18:41:55 RRSAgent has joined #aapi 18:41:55 logging to http://www.w3.org/2017/03/21-aapi-irc 18:41:57 RRSAgent, make logs world 18:41:57 Zakim has joined #aapi 18:41:59 Zakim, this will be 18:41:59 I don't understand 'this will be', trackbot 18:42:00 Meeting: Accessible Rich Internet Applications Working Group Teleconference 18:42:00 Date: 21 March 2017 18:42:13 chair: Joseph_Scheuhammer 18:43:12 agenda: this 18:43:22 agenda+ ISSUE-738 (Bogdan) Verify or provide correct UIA mapping for role="heading". 18:43:31 agenda+ (All) Level of detail in UIA mappings. 18:43:51 agenda+ (Joseph, Joanie) Remove RELATION_POPUP_FOR from ATK/AT-SPI mappings of aria-haspopup 18:44:05 agenda+ GH-ISSUE-536 (Joseph, Joanie) Latest AXRoleDescription strings for roles alertdialog and dialog 18:44:21 agenda+ (Joanie) AX API mapping issues and testing — weekly checkin. 18:44:29 agenda+ Triage actions/issues: https://www.w3.org/WAI/ARIA/track/products/23 18:44:57 agenda+ Triage core-aam bugzillas: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/buglist.cgi?component=Core%20AAM&product=ARIA 18:45:32 agenda+ Triage accname-aam bugzillas: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/buglist.cgi?component=AccName%20AAM&product=ARIA 18:45:39 agenda+ Triage accname actions: https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/products/26 18:45:47 agenda+ be done. 19:00:50 present+ Joanmarie_Diggs 19:00:52 richardschwerdtfeger has joined #aapi 19:00:54 scribe: joanie 19:01:00 present+ Joseph_Scheuhammer 19:02:46 regrets: Bryan_Garaventa 19:02:56 present+ Rich_Schwerdfeger 19:05:40 Zakim, take up item 1 19:05:40 agendum 1. "ISSUE-738 (Bogdan) Verify or provide correct UIA mapping for role="heading"." taken up [from clown] 19:05:55 issue-738? 19:05:55 issue-738 -- UIA mapping for heading incorrect -- closed 19:05:55 http://www.w3.org/WAI/ARIA/track/issues/738 19:06:09 JS: Cynthia asked a question about the heading role. 19:06:19 JS: Bogdan provided a patch. I pulled it in. 19:06:23 RS: Is it implemented? 19:06:38 JS: I added a comment that it might not be implemented. 19:06:56 JS: I closed the issue, but I realized this might be a 1.1 change. 19:07:09 RS: Why if it's under the covers? 19:07:29 JS: Before it just stated to map it to text. 19:07:59 JS: But arguably, everything is 1.1. So I don't have to call it out then? 19:08:24 JS: But if for UIA everything is 1.1, then we need tests for everything. 19:08:33 RS: We don't have to do them all. 19:08:46 RS: We just have to do what changed in 1.1. 19:08:57 Zakim, next item. 19:08:57 agendum 2. "(All) Level of detail in UIA mappings." taken up [from clown] 19:09:25 JS: We have a general request from Microsoft to put greater detail in the Core AAM. 19:09:34 JS: This request was made off-list. 19:09:59 JS: The last thing I heard from Bogdan was that he was willing to do the work. 19:10:24 JS: I suggested to Bogdan that he write a paragraph explaining the default interface should be assumed. 19:10:39 JS: Rather than repeating it everywhere throughout the spec. 19:11:26 JS: He is also going to provide some text explaining current versus cached. 19:11:47 RS: But what are we going to do for the ATTA? 19:12:27 JS: I think we agreed that we'd use cached, but Joanie is concerned about potential ATTA/harness timeouts should the calculation not come back sufficiently fast. 19:12:39 RS: So the ATTA developers will need to handle that. 19:12:57 JS: Also, Bogdan indicated that he'd do the work, but not when he'd have it done by. 19:13:20 JS: But this area is progressing and is no longer stalled. 19:13:37 JS: I guess I should ask Bogdan when he thinks he'll have it done by. 19:14:43 RS: Joanie, will we have an ATTA for UIA done in the near future? 19:15:07 JD: I'm not sure. 19:16:34 RS: I would like to have an ETA for ATTAs next week. 19:17:56 JD: 19:23:41 Zakim, next item 19:23:41 agendum 3. "(Joseph, Joanie) Remove RELATION_POPUP_FOR from ATK/AT-SPI mappings of aria-haspopup" taken up [from clown] 19:24:22 JS: This is a pull request that Joanie put out about a week ago. 19:24:46 https://github.com/w3c/aria/pull/537 19:24:56 JS: There's a RELATION_POPUP_FOR in ATK/AT-SPI, but there's nothing in the spec that allows the user agent to implement it. 19:25:07 JS: I had a couple of very small comments. 19:25:09 https://github.com/w3c/aria/pull/537#pullrequestreview-27926175 19:25:20 JS: One was wording in the ChangeLog 19:31:56 JD: 19:32:08 JS: Ok, that's fine. I will pull this in later in the week. 19:32:13 Zakim, next item 19:32:13 agendum 4. "GH-ISSUE-536 (Joseph, Joanie) Latest AXRoleDescription strings for roles alertdialog and dialog" taken up [from clown] 19:32:41 JS: https://github.com/w3c/aria/pull/536 19:32:55 JS: This is something Joanie discovered. 19:33:05 JS: AXRoleDescription for alertdialog is now "web alert dialog" 19:33:12 JS: AXRoleDescription for dialog is now "web dialog" 19:33:42 JS: I pulled it in and told Joanie that she could close it if she thinks it's complete. 19:33:47 https://rawgit.com/w3c/aria/master/core-aam/core-aam.html#role-map-alertdialog 19:34:45 JD: I can close it, but I'm not signed in and two-step authentication means I need to get a code on my phone, and I'm scribing.... 19:34:58 JS: I can sign in and close it. 19:35:20 JS: Done 19:36:07 Topic: Joseph post-ARIA 1.1 19:38:02 RS: Joseph's employer wants to phase Joseph out his work in ARIA. 19:38:14 RS: Because they want him to work on other things. 19:38:55 RS: Being out before 1.1 CR is going to be problematic. 19:39:15 JS: What they want is a transition plan. 19:39:41 RS: We don't have the resources right now, especially during the CR process. 19:39:51 RS: I don't know who is going to own it after 1.1. 19:43:59 JD: I'm willing to take on the Core AAM editorship, but NOT until 1.1 is done. 19:44:08 https://www.w3.org/WAI/ARIA/track/products/23 19:44:37 https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/buglist.cgi?component=Core%20AAM&product=ARIA 19:44:39 JD: I'm behind on ATTA work, I have implementations to do in WebKitGtk, I have regressions introduced by others I have to debug and fix.... 19:45:40 JD: However, I think I actually know more about the mappings and implementation than I do the authoring (hence my lousy examples in the ARIA spec.) ;) 19:46:58 JD: So given that the ARIA spec practice has been for people to make branches which I merge after consensus has been reached, I think I can take on the Core AAM (after 1.1). 19:48:39 Group: (Discussion about Tracker versus Github) 19:49:57 Phillipe 19:50:07 s/Phillipe// 19:54:40 RS: Let's say we finish these issues in github that are for 1.1. 20:04:37 RS: Joseph, you can tell your employer that we will try to phase you out and phase Joanie in. 20:04:56 RS: The exact timeline remains to be determined. 20:05:17 action-2117 20:05:17 action-2117 -- Joseph Scheuhammer to Update core-aam to not expose aria-details relationships that reference elements that are hidden. -- due 2016-09-22 -- PENDINGREVIEW 20:05:17 http://www.w3.org/WAI/ARIA/track/actions/2117 20:05:48 RS: You showed that one to us. 20:05:52 JS: Yes I did. 20:05:56 RS: Close it. 20:06:05 RS: Now you only have nine. 20:08:12 https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/products/26 20:08:17 JS: There's also the AccName spec. 20:08:37 JD: (only half-joking) Wait, a minute.... 20:09:00 https://www.w3.org/WAI/ARIA/track/products/26 20:09:04 RS + JS: That used to be part of the Core AAM, but was pulled out to be referenced by other specs. 20:09:47 JS: Somebody and some point moved a bunch of items from the ARIA tracker to AccName without any explanation. 20:10:24 JS: Also Cynthia raised a number of issues because Microsoft was having trouble implementing it and needed more information. 20:12:08 JS: Cynthia wanted a list, specific to SVG. But that doesn't belong in the AccName because that is host-language independent. 20:13:27 Zakim, part 20:13:27 leaving. As of this point the attendees have been Joanmarie_Diggs, Joseph_Scheuhammer, Rich_Schwerdfeger 20:13:27 Zakim has left #aapi 20:13:40 scribeOptions: -final 20:13:47 RRSAgent, stop