14:13:04 RRSAgent has joined #wot 14:13:04 logging to http://www.w3.org/2017/05/26-wot-irc 14:13:54 meeting: WoT IG - LD 14:14:18 present+ Kaz_Ashimura, Danh_Le_Phuoc, Darko_Anicic, Feng_Zhang, Maria_Poveda, Michael_Koster 14:14:32 zakim, pick a scribe 14:14:32 Not knowing who is chairing or who scribed recently, I propose Darko_Anicic 14:14:39 zakim, pick a scribe 14:14:39 Not knowing who is chairing or who scribed recently, I propose Kaz_Ashimura 14:14:46 scribenick: kaz 14:15:09 Agenda: https://www.w3.org/WoT/IG/wiki/IG_Linked_Data_and_Semantic_Processing_WebConf#Agenda 14:15:38 topic: Plan for upcoming activities 14:15:54 darko: 14:15:54 Preparation for the next F2F meeting and the Plug Fest participation 14:15:54 Proposal for aligning semantic models from W3C WoT TD, OCF, oneM2M etc. 14:16:22 present+ AAchille_Zappa 14:16:53 s/AAchille_Zappa/Achille_Zappa/ 14:18:06 darko: any topics for the next f2f meeting? 14:18:21 mjkoster has joined #wot 14:18:22 danh: roadmap? 14:18:43 darko: tried to start something 14:18:53 ... ideas on the roadmap 14:19:05 ... didn't manage to provide any concrete proposal yet, though 14:19:10 ... one question to Maria 14:19:21 ... do you want to talk about your ontology work? 14:19:42 ... temperature sensor, etc., during the breakouts 14:20:02 achille_zappa has joined #wot 14:20:22 maria: can talk about something 14:20:29 ... let me look for the slides 14:20:41 darko: ok 14:21:07 ... btw, is Michael McCool around today? 14:21:10 ... no... 14:21:29 ... recently, we talked about linked data model for WoT apps 14:21:45 ... we'd like to think about practical alignment with the model 14:22:20 ... devices coming from different areas 14:22:45 ... WoT, OCF, oneM2M, ... 14:23:41 danh: Darko's IRC disconnected? 14:24:09 darko: share his screen again 14:24:27 ... [The Linked Data for WoT Applications (persons?)] 14:24:52 ... there is interest in starting work alignment with ontology/semantic models 14:24:55 ... different levels 14:25:45 ... 1st level (interactive model): OCF, oneM2M, etc. 14:26:26 ... 2nd level (horizontal vocabulary): SSN/SOSA, SAREF (oneM2M), Haystack, Echonet 14:26:39 s/OCF, oneM2M/WoT TD and OCF/ 14:26:50 ... demo during plugfest 14:27:01 ... discover devices regardliess of the ecosystem 14:27:21 ... interaction between devices from different ecosystems 14:27:36 ... aligning with existing ontologies 14:27:50 ... TD ontology derived from Maria 14:27:59 ... also McCool's work 14:28:20 ... OCF model 14:28:21 ... and also oneM2M model 14:28:42 ... on our Siemens side, we also started the 2nd level alignment 14:28:55 ... any comments? 14:29:03 q+ 14:29:11 danh: kind of confused 14:29:18 ... alignment for what purpose? 14:29:24 ... present information? 14:29:42 ... get JSON-LD? 14:29:49 darko: what is the goal? 14:30:02 ... we have big 3 kinds of models 14:30:09 ... WoT TD, OCF and oneM2M 14:30:16 present+ achille_zappa 14:30:26 ... the first call is provided by some interaction model 14:30:51 danh: so the goal is discovery? 14:30:58 darko: yeah 14:31:21 ... the next level is putting the W3C devices and other devices work together 14:31:48 ... regarding scripting api tf, Michael Koster is working on OCF side 14:32:05 ... the first part should be achieved by us 14:33:10 ... e.g., I'm looking for a device regardless of what the device belongs to (ocf, oneM2M, ...) 14:33:16 align = map ? 14:33:43 ... need to discover devices which (potentially) belong to various standards 14:33:52 s/... need/darko: need/ 14:34:14 s|standards|standards/ecosystems| 14:34:40 danh: ok 14:34:41 q? 14:35:55 kaz: the point here is 14:36:06 ... starting with interaction model as the 1st level 14:36:21 ... and handling concrete ecosystem-based vocabs as the 2nd level 14:36:23 ... right? 14:36:27 darko: right 14:36:34 ack k 14:36:52 darko: any volunteers for this work? 14:37:01 danh: can work on SOSA 14:37:09 darko: Victor also has started some work 14:37:28 ... anyone who would work on the interaction model? 14:37:35 ... e.g., based on the OCF model 14:37:47 maria: not familiar with OCF model itself 14:38:07 ... my contribution would be more related to oneM2M 14:38:20 darko: ok 14:38:50 ... my impression is that McCool would also appreciate your help 14:38:52 ... let's see 14:39:02 ... handling RDF 14:39:45 ... [Thing Description Recipes (Darko)] 14:40:05 ... interop client creates a WoT app based on some recipe 14:40:11 ... that is a kind of template 14:40:21 ... capability template 14:40:33 ... discover first, instantiate, ... 14:40:50 ... there two tasks 14:41:07 ... recipe format based on TD and capability templates 14:41:13 ... implement a prototype 14:41:21 s/implement/and then implement/ 14:41:31 ... the focus would be TD 14:41:41 ... not mixing with another standard 14:42:07 ... would like to ask for volunteers for this as well 14:42:36 s/would like to ask for volunteers for this as well/would like to volunteer myself for this/ 14:42:44 ... anybody interested in addition myself? 14:43:01 koster: would like to work on it 14:43:06 ... how smart things work 14:43:22 ... machine constructive and human beings 14:43:36 darko: formalizing capabilities 14:44:00 ... let's see what we can do 14:44:05 danh: me as well 14:44:21 ... interested in semantic mashup for web services 14:44:32 ... template for SPARQL recipe 14:44:43 darko: ok 14:45:05 ... could be incorporated with semantic web services 14:45:23 ... need automatic query things 14:45:46 koster: can you go back to the previous slide? 14:45:58 darko: [The Linked Data for WoT Applications (persons?)] 14:46:09 ... orchestration of multiple devices 14:46:20 darke: make sense 14:46:32 ... two devices from different ecosystems 14:46:49 ... also interaction of devices from only WoT 14:46:58 ... is possible 14:47:21 ... [Semantic Processing for Web of Things] 14:47:28 ... not finished this slide yet 14:47:40 ... problem statement for semantic processing 14:47:47 ... validation and verification 14:47:59 ... specify property, event, action 14:48:32 ... then you can validate the value, e.g., within specific value range 14:48:54 ... your property is of some certain type 14:49:11 q+ 14:49:49 ... are all the possible types within your TD semantically correct? 14:50:04 ... some possible semantic constraints 14:50:14 ... this is also some sort of task 14:50:20 ... Victor working on validator 14:50:29 ... Maria also expressed some interest 14:50:57 danh: semantic processing here is just validation/verification? 14:51:02 ... low level of semantic 14:51:36 darko: this is based on the discussion so far 14:51:52 ... it's up to us to decide what should be done for semantic processing 14:52:19 ... first version of the validator could be a starting point 14:52:30 danh: there are several things in "semantic processing" 14:52:38 ... RDF semantics, etc. 14:52:47 ... data type checking for RDF nodes 14:53:21 ... taxinomy classification, etc. 14:54:03 ... checking is available within programming languages already 14:54:13 darko: do you have interest in this topic? 14:54:20 danh: yeah 14:54:52 ... but we should clarify the purpose of semantic processing 14:55:15 ... in addition to vocabulary alignment 14:55:38 darko: ok 14:55:54 ... my intention is raising topics first 14:56:03 ... and get people interested 14:56:39 ... would contact all of you who are interested in each topic 14:56:51 ... during upcoming telcos, we can talk about the details 14:57:02 q+ 14:57:14 present+ Michael_McCool 14:57:30 mccool: (joining now) 14:57:51 ... for what do you want to get volunteers? 14:58:10 darko: (goes through the topics) 14:58:56 mccool: certainly interested in OCF things 14:59:20 ... aligning the OCF model with the W3C WoT model 14:59:39 danh: can moderate the last one (Semantic Processing) 14:59:49 ... would like to talk with Victor, etc., as well 15:00:21 ... SSN is still on its way for REC 15:01:08 darko: TD Recipe: Koster, Danh, Darko 15:01:21 ... Semantic Processing: Danh, Victor, Maria 15:01:29 maria: interested in semantic validation 15:01:50 ... but not sure what this topic itself means here 15:02:10 ... happy to follow the discussion but a bit confused 15:02:25 q- 15:02:47 darko: this slide is rather empty, so we'd work on the details from now on 15:03:20 ... we're getting out of time 15:03:26 ... Maria's presentation for the next call 15:03:43 danh: also can give some talk (10min or so, etc.) 15:03:51 ... during the next call 15:03:55 darko: ok 15:04:09 ... will contact you offline 15:04:26 ... any other business for today? 15:04:39 mccool: are those slides available anywhere? 15:05:05 darko: will send them 15:05:54 ... in two weeks we'll have the next call 15:06:06 [adjourned] 15:06:13 rrsagent, make log public 15:06:18 rrsagent, draft minutes 15:06:18 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2017/05/26-wot-minutes.html kaz 15:14:52 Karen has joined #wot 15:54:54 Karen has joined #wot 16:40:51 ahaller2 has joined #wot 16:48:28 Karen has joined #wot 17:47:17 Zakim has left #wot 17:53:38 ahaller2 has joined #wot 18:43:05 Karen has joined #wot 19:06:24 ahaller2 has joined #wot 19:32:04 Karen has joined #wot 19:56:51 Karen has joined #wot 21:32:00 ahaller2 has joined #wot