16:36:55 RRSAgent has joined #aria 16:36:55 logging to http://www.w3.org/2017/04/20-aria-irc 16:36:55 chair: Joanmarie_Diggs 16:36:55 RRSAgent, make log public 16:36:55 agenda? 16:36:57 RRSAgent, make logs world 16:37:00 Zakim, this will be 16:37:00 I don't understand 'this will be', trackbot 16:37:00 Meeting: Accessible Rich Internet Applications Working Group Teleconference 16:37:00 Date: 20 April 2017 16:37:11 Rich has joined #aria 16:37:13 clear agenda 16:37:32 agenda: this 16:37:32 agenda+ Welcoming Job van Achterberg (new Invited Expert) 16:37:32 agenda+ Personalization CfC 16:37:32 agenda+ ARIA 1.2: Do it or not? 16:37:34 agenda+ Implementations - Progress update 16:37:36 agenda+ Testable statements - Progress update 16:37:39 agenda+ ATTAs - Progress update 16:37:41 agenda: be done 16:37:44 agenda? 16:38:16 regrets: Jason_Duan 16:39:08 present+ 16:49:27 present+ 16:55:44 present+ Joanmarie_Diggs 16:55:51 jongund has joined #aria 17:01:35 present+ 17:01:51 present+ Rich_Schwerdtfeger 17:02:28 clown has joined #aria 17:03:13 scribeNick: MichielBijl 17:03:35 RRSAgent, make minutes 17:03:35 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2017/04/20-aria-minutes.html MichielBijl 17:03:55 RRSAgent, make log public 17:04:35 present+ Joseph_Scheuhammer 17:04:50 Zakim, who is here? 17:04:50 Present: Joanmarie_Diggs, Joseph_Scheuhammer, MichielBijl, Stefan, janina, jkva, MichaelC, Rich_Schwerdtfeger 17:04:52 On IRC I see clown, jongund, Rich, RRSAgent, jkva, MichaelC, Zakim, janina, JonathanNeal_, ShaneM, joanie, timeless, yatil, MichielBijl, slightlyoff, AmeliaBR, Josh_Soref, trackbot 17:04:54 present+ 17:05:19 Stefan has joined #aria 17:05:36 jamesn has joined #aria 17:05:39 zakim, take up next 17:05:39 agendum 1. "Welcoming Job van Achterberg (new Invited Expert)" taken up [from joanie] 17:05:47 present+ 17:05:54 JD: We have a new person, yay new person 17:06:03 Job van Achterberg / jkva 17:06:09 You can introduce yourself 17:06:28 JA: I’m Job van Achterberg, from the Netherlands, 34 17:06:36 My wife is Mallory, whom you might know 17:06:48 I’m a co-organiser of role=drinks together with Michiel 17:06:59 I also run inclusive design meetup in NL 17:07:03 I also write PHP 17:07:09 s/PHP/Python/ 17:07:21 All: Welcome! 17:07:36 JD: I recently became a co-chair of this group 17:07:42 Dev for Orco screen reader 17:08:00 Periodically do WebKit etc implementations of ARIA stuff. 17:08:01 present+ jongund 17:08:03 mck has joined #aria 17:08:14 RS: Co-chair of this group 17:08:17 Used to be at IBM 17:08:27 Live in Bon Aireeadsd 17:08:42 Bonaire 17:08:56 present+ matt_king 17:09:23 s/Bon Aireeadsd/Bonaire/ 17:09:30 MB: I’m a dinosaur 17:09:40 JS: I’ve been part of this group for a while 17:09:49 Also part of other groups and chair of the APA 17:10:13 SS: I’m Stefan from Germany 17:10:21 I come from the applicability of ARIA 17:10:29 I joined this group about 5 years ago 17:10:41 It’s a nice working environment 17:10:48 I encourage you to take part 17:10:57 JN: I’ve met Job a couple of times already 17:11:01 Work for Oracle 17:11:07 Work on WCAG and APG 17:11:25 MK: I’m Matt King, work for Facebook 17:11:35 Think Rich brought me into this group around 2010 17:11:38 Editor on the APG 17:11:55 Used to be at IBM, that’s where I met Rich 17:12:11 MC: I’m the staff contact for the ARIA WG. 17:12:43 JG: I’m from the University of Illinois 17:12:50 Work on making their stuff more accessible 17:12:56 Been part of the ARIA WG for a long time 17:13:00 Also work on the APG 17:13:08 And on the ARIA testing with Joanie 17:13:30 JS: I work at the Accessibility Research centre in Toronto 17:13:35 Also worked on the … 17:13:57 Previous editor of the APG 17:14:03 Now editor of core-aam 17:14:19 This will be my second last meeting 17:14:29 I’ll be deserting you all at the end of the month 17:15:06 s/deserting/leaving/ 17:16:07 RS: Want to thank Joseph for all he’s done 17:16:37 topic: Joseph leaving 17:16:50 RS: Joseph was a great editor! 17:17:03 MK: He was always able to find anything faster than anyone else 17:17:31 JS: Thank you all! 17:17:33 sorry to see go Joseph 17:17:50 Irfan has joined #aria 17:17:53 We have done a great job, you will be missed 17:17:55 JD: I’ve tried to convince him to stay, but alas 17:18:09 We can’t replace you Joseph 17:18:24 We do have a dutch man to plug some holes now though 17:18:39 MC: The door is always open if you want to re-join 17:18:52 zakim, take up next item 17:18:52 agendum 3. "ARIA 1.2: Do it or not?" taken up [from joanie] 17:19:02 zakim, take up item 2 17:19:02 agendum 2. "Personalization CfC" taken up [from joanie] 17:19:09 https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-aria-admin/2017Apr/0001.html 17:19:24 JD: About 10 days ago Rich put out a CFC 17:19:31 To do a FPWD 17:19:43 for Advance COGA Semantics to Enable Personalization 17:20:41 The CFC passes with no objections 17:21:29 zakim, take up item 3 17:21:29 agendum 3. "ARIA 1.2: Do it or not?" taken up [from joanie] 17:22:33 RS: Situation: W3C management mesures on deliverables 17:22:37 of specifications 17:22:42 Like the HTML AAM 17:23:01 They depend on us, they link to all of our documents, it’s the basis of it 17:23:27 Not everybody is contributing on ARIA 17:23:52 Most work falls to three people particularly Joseph and Joanie 17:24:12 Some people prioritise other things over ARIA 17:24:22 For example work on APG instead of ARIA 17:24:40 This happened with 1.0 and we can’t have it happen with 1.1 17:24:47 Hello Everyone! This is Irfan from ETS. I just want to introduce myself here with the group. I work as accessibility engineer here at ETS. 17:25:08 yes I am 17:25:26 *scribe lost* 17:25:56 RS: There is a clear disconnect between what W3C management believes we should be doing, and what the group thinks they should be doing 17:26:08 Michael, did I mis-state anything? 17:26:29 MC: It’s a complicated situation 17:26:39 Philip is focused on the rec channel 17:27:04 If we don’t make our delivery dates they have to make radical changes that we don’t want 17:27:36 s/Philip/Philippe/ 17:27:43 RS: We should ask ourselves whether we should do 1.2, and whether we should continue as a WG after 1.1 17:28:09 Not saying APG is not a priority 17:28:20 Also want to thank all the APG members for all the work they do 17:28:31 However, we need to focus on getting ARIA 1.1 out the door 17:28:52 MC: We need to find a short term way to a ?? and b getting it done in that time frame 17:29:19 RS: Will point out this is not limited to APG 17:29:36 q+ 17:29:42 We’ve had some members dropping in and out for long periods of time 17:29:51 They’ve been helpful while they’re here 17:30:04 But the consistency isn’t what we’d like it to be 17:30:36 JN: ??? is doing work on the APG 17:30:42 MK: I’m trying to lure him back in 17:30:48 I’m not sure how this is frame 17:30:52 q+ to talk about how W3M perceives Member interest 17:30:53 s/frame/framded/ 17:31:13 s/framded/framed/ 17:31:32 You said there is a disconnect and working group membership, that’s a problem 17:31:36 s/???/Aaron Leventhal/ 17:31:47 And number two there is a skillset disconnect 17:32:02 s/I work at the Accessibility Research centre in Toronto/I work at the Inclusive Design Research Centre at OCAD University in Toronto/ 17:32:03 Is there a third problem? 17:32:20 Those are the two I’m hearing right now 17:32:39 RS: There’re resources that can do testing, that are working on the APG 17:32:52 I’ve done a bunch of test harness stuff this week 17:33:05 What we need is people working on APG to do testing 17:33:56 MK: Maybe a third problem is that everyone understands which work has to be done 17:34:49 MK ?? 17:35:07 JD: The one for ATK and ATPS are done and work even better 17:35:18 MK: So you’ve done two platforms? 17:35:28 Jon, I was under the impression that you made good progress? 17:35:29 s/ATPS/AT-SPI2/ 17:35:56 Maybe part of this is making sure that we all understand what the game plan is 17:36:00 And where it stands 17:36:19 q? 17:36:26 q+ 17:36:30 s/The one/I've developed one for AXAPI, though it's not in a public repository. And it works quite well. The one I did/ 17:36:36 Would make it easier for people to figure out how and where to contribute 17:37:08 MC: If we tell the management that we’re not going to make the deadlines 17:37:25 The management will see that as members not seeing ARIA as a priority 17:37:38 While most members do see it as a priority 17:37:46 ack me 17:37:46 MichaelC, you wanted to talk about how W3M perceives Member interest 17:37:57 The problem is that we need to show the management that it is a priority 17:38:27 MK: Browser implementers, the critical part, are missing 17:38:44 MC: We’re not the only group struggling with that. 17:38:51 We need to press them on that 17:39:14 RS: Not just our group, HTML, SVG, among others also have this issue 17:40:00 The only time I see browser vendors is weeks after a decision is made they have an issue with. 17:40:27 Jon, I know you’ve been working on this, how far away are you from having your test integrate with Joanie’s? 17:40:40 JG: We have some Python versioning issues 17:40:51 Joanie works in Python 3 and we use version 17:40:57 s/version/version 2/ 17:41:09 We need to adapt it to run in Version 2 17:42:45 *something about Python* 17:43:51 RS: Job can you work with Jon to work this out? 17:44:03 JA: If I can get some more details, sure 17:44:09 We can work this out in another channel 17:44:45 MK: Doesn’t NVDA also work with different prog languages? 17:44:48 JG: Yes they do 17:47:16 JD: To be clear, if you’re doing it in Python 2, you can do separately 17:47:26 It doesn’t have to work with my stuff 17:47:32 Just port it to Python 2 17:47:40 It would be a separate project 17:47:50 RS: So we’d be doing it twice? 17:48:12 JD: No, it would different, it will not interact with my code 17:48:32 RS: So if you change something, Jon would have to do it again? 17:48:36 JD: No 17:48:51 RS: Would it be better for Jon to do it in Python 3? 17:48:57 RS: Yes, that would be easier for the code 17:49:05 s/RS/JD/ 17:49:22 RS: Is there a reason you can’t use Python 3? 17:49:57 JG: It’s a complex library, but if you have a Python guru around that can help 17:50:07 RS: Is it a bug in the library or in python? 17:50:11 JG: Not sure yet 17:50:28 JG: Would prefer to do it in 2.7 17:51:11 JG: We’ll take Joanie’s code and port it to 2.7 17:51:30 *techie stuff* 17:55:21 MK: What are our jobs once we have the automated testing tools? 17:55:30 RS: We have to run the tests 17:55:44 Microsoft have sad that they won’t be working on the harness for 1.1 17:55:57 s/have sad/said/ 17:56:18 We can generate the files for manual testing 17:56:35 We will have bugs in the test harness due to little nuances here and there 17:57:43 What I prefer happen, is getting people assigned to run the tests 17:58:49 JD: Don’t need volunteers for my platform, we need people for Windows 17:59:04 I’ve been filing bugs for ATK 17:59:57 https://twitter.com/detonite/status/854334793739378691 18:01:15 RS: Jon, thank you for what you’re doing and please continue, you’re on the critical path! 18:01:48 RS: Joanie, will Jon’s work merge into the general dashboard that shows the results? 18:02:11 JD: You download some JSON and that has the results 18:03:27 JG: Matt, so I should put APG aside and focus on the test harness? 18:03:31 MK: Yes 18:04:16 I think there’re some issues the group needs to talk about regarding priorities and such 18:04:42 I do see some differences between REC track and non-REC track stuff 18:04:49 It seems to be a common problem 18:07:39 RS: Bottom line is that we need to get ARIA 1.1 is finished 18:08:17 If we can’t finish 1.1 we shouldn’t be working on 1.2 18:08:29 Thank you all for the conversation today 18:08:55 Jon, please get together with Job and some other people, and please let us know where you stand next week 18:08:59 q? 18:09:03 Michael did you want to add anything? 18:09:05 MC: No 18:10:35 RRSAgent, make minutes 18:10:35 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2017/04/20-aria-minutes.html MichielBijl 19:06:32 clown has joined #aria 19:20:10 Rich has joined #aria