ISSUE-124: Localization Quality Issue Types use RFC2119 values improperly
Localization Quality Issue Types use RFC2119 values improperly
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- MLW-LT Standard Draft
- Raised by:
- Arle Lommel
- Opened on:
- 2013-03-28
- Description:
- Statements 45-48 at http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/wiki/Ownership_of_rfc2119_statements#Purpose use RFC2119 values incorrectly and should be lower-case “must” and “must not.” See https://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/track/actions/421
- Related Actions Items:
ACTION-421 on Arle Lommel to Work on statements 45-48 at http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/wiki/Ownership_of_rfc2119_statements#Purpose , see prague f2f minutes - due 2013-01-30, closed- Related emails:
- Bled Issues review G4 results (from mauricio.delolmo@linguaserve.com on 2013-05-07)
- [Agenda] DRAFT MLW-LT call 3 April, noon UTC (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-04-03)
- Re: [All] various edits, please review diffs (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-03-29)
- RE: [All] various edits, please review diffs (from ysavourel@enlaso.com on 2013-03-28)
- [All] various edits, please review diffs (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-03-28)
- mlw-lt-track-ISSUE-124: Localization Quality Issue Types use RFC2119 values improperly (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2013-03-28)
Related notes:
RESOLUTION: accepted
Felix Sasaki, 4 May 2013, 06:50:04CHANGE-TYPE: editorial
Felix Sasaki, 4 May 2013, 06:50:24DECISION-DETAILS: just a clarification.
Felix Sasaki, 4 May 2013, 06:50:45COMMENTER-RESPONSE: satisfied
David Filip, 7 May 2013, 08:01:20DECISION-DETAILS: This is connected to the broader editorial issue. Lower case normative keywords should be reformulated in non-normative style throughout the spec, as suggested by Addison.
David Filip, 7 May 2013, 08:03:43Display change log
