Mailing-lists Search service

1. Re: Review of Best Practice Recipes for Publishing RDF Vocabularies (score: 9) (6,185 bytes)
Author: Diego Berrueta <diego.berrueta@fundacionctic.org>, Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 01:12:19 +0100 List: Public/public-swd-wg
In-Reply-To: <f032cc060801141316n2b0a2b54h9fd8df1fc32e4eac@mail.gmail.com> References: 1 2 3

Hi Ralph, Ed, please read my comments inline: Ed Summers escribió: Unfortunately, I think this issue is serious. For instance, I wonder whether it may cause problems with semantic web browsers embedd

2. Re: Review of Best Practice Recipes for Publishing RDF Vocabularies (score: 9) (3,241 bytes)
Author: "Ed Summers" <ehs@pobox.com>, Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 11:53:45 -0500 List: Public/public-swd-wg
In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.2.20080115103626.03616fe0@127.0.0.1> References: 1 2 3

I'm happy too, thanks for giving my hasty comments such a thorough treatment :-) //Ed

3. Re: Review of Best Practice Recipes for Publishing RDF Vocabularies (score: 9) (3,655 bytes)
Author: Jon Phipps <jphipps@madcreek.com>, Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 11:02:26 -0500 List: Public/public-swd-wg
In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.2.20080115103626.03616fe0@127.0.0.1> References: 1 2 3

Thanks Ralph!

4. Re: Review of Best Practice Recipes for Publishing RDF Vocabularies (score: 9) (2,149 bytes)
Author: "Ralph R. Swick" <swick@w3.org>, Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 10:53:16 -0500 List: Public/public-swd-wg
In-Reply-To: <75E24CD8-FEE9-4934-9E02-9561CC5AB78F@madcreek.com> References: 1 2 3

Jon and Diego, I am happy with your plan. Thanks! certainly. done. (anyone could have done this :) http://esw.w3.org/topic/ContentNegotiation

5. Re: Review of Best Practice Recipes for Publishing RDF Vocabularies (score: 9) (4,919 bytes)
Author: Jon Phipps <jphipps@madcreek.com>, Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 09:37:38 -0500 List: Public/public-swd-wg
In-Reply-To: <f032cc060801141316n2b0a2b54h9fd8df1fc32e4eac@mail.gmail.com> References: 1 2 3

Hi Ed, Ralph, Based on your feedback and discussion, here's our proposed list of pre-publish changes: BTW Ralph, In recipe 6, rather than the main doc providing any specific references to "pre-existi

6. Re: Review of Best Practice Recipes for Publishing RDF Vocabularies (score: 9) (11,545 bytes)
Author: "Ed Summers" <ehs@pobox.com>, Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 16:16:44 -0500 List: Public/public-swd-wg
In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.2.20080114114320.0326f698@127.0.0.1> References: 1 2 3

7. Re: Review of Best Practice Recipes for Publishing RDF Vocabularies (score: 9) (9,311 bytes)
Author: "Ralph R. Swick" <swick@w3.org>, Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 12:42:58 -0500 List: Public/public-swd-wg
In-Reply-To: <478A2DFD.4040703@fundacionctic.org> References: 1 2

8. Re: Review of Best Practice Recipes for Publishing RDF Vocabularies (score: 9) (9,118 bytes)
Author: Diego Berrueta <diego.berrueta@fundacionctic.org>, Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 16:27:57 +0100 List: Public/public-swd-wg
In-Reply-To: <f032cc060801080830hc33d3c4ua3dd0d7206dee119@mail.gmail.com> References: 1

Ed, Thank you for your review. Please read my response to your comments below: Ed Summers escribió: IMO, the recipes are not Apache-specific. Only the configuration examples (i.e.: the yellow boxes)

9. Re: Review of Best Practice Recipes for Publishing RDF Vocabularies (score: 9) (3,561 bytes)
Author: "Ed Summers" <ehs@pobox.com>, Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 14:13:28 -0500 List: Public/public-swd-wg
In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.2.20080108133629.02547af0@127.0.0.1> References: 1

Thanks for that clarification Ralph. My review was in fact based on a reading of the Dec 3rd draft. My apologies for the confusion, //Ed

10. Re: Review of Best Practice Recipes for Publishing RDF Vocabularies (score: 9) (2,025 bytes)
Author: "Ralph R. Swick" <swick@w3.org>, Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2008 13:47:19 -0500 List: Public/public-swd-wg
In-Reply-To: <f032cc060801080830hc33d3c4ua3dd0d7206dee119@mail.gmail.com >

Ed, just confirming that you reviewed the 3 December editor's draft [2] that is intended to be the update and not the published WD that you cited ([1]). (You referred to the editor's note on pre-exis

11. Review of Best Practice Recipes for Publishing RDF Vocabularies (score: 9) (6,208 bytes)
Author: "Ed Summers" <ehs@pobox.com>, Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 11:30:46 -0500 List: Public/public-swd-wg

Below is my (late) review of the Best Practice Recipes for Publishing RDF Vocabularies [1]. In general I think this is a useful document (I tried the recipes) for configuring an Apache web server to