outline view. (P2) 1. Make available to the user an "outline" view of content, composed of labels for important structural elements (e.g., heading text, table titles, form titles, etc.). 2. What constitutes a label is defined by each markup language specification. A label is not required to be text only. Techniques for checkpoint 10.5 Note: This checkpoint is meant to provide the user with a simplified view of content (e.g, a table of contents). For example, in HTML, a heading (H1-H6) is a label for the section that follows it, a CAPTION is a label for a table, the "title" attribute is a label for its element, etc. For important elements that do not have associated labels, user agents may generate labels for the outline view. For information about what constitutes the set of important structural elements, please see the Note following checkpoint 9.9. By making the outline view navigable, it is possible to satisfy this checkpoint and checkpoint 9.9 together: allow users to navigate among the important elements of the outline view, and to navigate from a position in the outline view to the corresponding position in a full view of content. See also checkpoint 9.10. 10.6 Provide link information. (P3) 1. To help the user decide whether to traverse a link, make available the following information about it: + link element content, + link title, + whether the link is internal to the resource (e.g., the link is to a target in the same Web page), + whether the user has traversed the link recently, + whether traversing it may involve a fee, and + information about the type, size, and natural language of linked Web resources. 2. The user agent is not required to compute or make available information that requires retrieval of linked Web resources. Techniques for checkpoint 10.6 Checkpoints for the user interface 10.7 Highlight current viewport. (P1) 1. Provide a mechanism for highlighting the viewport with the current focus (including any frame that takes current focus). 2. For graphical viewports, the default highlight mechanism must not rely on color alone. 3. This default color requirement does not apply if the highlight mechanism is inherited from the operating environment as the default and the user can change it in the operating environment. Techniques for checkpoint 10.7 Note: This checkpoint is an important special case of checkpoint 1.1. See also to checkpoint checkpoint 7.1. 10.8 Indicate rendering progress. (P3) 1. Indicate the viewport's position relative to rendered content (e.g., the proportion of an audio or video clip that has been played, the proportion of a Web page that has been viewed, etc.). 2. The user agent may calculate the relative position according to content focus position, selection position, or viewport position, depending on how the user has been browsing. 3. For two-dimensional renderings, relative position includes both vertical and horizontal positions. 4. The user agent may indicate the proportion of content viewed in a number of ways, including as a percentage, as a relative size in bytes, etc. Techniques for checkpoint 10.8 [next guideline 11] [review guideline 10] [previous guideline 9] [contents] Guideline 11. Allow configuration and customization. Allow users to configure the user agent so that frequently performed tasks are made convenient, and allow users to save their preferences. Web users have a wide range of capabilities and need to be able to configure the user agent according to their preferences for styles, graphical user interface configuration, keyboard configuration, etc. Most of the checkpoints in this guideline pertain to the input configuration: how user agent behavior is controlled through keyboard input, pointing device input, and voice input. Checkpoints 11.1 Current user bindings. (P1) 1. Provide information to the user about current user preferences for input configurations. 2. To satisfy this checkpoint, the user agent may make available binding information in a centralized fashion (e.g., a list of bindings) or a distributed fashion (e.g., by listing keyboard shortcuts in user interface menus). For user agent features. Techniques for checkpoint 11.1 11.2 Current author bindings. (P2) 1. Provide a centralized view of the current author-specified input configuration bindings. 2. The user agent may satisfy this checkpoint by providing different views for different input modalities (keyboard, pointing device, voice, etc.). For all content. Techniques for checkpoint 11.2 Note: For example, for HTML documents, provide a view of keyboard bindings specified by the author through the "accesskey" attribute. The intent of this checkpoint is to centralize information about author-specified bindings so that the user does not have to read the entire content first to find out what bindings are available. 11.3 Override bindings. (P2) 1. Allow the user to override any binding that is part of the user agent default input configuration. 2. The user agent is not required to allow the user to override conventional bindings for the operating environment (e.g., for access to help). 3. The override requirement only applies to bindings for the same input modality (e.g., the user must be able to override a keyboard binding with another keyboard binding). For user agent features. Techniques for checkpoint 11.3 Note: See also checkpoint 11.5, checkpoint 11.7, and checkpoint 12.3. 11.4 Single key access. (P2) 1. Allow the user to override any binding in the user agent default keyboard configuration with a binding to either a key plus modifier keys or to a single-key. In this checkpoint, "key" refers to a physical key of the keyboard (rather than, say, a character of the document character set). 2. For each functionality in the set required by checkpoint 11.5, allow the user to configure a single-key binding (i.e., one key press performs the task, with zero modifier keys). 3. If the number of physical keys on the keyboard is less than the number of functionalities required by checkpoint 11.5, allow single-key bindings for as many of those functionalities as possible. 4. The single-key binding requirements may be satisfied with a "single-key mode" (i.e., a mode where the current bindings are replaced by a set of single-key bindings). 5. The user agent is not required to allow the user to override conventional bindings for the operating environment (e.g., for access to help). 6. This checkpoint does not require single physical key bindings for character input, only for the activation of user agent functionalities. For user agent features. Techniques for checkpoint 11.4 Note: Because single-key access is so important to some users with physical disabilities, user agents should ensure that (1) most keys of the physical keyboard may be configured for single-key bindings, and (2) most functionalities of the user agent may be configured for single-key bindings. For information about access to user agent functionality through a keyboard API, see checkpoint 6.6. 11.5 Default binding requirements. (P2) 1. Ensure that the user agent default input configuration includes bindings for the following functionalities required by other checkpoints in this document: + move focus to next enabled element, and move focus to previous enabled element; + activate focused link; + search for text; + search again for same text; + increase size of rendered text, and decrease size of rendered text; + increase global volume, and decrease global volume; + stop, pause, resume, and navigate efficiently selected audio and animations (including video and animated images). 2. If the user agent supports the following functionalities, the default input configuration must also include bindings for them: + next history state (forward), and previous history state (back); + enter URI for new resource; + add to favorites (i.e., bookmarked resources); + view favorites; + stop loading resource; + reload resource; + refresh rendering; + forward one viewport, and back one viewport; + next line, and previous line. For user agent features. Techniques for checkpoint 11.5 Note: This checkpoint does not make any requirements about the ease of use of default input configurations, though clearly the default configuration should include single-key bindings and allow easy operation. Ease of use is ensured by the configuration requirements of checkpoint 11.3. 11.6 User profiles. (P2) 1. For the configuration requirements of this document, allow the user to save user preferences in at least one user profile. 2. Allow the user to choose from among available default profiles, profiles created by the same user, and no profile (i.e., the user agent default settings). For user agent features. Techniques for checkpoint 11.6 11.7 Configure tool bars. (P3) 1. For graphical user interfaces, allow the user to configure the position of controls on tool bars of the user agent user interface, to add or remove controls for the user interface from a predefined set, and to restore the default user interface. For user agent features. Techniques for checkpoint 11.7 Note: This checkpoint is a special case of checkpoint 11.3. [next guideline 12] [review guideline 11] [previous guideline 10] [contents] Guideline 12. Provide accessible user agent documentation and help. Ensure that the user can learn about software features that benefit accessibility from the documentation. Ensure that the documentation is accessible. Documentation of the user interface is important, as is documentation of the user agent's underlying functionalities. While intuitive user interface design is valuable to many users, some users may still not be able to understand or be able to operate the native user interface without thorough documentation (e.g., a user with blindness may not find a graphical user interface intuitive without supporting documentation). There are three types of requirements in this guideline: 1. accessibility of the documentation (checkpoint 12.1); 2. minimal requirements of what must be documented (checkpoint 12.2, checkpoint 12.3, and checkpoint 12.4). Documentation should include much more to explain how to install, get help for, use, or configure the user agent; 3. organization of the documentation (checkpoint 12.5). Refer to checkpoint 7.3 for information about following system conventions for documentation. Checkpoints 12.1 Accessible documentation. (P1) 1. Ensure that at least one version of the user agent documentation conforms to at least Level Double-A of the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 1.0 [WCAG10]. For user agent features. Techniques for checkpoint 12.1 12.2 Document accessibility features. (P1) 1. Document all user agent features that benefit accessibility. 2. For the purposes of this checkpoint, a user agent feature that benefits accessibility is one implemented to satisfy the requirements of this document (including the requirements of checkpoints 8.1 and 7.3). 3. The user agent may satisfy this checkpoint either by + providing a centralized view of the accessibility features, or + integrating accessibility features into the rest of the documentation. For user agent features. Techniques for checkpoint 12.2 Note: The help system should include discussion of user agent features that benefit accessibility. The user agent should satisfy this checkpoint by providing both centralized and integrated views of accessibility features in the documentation. 12.3 Document default bindings. (P1) 1. Document the default user agent input configuration (e.g., the default keyboard bindings). For user agent features. Techniques for checkpoint 12.3 Note: If the default input configuration is inconsistent with conventions of the operating environment, the documentation should alert the user. 12.4 Document changes. (P2) 1. Document changes from the previous version of the user agent to accessibility features, including accessibility features of the user interface. 2. Accessibility features are those defined in checkpoint 12.2. For user agent features. Techniques for checkpoint 12.4 12.5 Dedicated section on accessibility. (P2) 1. Provide a centralized view of all features of the user agent that benefit accessibility in a dedicated section of the documentation. 2. The features that benefit accessibility are those defined in checkpoint 12.2. For user agent features. Techniques for checkpoint 12.5 Note: The user agent satisfies this checkpoint automatically by providing a centralized view of accessibility features to satisfy checkpoint 12.2. However, developers are encouraged to integrate descriptions of accessibility features into the documentation alongside other features, in addition to providing a centralized view. [review guideline 12] [previous guideline 11] [contents] 3. Conformance This normative section defines what it means to conform to this document and explains how to make a valid conformance claim. The following are important conformance concepts. * Conformance and conformance claims differ. This document distinguishes conformance requirements and conformance claim requirements. The sections on unconditional conformance and conditional conformance explain the conformance requirements. The section on well-formed claims explains the claim requirements (e.g., identification of the components that make up the user agent, the operating environment in which they run, etc.) Here is a sample claim (expressed in HTML):

On 12 September 2001, Project X (version 2.3) running on MyOperatingSystem (version 4.2) conforms to W3C's "User Agent Accessibility Guidelines 1.0", http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/CR-UAAG10-20010912, level Double-A. Unsupported content types: Video, Speech. Unsupported input modalities: Voice. (see section 3.1 of the UAAG 1.0). The list of checkpoints that do not apply is available online.

* Modular conformance. A conforming user agent is not required to be a single piece of software. In general, a conforming user agent will consist of several coordinated components, such as a browser, a multimedia player, documentation on the Web, etc. The current document places no restrictions on the type or number of components that make up the "subject of a conformance claim", i.e., the user agent (i.e., set of components) about which someone has made a conformance claim. * Conditional conformance. A user agent is not required to satisfy every checkpoint in order to conform. This document allows "conditional conformance", which means conformance to less than (or more than) a default set of requirements. Claimants may not pick and choose which requirements they wish to satisfy in order to conform conditionally; conditional conformance is governed by several mechanisms described below: 1. conformance levels, 2. content type labels, 3. input modality labels, 4. selection label. When a user agent conforms conditionally, a conformance claim about the user agent must indicate how the set of satisfied requirements differs from the default set; see the section on well-formed claims. * Applicability. Some checkpoints may not apply to a particular user agent because of the nature of the user agent's user interface or the nature of the format(s) implemented by the user agent. If a checkpoint (or portion of a checkpoint) doesn't apply, the user agent is not required to satisfy it for conformance. A claimant must state in a well-formed conformance claim which checkpoints, if any, do not apply. See the section on applicability for information about how to determine whether a checkpoint applies. In this document (notably in the checkpoints and in this section on conformance), the terms "must", "should", and "may" (and related terms) are used in accordance with RFC 2119 [RFC2119