06:31:17 RRSAgent has joined #wot-td 06:31:17 logging to http://www.w3.org/2017/07/28-wot-td-irc 06:31:43 dape has joined #wot-td 06:32:03 Meeting: WoT WG - TD-TF 06:32:14 present+ Kaz, Dave, Koster, Uday 06:32:49 present+ Daniel 06:33:24 Agenda: https://www.w3.org/WoT/IG/wiki/WG_WoT_Thing_Description_WebConf#Agenda 06:33:34 present+ Sebastian 06:34:29 sebastian has joined #wot-td 06:34:39 dsr has joined #wot-td 06:35:02 mjkoster has joined #wot-td 06:35:09 present+ 06:35:44 scribenick: mjkoster 06:35:51 regrets: Maria, Soumya 06:36:01 uday has joined #wot-td 06:36:25 regrets+ Benjamin 06:36:51 sebastian: invited Mozilla to talk about their TD proposal 06:36:58 DarkoAnicic has joined #wot-td 06:37:04 present+ DarkoAnicic 06:37:15 -> https://www.w3.org/2017/07/26-wot-minutes.html July 26 main call minutes 06:37:43 ...topics: what is our feedback on the Mozilla proposal? 06:38:02 ...what is needed in the TD update? 06:38:06 i|invited Mozilla|topic: Summary of Wednesday's call about the member submission of Mozilla --> what are the next steps?| 06:38:10 ... vocabulary 06:38:43 ... issues and current status 06:38:54 .. any other topics? 06:39:23 ...1st point, what was the outcome? 06:39:26 s|topic: Summary of Wednesday's call about the member submission of Mozilla --> what are the next steps?|topic: Agenda bashing| 06:39:39 topic: Summary of Wednesday's call about the member submission of Mozilla --> what are the next steps? 06:39:41 s/outcome/outcome of the Mozilla discussion 06:40:05 -> https://www.w3.org/2017/07/26-wot-minutes.html July 26 minutes 06:40:18 q+ 06:40:58 -> https://hacks.mozilla.org/2017/06/building-the-web-of-things/ Ben's blog 06:41:25 dsr: Mozilla prefer to contribute to the IG, since the approach is still being developed 06:41:30 -> http://iot.mozilla.org/wot/ Ben's proposal 06:42:46 sebastian: the Mozilla proposal is similar to Dave's proposal 06:45:39 q+ 06:45:39 present+ Achille_Zappa 06:45:45 q+ 06:45:46 mkoster: Mozilla produced an example with @context and @type used as an extension 06:46:07 q? 06:47:19 sebastian: seems like syntactic sugar 06:47:30 ack darko 06:47:34 dsr: syntactic sugar is important to developers 06:48:27 darko: the reason for using RDF is extension to the harder use cases 06:48:44 [We’ve seen the importance of notations with the dominance of Turtle vs RDF/XML and JSON vs XML 06:49:08 darko: RDF is needed to process the data in the more complex applications 06:49:29 yongjing has joined #wot-td 06:49:44 q- 06:49:45 q+ 06:50:05 +q to note that it is very easy to formally convert JSON to triples using default context and a simple algorthm - we can easily apply validation and semantic processing 06:50:10 darko: the usefulness for industry applications is more important than the way the file looks 06:51:04 sebastian: there should be a default mapping to RDF from the simple json 06:51:16 present+ Yongjing 06:52:37 w? 06:52:39 q? 06:52:41 s/w?/ 06:53:28 dape: same comment as darko, the difference is marginal and potential large impact 06:54:08 dape: can JSON-LD 1.1 and shape languages work together? 06:54:39 dsr: shape constraints work on triples, so yes 06:55:16 ack dape 06:55:33 sebastian: would like to hear from schema.org 06:56:17 darko: they use rdfa on web pages 06:56:36 q? 06:57:04 ack k 06:57:13 sebastian: the Mozilla proposal doesn't focus on mapping to RDF 06:57:27 q- 06:58:10 kaz: to summarize, Mozilla was not interested in scripting API but is interested in TD serialization and protocol binding 06:58:12 q+ 06:59:07 kaz: @@2 06:59:15 ... Matthias asked Mozilla to bring specific proposals to the IG, we can evaluate them at that time 06:59:47 s/kaz: @@2// 07:00:30 q? 07:00:33 ack d 07:00:34 victor has joined #wot-td 07:00:55 q+ 07:01:16 s/at that time/at that time. I also asked him to join the IG officially and he's now checking within Mozilla for the procedure./ 07:01:28 ack m 07:02:04 achille_zappa has joined #wot-td 07:03:08 present+ Victor 07:04:21 sebastian: also having the serialization discussion JSON-LD vs. ttl in iotschema 07:04:23 achille_zappa has joined #wot-td 07:04:29 s/ttl/turtle 07:04:54 topic: next TD deliverables 07:05:38 ...dsr proposal for organizing deliverables; issue 19 07:06:15 -> https://github.com/w3c/wot-thing-description/issues/19 issue 19 07:06:19 dsr: follow best practices for vocabularies 07:07:41 dsr: specification document describing the vocabulary and serialization 07:10:13 victor: wrote a script to generate tables from the vocabulary files 07:10:21 -> @@@ victor's write-up tbd 07:10:31 q+ 07:11:41 victor: update the turtle file and automatically generate the HTML 07:12:22 q+ mention primer info 07:12:28 q+ 07:12:48 ack k 07:13:29 kaz: would victor send the information to the member list? 07:13:44 https://github.com/vcharpenay/wot-thing-description 07:14:07 kaz: also send email 07:14:41 q+ to ask if we should put the script into the HTML for autogeneration of the vocab entries 07:14:54 kaz: to clarify, the Mozilla document is not a member submission 07:15:05 s/to clarify/btw, to clarify/ 07:15:36 dape: should there be a quick start in the beginning of the document, or a separate document? 07:16:01 s/not a member submission/not an official W3C Member submission though it used the specific CSS and had a title of "member submission"./ 07:16:04 dsr: agree on separate primer document 07:16:54 sebastian: JSON-LD has a good example of a primer 07:19:18 ack dape 07:19:47 kaz: editor meeting doodle in progress, waiting for all of the responses 07:20:14 ...so far August 2nd, 1pm Europe time 07:21:05 topic: vocabularies in the TD name space 07:21:37 -> https://www.w3.org/ns/td/ TD namespace file 07:22:45 issues around how to organize the HTML, htaccess, etc 07:23:56 victor: we need to decide on content negotiation for a set of media types 07:24:48 s/types/types and directories 07:25:53 kaz: clarify our requirements and talk with the W3C system team 07:26:32 Best practice recipes for publishing RDF vocabularies https://www.w3.org/TR/swbp-vocab-pub/ 07:27:43 which talks about apache .htaccess files 07:27:44 q+ 07:27:48 q- 07:29:05 WoT Onotolgy (current location): http://iot.linkeddata.es/def/wot/index-en.html already serves few formats, e.g., turtle, XML... 07:32:11 topic: iotschema vocabulary 07:32:39 -> https://github.com/w3c/wot-thing-description/issues/18 issue 18 07:32:59 q+ 07:33:07 sebastian: organize a plan of action so we can track the activity 07:33:11 ack Dar 07:33:59 s/clarify our requirements/let's clarify our requirements, e.g., on the Member list (member-wot-wg@w3.org)/ 07:34:05 ...including milestones 07:34:44 ...also report/tracking of the protocol binding activity 07:35:04 s/Europe time/Europe time is the best candidate because all the responded Editors can make it./ 07:35:15 q? 07:35:18 ...also would like to set up the same for TD serialization 07:36:00 ...metadata for protocol bindings and dynamic URIs - discussion for 3 weeks from now 07:36:30 ...JSON-schema to RDF 07:37:05 ...use github milestones 07:37:51 q? 07:38:06 ack v 07:38:58 [ adjourned ] 07:39:13 rrsagent, make log public 07:39:17 rrsagent, draft minutes 07:39:17 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2017/07/28-wot-td-minutes.html kaz 07:48:52 naka has joined #wot-td