12:53:27 RRSAgent has joined #forms 12:53:27 logging to http://www.w3.org/2017/05/31-forms-irc 12:53:29 RRSAgent, make logs public 12:53:29 Zakim has joined #forms 12:53:31 Zakim, this will be 12:53:31 I don't understand 'this will be', trackbot 12:53:32 Meeting: XForms Users Community Group Teleconference 12:53:33 Date: 31 May 2017 12:53:48 Agenda: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xformsusers/2017May/0045 12:54:03 Steven has changed the topic to: Agenda: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xformsusers/2017May/0045 12:54:09 Chair: Steven 12:54:16 Regrets: Alain 12:58:52 pfennell has joined #forms 13:02:50 Present: Erik, Philip, Steven 13:03:09 Topic: ACTION-2126: Update dispatch text not to accept garbage for @delay 13:03:09 https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xformsusers/2017May/0038.html 13:03:23 Steven: Please check the text 13:03:42 Topic: Dispatch with delay="0" 13:03:42 https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xformsusers/2017May/0034.html 13:03:42 https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xformsusers/2017May/0042.html 13:04:02 Steven: Two parts, one is Erik's reply about JS 13:04:21 Erik: You can dispatch events synchronously in JS 13:04:37 Steven: So that answered the question we had last week 13:05:14 Erik: Had it not been the case, we should have done asynch events only 13:05:45 ... we don't say in the spec whether dispatch should be able to do synchronous events 13:06:35 Steven: So your suggestion is that no @delay or delay="" is synchronous, and delay="0" is asynchronous 13:06:46 Erik: We should clarify that. 13:07:48 Steven: We should check that Alain is happy with that, since he said last week that his events were always asynch 13:08:32 ACTION: Steven to tighten wording about effect of @delay on 13:08:32 Created ACTION-2127 - Tighten wording about effect of @delay on [on Steven Pemberton - due 2017-06-07]. 13:08:51 Steven: I will also explicitly check with Alain. 13:09:05 Topic: Events after xforms-disabled 13:09:05 https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xformsusers/2017May/0030 13:09:09 Steven: Related. 13:09:47 ... How to ensure that the controls get the event before the handlers are disabled (and vice versa). 13:10:52 ... How about sending the disabled event synchronously. 13:11:53 Erik: Maybe a bit tricky 13:14:00 ... the problem is that we are in the middle of refresh; it was nice that the refresh was atomic 13:14:56 Steven: I understand that; it's just how to ensure that the control receives its disabled event before it is disabled 13:18:02 Erik: DOM doesn't have such a property of turning event listeners off 13:18:29 Steven: But SMIL does; in some ways it is a problem with the design of the DOM 13:19:33 Erik: I'm not sure we need to define anything actually 13:19:49 ... an exception might be DOMActivate 13:21:10 ... if an action dispatches to a disabled element, maybe you wouldn't want it to be activated 13:22:03 Steven: It sounds like we need to do a bit more thinking, because I don't see a solution yet, except to leave it sort of vague as it is now in the spec. 13:22:28 Steven: Do you disable listeners in a disabled control? 13:22:37 Erik: Need to check, but I don't think so. 13:22:48 Steven: At present undecided. 13:22:59 Topic: Serialization as multipart/related 13:22:59 https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xformsusers/2017Mar/0024 13:23:15 Steven: I had an action item to spec up 13:23:25 ... which I have now started 13:23:45 ... it turns out to be stickier than I had expected, 13:23:53 ... hopefully ready by next week. 13:23:59 Topic: AOB 13:24:11 [None] 13:24:11 [ADJOURNED] 13:24:32 rrsagent, make minutes 13:24:32 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2017/05/31-forms-minutes.html Steven 15:13:12 Zakim has left #forms 16:17:43 liam has joined #forms 16:22:20 ebruchez has joined #forms 16:30:57 ebruchez has joined #forms