This is an archived snapshot of W3C's public bugzilla bug tracker, decommissioned in April 2019. Please see the home page for more details.

Back to bug 923

Who When What Removed Added
gritzinger 2004-11-02 19:22:52 UTC Component Spec Spec: Editorial
martin.chapman 2004-12-01 16:29:23 UTC Status NEW RESOLVED
Resolution --- FIXED
Summary No explanation of "action" and "new" in channel type defns

2.3.4 Channel Types

<channelType name="ncname"
usage="once"|"unlimited"?
action="request-respond"|"request"|"respond"? >
<passing channel="qname"
action="request-respond"|"request"|"respond"?
new="xsd:boolean"? />*
<role type="qname" behavior="ncname"? />
<reference>
<token type="qname"/>
</reference>
<identity>
<token type="qname"/>+
</identity>?
</channelType>


There is no explanation of "action" after "usage".
There is no explanation of "new" after "action".
No explanation of "action" and "new" in channel type defns
No explanation of "action" and "new" in channel type defns2.3.4 Channel Types<channelType name="ncname" usage="once"|"unlimited"? action="request-respond"|"request"|"respond"? > <passing channel="qname" action="request-respond"|"request"|"respond"? new="xsd:boolean"? />* <role type="qname" behavior="ncname"? /> <reference> <token type="qname"/> </reference> <identity> <token type="qname"/>+ </identity>?</channelType>There is no explanation of "action" after "usage".There is no explanation of "new" after "action".No explanation of "action" and "new" in channel type defns

Back to bug 923