Meeting minutes
tony: TPAC. Group meeting. We can do that. Virtual
https://
elundberg: likely a typo
tony: merge
https://
elundberg: editorial. fix date.
https://
akshay: looks fine.
tony: merge
https://
tony: any issues.
https://
agl: do 1585 first
https://
jeffH: merged
https://
jeffH: merged.
https://
jeffH: may want to mark as draft. this will be on-going discusson
dtony: mark it as draft.
https://
jeffH: this is another on-going discussion
elundberg: next step may be more reviews.
… should see how it interacts with #1546, depends on how it is addressed
… might become a special case. need to consider this
… figure out #1546 and then go on to next one. #1425
tony: issues to look at.
https://
akshay: looks like they want web authn for all crypto
lundberg: have external apps and add signatures.
jbradley: we have a tension around privacy
… audience restricted to origin.
… don't know origin of blockchain
… how would we do this with a FIDO assertion?
… these are legit use cases, but open can of worms and not being thought through
… we can stop this in the browser
… managing certificates is hard. not sure we want to go there
… why invent something new, if there is something else we can use.
agl: we have no intent to expand past authentication use cases
jbradley: should be hardware backed for web crypto.
… ??
agl: I don't think web authn will be the way we expose native apps
… this issue is too ambitious. aa full-feature to talk to native apps is not web authn territory.
dwaite: could be privacy implications
jbradley: we need to understand the web cyrpto intent
jbradley: sounds like not huge move to expand web authn
… if folks want web crypto, maybe that is worked on somewhere else
akshay: this is authtication.
… UV is another issue, do people care about that.
wendy: this group has avoided some issues by the carefully scoped work.
<jeffh> see also: https://
DanV: focus on this group has been helpful. Just because we talk to hardware doesn't mean everyone should get access.
… Web Authn is not a general anything.
agl: a statemen will be helpful
agl: not here, not , not ever
tony: you will write statement and close?
jeffH: yes
https://
elundberg: this is a duplicate, we should close
tony: yes.
https://
correction: https://
https://
jeffH: invites RP to select UV modality
aakshay: close
tony: close
https://
agl: should close
jbradley: I will close
tony: adjourn