Please could Accessibility be the first item?
various rationales include:
the complete lack of input for almost a decade,
following good practice as shown by W3C homepage.
- Jonathan, I intend to put Accessibility as the first item to discuss on the conf call this week. Since I know you will be most intimately involved with this activity, If you are not available for the wider IG conf call, you and I (and others) can have a separate call later this month to focus on the Accessibility activity. Also, in the future, can you please sign your Talk: page comments on the wiki using four tildes (~). Wikimedia automatically inserts your name and the time you edited. Jeff schiller 00:14, 23 June 2008 (EDT)
here is NOT a suitable word for a link. It tells the user nothing...
many users search through the links on a page, not the content, links need to be keywords with relevance to the linked content.
Torture tests vs. Canonical examples
While examples such as located at http://srufaculty.sru.edu/david.dailey/svg/newstuff/Newlist.htm might make appropriate torture tests (given review and comment and so forth)
other examples such as
<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"> <circle r="9"/> </svg>
might better belong in another page called "simplest examples"
Torture test discussion