ISSUE-2077
font-variant-anim
font-variant not animatable
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- SVG 1.2 Tiny: Last Call
- Raised by:
- Cameron McCormack
- Opened on:
- 2008-09-30
- Description:
Olaf Hoffmann <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-svg/2008Sep/0141.html>: [[ in '10.9 Font selection properties' of SVGT1.2 font-variant is indicated to be not animatable, in '10.10 Font selection properties' of SVG1.1 it is indicated to be animatable. Is this a specific restriction for the tiny profile or why was this change/ backwards inconsistency introduced? Or are there specific problems with the animation of font-variant for mobile phones? ]]
- Related Actions Items:
ACTION-2286 on Erik Dahlström to Change font-variant so that it is animatable and send a reply email - due 2008-10-16, closed- Related emails:
- SVG/profiles/1.2T doc-svgt12.html,NONE,1.1 (from cvsmail@w3.org on 2008-10-28)
- Minutes, SVG telcon Thursday 9 October 2008 (from anthony.grasso@cisra.canon.com.au on 2008-10-09)
- Re: Font-variant should be animatable IMHO (from ed@opera.com on 2008-10-08)
- Font-variant should be animatable IMHO (from chris@w3.org on 2008-10-07)
- Re: [1.2T LC] font-variant in SVGT1.2 and SVG1.1 (from cam@mcc.id.au on 2008-09-30)
- ISSUE-2077 (font-variant-anim): font-variant not animatable [Last Call: SVG 1.2 Tiny ] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2008-09-30)
Related notes:
2008-10-16 20:54:16: Responded that change made as requested: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-svg/2008Oct/0058.html
Commenter satisfied: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-svg/2008Oct/0065.html
[Doug Schepers]
Changelog:
2008-09-30 13:06:20: Created issue 'font-variant not animatable' nickname font-variant-anim owned by Cameron McCormack on product Last Call: SVG 1.2 Tiny , description 'Olaf Hoffmann <http://www.w3.org/mid/200809301438.43427.Dr.O.Hoffmann@gmx.de>: [[ in '10.9 Font selection properties' of SVGT1.2 font-variant is indicated to be not animatable, in '10.10 Font selection properties' of SVG1.1 it is indicated to be animatable. Is this a specific restriction for the tiny profile or why was this change/ backwards inconsistency introduced? Or are there specific problems with the animation of font-variant for mobile phones? ]]' non-public [Cameron McCormack]
2008-10-10 11:08:15: Status changed to 'pending review' [Erik Dahlström]
2008-10-16 20:52:04: Description changed to 'Olaf Hoffmann <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-svg/2008Sep/0141.html>: [[ in '10.9 Font selection properties' of SVGT1.2 font-variant is indicated to be not animatable, in '10.10 Font selection properties' of SVG1.1 it is indicated to be animatable. Is this a specific restriction for the tiny profile or why was this change/ backwards inconsistency introduced? Or are there specific problems with the animation of font-variant for mobile phones? ]]' [Doug Schepers]
2008-10-16 20:54:16: Status changed to 'closed' [Doug Schepers]