Edit ISSUE-2064: type or typeof?

Nickname:

Title:

State:
RAISED OPEN PENDINGREVIEW CLOSED POSTPONED

Product:
None All Module: Color Module: Compositing Module: Filters Module: Integration Module: Params Module: SVG Print Module: Transforms Module: Vector Effects Modules SVG 1.1 F2 Last Call SVG 1.1 RelaxNG SVG 1.2 Tiny: Errata SVG 1.2 Tiny: Last Call SVG 2 SVG Accessibility Module SVG Filters 1.2 SVG Full 1.1 SVG Full 1.2 SVG Tiny 1.2 SVG-and-HTML Test Suite - SVG Core 2.0 Test Suite - SVG Full 1.1 Test Suite - SVG Full 1.2 Test Suite - SVG Tiny 1.2

Raised By:
Rossen Atanassov Tab Atkins Jr. Tavmjong Bah Dmitry Baranovskiy Amelia Bellamy-Royds Bogdan Brinza Alex Danilo Francisco Dans Timothy Horton Koji Ishii Dean Jackson Gaurav Jain Alexandru Jurubita Vladimir Levantovsky Chris Lilley Chris Little Myles Maxfield Cameron McCormack Sairus Patel Leonard Rosenthol Dirk Schulze Ravinder Singh Shane Stephens Satoru Takagi Léonie Watson Jonathan Watt Eric Willigers Doug Schepers

Description:
Dr. Olaf Hoffmann <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-svg/2008Sep/0089.html>: [[ elements like image, audio, video have a 'type' attribute. This attribute is not animatable and as far as I understand the data type <content-type> it can only represent one type. Because xlink:href of those elements is animatable, the content type can be time dependent. 'type' does not care about this problem and if authors want to give a hint, this is not possible with 'type' for those animations. 'typeof' (5.10.1) can both contain more than one type and is animatable, therefore this solves the problem, but then the 'type' is redundant and could be skipped. If 'typeof' is intended for something different (for example in some programming languages there is a typeof operator available with another meaning, the word 'datatype' may indicate something like this, but a content type still may be a specific data type, therefore this usage seems not to be excluded), then the problem of type and animation remains and it is not obvious, what the purpose of 'typeof' could be - the 'type' problem needs to be solved and 'typeof' needs a better description about the purpose of this attribute to avoid confusion with 'type'. ]]

Add notes (no markup allowed, URIs get automatically hyperlinked):