W3C   W3C Internationalization (I18n) Activity: Making the World Wide Web truly world wide!

Related links

Other reviews

Review radar

Core WG home page

Internationalization Comments on HTML5

Date of first comments: Oct 2009

The WG column indicates whether these are comments on behalf of the Internationalization Core WG. The "Owner" column indicates who has been assigned the responsibility of tracking discussions on a given comment. Orange shading signifies that the comment is unresolved.

We recommend that responses to the comments in this table use a separate email for each point. This makes it far easier to track threads. Click on the icons in the right-most column to see email discussions.

You can edit this page using the buttons to the right and the form below the table. It doesn't actually change the text on the server. For that, hit the Create Source Code button near the bottom of the page and use to edit the page or send to someone for editing.

ID Location Subject Comment Owner WG Ed. /
1see commentwhat's the language of a document

Our proposal is as follows and is based on the text of the following sections:



[1] Explain clearly that declarations in the http header and the meta element refer to the document as an object, rather than the text in a specific element (this is what makes the distinction between single and multiple values sensible).

[2] Continue to recommend that the document-wide default language be defined by a lang attribute on the html tag, but say that if the lang attribute is missing and there is a language defined in the http or meta, then those language declarations can be used to guess the language of the text, if they contain a single value.

[3] Establish the precedence between http vs meta.

[4] Establish the rule that multiple values in the place that has precedence equates to lang="".

This is very close to what we already have, but doesn't try to make the meta declaration a different thing than the http declaration, or change it so that multiple values are no longer valid. At the same time, it allows either the http or the meta to provide language information for text-processing, if the declaration is useable.

We also feel that the spec seems to restrict the use of the term 'document-wide default language' to refer only to a language declared using the meta, and this is rather odd. We feel that in fact the lang attribute on the html element also establishes a document-wide default language. (See the text: "Until the pragma is successfully processed, there is no document-wide default language.")

RIYSLink to mail thread

Edit/create a comment

New comment?    Id:     Status:

Location in document:    URI:


Comments: Inline markup ok. Always escape < and >.

Owner: Working Group approved?    Editorial/Substantive?

Links: Prefix: Subject: List:

Source dump

Page template by Richard Ishida (ishida@w3.org).