QA Framework: Process & Operational Guidelines

Checklist Table (2002-02-22)


Guideline 1. In charters, describe QA goals, criteria, deliverables and resources

Nbr Checkpoint Priority Yes No N/A
1.1

In the Working Group charter include conformance test materials plans. Plan to have at least a commitment to "QA level three".

[Priority 1]      
1.2

In the Working Group charter, specify completion and publication of test materials to be a criterion for CR-exit and PR-entrance.

[Priority 2]      
1.3

In the Working Group charter, address QA staffing commitments.

[Priority 2]      

Guideline 2. In the Working Group charter, address where and how conformance test materials will be produced.

Nbr Checkpoint Priority Yes No N/A
2.1

In the Working Group charter, specify the WG's level of involvement in the ongoing evolution of test materials.

[Priority 1]      
2.2

Ensure a secure and reliable repository location for future test materials.

[Priority 2]      

Guideline 3. Ensure that the goals and scope of QA development are clear

Nbr Checkpoint Priority Yes No N/A
3.1

Ensure that test materials are documented, self contained and reusable by accredited third parties for testing purposes.

[Priority 2]      
3.2

Specify a policy for branding materials if applicable.

[Priority 3]      
3.3

Provide disclaimer regarding use of the test materials for compliance verification.

[Priority 2]      

Guideline 4. Allocate staff for the QA process.

Nbr Checkpoint Priority Yes No N/A
4.1

Appoint a test QA moderator.

[Priority 2]      
4.2

Designate a task force or another entity to maintain the test suite, as well as maintenance procedures.

[Priority 2]      

Guideline 5. Synchronize specification and test materials development

Nbr Checkpoint Priority Yes No N/A
5.1

Introduce intermediate milestones for test materials completion.

[Priority 3]      
5.2

Synchronize the latest published version of the specification and the latest published version of the test materials.

[Priority 3]      
5.3

Support specification versioning/errata in the test materials.

[Priority 2]      

Guideline 6. Produce QA process document.

Nbr Checkpoint Priority Yes No N/A
6.1

Review Test Materials Guidelines before writing the QA Process document and starting test materials development.

[Priority 2]      
6.2

In the QA Process document, define a contribution process.

[Priority 2]      
6.3

In the QA Process document, define the licenses applicable to submitted and published test materials.

[Priority 2]      
6.4

In the QA Process document, define a means for communication regarding test suites.

[Priority 2]      
6.5

In the QA Process document, define review procedures for submitted test materials.

[Priority 2]      
6.6

In the QA Process document, describe the way test materials will be published and point to the corresponding web page.

[Priority 2]      
6.7

In the QA Process document, describe how vendors can publish test results for their products, if applicable.

[Priority 3]      

Guideline 7. Plan the transfer of test materials to W3C if needed

Nbr Checkpoint Priority Yes No N/A
7.1

If transfer of the test materials to W3C is planned, perform assessment of their quality.

[Priority 2]      
7.2

If transfer of the test materials to W3C is planned, identify staff resources to meet requirements.

[Priority 2]      
7.3

If transfer of the test materials to W3C is planned, resolve IPR questions and reach agreement with external party that produced test materials.

[Priority 1]      
7.4

If transfer of the test materials to W3C is planned, update QA commitments in the Working Group charter if necessary.

[Priority 2]      

Guideline 8. Plan for test materials maintenance

Nbr Checkpoint Priority Yes No N/A
8.1

Maintain contribution and review procedures throughout test materials' and standard's entire life cycles.

[Priority 3]      
8.2

In the Working Group's QA process document, specify a procedure for updates of the test materials to track new errata/specification versions.

[Priority 2]      
8.3

In the Working Group's QA process document, identify the communication channel and procedure for appeals of tests validity.

[Priority 2]