15:00:40 RRSAgent has joined #sdwbp 15:00:40 logging to http://www.w3.org/2017/03/29-sdwbp-irc 15:00:42 RRSAgent, make logs world 15:00:42 Zakim has joined #sdwbp 15:00:44 Zakim, this will be SDW 15:00:44 ok, trackbot 15:00:45 Meeting: Spatial Data on the Web Working Group Teleconference 15:00:45 Date: 29 March 2017 15:00:49 Linda has joined #sdwbp 15:01:07 Present+ eparsons 15:01:24 present+ ClemensPortele 15:02:24 jtandy has joined #sdwbp 15:02:46 present+ jtandy 15:03:43 present+ Linda 15:03:51 Present+ Francois 15:04:18 Agenda: https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/Meetings:BP-Telecon20170329 15:05:56 joshlieberman has joined #sdwbp 15:06:04 present+ 15:06:25 scribe: ClemensPortele 15:06:28 present+ AndreaPerego 15:06:30 scribenick: ClemensPortele 15:06:41 regrets: Lars, Scott, Byron 15:06:41 ChrisLittle has joined #sdwbp 15:06:53 present+ ChrisLittle 15:07:08 Topic: Approving last meeting's minutes (https://www.w3.org/2017/03/15-sdwbp-minutes) 15:07:17 +1 15:07:21 +1 15:07:21 +1 15:07:25 +1 15:07:31 +0 not there 15:07:32 +0 absent 15:07:51 Resolved: Approving last meeting's minutes 15:08:02 joshlieberman_ has joined #sdwbp 15:08:15 https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/Patent_Call 15:08:20 eparsons: Reads the Patent Call 15:08:56 Topic: Confirm end-date for Last Sprint 15:10:23 tidoust: Next public working draft should be published very soon 15:10:44 jtandy: Were you able to add a diff? 15:11:10 tidoust: No, because we have not done this so far and it is not required 15:11:33 s/very soon/tomorrow/ 15:11:52 jtandy: Can you give us an update on the process for this sprint? 15:12:54 The timing issues are of more concern for W3C Rec and OGC Implementation Spec 15:13:04 tidoust: Can only speak for W3C, where the requirements for a Note are not high as expressed in my email 15:13:59 tidoust: If we want a horizontal review, this might make sense for the Best Practices, but it is optional 15:15:19 jtandy: (Discusses Scott's email from yesterday about the schedule from the OGC side) 15:15:40 q? 15:15:52 what joshlieberman_ said +1 15:16:10 joshlieberman_: If the vote needs to finish in June, the vote would need to start in mid May plus the 3-week rule 15:17:00 joshlieberman_: Maybe 2 weeks are fine as expressed by Scott due to prior versions of the document being shared with the OGC members regularly 15:17:36 jtandy: So we could target April 26 for the vote for release 15:18:07 not going on holiday :-( 15:18:16 jtandy: How do we feel about this? 15:18:48 joshlieberman_: Let's try to get as much done as we can in the time 15:19:00 Topic: Agree schedule for "(GitHub) Issue Resolution" call - we agreed to set a 3-hour block to go through all the issues 15:19:58 Linda: We wanted to go through an extra call to resolve the remaining open 44 (?) issues. Many of the can probably be closed without much discussion. 15:20:10 s/sniff/get better/ 15:20:18 Linda: When should we do it? 15:20:22 I can do this time next week 15:20:23 q? 15:20:40 +1 15:20:47 Next week bad for me (AAG meeting) 15:20:48 jtandy: Same time next week? 15:20:58 +1 to next week 15:21:04 ClemensPortele: next week is also bad for me 15:21:27 earlier in ok for me on the 5th 15:21:35 No way next week for me - at RDA from Web to Fri. 15:21:43 Linda: earlier would be better, if we need 3 hours 15:22:00 s/No way next week for me - at RDA from Web to Fri/No way next week for me - at RDA from Wed to Fri/ 15:22:03 jtandy: Maybe in 1 hour blocks? Start next week? Do we need 3 hours? 15:22:32 eparsons: We should try to get as much done next week as possible 15:23:12 jtandy: Let's go through the issues and close as much as we can. If anyone has a concern about closing an issue it may be re-opened. 15:23:17 Q+ 15:23:33 ack ChrisLittle 15:23:59 15:00 BST ? 15:24:00 ChrisLittle: maybe 90 minutes, longer is hard in a web-meeting 15:24:46 jtandy: Let's do 2 hours, starting 14:00 GMT 15:25:10 q+ 15:25:18 ack eparsons 15:25:21 jtandy: Put the tricky issues at the front 15:25:39 eparsons: Will go through the public comments next Tuesday 15:26:04 jtandy: Look also at Payam's list 15:26:14 q+ 15:26:21 Topic: Planning last sprint 15:26:23 ack AndreaPerego 15:26:36 https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/Detailed_planning_BP_document#Mid_March_-_end_of_April_2017: 15:28:03 AndreaPerego: (on the previous topic) I will not be available next Wednesday, maybe have a call earlier, e.g. Friday this week? 15:28:27 Linda: Friday does not work for me 15:29:13 Linda: But I can look at the issues earlier and flag issues relevant for AndreaPerego, if I know what topics he is interested in 15:30:17 jtandy: The issue resolution process should not interfere with the work on the BPs in general 15:30:59 jtandy: We could have a direct call to discuss BP8 on Friday? 15:31:08 AndreaPerego: Yes, that would be fine 15:31:19 q? 15:31:20 jtandy: Anyone else interested? 15:31:21 Friday is _1 for me 15:31:33 (Silence) 15:31:43 https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/Detailed_planning_BP_document#Mid_March_-_end_of_April_2017: 15:32:15 Yes. 15:32:40 jtandy: Based on the F2F this has been rewritten 15:32:55 jtandy: I will update "how to use" section 15:33:28 joshlieberman_: Fine with BP1 15:33:48 ClemensPortele: Fine with BP4 and BP11 15:34:02 jtandy: Will check with Peter Parslow 15:34:34 jtandy: And I have several BPs that I will take care of 15:35:15 jtandy: (Goes through the list of BP changes) 15:36:02 AndreaPerego: Asks for help from joshlieberman_ to refactor into 2 best practices 15:36:12 joshlieberman_: OK 15:38:04 jtandy: BP17, I will discuss the WKT coordinate order change with AndreaPerego on Friday 15:38:54 jtandy: Let's wait with the conclusion section until the end of the sprint 15:39:21 Linda: I am working on a paper on the Best Practices and we may be able to reuse some of that work 15:39:52 jtandy: File formats and vocabularies as planned 15:40:21 jtandy: The section on benefits, the requirements cross-reference and the glossary, too 15:40:39 Linda: The reordering is a bigger task 15:40:53 https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/index.php?title=BP_2017_reordering_proposal&action=edit&redlink=1 15:41:17 Linda: Input on the proposals is required - and discussion 15:42:04 Linda: available this week and next, then on holiday, back the week starting April 17 15:42:12 +1 15:42:19 +1 15:42:27 +1 15:42:41 jtandy: We should target that week then 15:42:46 +1 to that week for restucturing\ 15:42:55 Linda: That works, but I need the input before 15:43:37 jtandy: Issue resolution has already been discussed 15:44:04 q? 15:44:05 jtandy: BP8 and BP10 seem to be the toughest ones for this sprint 15:44:24 jtandy: Please get back, in case you need help 15:44:27 Agreed. 15:44:42 q? 15:44:45 jtandy: AOB? 15:45:11 q+ to ask about slides for RDA 15:45:43 ChrisLittle: Was the Time Ontology discussed at F2F? 15:45:52 q? 15:45:56 ack AndreaPerego 15:45:56 AndreaPerego, you wanted to ask about slides for RDA 15:45:59 eparsons: No, neither Chris nor Simon were there 15:46:50 AndreaPerego: Simon offered to present the SDW work at RDA, but he needs slides. Are slides available? 15:47:58 jtandy: Similar request from Armin, see list of available slides in that email exchange (mostly older slides) 15:48:54 AndreaPerego: These are needed next week 15:49:03 q? 15:49:11 Linda: Will provided up-to-date 2 slides on the BP 15:49:42 jtandy: I think we have a pretty clear plan for the sprint 15:49:54 have to go bye 15:50:14 tidoust: I will set up the Webex for the call next Wednesday (April 5) 15:50:17 Get well soon Linda xx 15:50:33 bye 15:50:37 bye 15:50:42 +1 to LvdB getting well soon 15:50:44 Bye! 15:50:45 rrsagent, draft minutes 15:50:45 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2017/03/29-sdwbp-minutes.html eparsons 15:51:23 bye 15:51:24 chair: jtandy 15:51:28 bye 15:51:43 RRSAgent, draft minutes 15:51:43 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2017/03/29-sdwbp-minutes.html AndreaPerego 15:51:53 i/jtandy: AOB?/Topic: AOB/ 15:52:17 RRSAgent, draft minutes v2 15:52:17 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2017/03/29-sdwbp-minutes.html tidoust 16:06:09 jtandy has joined #sdwbp 16:08:05 eparsons has joined #sdwbp 17:59:05 Zakim has left #sdwbp