16:03:34 RRSAgent has joined #dnt 16:03:34 logging to http://www.w3.org/2017/10/23-dnt-irc 16:03:36 RRSAgent, make logs world 16:03:36 Zakim has joined #dnt 16:03:38 Meeting: Tracking Protection Working Group Teleconference 16:03:38 Date: 23 October 2017 16:03:47 present+ 16:04:29 present+ wileys 16:06:10 present+ 16:06:48 at has joined #dnt 16:07:06 topic: ePrivacy amendments - first impressions? 16:07:10 moneill2, which document are we talking about? link? 16:07:42 https://t.co/mePis8Cuve 16:07:48 Mike gives an intro to the ePrivacy proposal of the EU parliament. 16:08:42 present+ Bert 16:09:45 Shane, purposes are mentioned in ePR 16:10:16 +q 16:11:00 ack mon 16:12:02 bert, internationalisation? 16:12:15 https://github.com/w3c/dnt/issues/61 16:14:24 Roy, no need because its referred to HTTP - separate request 16:16:11 Roy, internationalisation maybe more important if we put in purposes into spec 16:16:43 https://github.com/w3c/dnt/issues/62 16:17:47 Roy: no requirement 16:18:31 https://github.com/w3c/dnt/issues/63 16:18:38 issue 63 16:20:30 Roy, server will use whatever language is used for the page 16:21:56 Bert, does TPE already say to use UTF8 16:22:34 https://github.com/w3c/dnt/issues/64 16:22:55 bert, issue 64 who is fred roy alraedy dealt with it 16:23:11 roy, nothing we need to do 16:23:49 bert, 64 resolved no further action 16:23:57 https://github.com/w3c/dnt/issues/60 16:24:59 RESOLVED: close issue 60 with no change. 16:27:03 Shane, lawyers say purposes definately required 16:31:23 q+ 16:31:42 shane, industry should have to adjust multiple domains, one domain per purpose 16:33:05 shane, we seem to have covered most of the grounds so should be done pretty fast 16:33:39 s/should have to/should not have to/ 16:34:21 bert, should we have some text to be going on with 16:34:52 q? 16:34:56 ack fie 16:36:25 roy, no problem giving thorough examination while CR goes through, then new text could go in iin next realease 16:36:44 Correction in the notes: Shane said “industry should NOT have to adjust multiple domains where one domain equals one purpose” 16:36:45 roy, implementation is the important issue 16:37:20 shane, conversations are ongoing 16:38:06 roy, backroom deals more likely than converstaion on this list 16:39:05 shane, multiple purposes necessary, industry not asking browsers till that is sorted, chicken&egg 16:39:07 I mean, in terms of getting implementation folks to work on the spec or extensions to the spec, asking them to attend the WG meetings is a non-starter. 16:40:30 bert, how do we tell people what we are discussing 16:40:41 roy, that is what issue list is for 16:41:27 +q 16:41:54 ack wil 16:42:51 s/RESOLVED: close issue 60 with no change/RESOLVED: close issue 64 with no change/ 16:42:52 I already closed 64 and 60 is still open 16:47:42 (Discussion about how to use the extenstion syntax without making other, future etensions impossible.) 16:47:59 s/etensions/extensions/ 16:51:38 https://github.com/w3c/dnt/issues/65 16:52:54 roy, issue 65 - no need to change protocol, 16:53:42 AFAICT, no change needed at this time, but also no hurry to close this one untile we have time to discuss with Rob on call 16:53:57 s/untile/until/ 16:54:11 bert, no more to discuus, conculsion we discuss issue 60 on email and next week 16:54:31 wileys has left #dnt 17:14:39 present+ Brendan, jnovak 17:14:47 zakim, list attendees 17:14:47 As of this point the attendees have been fielding, wileys, Bert, Brendan, jnovak 17:15:07 resent+ moneill 17:15:30 present+ moneill 17:15:44 zakim, list attendees 17:15:44 As of this point the attendees have been fielding, wileys, Bert, Brendan, jnovak, moneill 17:16:27 scribe: moneill2 17:16:37 trackbot, end meeting 17:16:37 Zakim, list attendees 17:16:37 As of this point the attendees have been fielding, wileys, Bert, Brendan, jnovak, moneill 17:16:45 RRSAgent, please draft minutes 17:16:45 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2017/10/23-dnt-minutes.html trackbot 17:16:46 RRSAgent, bye 17:16:46 I see no action items