I18n comments on WSDL 2.0

Version reviewed

This review is about three documents:

Main Reviewer

Felix Sasaki.

Notes

These comments have not yet been endorsed by the I18N Core WG.

Comments

ID Location Comment Mail thread Accepted
1 General

Your deployment of IRI is excellent!

- -
2 Core

In sec. 2.1.2 you write: "The value of the targetNamespace attribute information item SHOULD be a dereferenceable IRI (see [IETF RFC 3987])." In sec. 2.1.2.1 you write: "The type of the targetNamespace attribute information item is xs:anyURI. Its value MUST be an absolute IRI (see [IETF RFC 3987])." Why do you have a SHOULD vs. a MUST? If the SHOULD is because of "dereferencable", I would propose: "The value of the targetNamespace attribute information item MUST be an IRI (see [IETF RFC 3987]) and SHOULD be dereferenceable."

- -
3In Core: On reference of xs:anyURIIt would be good if you could mention that although xs:anyURI allows for IRIs (see LC74a), the mapping from IRI to URI in xs:anyURI is currently not defined in terms of IRI. This comment relates also for example to the reference of xs:anyURI in sec. 2.1.2.1 and sec. 3.1.2.1, and to the Adjuncts specification.--
4Core sec. C.2, Binding sec. 2.4Some examples need better formatting.--

Version: $Id: wsdl20-review.html,v 1.2 2005/10/25 16:07:27 fsasaki Exp $