14:04:35 RRSAgent has joined #webtv 14:04:35 logging to http://www.w3.org/2017/05/03-webtv-irc 14:04:39 Zakim has joined #webtv 14:05:27 present+ Kaz, Alexandra, Chris, Colin 14:05:38 Meeting: Web&TV IG - Cloud Browser TF 14:06:33 -> https://www.w3.org/2017/04/19-webtv-minutes.html minutes 14:06:43 s/minutes/Apr 19 minutes/ 14:07:08 alexandra has joined #webtv 14:07:12 -> https://www.w3.org/2017/04/19-webtv-minutes.html minutes 14:07:39 colin: discussed publication preparation for the Note 14:07:47 ... there was questions from the W3C Team 14:07:57 ... about what Clowd Browser was like 14:08:16 ... e.g., difference from X Window system 14:08:39 kaz is doing an update on the pubslishing the docuemtn 14:09:04 we have to make a note within the intro section 14:09:59 for ex. --> we are trying to publish not only the group note, but other documents --> we can put it into one document 14:10:41 there, we publish the document 14:11:58 kaz explains the story 14:12:16 and ask all if it's ok to add a note on our plan to this architecture note 14:15:17 would be even clearer to add that note 14:15:37 given it's ok by us all, I'll get back to the W3C Management and work with them and the Webmaster 14:16:18 chris: wondering about the accessibility use cases 14:16:28 alex: we can add them to the use case wiki 14:16:35 chris: would like to add a section to the wiki 14:16:40 all: ok 14:17:21 alex: question on accessibility use cases 14:17:39 chris: there are limited opportunity for disabled people 14:18:15 ... would like to clarify the outline of people's requirements 14:18:25 colin: would be really useful 14:18:44 -> https://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/wiki/Main_Page/Cloud_Browser_TF/UseCases use case wiki 14:19:21 colin: there is a section for accessibility there 14:19:32 (currently just include links to resources) 14:20:03 alex: use cases for basic interaction is blue (within the diagram) 14:20:40 ... and the green line is additional ones 14:21:29 ... you can start your work on accessibility and add use cases 14:21:40 s/additional ones/"impact use cases"/ 14:22:23 ... you can expand your use cases on a separate wiki page like the one for "Tuner" 14:22:23 https://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/wiki/Main_Page/Cloud_Browser_TF/UseCases/Tuner 14:23:17 alex: on the main page, we have a list of documents 14:23:24 ... would like to extend it 14:23:45 ... e.g., difference between cloud browser and other technologies 14:24:10 -> https://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/wiki/Main_Page/Cloud_Browser_TF main page 14:24:46 kaz: are you talking about the "Resources" section? 14:25:26 alex: (goes through "Success Criteria" section and "Deliverables") 14:25:58 ... maybe we should add some description about our plan for documents 14:26:38 colin: we're publishing the architecture note 14:26:52 ... and have resources for use cases/requirements and comparison 14:27:09 ... maybe one/two sentence about the structure/plan would suffice 14:27:50 kaz: to which section do you want to add that description? 14:27:58 ... maybe the "Deliverables" section? 14:28:03 alex: yeah 14:29:20 kaz: maybe we can simply add a subsection to "Deliveralbles" section 14:29:31 ... saying "Publication plan" 14:29:49 ... mentioning "architecture note first, and uc/req and comparison next" 14:30:23 alex: we have resource on comparison to split browser, X Window, etc. 14:30:51 ... would be better to clarify the difference from split browser 14:32:11 kaz: btw, maybe it would be clearer to make the current "Resources" section a subsection of the "Deliverables" section 14:32:31 ... because it's a list of our own resources for our deliverable documents 14:32:56 alex: yes, those are our own resources 14:33:40 ... next, what about the use cases? 14:33:53 i/next/topic: use cases/ 14:34:10 colin: would like to update the use cases for the next call 14:34:25 alex: ok 14:34:42 ... I've put QoE/QoS use cases under "Impact Use Cases" 14:35:12 ... from my viewpoint, this list is ok 14:37:35 kaz: regarding the title, I personally think it would be easier to understand if we said "advanced use cases" instead of "impact use cases" and "basic use cases" instead of "cloud browser use cases" 14:37:51 chris: was also not sure what "impact use cases" meant 14:38:01 ... maybe we could change the category name at some point 14:39:45 colin: we thought these names were a bit more friendly than "issues", etc. 14:40:23 alex: green line includes how to work with legacy framework 14:40:40 kaz: ok. we can revisit naming issue later. 14:41:03 alex: colin working on the impact use cases 14:41:54 ... I'll be working on HbbTV signaling 14:42:07 ... to be discussed at the next call 14:42:20 ... Chris will work on the accessibility 14:42:51 kaz: at some point I can help accessibility and user interface 14:43:00 alex: any other business? 14:43:14 chris: maybe can't make the next 2 calls 14:43:36 ... will try to join the call, though 14:44:16 [ adjourned ] 14:44:20 rrsagent, draft minutes 14:44:20 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2017/05/03-webtv-minutes.html kaz 14:44:50 thank you for taking the minutes! 14:45:42 you're welcome :) 15:56:16 rrsagent, make log public 15:56:19 rrsagent, draft minutes 15:56:19 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2017/05/03-webtv-minutes.html kaz 16:32:40 Zakim has left #webtv