Date: Thu, 12 Jan 95 18:38:37 EST From: "Joan Mitchell (8-863-7238)"As one of three editors of the JPEG Part 1 document, I am responding to your inquiry. The "Requirements and Guidelines" document, called ITU-T Rec. T.81 | ISO 10918:1, became an official CCITT recommendation in Sept. 1992 and an ISO published standard in February 1994. Except for the foreword, the text is common. Part 2 "Compliance Testing" is probably also an official standard now. Part 3 "Enhancements" is working its way through the Draft International Standard (DIS) ballot.
To: Tim Berners-Lee <email@example.com>
The IS version is for sale from your national standards body. In the US the number to call at ANSI is 212-642-4900. Bill Pennebaker and I got permission to publish a copy of the Draft International Standard Part 1 and 2 in our book "JPEG: Still Image Compression Standard", Van Nostrand Reinhold:New York c. 1993 ISBN 0-442-01272-1. It sells for $59.95 in the US. Anyone who is seriously implementing will need an official copy of the IS rather than the DIS.
The JPEG international committee tried hard to have early disclosure of patents. So far no one has pressed any claims on the JPEG baseline (sequential Huffman) system that I know of. I can not take responsibility for knowing the future however. I have not attended the JPEG meetings for nine months now so I am a bit out of date.
I have appended below Annex L from the Draft International Standard 10918 Part 1 that discusses patents. Below it are the names that were included in the final International Standard. In a separate e-mail, I'll send you the text of IBM's letter relative to licensing arithmetic coding patents to practice standards. John Lowe is the official person to contact for a license from IBM. The JPEG/JBIG arithmetic coding patent holders (IBM, AT&T, and Mitsubishi Electric Corp.) have all issued statements indicating a special deal for implementing those standards. I would recommend that you contact them directly. You also may want to contact Eric Hamilton, Chair of JPEG, (firstname.lastname@example.org) for more information. Tom Lane, Independent JPEG Group, may also have lots to say on this topic.
JPEG is not appropriate for color images after they have been converted into 256 palette values. So you may want to look at other standards. For example, during my leave of absence to write the MPEG book, I am working part time at IBM Burlington, VT. The group here makes chips (LZ-1) that run between 5 and 40 Mbytes/second. The encoder certainly has proprietary things in it. But to the best of my knowledge, decoders would not be so likely to hit intellectual property. The algorithm, called ADLC, is right now winding its way through the European Computer Manufacturers Assoc. standards program and the Quarter Inch tape Cartridge standards. If you want more information, Bill Lawrence (802-769-6685) would be happy to supply anyone with some literature and even a diskette that runs the algorithm so its compression can be tested.
P.S. I expect that you will want to propagate this answer. You have my permission.