13:53:40 RRSAgent has joined #dxwg 13:53:40 logging to http://www.w3.org/2017/08/14-dxwg-irc 13:53:56 rrsagent, make logs public 13:56:58 mbruemmer has joined #dxwg 13:57:44 alejandra has joined #dxwg 13:57:51 meeting: Data Exchange Working Group 13:57:55 Caroline has joined #DXWG 13:58:38 present+ 13:58:48 Present+ 13:59:08 present+ 13:59:42 present+ 13:59:50 present+ 14:00:08 roba has joined #dxwg 14:00:32 present+ Simon_Cox 14:00:52 present+ alejandra 14:01:02 chair: Caroline 14:01:47 present+ roba 14:01:49 present+ Rob_Atkinson 14:01:52 SimonCox has joined #dxwg 14:02:10 scribenick: SimonCox 14:02:13 present+ SimonCox 14:02:14 Jaroslav_Pullmann has joined #dxwg 14:02:22 present+ 14:02:44 https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/wiki/Meetings:Telecon2017.08.14 14:02:54 present+ 14:03:00 https://www.w3.org/2017/08/07-dxwg-minutes 14:03:24 annette_g has joined #dxwg 14:03:32 Motion: to approve minutes from last week https://www.w3.org/2017/08/07-dxwg-minutes 14:04:09 Thomas has joined #dxwg 14:04:14 present+ 14:04:34 +1 14:04:41 +1 14:04:50 APPROVE: minutes from last week https://www.w3.org/2017/08/07-dxwg-minutes 14:04:55 +1 14:05:01 NOTUC? 14:05:15 Resolved: minutes of last meeting https://www.w3.org/2017/08/07-dxwg-minutes 14:05:17 Present+ annette_g 14:06:53 Ixchel has joined #dxwg 14:06:56 present + Ixchel 14:07:01 @kar 14:07:23 karen: progress to deliverables 14:07:45 scribe: SimonCox 14:07:48 s/karen/kcoyle 14:08:38 Caroline: implementation report - after we have all document outputs, need to meet W3C criteria 14:08:52 ... to prove adoption in 2 places 14:09:16 ... 1. vocabulary update, 2. Content negotiation, 3. profiles 14:10:01 q? 14:10:02 ... UCR editors will enumerate requirements, which must be clear in advance of production of output documents 14:10:15 LarsG has joined #dxwg 14:10:20 present+ 14:10:34 TOPIC: UCR group reports 14:11:03 ack roba 14:11:24 roba: has been working trhough requirements, de-duplicating 14:11:38 ... cross-referencing to come 14:11:52 ... deep editorial work from ixchel 14:12:05 ... some contributions from others viw pull-requests 14:12:21 ... invitations sought from anyone else who is interested 14:12:21 q+ 14:12:49 ack Ixchel 14:13:12 Ixchel: mostly working on editing how reqs are described 14:13:20 ack Jaroslav_Pullmann 14:14:09 Jaroslav_Pullmann: Did you find a methdology how to update and add new input? esp. Wiki vs GitHub 14:14:11 q+ 14:14:32 ack kcoyle 14:14:34 ... (alejandra provided a GitHub template for new issues) 14:14:48 note that the template is the same template as before 14:14:53 kcoyle: q+ 14:15:00 only that it is not provided in the github issues 14:15:04 q+ 14:15:08 s/not/now 14:15:36 kcoyle: new UCs use GitHub, only editors accept changes to document 14:16:20 ack SimonCox 14:16:34 present+ 14:17:12 SimonCox: I submited an use case on the wiki and I sent an annoucement on the Github as a issue 14:17:34 ... I added I new issue under the old method 14:17:40 s/Github/ 14:18:10 s/Github/Github 14:18:31 https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/17 14:18:32 ... issue 17 on Github is about that 14:18:39 q? 14:19:27 roba: it is annouced to me and I am happy to work on it 14:19:41 achille_zappa has joined #dxwg 14:20:23 roba: had noticed this - not processed yet - hadn't been discussed and adopted by groupo 14:20:31 s/groupo/group/ 14:20:39 +q 14:20:48 ack alejandra 14:21:11 roba: what is expectation about process? shoudl they need discussing before adding to UCR document? 14:22:07 q? 14:22:30 ack alejandra 14:22:58 alejandra: will poll group for meetings of UCR editors - likely September 14:23:08 s/UCR/DCAT/ 14:23:23 q+ 14:23:35 ... has started tabulation of known Application Profiles 14:23:40 ack roba 14:24:14 roba: spreadsheet only relates to AP activity so far? will be updated to other requirements in due course 14:24:42 q+ 14:24:56 q+ 14:25:03 alejandra: michael from Fraunhofer has done analysis, will be incorporated in due course 14:25:16 ... spreadsheet was just exercise to list elements in profiles 14:25:46 ack Jaroslav_Pullmann 14:26:28 Jaroslav_Pullmann: has spoken with michael about comparison of profiles, also usage (in Europe) 14:27:00 ... analysis of usage in repositories, will provide us with relevant input, including 'national extensions' 14:27:04 ack kcoyle 14:27:30 kcoyle: ask that links from the wiki be added to these documents 14:27:59 I already listed the spreadsheet in the wiki 14:28:11 Action: alejandra to add link to spreadsheet from wiki 14:28:12 Created ACTION-33 - Add link to spreadsheet from wiki [on Alejandra Gonzalez Beltran - due 2017-08-21]. 14:28:48 alreay done 14:28:50 q? 14:29:00 close ACTION-33 14:29:00 Closed ACTION-33. 14:29:19 This is where the link to the spreadsheet and list of existing application profiles is: https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/wiki/Guidance_on_publishing_application_profiles_of_vocabularies 14:29:35 s/alreay/alejandra already/ 14:30:53 open actions https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/track/actions/open 14:31:29 https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/track/actions/5 14:34:46 annette_g has joined #dxwg 14:35:40 https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/wiki/Use_Case_Working_Space#ID46 14:35:49 Topic: UC-46 ID46 14:36:43 q+ 14:36:55 q+ 14:37:07 ack SimonCox 14:37:28 SimonCox: what is the target of those requirements? 14:37:42 ... particularly the first one 14:37:59 q+ 14:38:08 ... are you suggesting that one of the outuputs would be to find users directions? 14:38:13 kcoyle: this is documentation 14:38:22 q+ 14:38:45 SimonCox: defining a user experience I am not confortable that is in the scope 14:38:59 kcoyle: this is not the user eperience. This is where the vocabulary is defined 14:39:03 Q+ 14:39:20 ... is providing that information along the vocabulary 14:39:47 SimonCox: we need to make sure it is not fully open ended 14:39:49 i have tried to deal with these issues in requirements consolidation 14:40:04 ... the way it is written now it feels open ended 14:40:10 +q 14:40:15 ... the 2nd and 3rd requirements it is good 14:40:58 ... user experience I wouls suggest it is out of scope 14:41:59 ack roba 14:43:15 roba: has treated this as a general requirement for specifying a profile 14:43:34 ... (kind of recursive) 14:43:46 for vocabularies, there is a specific use case: ID41 14:44:04 ... profiles must include a defined set of documentation/annotation 14:44:20 ... multiple use-cases have a common set of requirements 14:44:36 ack mbruemmer 14:44:48 annette_g has joined #dxwg 14:44:54 ... ID46 draws out this common requirement from multiple uc's 14:45:42 mbruemmer: example - use SHACL to assist with input forms 14:45:47 ack Jaroslav_Pullmann 14:46:45 Jaroslav_Pullmann: lost of requirements overlap; ID46 is editor-oriented, hints on which sort of input is expected 14:47:05 ... ID46 synthesizes requirements from multiple uc's 14:47:10 ack annette_g 14:47:55 ack alejandra 14:48:03 annette_g: ID46 is good UC - request specific profile and use its description to generate an interface 14:48:24 q+ 14:49:09 alejandra: important to help UI development, but unclear what goes where 14:49:35 q+ 14:49:37 ack roba 14:49:43 ... is this within an applicatoin-profile definition, e.g. definition of terms belongs in a vocabulary, not an application profile 14:50:29 ack kcoyle 14:50:32 q- 14:50:35 roba: back to process, is ID46 a good UC? can discuss detail later when assessing all the consoldiated requirements 14:50:42 annette_g has joined #dxwg 14:50:51 proposed: accept ID46 14:50:58 +1 14:50:59 +1 14:50:59 +1 14:50:59 +1 14:51:00 +1 14:51:01 +1 14:51:03 +1 14:51:03 +1 14:51:07 +1 14:51:08 +1 14:51:08 +1 14:51:16 -1 14:52:16 alejandra: important that we are clear that intention of problem statement is that AP 'has human readable definitions' 14:52:40 q+ 14:52:42 roba: implementation choices - 'definitions are available' - mechanisms may vary 14:53:06 how does it differ from https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/wiki/Use_Case_Working_Space#Vocabulary_constraints_.5BID41.5D 14:53:19 ... may be in profile, or in vocabulary (for example) 14:53:28 q+ 14:55:00 kcoyle: ID46 differs from ID41 - human-readable vs testable 14:55:22 ... e.g dc:title can be used for a person's name 14:55:45 changing vote to +1 14:55:49 resolved: UC ID46 accepted 14:56:16 ack annette_g 14:57:10 ack Jaroslav_Pullmann 14:57:16 NB UC is in scope, requirements to be clarified later (in all cases!) 14:57:53 resolved: 14:58:10 resolved: accept ID46 14:58:54 Caroline: no more time to discuss UCs 14:59:19 ... please raise UCs on mailing list to move discussion forward ahead of next meeting 14:59:29 thanks all for joining call 14:59:38 bye! 14:59:39 bye 14:59:42 bye 14:59:42 present- 14:59:45 rssagent please generate minutes v2 14:59:50 zakim, please generate minutes 14:59:50 I don't understand 'please generate minutes', SimonCox 15:00:24 rrsagent, create the minutes v2 15:00:24 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2017/08/14-dxwg-minutes.html kcoyle 15:00:35 thanks kcoyle 16:00:10 trackbot has joined #dxwg 17:13:04 Zakim has left #dxwg