W3C

- DRAFT -

WoT IG - Security

30 Jun 2017

See also: IRC log

Attendees

Present
Elena_Reshetova, Michael_Koster, Michael_McCool, Kaz_Ashimura, Daniel_Ibaseta
Regrets
Chair
McCool
Scribe
kaz

Contents


Privacy questionnaire - online google doc

Elena: RFC6973 questionnaire
... generated a google doc for that

McCool: first question about stakeholder?

Elena: and then system maintainer, asset list, ...
... (goes through the questionnaire list)
... list of threats complete?
... security objectives correct?

McCool: use cases look more like features
... would clarify scenario of use use cases

Koster: use case being what use is doing
... so far it seems component-oriented approach
... we had "atomic use cases" already and that is a bit different kind of use case
... still struggling about what "security for WoT"
... there are existing security considerations
... asking about this questionnaire is a good approach
... also we should go back to people and ask what they're concerned about WoT security

Elena: f2f would be a good opportunity to get people's opinions

McCool: we should generate this questionnaire and also should have a session during f2f
... we need to think about scenario more

F2F agenda

McCool: we have 2 sessions, one is security, another is privacy
... how to handle them
... how many sessions should we have?
... Elena will call in
... Zoltan will be there f2f
... 3 hours total maybe?
... should avoid parallel sessions

Elena: 1 hour for privacy?
... the rest 2 hours scenarios

McCool: there are already security features in the architecture
... good to get connected with them
... we should include scripting people as well
... half hour for review

Elena: how many mechanisms?

McCool: TLS, secure CoAP, etc.
... will go back to see the details
... a section in the TD about security but vague
... the details should be written in another document and should add a link to that
... management API
... isolation
... would figure out how to evaluate
... focused discussion with scripting guys
... 3 hours total
... 1 hour for privacy
... security architecture session
... 1.5 hour for use case scenarios
... 0.5 for reviewing existing mechanisms

Elena: we don't have anybody from TD

McCool: shows the f2f agenda: https://www.w3.org/WoT/IG/wiki/F2F_meeting,_9-13_July_2017,_D%C3%BCsseldorf,_Germany
... edits the agenda
... 1 hour for TD
... adds topics for security
... 1.5h securiy use cases and scenarios
... 0.5h review of exisiting/proposed security architecture
... 1h privacy

Privacy questionnaire

-> Elena's doc file on "Privacy questionnaire for WoT protocol"

Elena: can modify it
... and put it a google doc

McCool: looks good

Elena: will apply changes

McCool: next Friday, I'll be travelling

Koster: will be preparing on that day

McCool: would propose we cancel the next meeting
... we should have a couple of presentation slides for f2f
... let's skip general background
... join the openday, and mention the state, etc.

Elena: can generate some slides and send them to you

McCool: introductory explanation probably will be done by Matthias

Elena: how to distribute the resources?

McCool: google doc?
... would have a link on the security tf page
... and ask people to review particular documents/questionnaires on the ML
... to fill out the questionnaire prior to the f2f

AOB

Kaz: think we should have security sessions as plenary sessions

McCool: agree
... would add "plenary" mark to those sessions

Kaz: another question is distributing today's resources to the group lists: member-wot-ig@w3.org and member-wot-wg@w3.org

Elena: can update the google doc today
... and send them to you

McCool: will add hyperlinks to the TF wiki page

Kaz: just thought it would be nicer to add concrete resources to the minutes from this call

Elena: can update the resources and add links to the minutes

[adjourned]

Summary of Action Items

Summary of Resolutions

[End of minutes]

Minutes formatted by David Booth's scribe.perl version 1.152 (CVS log)
$Date: 2017/06/30 12:55:58 $