13:29:41 RRSAgent has joined #silver 13:29:41 logging to http://www.w3.org/2017/06/09-silver-irc 13:29:43 RRSAgent, make logs world 13:29:43 Zakim has joined #silver 13:29:45 Zakim, this will be 13:29:45 I don't understand 'this will be', trackbot 13:29:46 Meeting: Silver Task Force Teleconference 13:29:46 Date: 09 June 2017 13:31:21 SarahHorton has joined #silver 13:31:42 sloandr has joined #silver 13:31:52 trackbot, start meeting 13:31:55 RRSAgent, make logs world 13:31:58 Zakim, this will be 13:31:58 Meeting: Silver Task Force Teleconference 13:31:58 Date: 09 June 2017 13:31:58 I don't understand 'this will be', trackbot 13:33:21 agenda+ Research survey core research questions finalized 13:33:28 agenda+ Research project sheet review 13:33:34 present+ 13:33:34 agenda+ Poll https://docs.google.com/a/google.com/forms/d/1wjB5ZCvMAIBpMkQELA61czFsRR3-EVdjJbyeaZXNRMY/edit 13:33:39 agenda+ November 9th Meetup 13:33:45 agenda+ Policies on stakeholder list 13:33:51 agenda+ Open action item review https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/task-forces/silver/track/actions/open 13:34:22 jemma has joined #silver 13:34:39 present+ Jeanne, Sarah, Jennison, Dave 13:34:47 regrets+ Shawn 13:35:32 chair: Jeanne 13:35:37 scribe: Sarah 13:35:51 zakim, take up item 1 13:35:51 agendum 1. "Research survey core research questions finalized" taken up [from SarahHorton] 13:36:40 Dave: Collected feedback from RQTF, shared response in email 13:37:32 Dave: Branching question, no questions for the "no" branch 13:37:35 present+ JaEunJemmaKu 13:39:08 RQTF survey feedback: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-silver/2017Jun/0011.html 13:39:57 Sarah: Keeping in mind these are core questions, and "no" branch might go to actual survey 13:42:17 Jeanne: Worry that we are making core questions too big 13:42:41 Jennison: Agree, let's leave door open to creating "no" questions down the road 13:44:25 Jemma: Could ask about other standards 13:45:31 Dave: Already ask questions about familiarity with other standards 13:46:24 s/other standards/accessibility 13:47:36 Jeanne: If it's too long then people might not complete it 13:48:06 Jennison: Maybe the question about other standards and sources of truth is helpful 13:48:47 Jeanne: Let's do our own survey and ask that 13:49:49 Sarah: That means we keep the core questions to demographics and WCAG usability 13:50:25 jeanne has joined #silver 13:50:37 Dave: More feedback, is there value asking why people use WCAG? 13:50:51 Jennison: Might be stakeholder specific 13:55:00 Jemma: Looking at categorization of research questions, trying to map, hard to sort core questions and from survey specific questions 13:55:27 Jeanne: Will be asking these questions on every survey, need to keep that in mind 13:57:54 Jeanne: Think we're interfering with researchers 13:59:18 Jan has joined #silver 14:03:35 https://docs.google.com/document/d/1vDzSCO-mEnPB7jaAzIhOOLf92b0pCuzzR8u_GSWTw_M/edit 14:04:47 Jemma: There are questions in the feedback from RQTF that we could offer to researchers to use 14:05:20 Jemma: Add to question bank 14:06:06 Dave: Other demographic questions, add casual/consultant question to list 14:06:54 Dave: Other suggestion on learning accessibilty, suggestion to include formalized training and newsletters 14:07:14 Dave: Other questions might be in question bank 14:07:48 Dave: WCAG more than guidelines and SC, other resources aren't included in core questions 14:09:05 Dave: Could limit core questions to demographic data 14:10:00 Jeanne: Good question about using resources other than SC 14:10:36 Jeanne: Removing WCAG questions, include RQTF questions in our own survey with the WCAG questions 14:12:20 Dave: RQTF willing to provide input on future surveys, will need more time to review and collate feedback 14:13:37 Dave: Internationalization, important process question, when we're doing surveys, if we only deliver surveys in English we exclude people 14:14:03 Dave: Do we require researchers to translate? 14:14:15 Jennison: Could we include this in funding requests? 14:16:21 Jeanne: Difficult to manage translations so they are fair, we should encourage researchers to do work in own language 14:16:51 Jemma: Could reach out to resources to do Korean translations 14:17:36 Dave: What about writing a blog post to address initialization? 14:18:01 s/initialization/internationalization 14:18:29 Jeanne: Great idea 14:18:57 Dave: We really care about this but we have limited capacity 14:19:42 Jeanne: Active groups around the world, can approach them when we have survey ready to go 14:19:54 action: jeanne to write a blog post on the SIlver position on internationalization and translation into other languages 14:19:54 Created ACTION-93 - Write a blog post on the silver position on internationalization and translation into other languages [on Jeanne F Spellman - due 2017-06-16]. 14:20:34 action-93 due 21 July 14:20:34 Set action-93 Write a blog post on the silver position on internationalization and translation into other languages due date to 2017-07-21. 14:22:12 Jennison: Question about roles, does "person with a disability" belong in list of jobs, could we ask that separately? 14:23:14 Dave: We have two groups, people who need accessibility guidelines, people who use accessibility guidelines, sometimes overlap 14:24:46 Jennison: Do you self-identify as having a disability or impairment? Yes or No. 14:29:57 action: Dave to start work on question bank 14:29:57 Error finding 'Dave'. You can review and register nicknames at . 14:30:14 action: sloandr to start work on question bank 14:30:14 Created ACTION-94 - Start work on question bank [on David Sloan - due 2017-06-16]. 14:30:55 Sarah: Will get back to Pete 14:33:27 Jemma: Will want to learn more about Nov 9 meeting 14:34:07 Sarah: we have signed off on core question, focusing on demographics 14:34:26 Sarah: we are setting up question bank with other questions, Dave will own question bank 14:35:10 Dave: Will provide some text about how to use the question bank 14:35:28 Sarah: Dave can continue checking in with RQTF about question bank 14:36:23 Jennison: Need to be agile with the questions 14:38:43 agenda+ Research project sheet review 14:38:54 zakim, take up item 1 14:38:54 agendum 1. "Research survey core research questions finalized" taken up [from SarahHorton] 14:38:59 zakim, take up item 2 14:38:59 agendum 2. "Research project sheet review" taken up [from SarahHorton] 14:39:11 rrsagent, make minutes 14:39:11 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2017/06/09-silver-minutes.html jeanne 14:41:23 Dave: Lowell has started exploring adaptations of WCAG, has list of adaptations, next steps are to review and identify themes, do we have suggestions of where to find more adaptations 14:41:41 Dave: He's doing a broad approach to including adaptations 14:43:29 Dave: Looking for suggested timeline 14:44:07 Jennison: He could post note to email discussion list (e.g., WebAIM) 14:44:25 Jeanne: Dave will connect Lowell with Jan's contac 14:44:49 s/contac/contact 14:45:12 Dave: Do we have preferences about where to store data and report activities 14:46:46 Sarah: Could use community group as researcher hub 14:47:21 Jennison: What are the deliverables? Information about adapations, analysis, maybe a survey? 14:47:35 s/adapations/adaptations 14:47:52 Dave: Would be great to learn motivation for adaptations 14:49:14 Sarah: Can we encourage him to post on the Community Group? 14:49:40 Dave: Will do, and then he can publicize on mailing lists 14:50:50 Sarah: Pete is ready to go, we will inform him about core questions and then he can go 14:51:24 Sarah: Also Thomas Westin responded and is interested in game accessibility 14:53:29 zakim, take up next 14:53:29 agendum 1. "Research survey core research questions finalized" taken up [from SarahHorton] 14:53:35 agenda? 14:53:58 zakim, take up item 3 14:53:58 agendum 3. "Poll https://docs.google.com/a/google.com/forms/d/1wjB5ZCvMAIBpMkQELA61czFsRR3-EVdjJbyeaZXNRMY/edit" taken up [from SarahHorton] 14:55:08 jeanne: Needs introduction and needs to be broken up into headings 14:56:46 Jennison: Poll is going to community group, first attempt at engaging group in dialog 14:57:38 Jennison: Will be accompanying email 14:58:40 Dave: What about language, is there a way to indicate priority, is there another option? 14:59:36 Dave: Would rephrase to "no essential to" rather than "not directly related" 14:59:56 s/no essential to/not essential to 15:01:15 Jeanne: Agreed, will add instructions for Shawn to poll document 15:05:32 rrsagent, make minutes 15:05:32 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2017/06/09-silver-minutes.html SarahHorton 15:05:41 rrsagent, make logs public 15:07:44 zakim, clear agenda 15:07:44 agenda cleared 15:07:52 rrsagent, bye 15:07:52 I see 3 open action items saved in http://www.w3.org/2017/06/09-silver-actions.rdf : 15:07:52 ACTION: jeanne to write a blog post on the SIlver position on internationalization and translation into other languages [1] 15:07:52 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2017/06/09-silver-irc#T14-19-54 15:07:52 ACTION: Dave to start work on question bank [2] 15:07:52 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2017/06/09-silver-irc#T14-29-57 15:07:52 ACTION: sloandr to start work on question bank [3] 15:07:52 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2017/06/09-silver-irc#T14-30-14