14:31:57 RRSAgent has joined #ag 14:31:57 logging to http://www.w3.org/2017/09/05-ag-irc 14:31:59 RRSAgent, make logs public 14:32:02 Meeting: Accessibility Guidelines Working Group Teleconference 14:32:02 Date: 05 September 2017 14:32:04 zakim, who is on the phone? 14:32:04 Present: AWK, KimD, JakeAbma, Joshue108, JF, shawn, shadi, MichaelC, MikeGower, Laura, Detlev, Mike_Pluke, Makoto, Melanie_Philipp, Katie_Haritos-Shea, marcjohlic, Kathy, 14:32:07 ... alastairc, Glenda, david-macdonald, jasonjgw, Mike, Elledge, dboudreau, chriscm, jon_avila, kirkwood, JanMcSorley, Roy, Wilco, lisa, Greg_Lowney, bruce-bailey, steverep, 14:32:07 ... Brooks_Newton, Kim 14:32:13 present: AWK 14:32:17 zakim, who is on the phone? 14:32:17 Present: AWK 14:32:50 regrets+ Chris_Loiselle, Denis_Boudreau 14:33:13 regrets+ Pietro_Cirrincione 14:33:19 Zakim, agenda? 14:33:19 I see 1 item remaining on the agenda: 14:33:20 3. Planning - next phase/steps discussion [from Joshue108] 14:33:28 Zakim, clear agenda 14:33:28 agenda cleared 14:34:07 agenda+ Device Sensors and next publication 14:34:12 agenda+ TPAC 14:34:24 agenda+ Tracking sheet and signups: https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/Accepted_WCAG_2.1_SC 14:34:41 agenda+ Resolving outstanding comments 14:49:36 interaccess has joined #ag 14:49:44 Roy has joined #ag 14:50:39 Kathy has joined #ag 14:51:12 Detlev has joined #ag 14:52:00 laura has joined #ag 14:55:59 Makoto has joined #ag 14:56:28 KimD has joined #ag 14:57:03 Present+ KimD 14:59:33 steverep has joined #ag 14:59:47 present+steverep 15:00:00 trackbot, start meeting 15:00:03 RRSAgent, make logs public 15:00:06 Meeting: Accessibility Guidelines Working Group Teleconference 15:00:06 Date: 05 September 2017 15:00:10 Greg has joined #ag 15:00:14 Brooks_Newton has joined #AG 15:00:14 zakim, agenda? 15:00:15 I see 4 items remaining on the agenda: 15:00:15 1. Device Sensors and next publication [from AWK] 15:00:15 2. TPAC [from AWK] 15:00:15 3. Tracking sheet and signups: https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/Accepted_WCAG_2.1_SC [from AWK] 15:00:15 4. Resolving outstanding comments [from AWK] 15:00:24 Chair: AWK 15:00:30 present+ 15:00:49 Present+ Brooks_Newton 15:00:52 present+ Detlev 15:01:01 Glenda has joined #ag 15:01:34 present+ 15:02:04 present+ 15:02:13 JakeAbma has joined #ag 15:02:20 present+ JakeAbma 15:02:34 alastairc has joined #ag 15:02:57 Mike_Elledge has joined #ag 15:03:13 present+ Laura 15:03:25 present+ alastairc 15:03:34 present+ Glenda 15:03:55 Alex has joined #ag 15:04:02 Present+ Mike Elledge 15:04:04 MelanieP has joined #ag 15:04:43 I can do it 15:05:23 scribe: Detlev 15:05:37 marcjohlic has joined #ag 15:06:00 Mike_Pluke has joined #ag 15:06:02 I can do the 26th. 15:07:59 zakim, next item 15:08:01 agendum 1. "Device Sensors and next publication" taken up [from AWK] 15:08:28 AWK: Introductons to new people: Brooks & Roy 15:08:49 JF has joined #ag 15:08:53 Roy: new staff at W3C in China 15:08:57 Present+ JF 15:09:45 present+ Roy 15:09:46 Brooks: Introduced himself last week 15:09:54 present+ Mike_Pluke 15:09:56 Brooks: Joined Thomson Reuters 15:10:10 present+ Greg_Lowney 15:10:13 present+ Melanie_Philipp 15:10:26 present+ Joshue108 15:10:38 AWK: CfC device sensors still going for 49 mins 15:11:00 bruce_bailey has joined #ag 15:11:10 present+ bruce-bailey 15:11:26 AWK: Deadline extended due to public holidays - so far one objection 15:11:45 q+ My response was not an objection 15:11:58 david-macdonald has joined #ag 15:12:12 ...went through prior CfC and was rejected - now attempt to find new consensus, revisit it soon 15:12:36 ...concern in editors' note that there is concern about scope 15:12:37 https://rawgit.com/w3c/wcag21/device-sensors_ISSUE-67/guidelines/sc/21/device-sensors.html 15:12:39 present+ david-macdonald 15:12:47 ack s 15:13:18 steverep: Does not count his response as objection - more a question 15:13:25 AWK: great 15:14:03 AWK: Be clear in your response to CfC - object using -1 and explain why - make it unambiguous 15:14:37 AWK: after this CfC we will be assembling last PWD prior to TPAC 15:14:57 ..will be looking at additional feedback 15:15:23 ...Michael, any sense of time frame? 15:16:15 MichaelC: should be next week - main blocker after closing CfCs is preparing wider message - draft should go out within next week, or less 15:16:44 AWK: questions? 15:16:51 zakim, next item 15:16:52 agendum 2. "TPAC" taken up [from AWK] 15:17:19 +1 15:17:20 +1 attending 15:17:20 +1 15:17:20 +1 15:17:21 +1 15:17:22 +1 15:17:22 +1 15:17:22 +1 15:17:26 AWK: If you are going to TPAC put in a +1 15:17:27 +1 15:17:27 -1 15:17:28 tpac: +1 15:17:29 -1 15:17:29 +1 15:17:30 -1 15:17:30 -1 15:17:31 0 15:17:31 -1 15:17:33 +1 but only first 2 days 15:17:33 +1 15:17:40 +1 15:17:45 Mpluke -1 15:17:55 -1 15:18:06 +1 15:18:14 AWK: 15+ people definitely attending 15:18:27 gowerm has joined #ag 15:18:32 present+ MikeGower 15:18:33 q+ 15:18:34 ..people can also attend remotely (but that is challenging) 15:19:05 -1 15:19:05 AWK: By that time we should have comments at hand and more clarity what needs to be discussed / changed 15:20:09 ...working through comments and issues with SCs, Techniques etc - agenda not yet fixed 15:20:12 q+ 15:20:15 q+ 15:20:17 ack mic 15:20:25 ...does the group have any particular expectations what should be done? 15:20:34 https://www.w3.org/2017/11/TPAC/ 15:20:46 MichaelC: If you intend to go please register at the TPAC page 15:21:08 AWC: Get a hotel room if you haven't got one yet 15:21:09 ack dav 15:21:38 David: Would like mergers or associating new SCs with existing ones 15:21:44 s/AWC:/AWK: 15:22:34 AWK: so you want to figure out which of the new SCs are candidates tfor mergers, form strategy? 15:22:38 David: yes 15:23:03 -> https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/Meetings/TPAC_2017 AG WG TPAC meeting page 15:23:35 AWK: Big issue to address with WCAG 2.1 - [what is modified / merged and what are new SC] 15:24:27 David: third possibility: changing requirements without reducing requirements of 2.0 (?) 15:25:33 David: We should discuss whether we can change existing SCs without changing the requirements of WCAG 2.0 SCs 15:26:34 AWK: Some things might be straightforward - e.g. set new contrast criteria (hypothetical example) 15:26:54 David: another example: focus visible with a requirement for the amount of contrast 15:27:15 AWK: more comments? 15:27:35 ...Nov 6 and 7 will be days for WG meetings 15:28:11 AWK: Recommends staying around longer, other interesting stuff 15:28:12 q? 15:28:19 zakim, next item 15:28:20 agendum 4. "Resolving outstanding comments" taken up [from AWK] 15:29:26 AWK: outstanding comments 188 open issues - often comments about first PWD - have looked at many of them already, many have been overcome by events. 15:29:51 ...some didn't making into the PWD, deferred to 2.2 15:30:14 ...in other cases, changes to SC text have removed the cause for comment 15:30:56 ...how shall we handle that in an initial 'scrub' - would like not doing an individual CfC for each one of them 15:31:17 ...for others that remain we will have a more formal comment process 15:31:40 ...are people OK with that? 15:31:41 +1 to initial scrub on non-controversial done by leads handling directly :) 15:31:49 +1 15:31:49 q? 15:31:57 +1 15:31:58 +1 15:32:02 +1 15:32:02 +1 15:32:04 q+ to ask how we want to handle public comments on SC that have changed significantly 15:32:08 +1 15:32:12 +1 15:32:17 +1 15:32:58 steverep: some of the comments on a couple of SCs like hover/focus do no longer match - shall we ask them to rephrase comment? 15:33:06 jon_avila has joined #ag 15:33:12 present+jon_avila 15:34:09 AWK: When nature of comment does not apply anymore due to changes we can reply "thanks for comment, things have changed, your concern has been handled or no longer applies", then point to latest version and close comment 15:35:00 AWK: It will be helpful to start afresh - close it and point to new version 15:35:18 AWK: question? 15:35:58 present+ Kathy 15:36:11 AWK: intention is to go through comments, have a set that will be retained, requires research for defining responses 15:36:30 ...then also addressing Understanding docs 15:36:42 zakim make minutes 15:36:59 zakim, next item 15:36:59 I see a speaker queue remaining and respectfully decline to close this agendum, Detlev 15:37:04 q? 15:37:10 ack s 15:37:10 steverep, you wanted to ask how we want to handle public comments on SC that have changed significantly 15:37:17 zakim, next item 15:37:18 I do not see any more non-closed or non-skipped agenda items, Detlev 15:37:45 zakim, take up item 3 15:37:45 agendum 3. "Tracking sheet and signups: https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/Accepted_WCAG_2.1_SC" taken up [from AWK] 15:38:37 AWK: people should look at the tracking sheet - has the set of accepted 2.1 SCs for next PWD 15:39:44 ...has conformance level, links to edit and view understanding comment, and cells for TF reviews 15:40:15 ...you can indicate in column " People working on this (use GitHub user name if possible)" when you want to work on one of them 15:40:16 What's the status on "Undo" 15:40:53 AWK: some people are more familiar with writing Understanding stuff rather than Techniques 15:41:19 AWK: Regarding Undo, decision was made on WF call that no consensus was reached 15:41:30 q+ 15:42:07 ack kathy 15:42:18 AWK: Talk to you TF facilitators when you want to be involved - in some cases content from Github has be broufght over already 15:42:59 Kathy: Do we need to work on the new guideline 2.5.X as well? 15:43:20 q? 15:43:29 AWK: There is understanding content on the Guideline level 15:43:40 MichaelC: confirms that 15:43:59 q+ 15:43:59 AWK: Will be high level - will set up branches for that 15:44:17 ack mi 15:44:19 AWK: there is also Understanding text for conformance requirements 15:44:21 RSAgent, make logs public 15:44:54 rrsagent, make minutes 15:44:54 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2017/09/05-ag-minutes.html Glenda 15:45:01 MichaelC: Hasn't set up branch because it was unclear whether new guideline would be kept 15:45:12 Kathy; That applies to esp. 2.7 Speech 15:45:45 Michael: Hesitant to set up new branches before decision has been made 15:45:46 ack me 15:46:20 Sorry, must leave early. 15:46:34 AWK: Guideline 2.7 doubts - the SC names (like Accessible name) have changed, it no longer exclusively fits under speech 15:46:58 Kathy: explains shift of SC focus, could fit elsewhere 15:47:46 AWK: assumption is that we need a CfC to move SC "Accesssible name" out of... to somewhere else 15:48:16 2.7.1 15:48:25 AWK: could be put under Principle 4 Operable together with name role value 15:48:31 +1 15:48:58 q? 15:49:01 AWK: there may be reasons to put it somewhere else as well - we need to find consensus 15:49:20 q+ 15:49:21 AWK: any other questions? 15:49:47 gowerm: Happy to be told where to put in effort 15:51:05 q+ 15:51:53 AWK: First pass is being done by the task forces - initial draft of Understanding text was part of the initial SC proposal - in some cases it is still close, in others it is wildly off because SC text changed substantially - so the task forces should go through SCs and check if Understanding text is still appropriate 15:52:29 ack gower 15:52:35 ack ala 15:53:11 alastairc: How are we going to tackle version control - if one works on th etext, should someone else create a fork wit ha merge request or how else should we work? 15:53:29 AWK: would prepare creation of a fork that could be merged (or not) 15:53:49 q+ 15:53:52 ...someone else might work differently (email comms) 15:53:59 So basically: contact the person assigned and sort out with them...? 15:54:13 ...Up to individuals to work out best way to co-operate 15:54:40 ...once things get back from TFs all work will be done in github 15:54:49 ack mi 15:54:52 ...COGA will do work in google docs 15:55:45 MichaelC: People working on particuar branch decide how to do it - if you create a new branch name it clearl y(your name in it) and delete it if it is no longer needed 15:56:13 q? 15:56:18 AWK: question? 15:56:37 agenda? 15:57:00 30 minutes to fix device sensors? :) 15:57:17 AWK: agenda is covered - any other business you want to discuss? 15:57:27 David: decide about device sensors? 15:57:53 David: only objection has been qualified (i.e. it is no objection) 15:58:14 AWK: looks like SC Device sensors would be passing without objections - one min left 15:58:41 q+ 15:58:50 ack da 15:58:50 ...we can talk about it - but may not be the best use of time right now 15:59:31 https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/issues/67#issuecomment-325716721 15:59:35 q+ 15:59:36 David: would prefer to work out with the language (see link above) 16:00:23 AWK: no friendly amendments right now - some responses lukewarm, but will go through as accepted 16:00:55 David: thinks amended language is cleare and will create less pushback 16:00:59 q+ 16:01:04 +1 to David, obviously 16:01:50 AWK: concern that Steve's, Mark's, Jason's are also ou there - we do not have the basis for a new unified proposal 16:02:17 David: We can reach out to them to find a consensual version 16:03:36 ack me 16:03:41 ack jason 16:03:41 MichaelC: process remark: Change to wording will require new consenus process which would take some days which delays publication and review process - the point of the next two months is to do the tweaking - recommends to go with current consensus, then clean up after publication 16:04:09 q+ Fine with not delaying and process, but we have 20 minutes 16:04:25 Jason: Don't delay publication for changes - we need a process to collect and address comments 16:04:52 ..very complex, will keep us busy til Candidate Recommendation 16:05:02 q- 16:05:11 MichaelC: Hole to have more suggestions next Tuesday 16:05:20 s/Hole/Hope 16:05:38 AWK: any other items? 16:05:59 :) 16:06:02 bye all! 16:06:24 rrsagent, make minutes 16:06:24 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2017/09/05-ag-minutes.html Detlev 16:06:35 present+ marcjohlic 16:06:45 present+ Makoto 16:07:39 KimD has left #ag 16:38:23 MichaelC has joined #ag 16:59:07 kirkwood has joined #AG 17:04:21 alastairc has joined #ag 17:23:34 MichaelC_ has joined #ag 17:47:10 MichaelC has joined #ag 17:57:31 MichaelC_ has joined #ag 17:59:03 micro__ has joined #ag 18:07:06 MichaelC has joined #ag 18:14:02 Zakim has left #ag 18:14:48 MichaelC_ has joined #ag 18:21:26 MichaelC has joined #ag 19:04:34 MichaelC_ has joined #ag 19:36:53 MichaelC_ has joined #ag 19:42:26 MichaelC has joined #ag 20:37:55 MichaelC_ has joined #ag 22:18:30 alastairc has joined #ag